690°

If Destiny 2 is delayed until 2018, Activision acquires a 'hefty chunk' of Bungie shares

Good thing it probably will release in 2017 then.

Read Full Story >>
ibtimes.co.uk
-Foxtrot2649d ago

Bungie sold their soul to the devil

UCForce2648d ago

Yeah, I agree on that one.

DillyDilly2648d ago

Were they that desperate that they even agreed to these stupid terms ?

TheCommentator2648d ago

More importantly, Random, does that mean that Destiny 2 releases unfinished just like the first one?

Elwenil2648d ago

@TheCommentator

That is precisely what it means.

Especially since now they know they can get away with it and the gamers today will eat it up and ask for more.

morganfell2648d ago

Rented, not sold. There is a huge difference. And are you going to sit there and say you have never enjoyed an Activision title? Activision is an easy whipping boy. They're a company that has to make money for stockholders and to continue making games. It is a business, not Santa Claus. If you are going to hate Activision you might as well turn that on every game company and leave the hobby altogether. Activision would not be able to conduct their affairs as they do if a massive chunk of the gaming demographic, the buying public didn't make this possible. Perhaps your hate is misplaced. Maybe it should be at that buying public. Or maybe at yourself for being in the minority. Plenty of people talk about how they revile Activision then they go out and buy their games as if they have no choice. A truckload of people discuss on forums how they revile Activision and then there they are at the midnight launch. or else they say, "Well I didn't buy full price" or some other such nonsense.

You played the game.

You liked it.

Damn at least be honest.

I do not wish to sound like this is only aimed at you. It is not. But it often seems as if disliking Activision is almost a reflex.

I'll be honest up front and say I do not care. If it is a good game I'll buy it. I bought Infinite Warfare and enjoyed the hell out of the campaign. I have purchased every COD...ever. No doubt I will get the next one as well.

Godmars2902648d ago

" Activision is an easy whipping boy."

Because they have a history of gutting IPs and studios. Bad enough that, as far as the audience is concerned, such works. Activision shortchanges devs, gamers, and we prove their methods by buying their product.

The 10th Rider2648d ago

And many people don't exclusively bash Activision, either. Ubisoft and EA each get their own dose of criticism, though EA has gotten better than they once were.

GorillaTact2648d ago (Edited 2648d ago )

morganfell

You enjoying Call of Duty is irrelevant to the point. Just because they sell a few games it doesnt mean that how they handle their properties is pro consumer. You are basically saying that its a good thing for them to release unfinished games and then charge consumers for the rest of the game via dlc.

TankCrossing2648d ago

None of what you said changes the fact that they are the worst publisher out there for microtransactions and DLC practices, and up there with the worst for base pricing.

None of that changes the fact that COD games and Destiny rely heavily on peer to peer connections, while even EA and Ubisoft host games properly.

Activision stink. They're very good at what they do, but they stink.

Dirtnapstor2648d ago

Morgenfell

I agree. Reflecting on comments now and of the past concerning similar topics, many individuals have no clue how the corporate world is structured and needs to function in order for us as consumers to continue to feed our wants and desires. Business is not about hand-outs and/or creating a type of consumer-welfare. Business is about providing not supporting. You want to be a producer, you must be able to produce as contracted. Others (individuals and entities) depend on goals being met.
My only potential fear is that Destiny 2 will be fragmented. But at the same time, Bungie has been at it for awhile with this IP and has seen what works and what has flopped. So it should be a non-issue. We shall see.

81BX2648d ago

@morgan
I agree its a business but there are businesses that are ran with everyone in mind not just suits.

morganfell2647d ago

Thanks to the people that get it. Activision doesn't just sell a "few" games. You do not stay in business and continue to fund titles by only selling a few. And for all the hate at COD, at least the layout of each game is different unlike Assassins Creed which I love but Ubi has run into the ground.

Here are the city quadrants, unlock this, do these same things over and over, boom quadrant freed. Next.

And detractors failed to address the point concerning buyers. The enablers to a policy with which some do not agree. But a large number agree and despite their hypocritical remarks they buy the games from a company they claim to despise. Action is the great definer. That is where and how lasting statements are made.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2647d ago
Chrisgamerguy2648d ago (Edited 2648d ago )

Yes but what company could they have of worked with and not sold there soul? Lol I mean ms owned it before them

Asuka2648d ago (Edited 2648d ago )

This has been debunked...see updated section

http://kotaku.com/destiny-2...

Ravenor2648d ago

We don't pay attention here!

Death to Activision!!!!!

Am I doing it right!? Am I hip yet!?

Lilrizky2648d ago

I do agree that might be the case with Bungie, but Blizzard "sold their soul" to Activision and they're killing it.

Ravenor2648d ago

Diablo 3 "not enough skulls"

Utalkin2me2648d ago

Seems Bungie likes selling their sole to the devil.

81BX2648d ago

Wtf kind of deal is this? Poor poor Bungie

Drizzy2648d ago

So now we know destiny 2 will be rushed trash

Phill-Spencer2648d ago

Freed their soul from one devil just to make a new deal with another one.

Dan_scruggs2648d ago

They made too much money to care what Sonic's sidekick thinks of them.

jaymacx2648d ago

@-Foxtrot best comment that sums up this deal. Was it better to have a new IP(with Activision) or continue Halo(with Microsoft)? It would seem its not much better LOL

Sparta072648d ago

Well it was either this or they could of stood with Microsoft and made halo, halo, halo and halo.....

I'll give Bungie the benefit of the doubt. I put in more hours in Destiny then I had any game this gen. It started off to a bad start but ended up being a great game.
Let's hope they bring out a great game Day one.

TheSaint2648d ago

Get ready for a buggy and messed up game on release.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 2647d ago
freshslicepizza2649d ago

when you sign with the devil you face the consequences. i think any reasonable deadline should be set in place because it is a business after all and there needs to be some accountability. when i see how games like gt 7 constantly get delayed and then turn into a smaller project i wonder what the heck is going on with those types of teams who constantly cannot meet deadlines. we also dont want games rushed like what i think happened with forza 5.

ShadowKnight2649d ago (Edited 2649d ago )

Well Microsoft should have sign them and expand their first party studios and portfolio. Oh well

freshslicepizza2649d ago

microsoft wanted them to keep pumping out halo, now activision will want them to keep doing destiny for 10 years.

TankCrossing2648d ago (Edited 2648d ago )

Microsoft did sign them. Bungie were very much a Microsoft first party studio. Bungie departed MS by mutual consent, on amicable terms because they simply didn't want to make Halo any more.

Then Activision offered them loads of money to make a game just like Halo, and for some reason they signed away their next 10 years.

DeadlyOreo2648d ago

Lol. Had to get a little Sony dig in there didn't you Moldy 😂 I mean, come on man. There are clearly so many better examples than GT7, you just couldn't handle putting a non biased comment.

freshslicepizza2648d ago (Edited 2648d ago )

i also mentioned forza 5 being rushed so stop being so defensive over plastic toys.

SpinalRemains1382648d ago

He makes a valid point and wasn't exclusively digging at SONY. His comment wasn't intended to attack SONY.

Liqu1d2648d ago

Of course you had to start talking about Sony in an Activision article. And GT7 didn't get constantly delayed and then become a smaller project. Just grow up.

freshslicepizza2648d ago

yes it did,

http://www.polygon.com/2013...

"The PlayStation 4 game which we'll likely call GT7 will be done in about a year or two"

that was written in 2013

then this was said in 2015,

http://gearnuke.com/gran-tu...

"Yamauchi spoke about the rumored 2017 release date saying “we are talking about Gran Turismo, people will not have to wait so long”. His statement likely points to a late 2016 release date, but a late 2015 release may also be possible according to his earlier interview in 2013 with Famitsu magazine where he said “a year or two (from 2013)”

and yes, this game will not be a full gt7 game,

http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...

"The old days, when the games were offline, the experience was defined by what's on the disc. You had a distinction between a Prologue and a full GT, it was very stark. When the game becomes more of an online connected experience, that distinction blurs. This will be much more than a Prologue type experience."

gt sport will not be a prologue type game but it also wont be a full fledged gt7 either.

anyways back to destiny 2, bungiue needs to be held accountable to release dates because this is a business and if the game gets delayed that is lost sales for that fiscal year.

Shadowsteal2648d ago

Honestly that's no one's fault but Bungie's. The fact that they felt they'd have a more enjoyable time with Activision as a publisher vs. Microsoft was a bad play. If they wanted even the slightest bit of creative control over what happens with their games they shouldve gone to Sony. You don't see Naughty Dog pumping out Uncharted, Guerilla Games making Horizon, and Sucker Punch is making a new IP.

freshslicepizza2648d ago

you really think there wont be another uncharted game?

InTheZoneAC2648d ago

then go work for M$

it is absolutely stupid to meet deadlines just because

these are smart qualified people, no need to rush because $$$, they will get more of that $$$ back when they release a quality product. Your mindset is what's wrong with a lot of America.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2648d ago
Gecksta2648d ago

And bare minimum game. Watch as the dlc is much bigger than the vanilla game.

Aenea2648d ago

I know it's not what you meant to say, but I kinda hope that is going to happen!

Hear me out! It's a game that does need a steady supply of new content to keep players engaged, so if the DLC's after 2 years aren't all that big compared to the main game I would not be happy!

Heck, Destiny 1 needed more DLC, not less!

GorillaTact2648d ago

I was thinking the same thing. Lack of content was one of my biggest gripes with the first Destiny. It lacked content in every aspect of the game. Years later and Destiny has finally became the game it should have been from day 1.

Kribwalker2649d ago

If they don't get it out this year they will be owned again. MS already got to keep a chunk of equity in the company when they separated in 2007, if activision gets a large chunk there won't be anymore equity for employees and they will be worse off now then ever before

Show all comments (102)
330°

Square Enix Preparing for Layoffs in U.S. and Europe Amid Heavy Restructuring

In a town hall that took place on Monday, Square Enix president Takashi Kiryu reportedly confirmed imminent layoffs in the U.S. and Europe.

14h ago
lelo2play13h ago(Edited 13h ago)

Square should ask Sony for more money...

Outside_ofthe_Box8h ago

Square should ask Microsoft to buy them out...

FinalFantasyFanatic5h ago

@Outside_ofthe_Box,
So that Microsoft can close down the studio after doing nothing with them? Right...

gleepot12h ago

Sad but true. It's the consequence of a shift in player habits, massive overhead, and out of control budgets across the industry.

blackblades13h ago(Edited 13h ago)

What did NA and EU did anyways? Just translate or something? I would say it might help them get back to there roots but DK.

Hofstaderman13h ago(Edited 13h ago)

Actually, you are correct they play a hand in localization especially in Europe with the many languages. That and marketing.

Show all comments (56)
260°

Xbox Gives Incoherent Explanation For ‘Hi-Fi Rush’ Studio Closure

The gaming world is still reeling from the announcement that Microsoft is shuttering Tango Gameworks, the studio behind last year’s big Xbox hit, Hi-Fi Rush.

Reaper22_9h ago(Edited 9h ago)

They have a reason but they don't need to give a explanation. Gamers nowadays think they have a say so in telling people how to run their company. It's not the end of the world, fanboys. Microsoft is gonna due what benefits them the most. It's never been about you. Same with sony. Some of you need to get a grip. The crazy part is that some of the ones complaining don't even own an xbox.

enkiduxiv8h ago

I don’t own an Xbox and I have no real interest in HiFi Rush. I just hate to see a talented group of people lose their jobs when they did everything that was asked of them. You know… the decent, normal reaction to have when something like this happens.

Relientk771d 11h ago

There's no logical or good reason to give for closing Tango Gameworks. They make great games consistently and Hi-Fi Rush was the highest rated Xbox game in literal YEARS. Closing the studio was just plain stupid and nonsensical.

notachance16h ago

It’s quite strange to not see Phil Spencer in any talkshow or podcast… usually the dude would talk almost daily when there’s even a bit of news from xbox.

Hofstaderman15h ago

Muzzled and/or in on it from the very beginning. You have to be a very stupid person not to anticipate that your division is going to be under scrutiny from shareholders after 80 Billion Dollars worth of acquisitions

Aloymetal15h ago

The beauty of being a CEO here in America is that when your company does well, you get extra money as a reward...
And when your company does badly, you get extra money to encourage you to stick around and lead it through the storm...And at some point, you get to bow out and float toward retirement on your golden parachute, which means and you guessed it, MORE MONEY!! What a deal for snake oil man Phil!!

14h ago
14h ago
-Foxtrot10h ago(Edited 10h ago)

Oh god no

You see when shit like this happens he throws Sarah Bond to the wolves

Seriously I only hear from her when it’s the yearly big Xbox showcase or when it’s super bad.

When the whole multiplatform release came out earlier this year he put her front and centre…kept his mouth shut for most of it

Michiel19891h ago

weird huh for a president of a division to say thing about said division?

purple10116h ago

Perhaps they think they can sweep this one under the rug, gamers will forget about it,

We will not

They made a good game and you put the whole studio in the bin, this couldn’t be clearer, ms don’t care, everyone suspected it, but now we KNOW it

Amplitude15h ago(Edited 15h ago)

She's kinda got the verbal communication of 3-years-ago Biden trying to say something he knows nothing about.
What she meant to say is: "We wasted our budget for the next couple years buying Call of Duty, and we're moving all our chips to that one series"

It's starting to seem quite obvious that XBox is going to be shutting down most of their studios or selling them off, then focusing on some sort of PC/Console hybrid OS for the next XBox where they can collect royalties Valve style.

esherwood13h ago

To be fair I don’t think there is a good answer, I’d rather her been honest but that probably would have pissed more people of then the word salad route.

Silly Mammo11h ago

Amp- Do you ever get tired of trying to make everything political?

1Victor10h ago

@amp please leave your political red ruby sleepers at the door this is a gaming site or go back to truthfoxnewsmax to comment over there.
BACK ON TRACK
It’s obvious that Microsoft is moving on the money now direction guided by their investors watching all the failures from the 3rd quarter of the 360 gen to this generation I wouldn’t be surprised if they have a plan to replace Phil with Bobby as he proved for years he kept making money for activision.

shinoff21838h ago

Bobby jeez that would be an interesting turn of events and they'd certainly go 3rd party

Show all comments (33)
460°

Square Is Shifting Strategy To Aggressively Pursue Multiplat Releases,Focus On Quality Over Quantity

Square Enix is shifting its strategy to aggressively pursue multiplatform releases and focus on quality over quantity.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
CantThinkOfAUsername23h ago

Yup, it's official. FFXVI and FFVII Rebirth didn't sell as much as they expected.

gold_drake22h ago

read the report, where exactly does it say what u just said ? lol

TheEroica7h ago

Denial isn't just a river in Egypt for some gamers.... 🤣

Barlos20h ago

It's your interpretation. That doesn't make it 'official'.

CantThinkOfAUsername13h ago

- 1% increase in net sales compared to a year with Forspoken and Octopath Traveller II, which didn't sell more than 3 millions combined (and I'm being generous).

- A 38.3% decrease in operating income despite the release of 'High-Definition' titles namely FFXVI, FF Pixels Remaster, Dragon Quest Monsters, and FFVII Rebirth.

- Aggressive multiplatform strategy one year after saying that exclusivity with PlayStation was mutually desired.

Sure, it's all in my head.

Sonic188117h ago(Edited 16h ago)

Probably for PC and the upcoming Nintendo Switch 2. Square Enix games doesn't sell to well on Xbox

Extermin8or3_16h ago

Nothing sells well on Xbox that's precisely Microsoft's problem

The3faces15h ago

Apparently they don't sell well on PlayStation either.

Lightning7715h ago

Square named Drops Xbox as part of their multiplatform approach in their quarterly reports.

Like it matters MS will probably find away to close them down to.

FinalFantasyFanatic6h ago

I can see them going for PS5/Switch/PC for the most part, it'll mostly likely be the Switch 2 by the time their next game enters development, which is probably a good thing since the Switch is struggling with 3rd party games. If they're hurting for money/sales, I don't see them bothering with Xbox, that's just wasted time/money for them.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 6h ago
DarXyde16h ago

I mean, maybe? They'll want as much as possible and I figure they could have been hoping for greater impact on PlayStation, but that's good reason to reflect and realize the resources and development cycle of these games aren't very sustainable. The solution is to make more affordable games with shorter dev cycles, then once in a while bring out the big guns.

I think Final Fantasy VII Re make and Rebirth would do really well if it was multiplatform. Specifically, if Nintendo gets their hardware up to snuff, and the rumors are promising. I don't really have much faith in its performance on Xbox, but Nintendo gamers really commit to buying their games. At one point, Breath of the Wild for Switch outsold the Switch itself.

Granted, Zelda always solos everything except GTA, but Nintendo folk are avid Final Fantasy fans. I think it would do exceptionally. Nintendo just needs to make porting easy and inexpensive and they'll get more games.

FinalFantasyFanatic6h ago

I don't think the exclusivity hurts them as badly as they think, I think it's a range of factors, like the quality of the games, high sales expectations, ESG/DEI, censorship, development costs/time... I also suspect that Square-Enix is extremely inefficient with their resources, they struggled/avoided towns in the FF13 trilogy, and FF14 was mostly wilderness with little to do apart from derp about in the wild (they also avoid towns and making a lot of characters there too). But FF14 also went through development hell, I think Square-Enix just needs to overall how they do everything, because the way they manage that studio just isn't working.

Christopher15h ago

The two most profitable games for them didn't sell as much as expected. Yes. Make it make sense.

MrCrimson12h ago

I interpret it as - they want to be multiplatform, as they will sell more copies.

EternalTitan11h ago

16 isnt even a JRPG let alone a final fantasy game.
So glad that it bombed.

itsmebryan8h ago

Square finally realized what Sony figured out recently, their installed base is not enough. We are going to see a lot less exclusives from everyone moving forward.

MajorLazer2h ago

PS5 is nearly at 60 million only half-way through its life-cycle, but sure, the install base is not enough.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 2h ago
CrashMania23h ago(Edited 23h ago)

Hopefully the next Nintendo system isn't a potato and it can contribute to FF sales in future as well, in addition to PC releases. If this ensures the long term health for SE and franchises than like FF and KH then I'm all for it.

NotoriousWhiz22h ago

Adding Nintendo and PC customers is the best way to increase sales and long term success. Not going to get that from Xbox.

shinoff218317h ago

Hopefully square brings all the lose switch exclusives over to.

Hofstaderman21h ago

Will there be a XBOX for Square to release games on? Or a MS Games service?

thesoftware73020h ago

Hof,

You must not have heard they are launching new hardware and have already committed to a Next-Gen Xbox.

But, for some reason, I think you already knew that and wanted to spin a silly narrative; besides, why wouldn't they release games on the SX/SS? You do know these consoles will still be here, right?

Hofstaderman19h ago(Edited 19h ago)

Optics. They have a STATED plan to do so. Thats not commitment. The shareholders and board are calling the shots now. Lets see if they have the appetite for hardware because they are owed 80 Billion Dollars already. Investment in hardware, R and D and marketing is how much again? That cost with the history of their hardware performance....at most maybe a handheld. What I am certain of XBOX is finished, the writing has been on the wall before the studio closures. Its MS Games and they are not hardware. They are software because MS is a software company. Expect them to be folded in the Surface team.

DarXyde16h ago

*hardware

I believe they committed to hardware.

I hate to nitpick, but that's kind of the company they are. You have to.

16h ago
Michiel198911h ago

@hofstaderman the board and shareholders have always called the shots or had a huge impact on decisions.

Xbox finished lmao, the writing has been on the wall? mate they just spend 70 BILLION dollars, and you see the writing is on the wall that they're done. 0 idea what you're talking about. They grafiti'd on the wall and you still can't see it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 11h ago
Aloymetal18h ago

No to both, not worth the effort, money and time on an already dying brand.

16h ago
thesoftware73018h ago

"They have a STATED plan to do so. That's not commitment."

Huh? What are you talking about? They announced they would be unveiling new Hardware this holiday season; how else are they supposed to commit to it?

" Lets see if they have the appetite for hardware because they are owed 80 Billion Dollars already"

What a silly statement, you think this deal was approved so they could make 80 billion in less than a year? This is a long-term commitment, a future-proofing of profit.

"What I am certain of XBOX is finished,"

No, you are not certain of this lol; as you stated, if they make even a Handheld in the form of a Steam-Deck that can dock to a TV/monitor, wouldn't that be just changing the form factor but still XBOX?

Closing these studios has really got you guys delusional; that is what happens in companies, in a changing market: you acquire, and you trim; like it or not, that is the way things are done. Lets look.

Where is the new Psygnosis with a new wipeout?
What happened to Japan Studio? Pixl Opus? London Studio?
Where is Zipper Interactive?

I can list more, but you see, closing devs doesn't mean your company is finished, especially when you have like 30+ dev teams.

Extermin8or3_16h ago

They won't be unveiling the hardware this holiday season it will be like the series x and s they got a tease at the game awards 2018. But no details until year of their release in 2020 lol

Relientk7721h ago

Please tell me the Dragon Quest III HD-2D Remake is still coming. I feel like I've been waiting forever for that game.

gold_drake17h ago

i think the juggernauts kingdom hearts (disney provides the money for that one) final fantasy and dragon quest are fine, the rest not as much

Michiel198911h ago

I'm kinda worried about the future of DQ though, Toriyama and the composer both passed away. Huge blow to the franchise.

FinalFantasyFanatic5h ago

@Michiel1989,
Akira Toriyama had an understudy though, he emulates his style, so maybe he'll do the art for Dragon Quest games, I would love to see Nobue Uematsu do music for the series though, that could be fun if they could convince him.

FinalFantasyFanatic6h ago

I'll be so p*ssed if that doesn't go ahead, also, where's DQ12 at? They've been silent on that for so long, and it was announced years ago.

@gold_Drake,
I'm pretty sure they can siphon some profit from A Realm Reborn to keep FF and Dragon Quest going too. I think the company would have gone bankrupt if it wasn't for that cash cow.

gold_drake1h ago

14 is definitely brings in the a consistant cashflow

Charal21h ago(Edited 21h ago)

Another sign that dedicated consoles market is in trouble, while PC seems more and more attractive to big publishers.

Having a good gaming PC and a PS5 myself, given current trend form both Sony and MS I am less and less playing on PS5, waiting for exclusives to release on PC, so I understand the logic behind the new strategy.

anast21h ago

Post those numbers. Then your comment might make sense.

thesoftware73019h ago(Edited 19h ago)

Ants,

I get that we don't know exactly without numbers, but come on, man, we can clearly see what's happening.

The console market has not grown much, the highest-selling console in history is still the PS2. You can play the " prove it" game all you want, but Sony's more aggressive PC push, SE completely rebooting their company/business, after being mainly exclusive to one console and showing a sizeable profit loss is telling.

PC is a high seller, and your doubtful PS5 dominant stance does not change the clear writing on the wall, straight from Sony's mouth, that they need to be, and will be more aggressive in the very lucrative PC market.

So, in other words, PC market is indeed looking more and more attractive to Pubs.

anast19h ago

@730

Numbers?

I'm willing to bet the farm that ¨PC gamers are not the dominate number compared to console, but I don't know because I don't have numbers. However, the price point of entry can allow us to infer what I had just stated.

anast14h ago

I don't click on links on forums. Tell me why that .com source is legit.

Tacoboto12h ago

What an ironic thing to say on a link-agreggate site like N4G. Explains your comment history perfectly.

Michiel198911h ago

asks for numbers. receives numbers and then continues to say I don't wanna click a website (because it might shatter my illusion)

anast9h ago(Edited 9h ago)

@All the people with that good 'ol folk wisdom

It's ironic how I clearly asked for the site and people still can't even answer this simple question.

Tell me how many people click on random links on forums?

Tell me the site and I will look. I don't mind being wrong and I'm barely intelligent enough to change my mind with something substantial.

All the numbers I have seen is that PC doesn't even come close console gaming in revenue, and nothing touches mobile gaming. More people touching something doesn't mean anything. It just means more people own PC for work and touch Steam every now and again, those numbers mean even less.

Charal2h ago

Anast I wasn’t expecting more from you and I haven’t be disappointed.

Don’t believe any number if you want, but things cannot be more evident that most of games companies are pushing to get the most they can from PC market.

Hell, we have both MS and Sony that are releasing their biggest franchise on PC with no or less and less delay vs console release, that is never seen before in the industry.

What is surprising me is that PC is not cheap in term of hardware cost, a rig close to PS5/XBX perfs may be close to double the price I guess, and close to 4x for a good gaming PC.
Plus, PC gaming does not have physical release anymore.

So a lot of supposed advantages from console market are not there but PC market is successful anyway, it would be very interesting to understand it.
Maybe one big argument is that we are more likely to need a PC at home, were we can work with, browse, and game, than a dedicated gaming machine. That why handled console market have been crushed by smartphones, we could see a repeating pattern here.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 2h ago
Babadook78h ago

From what I can ascertain PC is a smaller market than PS. There are occasionally times when PC looks to be stronger but overall it's still behind.

FinalFantasyFanatic5h ago

PC also has a lot more competition, especially when people can easily buy and play older games from 20 or so years ago on it.

Show all comments (106)