230°

Team Ninja: "[Ninja Gaiden] Needs to be in the Shadows for a While"

Team Ninja creative director discusses the whereabouts of the iconic action franchise, says Yaiba: Ninja Gaiden Z "wasn't the right move" for the series.

Gaming4Life19812659d ago

I am a die hard fan but ninja gaiden 3 sucked so make it more like 1 and 2 or not at all.

spicelicka2659d ago

Yes! Specially the physics of NG2, still my favourite hack n slash game.

Movefasta19932659d ago (Edited 2659d ago )

ng2 has great physics,the combos felt great to land.The 360 version was insane,the gore and the ultra aggressive enemies .Miss the game :(

thatguyhayat2659d ago

They dumbed it down soo much. But luckily these guys listen to fans so hopefully they learnt their lesson

blitz06232659d ago

I would totally buy a 1-2 HD remaster. Hell, throw in 3 there too

DarXyde2659d ago

Ninja Gaiden was always HD.

darthv722659d ago

You do know Ninja Gaiden Sigma was an HD remaster of Ninja Gaiden 1/Black right? you could say the same about NG Sigma 2 as it relates to NG2.

Gaming4Life19812659d ago

Agreed. I loved ninja gaiden 1 but ninja gaiden 2 is my favorite and i would do anything for a ninja gaiden 1 & 2 remaster.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2659d ago
KakashiHotake2659d ago (Edited 2659d ago )

They should have known better than to make Yaiba: Ninja Gaiden Z. That didn't look or feel like a Ninja Gaiden game at all. They need to make another one like Ninja Gaiden Sigma that came out on PS3. That was good.

Seraphim2659d ago

Agreed. They never should have put the NG name on that product. While I see why they wanted to do something different they should have left the game sell on it's own merit, or lack thereof in this case. The idea was pretty good but the execution was poor. Furthermore they could have sold it as in the NG realm w/o calling it NG. At the end of the day it had absolutely no business having NG in it's name.

Anyway, while I have faith in the team I think they might not have the vision to recreate NG as we saw it in 1 and 2 nor are they sure how to improve upon it or where to go now. That was proof in 3 when Itagaki was out & it was up to the remainder of Team Ninja to create 3. In Ni-Oh, if successful I can see Team Ninja focusing on a sequel and not coming back to NG for some time. Which is a shame.

CrimsonWing692659d ago

or why don't you redeem yourself and make a seriously good ninja gaiden game instead of making fans wait.

Xb1ps42659d ago

Ninja gaiden... loved that game and remember those great moment on the Xbox.. I'm not much of a fan of remasters but I would buy a pro or Scorpio remaster of ninja gaiden day one...

Show all comments (36)
50°

Here's Everything I Expect From The Witcher 4's Combat

Danish from eXputer: "The Witcher's upcoming sequel needs to overhaul the series' combat system if it wants to make a big splash among gamers."

120°

Square & Bandai Namco Being Honest About Quality Is A Step In The Right Direction

Saad from eXputer: "After suffering from massive financial hits, Square Enix & Bandai Namco appear to be turning over a new leaf but I'm still unconvinced."

Nerdmaster6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

I was talking about games with some Japanese guys here in Japan, and it seems like around here Bandai Namco has a fame of making low-quality games, with the occasional gem.

About Square Enix, I believe they lack the capacity to improve. They should learn with Capcom (although even Capcom still makes some bad mistakes), but I don't think they ever will. They keep chasing whatever is new at the time (blockchain, AI...) to say "we innovate", without considering the public perception and if these things actually improve the games or not. Them releasing too many small games with no advertising also shows a lack of trust in its own products. Even with their biggest games, like turning FF into an action game with XVI and the very divisive plot changes regarding whispers and timelines in VII Remake, shows them trying to attract a new generation of gamers without understanding what made the series so big in the first place.

shinoff21835h ago

I want a true ff7 remake. With thatcsaid I'm way happier with 7 remake then I was with ff16. I'd still prefer turn based but square keep chasing these Lil kids

Snookies122h ago

Man, it is perfectly fine to prefer turn based. Turn based is amazing. But there's zero reason to call anyone who likes action games "lil kids". Liking one gameplay system over another does not make you more mature in any way.

VersusDMC5h ago

People love the new FF's overall...the problem is the abundance of 7's they release that lose money or make very little like diofield, star ocean divine force, Valkyrie asylum, harvestella, foam stars, etc. Advertising wouldn't have saved those games. Apparently Forespoken had a big Advertising budget but we saw how that went.

shinoff21834h ago(Edited 4h ago)

Star ocean divine force actually sold well from what I've read not ff type numbers but well enough. Was a dope game to.

FinalFantasyFanatic3h ago

Bandai Namco is going to Bandai Namco, I do believe that Square Enix can't change without changing the entire management, they've had these issues for more than a decade and haven't learnt, I have very little faith they can course correct. I'll still buy their better remasters/remakes like Star Ocean 2 though (not FF7R).

Asterphoenix1h ago

Namco is just milking the same Sword Art Online with lack of budget as well as anime IPs that don't go to decent developers like Jujutsu Kaisen and My Hero Academia. Namco deserves their losses and no future Dot Hack or Xenosaga remaster :(.

Square allocated lot of their budget on Forspoken was a mistake. Square always had management issues. Star Ocean 2 was a great remake and I found their recent entries of FF(16 and Rebirth) better than 13 and 15.
I think they were better than 360/PS3 generation where Square went really downhill.

CrimsonWing694h ago

I don’t know why NOW they decide on this, but I guess later is better than never.

110°

Baldur's Gate 4 Has a Huge Uphill Battle Without Larian

With confirmation that Larian Studios will not develop another Baldur's Gate game, the fourth entry has a major challenge on its hands.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
kythlyn7h ago

Larian had big shoes to fill themselves. Hopefully another studio can pull off the same miracle, but uphill battle is an understatement at this point. It feels impossible that BG3 even exists and accomplishes what it does.

franwex7h ago

I doubt anyone will attempt a Baldur’s Gate 4 for minimum a decade. It took about 20 years to get a third one for a a reason.

shinoff21834h ago

I'd just copy every single thing larian did obviously with different story and characters. Sometimes innovation isn't needed at that particular time.