170°

Nintendo Switch Innovates, but Battery Life May Hold it Back

Nintendo officially announced some specs and games coming on the Nintendo Switch. The battery life will be moderate, but the games may make up for that.

Read Full Story >>
twoleftsticks.com
Erik73572694d ago

Yes, 2 and half hours is not amazing. But that is bare minimum, max was 6 hours. I see myself getting 3 hours of gameplay I guess on the go. Better have a charging port or portable battery!

ElisaDS2694d ago

Has a charging port as well as possibly a car charger... so outlook is not terrible :)

Erik73572694d ago

Agreed it's acceptable.

Sure you could find some place to charge it in any building really....

Player3Podcast2693d ago

I just worry about the dev-math behind it. Is it 6.5 hours on the lowest brightness running a game that isn't really intense?

ElisaDS2693d ago

Maybe like Splatoon 2, but if it's Skyrim or possibly even Breath of the Wild, it'll probably be on the shorter end.

ZeekQuattro2694d ago (Edited 2694d ago )

I don't have a problem with the battery life. Outside of the house I play my New 3DS usually an hour or 2 hours tops and even then usually in bursts. I will be doing the same with the Switch but for the most part like my 3DS I will be playing the Switch at home more then anything and in the case of the Switch on my 52 inch flat screen because its cool I can play current console games on the go I would prefer to see them on my TV instead.

ElisaDS2694d ago

I agree, I just hope Nintendo isn't trying to do too many things in one console.

Player3Podcast2693d ago

I wonder how well a portable battery would do with it?

ElisaDS2693d ago

Like a back up battery or power bank? Good question, I'd be interested to find out. If the leaked possible accessories are any indication, it looks like Nintendo has accepted the moderate to poor battery life and has provided ways to use the console on the goal and yet still have to plug it in somewhere.

rainslacker2693d ago (Edited 2693d ago )

Same. Play both my Vita and 3DS, and 3 hours with the more demanding games, with a decent screen brightness, is a god send. There are some games which can last longer, but it's purely dependant on the game. Pretty commonplace really. Any mobile device(phones and tablets) really get about the same amount of time when playing more complex games, or even running tons of aps. My phone for instance, can maybe run YouTube for 3 hours before the battery gets to critical.

FallenAngel19842694d ago

Battery life was never good for a tablet that allegedly has hardware parity with PS4 & XO

ElisaDS2693d ago

You're right, it's doing a lot considering what it's intended for.

Player3Podcast2693d ago

All indications are that the Switch isn't as powerful as the PS4 or Xbox One. There isn't parity.

Neonridr2693d ago

2.5 - 6 is quite a range though..

Player3Podcast2693d ago

You have to imagine 6 is like bare minimum brightness and non-intensive game.

ElisaDS2693d ago

We'll have to see just how each game responds to the battery and we'll finally get a good idea as to how it works. But up to 6.5 is better than we'd all thought.

Player3Podcast2693d ago

Whenever I see a range, I always think towards the bottom of it. Like a computer or smartphone. The more you use it the shorter the batter will last.

ElisaDS2693d ago

I agree. I wonder if it will have any power-save options in the future.

Show all comments (22)
200°

Sony Says The PS5 Is Its “Most Profitable Generation To-Date"

During Sony’s recent business segment meeting and investor presentation regarding its game and network services, the PlayStation company revealed that PlayStation 5 is the company’s “most profitable generation to-date.”

It’s the top slide of the presentation, showing that in its first four years, the PS5 generation has already hit $106 billion in sales, having almost caught up to the PS4’s total $107 billion generated.

Operating income for the PS5 generation has also already surpassed that of the PS4, having now reached $10 billion.

ApocalypseShadow5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

I wouldn't doubt it. They released a high quality system. A lot of high quality games from themselves and their support of 3rd party developers and indies. They released many high quality remakes and remasters. They released a high quality GaaS game going against the naysayers thinking Sony would abandon single player games. And they most likely are profiting a lot more than PS1, PS2 PS4 and the loss leading PS3 that drained all their profits.

Now, I'll wait to see what's cooking tomorrow. But can you use some of those profits to better support your high quality VR headset? Because, by supporting it, you can sell more games and more systems and make more profits?

jznrpg5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

I want RPGs for PSVR2! Good ones of course

shinoff21833h ago

If it had some rpgs I would buy right fking now. It looks dope and alot of fun, but it's biggest game resident evil 4(maybe) I've got no interest in. I'm not a fan of racing games, even with that metro game coming i was never much into that series. Rpgs would be fantastic.

MrNinosan1h ago

Lemme know if ya wanna play some Zenith 🙌
Bought it at release, but haven't played it more than 1-2 hours but for sure on my "todo list".

Cacabunga1h ago

Normal when they released mostly cross gen games so far. That’s a lot of money saved..
We haven’t seen what PS5 can do yet. 4years in and PS4 games still look great to me. The gen leap isn’t quite there yet.

--Onilink--2h ago

The interesting metric for me is the $106billion in operating income/profit (not sales as mentioned in the article) reaching the same as the PS4 did with only half the consoles sold.

In particular because they all are supposed to be making the most per hardware sold after a few years when manufacturing costs are down.

So even putting inflation aside(and the higher console price), it is interesting that they could reach PS4 $ with just half the consoles sold.

Maybe there is more to the metric thats whats seen at face value, but they have clearly been making a lot more money than before on the software side (with also less games released I suppose, given its only been half the generation so far)

VersusDMC2h ago

The bulk of the money has to be coming from the 30% cut on all games and microtransactions. Especially on all the free to play juggernauts like genshin, apex, fortnight, etc.

--Onilink--16m ago(Edited 13m ago)

@Versus

They are definitely making a lot on that for sure (which the $70 price increase factors into as well), but its not like many of those games werent around for the PS4 too.

They might be counting the gen as a whole and not just PS5 itself (so extra profit from PC sales, whatever that may be)

PS+ price increase and different tiers probably amount to part of that too.

But in general, its still quite a surprising metric. Half the time, half the consoles sold, less first party games released so far and still already making more of a profit than last gen is quite something, and as mentioned, there is probably more to it that we dont know, after all, since we are talking about operating income, all the expenses they have also factor into it, so it is also possible that they have found ways to significantly reduce that + all the means of increased revenue that appear to be factoring into the equation

All in all, just an interesting situation from a business perspective

Abnor_Mal4h ago

This will surely shut up all the new trolling accounts trying to spread lies and non facts in other articles comment sections before this article is posted.

Hofstaderman3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

Obscurely, those trolls or troll will not show in these articles as the truth is contradictory to his or their orchard-sized daily dose of copium and hopium.

Tacoboto2h ago

Or... They're intentionally trolling you guys specifically. Because they know it upsets you so easily.

Name-dropping Orchard, after this many months? How long has it been and he's still in your thoughts?

Elda2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

I'm quite sure the individual is reading these positive comments downvoting & seething at the same time. Edit: It just downvoted my comment...lol!!

Hofstaderman2h ago

No I'm entertained by this individual. I love unhinged people, they are so interesting lol.

Marvellepus2h ago

lol Tacoboto is right, this dude still talking about Orchard.

Dude hasn’t been on N4G for over a year and is still living in your head rent free

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2h ago
repsahj3h ago

Wow! I am super impressed that in just 4 years, ps5 already caught up to the PS4's. Congratulations.

sagapo3h ago

Not really surprised as Sony barely has any competition at the moment.

Show all comments (24)
70°

Zotac To Reveal Their Portable Gaming PC At COMPUTEX 2024

This sounds like a very interesting mobile gaming PC. ZOTAC returns to COMPUTEX 2024 to showcase its biggest push yet into brand-new product categories from Handheld Gaming.

smashman988h ago

My last 2 gpus have both been zotac. No issues. I'm interested.

Garethvk6h ago

It will be interesting to see what they have to offer

300°

PlayStation VR2 Official PC Adapter by Sony Is Being Certified

An official PlayStation VR2 adapter for PC made by Sony is being certified. It won't be long before the VR headset is officially compatible.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
Profchaos20h ago

one step closer to unlocking the headsets full power.

I'm extremely underwhelmed with how Sony has treated it's psvr2 customers seriously Nintendo treated it's Wii U owners of which the sales were probably equal in the headsets 2bd year v the consoles far better.

This is the least they could do

ravens5217h ago

I agree. I'm a day 1 consumer too. 😢 For my day 1 Vita. I do not like when Sony does that crap.

DarXyde56m ago

I still don't have PSVR2, but this was always my concern. I almost pulled the trigger for RE4, but I waited it out to see what changed. As it happens, not much.

I love my Vita. Great piece of hardware. It didn't shine the way we know it could have, but it'll still got amazing titles.

PC support is very much a step in the right direction. Even if some PC only titles can make use of the headset, it does increase PSVR adoption: it's a great piece of hardware and it's also the best in its price bracket, so I see a way forward for uptake. Who knows? Maybe that'll allow VR devs to feel more comfortable releasing on PS5.

17h agoReplies(2)
BlackOni16h ago

Agreed, but to your point, those dollars went a lot further back then than they do now. This should have been a consideration from the beginning.

Imagine buying a monitor or tv that could only work with one device. That's basically what this equates to, so they left a LOT of money on the table by not making it PC compatible from the getgo. But to Sony's credit, even they were unaware of how popular their games would be once released on PC.

poppatron1h ago

No credit to Sony on this one I’m afraid, first party and generally Sony support for psvr2 really hasn’t been great

Babadook713h ago

I doubt there will be foveated rendering implemented on PC. PSVR2 is already a better experience than PCVR. PS5 Pro will unlock the full power.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 56m ago
Neonridr18h ago

so now Sony is going to sell me an adapter I have to buy so I can use the headset on my PC? Gee, how generous of you :P

While it's great that I will be able to use this headset instead of my Index or Q3 for PC only VR titles, it's still a sad realization that Sony is sorta waiving the white flag here. Here's hoping they at least make some of their PSVR2 exclusive content available on PC as well now.

ocelot0718h ago

I don't see it as waving the white flag. PSVR the first one even though modders did get it working on pc it was a awful experience.

PSVR2 one of the best VR headsets available. Requires just one usb c cable. Even though I truly believe exclusives are what sell consoles. When it comes to VR it's very nich among gamers. I'm ecstatic that soon I can imo use the best VR headset on both ps5 and pc. No need for a pc vr headset. I have said it since PSVR2 was announced that I hope they make it pc compatible. With it being a very expensive headset and pc vr being more popular it just makes sense for Sony to do this.

17h ago
Neonridr16h ago

as opposed to a Quest 3 that requires no cables, or a single cable if you want to pair it with your PC right? ;)

While the tech is better in the PSVR2 for the most part (I own an Index, Q3 and PSVR2), I'm still let down by certain things. Headset rumble is a novelty. Eye tracking has only been used well on a couple of titles.

to each their own I guess, but to me this doesn't give me confidence that Sony is fully investing in their own hardware, more like they are stepping back to allow others to fill in the gaps.

ocelot0712h ago

@Neonridr not owned a quest 3. Did own a quest 1 and 2 both where fairly good. Have used a quest 3 for a limited time and thought it was fine. But comfort wise not as nice as psvr2.

Tried using quest 2 via wireless streaming to my pc and it was so bad I much rather using a single cable and have a solid connection than streaming the game from pc to headset.

17h agoReplies(2)
ocelot0718h ago

It's most likely just going to be a usb c to usb 3 adapter. Even for modern era a lot of new cases and motherboards don't have a usb c ports.

The budget but still fairly fairly high end pc I recently helped my friend build. He went with a b550 motherboard. Didn't have a usb c port or a on board socket to connect a pc case with a front panel usb c. Had to get a cheap pcie usb c.

1nsomniac14h ago(Edited 14h ago)

They developed the headset/attached usb c cable so that it wasn’t possible to run through any port other than a designated ps5 port. The adapter allows all the data to be passed correctly to a none designated ps5 port.

17h agoReplies(1)
Show all comments (54)