130°

2016's Top 10 Most Disappointing Games - The Only Top 10 You Don't Want to Take #1 In

It has been a great year for gamers but 2016 was also a year filled with many letdowns. We rank the 10 most disappointing games of 2016.

Read Full Story >>
cogconnected.com
thorstein2702d ago

Seriously? You can't come up with an original article?

You pick disappointing games based on lies you heard in echo chambers then pass it off as "opinion." And how original, you used No Man's Sky art to use with your lame opinion. Find a new hobby if you hate gaming so much.

You're a joke of a journalist (just my opinion.)

Gaming_Cousin2702d ago

I have a feeling you are defending No Man's Sky here.

"You pick disappointing games based on lies you heard in echo chambers" I'm interested, can you spot one "lie" that he wrote in his article?

You seem overly furious at the author

thorstein2701d ago

The entire paragraph about NMS is a complete fabrication.

Lie #1 "it seemed to have all of the problems the other games on the list had and then some"
The author claims that the problem with Quantum Break was the accompanying show. NMS didn't have an accompanying show. Mirror's Edge didn't improve upon the original according to the author. NMS isn't a sequel. Division complaint according to the author was Endgame material: Dark Zone.... I'll stop here for brevity.

Lie #2 "the promise that just wasn’t delivered on, causing many in the industry a lot of anger." Very few people "In the industry" - which translates to devs, publishers, and retailers were angry about this game. Some journos were and of course the normal hateboys that clung to their echo chambers and repeated lies to each other. They were called out and even two lost their bid to claim false advertising when the investigation found that they lied about Large Scale Battles.

Lie #3 "this game was eagerly anticipated by gamers around the world, all of whom had their hopes shattered when it was finally released." Not true at all. The majority of players don't cling to gaming websites, they play games. The majority of players played the game for about 50 hours. There were a few complaints and a few refunds, but the number of refunds were less than a few hundred, there were just repeated reports about them, over and over. Many gamers liked it. The lie is that he claims ALL GAMERS had their hopes shattered. That is a lie.

Lie #4. "No Man’s Sky was completely lacking gameplay and content considering many features that had been promised both by PlayStation and Sean Murray were nowhere to be found" Actually the game launched with most of what was promised. Sean said in 2014, 2015, and 2016 that it wasn't multiplayer and you wouldn't be able to see someone even if you were on the same planet at the same time. There are huge space battles. The about page remains unchanged and it explains explicitly what the game was about. Did it have everything? No. But neither did a plethora of other games. They were found not to have falsely advertised.

So, you may now apologize as I only ripped apart one paragraph written by this hack.

Go ahead. Just say, "oh, my bad" or whatever. It doesn't hurt to admit being wrong about something.

But understand the real reason for my post was to point out that this is the 12,156,355th article like this that has been posted this month. It isn't original. And the hate aimed at NMS has far outstripped any amount of hype it had.

Digital_Anomaly2701d ago

Haha... you worked really hard at that as what you call lies are a HUGE stretch pal. It's cool, you got nerd wood for NMS and that's totally OK. No need to drop a nugget so hard just because someone thinks differently than you.

danny8182702d ago

There is proof that some things said about this game were misleading by its creators. Now it's N4G. Where anything goes. Relax people are just looking back at the year because it's ending.

Digital_Anomaly2702d ago

Wow man, you're nearly staining your shorts over a random writer's opinion piece? Enough so that you make it a personal attack? Get over yourself... at least that journalist is getting paid to spout an opinion. You're just randomly ranting on N4G for nothing.

thorstein2701d ago

Just my opinion, isn't it? So, I can't use my opinion about someone else's opinion? Lulz.

Digital_Anomaly2701d ago

Haha... look at all the NMS shit you've posted to N4. This has nothing to do with the list as a whole and everything to do with you being butthurt that someone disliked a game you like.

LULZ INDEED

thorstein2701d ago

So, you're the author and you're butthurt that someone called out your opinion? lulz, that is about as original as the article.

Headline: Critic gets angry because his opinion is torn apart, cries about it, claims others can't have opinions about his opinion.

You are a hack.

Digital_Anomaly2699d ago

Ha, I didn't write it. I'm laughing hard at your painfully obvious bias though.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2699d ago
joab7772702d ago

There's a lot of other too 10's ya wouldn't want to be #1 on!

Psychotica2702d ago

I wasn't disappointed by Watch Dogs 2 at all

100°

Titanfall 2 Is Still The Smartest FPS Of The Last Decade

The best shooter campaign since Half-Life 2 still hasn't been topped eight years later.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
Leeroyw9d ago

I agree with this. The time travel mechanics. The sense of scale. The relationship with your mech. The bosses all had personalities. It's a wonderful game.

9d ago
mastershredder9d ago

Yeah it was good, but it only did the time travel bit in one level. Dishonered 2 did the same thing. Now how about a game where it's implemented throughout the gameplay? Singularity says Hello (and deserves so much more recognition).

210°

No Man's Sky Is Easily One Of Gaming's Greatest Comeback Stories

Despite No Man Sky's rocky launch, Hello Games managed to turn it into one of the best space exploration RPGs out there.

darksky11d ago

HG could have stopped after making 3-4 updates and the debt would have been paid to those why are crying about paying full price. However, they have continously provided free updates for the last 6-7 years. No other developer in hostory has ever done this and probably never will.
There are many AAA games that disappointed but the devs normally move on or close the studio rather than fix the game.

-Foxtrot11d ago

I hate the whole concept of "comeback story" because at the end of the day it doesn't remove the core issue we had in the first place, that we were lied to, it was disappointing and it launched with bare content to what was promised for years.

Any bad game can have a comeback story if it's supported enough after launch but for me if you launch in a terrible state then you had your chance. I can applaud you for what you've done after but at the end of the day there's not much of a choice since most gamers would blank your next product if you ditched your last game so fast, it's not about repairing the game but spending your time repairing gamers trust before you launch your next product otherwise it would be dead on arrival.

With these stories and the games being updated, the only way is up most of the time so of course it's going to improve the game and feel better over all, getting better and better as time passes. No Mans Sky, Sea of Thieves, Fallout 76 etc but then you have games like Anthem, Suicide Squad, Redfall and The Avengers where the devs just clearly moved on, now if they have another product people won't be as exited for it, I mean hell Guardians of the Galaxy was a great game but because of the Avengers it didn't help its sales since people were obviously still sour at that point.

I still think despite the improvements to games like No Mans Sky and Cyberpunk along with being better now overall the games are still not up there to what was promised and hyped as for years.

If we keep celebrating these “comeback stories” then unfortunately it only strongly supports the concept that these studios / publishers can continue to push half arsed broken products out for the sake of quick sales instead of waiting until they are fully finished. We need to condemn this awful behaviour or sadly we lose all voice and power as consumers.

Sonic188111d ago (Edited 11d ago )

I feel the same way about Cyberpunk 2077. I'm glad you mentioned that. I'm not a fan of comeback stories as well. But No man sky developer was a small indie team compared to CDPR. It's worse when it's coming from a AAA developer

Nacho_Z11d ago

"Any bad game can have a comeback story if it's supported enough after launch"

You make it sound so simple and easy. It's not. After release Hello Games poured countless hours into getting their game closer to what they originally wanted, without charging a penny to anyone. That's not normal.

The reason NMS and HG are held in such high esteem and calling them liars is a weak stance is the amount of work they've put into it, for free. They're not chasing a quick buck, they've dedicated their lives over the last few years to giving their fans the game everyone wanted.

-Foxtrot11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

They are liars though...

We are not revising history here, I'm sorry but we're not

They built this game up for years and they launched it knowing full well it wasn't up to scratch to what they originally showed off or hyped it up to be.

"They're not chasing a quick buck, they've dedicated their lives over the last few years to giving their fans the game everyone wanted"

And like I said above most of that comes from the fact that if they had just moved on straight away nobody would have supported their next game. They've washed most of that sour taste away after supporting No Mans Sky so now they are doing a new game which more people feel like they can support and get excited for.

Anyway how can you say "You make it sound so simple and easy. It's not" and then make the point that "Hello Games poured countless hours into getting their game closer to what they originally wanted, without charging a penny to anyone"

This means that if a small team like this can turn a game around then big AAA games like Suicide Squad, Redfall, Anthem and the like should have been able to do it no problem, oh but that's right they didn't want to put the time or effort into it. They can do it but some people just decide not to.

Blad3runner0011d ago (Edited 11d ago )

"You make it sound so simple and easy. It's not. After release Hello Games poured countless hours into getting their game closer to what they originally wanted, without charging a penny to anyone. That's not normal."

People paid for the game at launch and got lied to. Now the game is what it SHOULD have been from the start (what people paid for) and we should be happy they aren't charging EXTRA? Its free because people ALREADY paid for the game at launch.

People PAID for what the game is in its current state (what it should have been at launch), not what it was when it released. Charging people AGAIN would result in even more backlash.

anast11d ago

"You make it sound so simple and easy. It's not. After release Hello Games poured countless hours into getting their game closer to what they originally wanted, without charging a penny to anyone. That's not normal."

They already charged for the full price game. All of that work is owed because it was already paid for.

JackBNimble11d ago

Fox ... sure HG made a huge mistake, but they have also done more then any development team that I have seen to fix the problem and go way beyond in supporting the game. And every update has been free, so I don't really get why you are holding on to this grudge.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 11d ago
milohighclub11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Whatever happened at launch is in the past. By your logic they could have supported it for a year got it to the project they promised then stopped but they didn't. They're still supporting it to this they, they've released more content post than pretty much any game I can think off. More than most MMOs. They didn't have to go this far but they have and don't have any plans of stopping. All for free too.
Yeah they had a shit launch and they've apologised, learned and more than made up for it. I was pissed off at them at launch, but not petty enough to keep slandering them 7 years later.
You have much bigger studios releasing half assed games and fixing it later or even worse not even bothering.

anast11d ago

The DLC costs money. But yeah, people are hanging on to this one longer because of their previous reputation.

TheCaptainKuchiki11d ago

And it doesn't change the fact that the game is a boring procedurally generated environment in which your repeat the same actions over and over again with no real purpose. I hate when they say that the game became good.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 11d ago
thorstein11d ago

I really enjoyed it at launch and had every trophy by August 2016.

The experience I had is no longer in the game: It was just me and my ship. It was a survival game and the feeling of loneliness in the universe was pervasive. There was no way to ruin too far from your ship and, in an emergency, you grenaded a hole in the ground to survive.

I miss that aspect, but since then, I love what they've done.

Hugodastrevas11d ago

I'd say it's THE definitive comeback story

TheGamingHounds11d ago

Final Fantasy 14 takes that one imho

CrimsonWing6911d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Yep and the way they actually did it where Bahamut destroyed the original FF14 and the realm was “reborn” seals it as the best way to do something like this, lol.

jwillj2k411d ago

Oh great another story about the cleanest shirt in a bin of dirty laundry.

Show all comments (26)
80°

Latest No Man’s Sky update adds ship customisation, space station overhaul, and more

Orbital update drops today, also bringing with it engine improvements and UI refresh.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
Zeke6851d ago

The game that keeps on giving 🦾🥳✌️

Christopher50d ago

The support they've given this game only makes me more interested in their next game.

Zeke6850d ago

Agree, curious what they are cooking up for that one?!