890°

The Witcher author - Andrzej Sapkowski - "The game has caused me a lot of s***"

Eurogamer.pl: "In a lecture at the convention Polcon in a fairly harsh words he spoke about the players and developers."

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.pl
Cy2807d ago

This site really needs to stop accepting these google translated articles. They're basically unreadable.

monkey6022807d ago

Yeah I tried and got nowhere with making any sense of all that

NewMonday2807d ago

From what I could decipher the author is upset that people think his books are an adaptation of the game, while the game is actually an adaptation of his books, and that the story cannon from the game has superseded the original cannon of the books.

though he dose acknowledge that the game gave his work popularity in the first place and that lead to his work being published in several languages.

Bansai2807d ago

Basically, he's salty that the games overshadowed the books.

_-EDMIX-_2807d ago

@ban- no he's angry that the developers have not given proper or I would say more transparent citation to his work

Bansai2807d ago (Edited 2807d ago )

He never said that, and even if he did, they [CDPR] did punctuate that the whole series is based on the books and not the other way around. Every single game says that.

Eamon2807d ago (Edited 2807d ago )

Actually, the games are a sequel to his books. CDProjekt did a very clever move by making Geralt amnesiac at the beginning of the first Witcher game. It was clever in that it easily introduced new people to the world of The Witcher without having to adapt the original stories nor having to change their events at all.

Characters like Philippa Eilhart would meet Geralt for the first time in the games and the player wouldn't know that Geralt actually met her before, so since he doesn't remember, it feels like a first meeting all over again. The same with Triss, Dandelion etc in the first Witcher. It also gives a valid excuse to why Geralt doesn't talk about or search for Yennefer or Ciri in the first 2 Witcher games.

nix2807d ago

Guys read the book series. It's freaking amazing.

Lon3wolf2806d ago

@Edmix,

GoG have always said it was adapted form those novels, they even had Andrzej Sapkowski advise on the games (I believe) in the beginning. He distanced himself from the games ages ago. I bet it's just some journo dragging up old stuff again now that the GOTY W3 is coming out.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2806d ago
Bahamut2807d ago

You're right, completely unreadable.

Anzil2807d ago

Didn't even read the second paragraph

zodiac9092807d ago (Edited 2807d ago )

I find it so weird that in this day and age, Google Translate STILL has so much trouble accurately translating languages. =/

2806d ago Replies(1)
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2806d ago
Movefasta19932807d ago

I only read book 1,and i love it.I'll read book 2 soon.

Fist4achin2807d ago

Same here. I've heard the second gets into the weeds of the politics of the kingdoms. I am just starting it.

RememberThe3572807d ago

I just finished the first book a couple of days ago and I honestly wasn't that impressed. It read like a series of short story's loosely related; not a bad thing in essence and i actually found some of the situations interesting, but it felt shallow and impersonal. When it ended it felt like the end of a first act and. If hadn't had the context of the games I wouldn't have finished it. After reading this book I'm firm in my thought that the developers of the game are better story tellers than the author.

Movefasta19932807d ago (Edited 2807d ago )

I prefer the short story layout but i can understand why you did not like it. The chapter with Geralt and Renfri was legendary imo .

RememberThe3572807d ago

Yeah the book has a couple moments that are so "Witcher" and so awesome. But my expectations were molded by the games and that might not be fair since you're the Witcher all the time and you're with him through everything. Plus, I just finished the Red Rising series earlier and I think I was hoping for that sort of book. With all that said, I still plan on continuing the series, Geralt is awesome and the stories are so unique.

cerpintaxt442807d ago

the first book is a collection of short stories. Blood of Elves is the book that starts the narrative.

FalloutWanderer20772807d ago (Edited 2807d ago )

"After reading this book I'm firm in my thought that the developers of the game are better story tellers than the author. "
No, you don't get it. The first two novels chronologically are The Last Wish and Sword of Destiny, both of which are just that, short story collections. The Last Wish, the book you read, is supposed to flow exactly as you described and IMHO, I love how it has interlude chapters continuing Geralt's recovery and stay at the temple of Melitele in Ellander from the Striga attack. The Witcher saga doesn't truly begin until Blood of Elves. This is the chronological reading order
1. Last Wish (Short story collection)
2. Sword of Destiny (Short story collection)
3. Blood of elves
4. Time of Contempt
5. Baptism of Fire
6. Tower of Swallows
7. Lady of The Lake
The novels are absolutely excellent and must-reads for any fan of the Witcher games and Dark Fantasy. I'd strongly advise reading the novels before playing the games, in between games if need be but before playing Witcher 3 or at the very least after playing so you can go back and replay the games to see just what you've missed. There's so much lore, remarks between characters, past events and history that only book readers will understand and appreciate. Personally, I played TW1 and TW2 and then read the books before Witcher 3 released. Highly recommended!

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2807d ago
burza19822807d ago

Read stories and novels first. Saga is on the end and stories and novels are better then saga, more Geralt and similar what you had in the game.

RenegadeRocks2807d ago

the books are the best. My most treasured stories. the way Andrej intertwines persoanl human themes with global modern themes is magical. love the humour, the characters, the world. Its mind blowing. I feel like re reading them all right now. Might as well do after my current deadline ends. :)

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2807d ago
Kreisen2807d ago (Edited 2807d ago )

Without CD Projekt RED nobody outside of Poland wouldve ever even heard about his books and yet he never had anything good to say about them or the game.
Hell how much money did he pocket becouse of CD Projekt RED? Im sure he was very, very angry accepting all that cash. What a piece of shit...

RememberThe3572807d ago

That was my first thought. This guy is tryin to convince everyone that the success of the game was because of the success of the books. The ego is strong with this one.

letsgopal2807d ago

For years he's known for being a very egoistic asshole. And he basically said that people who play video games are idiots.

bloodybutcher2807d ago

Of course. If you ignore the pre-game translations to Russian, German, Spanish, French etc.

RabbitFly2806d ago

Yep. Yet never in English, which is the biggest market for books. Not because Murica! like Cerpintaxt44 jokingly says, but because there are a lot more people viable to read books in english in countries all over the world.

Me f. ex. I am not from an english speaking country, but of all the languages that the Witcher books have been published in. The only one I can read is English, and none of the books, maybe except the last wish, was published in english before the games made the stories popular.

TheTwelve2807d ago

Must be horrible to have your books get so much attention and increased sales due to the game. I wouldn't wish this upon any struggling writer, in fact.

Cy2807d ago

As a struggling writer, I totally agree. I'd hate it if someone made games out of my books and drove up my sales. It would be even worse if it got my books translated into other languages, of all things. I feel so bad for this poor guy.

letsgopal2807d ago

he's just an asshole towards anything and anyone. He thinks people that play video games are stupid

theshredded2807d ago

Judging by this, CD project Red are greedy limited bastards.

RememberThe3572807d ago (Edited 2807d ago )

With all that free DLC and epic story telling I'm left feeling the same way

/s

Show all comments (68)
110°

The 7 Best Western RPGs: Immersive Adventures

RPGs are often huge, sprawling endeavours. With limited playtime, we have to choose wisely, so here's the best western RPGs available today.

SimpleSlave33d ago

"I started playing games yesterday" the List... Meh!

How about a few RPGs that deserve some love instead?
1 - Alpha Protocol - Now on GOG
2 - else Heart.Break()
3 - Shadowrun Trilogy
4 - Wasteland 2
5 - UnderRail
6 - Tyranny
7 - Torment: Tides of Numenera

And for a bonus game that flew under the radar:
8 - Banishers: Ghosts of New Eden

DustMan33d ago

Loved Alpha Protocol in all it's glorious jank. Great game.

SimpleSlave33d ago (Edited 33d ago )

Not only glorious jank, but the idea that the story can completely change depending on what you do, or say, or side with, makes it one of the most forward thinking games ever. The amount of story permutation is the equivalent of a Hitman level but in Story Form. And it wasn't just that the story changed, no, it was that you met completely new characters, or missed them, depending on your choices. Made Mass Effect feel static in comparison.

Alpha Protocol was absolutely glorious, indeed. And it was, and still is, more Next Gen than most anything out there these days. In this regard at least.

Pity.

230°

All the Essential Video Games Everyone Needs To Play At Least Once

Given the medium's wild diversity, this primer of the essential video games everyone should try is a good place to start.

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com
thorstein57d ago

.... from the 2000s (mostly).

shinoff218357d ago

I can't fk with this list. They missed on alot of games probably before the writers times. Also I know people loved some portal but I was never a fan.

Cacabunga57d ago

Tomb Raider 1
Driver 1
Abe’s Odyssey
FF6
King of Fighters 94
Mortal Kombat OG
LINK 2 the past
Street Fighter 2
Resident Evil 1

Inverno57d ago

Infinite but not the first two games? Witcher 3 but not the first two games?? GTA V but not literally any of the games before it??? Portal 2 but not the first? Also if you're going to play Shadow of The Colossus play the remaster and not the remake. Can't say I disagree with the list but my man it's all over the place.

Name Last Name57d ago

I mean some sequels are objectively better and you don’t need to play the whole series.

Inverno57d ago

But most of these games have a story to follow, sure you can catch up with a YouTube vid but where's the fun in that?

LucasRuinedChildhood57d ago (Edited 57d ago )

A list like this isn't telling you not to play the previous games if you want to. It's just giving you legendary games to play.

But tbh, you don't always have to force yourself to play every entry in a franchise to get to the better ones.

- The vast majority of Witcher 3 players never played the first 2 and had a great time. The first 2 games aren't in the same league.
- The GTA games are self-contained with the odd fun reference. You can easily jump into any of them.
- The Shadow Of The Colossus remake looks and controls better than the original (plus it has a 60fps option while the remaster is just 30fps). New players will enjoy it more.
- Portal 2 is a lot better than Portal 1 and takes the concept much further gameplay-wise. Storywise, Portal 1 is fairly light too. Not that you shouldn't play it but realistically ... you'd love Portal 2 whether you play it or not (at lot of Portal 2 players have never played 1).

Bioshock 1 is the only one I agree with you on simply because it's one the best games of all time and arguably better than Infinite. No other setting like Rapture.

Looking at the list, I'd recommend playing Uncharted 1 before 2 but no doubt, 2 is the legendary one you have to play.

Inverno57d ago

I get it, but that's just my opinion on his opinion. I just think that before you play a sequel you should still play what came before it. Maybe it's just me but i find it fascinating playing through the first game in a series and seeing how it has evolved through its sequels. Like I said I don't disagree with the list, other than SoTC which I strongly believe the remaster of the original should be played above the remake.

AuraAbjure57d ago

Awesome list! Hot take on Fear (and it's hard af expansion Persaus Mandate!) Bioshock Infinite is stellar, so is the Witcher 3 and you nailed it by having Ocarina of Time. So many fantastic games! Gotta play 'em all! Next one on my list is Prey after I beat Dead Space 2 and Splinter Cell Conviction.

Show all comments (11)
80°

The Best Video Game Romances of All Time

Wealth of Geeks explores some of the best gaming romances that have stolen our hearts over the years.

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com