290°

The Nintendo Switch’s First-Year is Actually Really Promising

— Nintendo Enthusiast:

The Nintendo Switch's 2017 line-up isn't incredibly large, but there are a lot of guaranteed system sellers in the mix. Nintendo really has properly planned the launch of its new home system.

Read Full Story >>
nintendoenthusiast.com
freshslicepizza2648d ago

it will definitely do better than the wii u and it has some great games for the first year but mario has to ship this year otherwise nintendo will quickly lose momentum again.

CocoaBrother2648d ago

I'm hoping Bomberman is going to be good.
SnipperClips looks like a lot of fun for my wife and I to play together.

Super Mario Odyssey releases this year too and I've been waiting for a 3D Mario game for 3-4 years(since 3D World).

Arms is a game my wife wants but I'm not too sold on it yet until I see more; and luckily, they still got time to show more of it to convince me(although I'll probably pick it up for the wife anyways if she really wants it)

Moonman2648d ago (Edited 2648d ago )

Since Galaxy 2 actually. No shade to the nice Super Mario 3D World but I would call it 2.5D. ARMS is made by the Mario Kart 8 team so I'm looking forward to trying it out.

CocoaBrother2648d ago

Yeah 3D World was considered a 2.5 but nevertheless, I've been waiting for a new Mario game in general that wasn't a party/sport game.

I keep hearing people say ARMS is the Splatoon for fighting games which makes me feel it's a refreshing take on an over saturated series but I still want to see more before I take the dive

The 10th Rider2648d ago

I felt the same way about 3D World, still played through all of it and it was a great game, well deserving of it's 93 metacritic score, but I need something to tickle the 64/Sunshine/Galaxy fancy. There's good reason those are some of the highest rated games of all time.

As for ARMS, I wasn't incredible impressed with the reveal, but watching gameplay looked better. It later occured to me that I'd felt the same way about the Splatoon reveal, but that ended up being a total blast. I'm still not sold, but it does have the potential to be the Splatoon for fighting games.

higgins782648d ago

Not only does SM3DW deserve mention in the same breath of the very best games in the Mario canon, both 2D and 3D, it also deserves mention as the best game this gen and easily in the top 50 of all time. Essential.

IamTylerDurden12648d ago

Xenoblade 2 is what interests me.

CocoaBrother2648d ago

Completely agree. Both Nintendo of Japan and Europe say it'll be a 2017 release and while I really wish for that to be true, I feel it'll get delayed.

deafdani2647d ago

Yeah, that's my most anticipated title as well, but I think that's the one game that will be delayed to 2018.

I think everything else will release on time, though.

Zeldafan642647d ago

I wonder if any of the original cast will be back. TBH I doubt it will which is a shame.

Notellin2648d ago (Edited 2648d ago )

Man I want super bomberman r to be really good but when the description of the game on Nintendo's official website says Photo-real graphics I get sick to my stomach.

It's weird because the screen shots don't seem to match that description at all but it makes me wonder.

Uken122647d ago

I respect everyones opinion but personally I think 3D world is much better than Galaxy. Galaxy used the Wii remote in the worst possible way, actually made the game worse for me. There was no reason to have it. I thought the idea was cool but I felt that all the planets were just very small and too short, almost felt like a chore at points.

Galaxy has a lot of cool ideas, but it is like Wind Waker to me. Too many super small areas that don't really push the boundaries. 3D world is essentially the same but with better gameplay overall. And the multiplayer makes it extremely fun. If it was a one player only game it would not be nearly as fun. Plus later in the game the challenge shoots up dramatically making it awesome.

Also I have been waiting for Mario64 the true sequel to come out for 20 years. lol.

deafdani2647d ago

For me, it's:

Galaxy 2 > 3D World > Galaxy.

So, yeah I have 3D World on a high pedestal as well. Also, I had just as much fun playing it solo as I did playing it multiplayer. (Coincidentally, I loved multi and single player on New Super Mario U as well; I think Nintendo has already mastered that balance between both modes and it shows on those two games).

Uken122646d ago

@deafdani

I respect that. I just thought 3D world really made Luigi awesome. I have always played as Luigi back in the old games because my older bro would be Mario lol. I know you can be him in Galaxies, but it is harder with him lol.
I played Mario 3D land on 3DS and it is similar to 3D world but 1 player. It is a great game and i recommend you play it.
I like all 3D mario games really. So I really can't complain too much XD

deafdani2646d ago

Uken12: I already beat 3D Land years ago. Pretty good game, but not on the same level as the other 3D Mario adventures in my opinion.

Also, screw Luigi. Toad is my main! :P

And yup, I like all Mario platformers in general, both 2D and 3D. Only one I haven't played is Sunshine... needs to get to it somehow.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2646d ago
wonderfulmonkeyman2648d ago (Edited 2648d ago )

The amount of indies flocking to it is a really nice sign in my eyes.
Indies are the ones that are in the most danger of a shutdown from financial risks, since many of them don't have anywhere near as much capital as a AAA dev, like EA, does to fling around, even despite the lower budgets their projects usually have, so seeing so many wanting to bring their games to Switch makes me happy.
I'll probably be investing in quite a few, but Binding of Issac Afterbirth + will probably be the first on my list.

We aren't even at launch yet, let alone E3 which is where the bigger surprises get unveiled, and the first year of games is already looking to be spread out much better than the Wii U, and with less shovelware to boot, with higher quality titles, outside of FIFA and 12Switch.
Can't say I'm happy about the state of their online subscription plans, but the lineup makes up for a lot, especially as a lover of action-adventures and RPG's.

Featuring_Dante2648d ago

you know nothing about indie developers.

wonderfulmonkeyman2648d ago

Prove to me the majority of indies are further away from that breaking line than AAA's like EA, and I'll agree.
Until then, please stop trying to pick a fight with me over a positive message.
That's what trolls do.

IamTylerDurden12648d ago

Lack of 3rd party AAA is troubling, but indies are nice to have.

Ristul2648d ago

I agree Monkey, Switch is perfect for indies too as you will be able to take them on the go and also play them on the big screen. I hope we get a lot of physical releases of indies for the switch, and not just downloadable versions, that would be great for collectors.

ruefrak2648d ago

But Nintendo ignores E3. They haven't made an effort there in years. Last E3 they showed Zelda and.... well, Zelda. What makes you (and everyone else) so certain that this E3 is going to be different?

wonderfulmonkeyman2648d ago (Edited 2648d ago )

Because the Wii U was on life support( Zelda will be its last first party game, and that doesn't seem like a recent decision), while the Switch is just beginning, on top of the fact that they are intentionally spreading out their releases more on the Switch to avoid the Wii U's game droughts.

Featuring_Dante2648d ago

independent devs mostly operate from their residence, their games only take a few thousand copies sold to turn a profit and marketing mostly comes from word of mouth or presence at conferences or streams, not to mention self employment or free lance work most indie devs do. also, most indie games are self published through digital outlets, eliminating the need for a publishing deal.
All of what i've listed above eliminates:
-rent for a studio or work place and management
-inflated budgets due to marketing
-publishers which means direct income

So please tell me how are indie devs on the line again? if anything, indie devs are on solid green hills compared to major publishers which are on thin ice.

wonderfulmonkeyman2648d ago (Edited 2648d ago )

I said further from, not on. The distinction is important.
Also, while word of mouth is nice, it isn't fool-proof, and plenty of devs rely on aid outside of self-marketing/publishing (for those that do physical and/or musc CD's etc) because, for a dev that doesn't start out with much to begin with and still have to pay any fellow employees, that's still a heavy toll if they don't meet their sales quota.

There was actually a report not too long ago of a certain dev not making a single cent of profit off of their game.

There are plenty of devs that never make it to AAA status, and in fact toe the line from check to check, while working on their games, which is a far cry from the financial security of a giant like EA.

Giant publishers aren't infallible, but saying most of them are on thin ice, compared to smaller devs, who have less protection and in most cases far fewer additional revenue streams to help them, is quite a stretch.

Featuring_Dante2648d ago

Evident by 7th gen, all it takes for a big publisher to go poof is one major slip.
a small studio like hello games, famous for the no mans sky game, has 2 previous games, Joe Danger. Even though nms is a bomb, the studio is still going.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2648d ago
2648d ago
gamer78042648d ago (Edited 2648d ago )

It's promising?

expensive peripherals, games that are already available on the wiiu, or old ports, no online explanation other than paid service with no free games (other than monthly trials) and no idea how it will work, will you have to have android or iOS etc, can you hear game audio and chat out of both ears?. Granted mario odysee looks fun, but i'm not going to shell out $430 (switch + pro controller + a game to play) just to play one game.

I really want switch to succeed, nintendo has so much potential if they'd invest in network infrastructure and hardware, i'd love to buy one, i just don't see how its worth it right now, maybe in a year or 2.

The 10th Rider2648d ago

We really should start reporting any post that claims you HAVE to buy a Pro Controller as spam. The system is $300, a game is $60, the Pro Controller is $70 if you want one. I'll probably get one at some point for multiplayer, but it's not required in any way, shape or form.

wonderfulmonkeyman2648d ago (Edited 2648d ago )

I second that. Traditionalist controller fanboys are starting to get on my nerves.
I love my dualshocks and pro/classic controllers, but liking them doesn't make stuff like the Joycons horrible.

gamer78042648d ago

How do u get a real dpad then?

Erik73572648d ago (Edited 2648d ago )

Lol...

You wouldn't have to shell out for a pro controller. That's your own fault for making it that expensive.

wonderfulmonkeyman2648d ago (Edited 2648d ago )

Name at least twenty modern games that absolutely need a Dpad these days before you go saying the Pro controller is a necessity.
Even fighters like Street Fighter work better with sticks these days. You're over-inflating the importance of the pro controller. It isn't a necessity.

gamer78042648d ago (Edited 2648d ago )

any 2d platforming game, specifically 2d Mario, Kirby etc. games are great with the d-pad, i mean thats what they were originally designed for.

This would be the first nintendo console without a d-pad, i think that feature alone is worth an opinion of necessity

wonderfulmonkeyman2648d ago

I play 2D Mario, Kirby, etc just fine with sticks and slide pads, as do quite literally millions on 3DS.
But please, keep trying if you can think of something better...

Show all comments (69)
80°

Behind The Dangerous Stunts Of Nintendo’s Iconic Mario Commercials

Two married costume designers share stories from a decade of traveling the globe with Nintendo.

Read Full Story >>
gameinformer.com
265d ago
110°

Bowser Is Canonically 34 Years Old

In a YouTube video showing Nintendo Switch owners how to create a Nintendo Account, Nintendo of America revealed that Bowser is canonically 34 years old.

jznrpg327d ago

I saw Bowser when I was a kid and now I’m older than him , sigh.

Brazz326d ago

Wow, i'm as old as Bowser!!

Stanjara326d ago (Edited 326d ago )

He looks 55 to me.

Show all comments (7)
100°

Nintendo Is A Bad Company, But We Can't Help Loving Them Anyway

TG: “Most of us also grew up with Nintendo, likely forming a nostalgic connection with games that have long been crowned as our personal favourites. The Legend of Zelda: Wind Waker was an experience that shaped my view on open world fantasy, and Super Mario 64 changed my life like it did for millions of others. These titles have earned their place in history, and remain loved to this day for so many worthwhile reasons. We replay them and beg for remasters all while delving into their worlds time and time again because they mean that much to us. It’s a shame then that the company behind them often kicks its own sweet darlings to the curb.”

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
Magog335d ago

I never got the love for Nintendo games personally. The annoying vocalizations and ugly character designs do nothing for me.

Kosic334d ago

Don't forget the constant hand holding with tutorials. Learn this new ability by pressing Y, now prove that you can press Y 8 times before you can move on....

Tapani334d ago (Edited 334d ago )

Another very weird article.

Nintendo is a great company by almost all possible normal measures. The biggest one being: their own staff is happy, and they seem to be very happy, well compensated and retain rate is solid. They are also financially very stable, profitable, and cash rich, so shareholders love them.

Overall it is an extremely creative group of people, and their mission statement is fantastic as well "to put smiles on the faces of everyone we touch. We do so by creating new surprises for people across the world to enjoy together." The social impact is also massive, not to speak culturally. Additionally, they have a really strong core business, high customer retention rate and loyalty. Nintendo's reputation is extremely good, I think in the US alone they are 9th most reputable company, their customer service is better than the average company. Plus, the press gives them a pass, because they are Nintendo. But there's a reason why they do that, it's not "because they are Nintendo", there are more layers to the argument.

Then, then there's the random negative gamers online...and their "reputation" which is inside their heads. And their western ideas of how a Japanese company should behave or what they should do. But they have no right to ask a company to do anything for them, because they can vote with their wallets.

There's a small vocal community online who dislikes Nintendo for what they are, but then again, there's always a small vocal community that dislikes something.

Nintendo also disagrees with the Western world about IP, but most people call Westerners "hidoi!" when they emulate Tears of the Kingdom and do not experience it the way Nintendo wanted them (even if it is not the best visual way), because it is a matter of principle to them (Japanese are very much against anything close to plagiarism, and there are laws that are tight about creative works copying etc.)

The Western Braveheart "freedoom!" shouters need to understand that it is not an American company, nor they need to behave like one. They can have their own fights based on their principles (against emulation). And they very well may lose the battle with that and change, or find a new audience.

In the end, it is so very simple. Don't buy the products if you don't like a company, but there's no need to paint a picture that is unrealistic about Nintendo either.

MadLad334d ago

I hate virtually everything about their business practices, actually. Suing everybody for virtually anything, shooting down fan projects, games they never let devalue, their online infrastructure and how they handle BC.

They're lucky they make great games, because that's the only thing I feel they do right.

gold_drake334d ago

my issue with them, is the complete refusal to have decent tech for us.

and their odd censorship and lawsuits for modders.