310°

Facebreaker PS3 vs Xbox 360 Comparison Video

Does this boxing beauty have a console K.O.?

Read Full Story >>
gametrailers.com
QueefyB_Angelitos5714d ago

Wow, I didnt know the Nintendo DS had more horsepower than a 360.

power of Green 5714d ago

What are you talking about? the PS3 version is washed out and is slightly more fuzzy.

heyheyhey5714d ago

POG still spewing the same g@y-ass sh!t that is a complete lie

there is ZERO difference.... ZERO

360 man5714d ago

360 has way better crisper graphics than the ps3 version

5714d ago
juuken5714d ago (Edited 5714d ago )

PoG, you dumbass idiot...the PS3 version and the 360 version were nearly identical.

And besides, this game got mediocre scores anyway. Gametrailers ought to wait for more worthwhile games instead of comparing crap with crap.

power of Green 5714d ago (Edited 5714d ago )

If you pause it and see it on an 46" LCD you can seeeeee lol.

Ali_The_Brit_ aka 5 bubble troll(due to this site being made up 98% PS3 fanboys) I don't care I was responding to a troll that was saying sh*t that doesn't make anysense in relation to this video.

The anwser to your question is: I care as much about this game as all the other gamers in this thread saying they don't care about this anyways lol :)

Do you understand?

juuken5714d ago

And you couldn't ignore him?

That's what an ignore button does ya know.

They're almost identical.

Get over it.

gambare5714d ago

Where did you bought those fanboy glasses? it seems to make look better the games than the competition even if it's not true, how much they cost?

Jock5714d ago

The game sucks any ways , but they both look identical with the PS3 looking sharper than the 360 in sum shots and vice sersa with the
360....

Sir_Ken_Kutaragi5714d ago

...and Deleted it!!! It's not even worth typing about...so i won't...er erm...oh i just did... ;)

+GameTraitors.con again??? No thanks!!! I'm not watching it!!! :-/

This sort of game should be xBox 360 only!!! i.e because it's CR*P ;-D

Spread Butt Cheeks5714d ago

Its so fvucking obvious that it looks better on the 360. every time you ps3 fanboys see a game looking better on the 360 its always "omg this game sucks anyway. im not buying it"

get over it. you spent way too much money on a crappy console. enjoy your bluray player dipshits. bu bu bu bu teh cell waaaaaaaaaa

:(

Jock5714d ago

well if you have played the demo you would know that the game sucks...it looks like a Wii game , the gameplay mechanics are shallow as hell...and it's gets repetitive after the 1st 5 mintues since the rounds dont last longer than 30 secs most times

Spread Butt Cheeks5714d ago

www.lemonparty.org states that the PS3 version is superior. complete BS look at the video

Jock5714d ago

who cares which version is superior cuz both versions play the same and in the end gameplay rules over graphics....and the gameplay is boring and repetitive in this game.

5714d ago
KBDuB5714d ago (Edited 5714d ago )

Don't shame the PS3 by saying that..

They look exactly the same. -.-

Shane Kim5714d ago

It looks exactley the same. The ONLY and I REPEAT the only difference is that PS3 backround are a bit blurrier than xbox. And that can be argued either way. More realism on PS3 since the players are more focused or whatever reason bots can come up with.

+ Show (15) more repliesLast reply 5714d ago
MaximusPrime5714d ago (Edited 5714d ago )

do we need another comparison video?

I can't see the difference. But i noticed that PS3 version (what GT claims) is a little brighter.
The game sucks anyway.

Bombibomb5714d ago

Worst boxing game ever made and they're comparing the two versions? What's even the point?

NO_PUDding5714d ago

To me... they look identical.

Great job EA, shame that it sucks. I am serious.

It's a shame.

Fight Night 4 please.

ShinMaster5714d ago

PS3 videos in GameTrailers are sh*t compressed!

No one should trust any of these comparisons, period.

mfwahwah5714d ago

I didn't even watch it and I can tell you that they both look nearly identical.

xhairs95714d ago

I'm glad I'm not the only one who thought this game was terrible. I played the demo on normal and felt like I was playing it on impossible. The game sucks period I don't wish to see anything compared to this unless it's rated a < 40 on metacritic.

NipGrip5714d ago

Needs to hang up the boxing gloves for a bit. I can't remember one boxing game since Mike Tyson's Punch-Out! that I enjoyed. Well, Super Punch-Out! on SNES was great as well. Oh Ring King rocked, bring back Ring King please. I miss being able to uppercut the opponent out of the ring in 8-bit glory.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5714d ago
Silogon5714d ago

The ps3 version is brighter because they don't use full rgb on their comparisons. This has been proven time and time again. I foresee, with how little difference there is here; as in none. That these Ps3 vs xbox 360 split screen debates will no longer be aroun. Mercs 2 looks like ass on both systems. Madden looks like ass on both systems and now this game. All 3 looks like ass on both systems so really the only thing left to wonder is; who has the best looking exclusive?

not who has the best looking, watered down, multiplatform game. Cos we all know they're going to look junk bunk.

Fox015714d ago

And why do you have only 2 bubbles? I've seen idiots (Morgenfell, Juken... just some few examples) that post crap all the time and still have 7-10 bubbles!

mohib-uddin79865325714d ago (Edited 5714d ago )

havent watched this video and wont

but i bet the PS3 version is brighter becuase GT dont enable to Full RGB feature since they dotn think its fair.

Becuase it makes everything look crispier and they say both have to be set to default settings

MaximusPrime5714d ago

true. i didnt know my PS3's RGB was set at "limited". So ive changed it to "FULL" and it is much better.

better graphic and a little darker.

Damn u lazy Gametrailers.
I like your collections of trailers but never comparison videos (after what happened to an "accident" with labeling which is xbox 360 and PS3)

InMyOpinion5714d ago

I wonder why 'limited' was default, it makes no sense.

mohib-uddin79865325714d ago (Edited 5714d ago )

Becuase Sony is a stupid ass company. Even "wired cable ehernet connection" is the default net set up on ps3.

if "wirLESS" net connection was default i bet loads more people will find a way to join to psn and go on net . Because with wriless option it brings up a step by step thing . which gets you on the net quick and easy

if it was defulat maybe 1 milllion more people would be on psn.

kazuma5714d ago (Edited 5714d ago )

because LOTS of hdtvs don't support it

read this
http://boardsus.playstation...

lots of links in there that u can read.
if ur using a hdtv, chances are that u probably should be using limited.
if u want to try it, lots of forums have a picture with different levels of black, try it out.

kai_h5714d ago

The reason "Limited" is enabled by default, is because it is a Video Level Signal, which all TVs support.

"Full" on the other hand, is a PC Level Signal, which only select few TVs support (while other TVs experience black crush and white clipping). Full is made so anybody using a PC display to play the PS3 does not have a washed out picture.

But yes, GameTrailers should enable "Full" on the PS3 for videos they post online because only then, will the picture have the same look on their videos as what people see on their TV.

clevernickname5714d ago (Edited 5714d ago )

Excellent post, kazuma.

The bottom line is "RGB limited" is the color range of HDTVs, while "RGB Full" is the color range of a typical PC monitor. If you have an HDTV, use RGB Limited; if you have a PC monitor use RGB Full.

A perfect example of this is the game Dark Sector and the very first level of the game. When I set my PS3 to RGB Full I cannot see a bloody thing in the darkened hallway on my 46" Samsung LCD HDTV. Reseting to RGB Limited and the details and lighting pop right off the screen. HUGE difference.

kai is correct is pointing out, though, that if GamesTrailers are taking their captures directly from a PC monitor then they need to enable RGB Full, otherwise the capture does not accurately reflect what home users will see on their HDTVs.

tk5714d ago

No Max... they are not lazy. They had to work hard to ensure that RGB full is off. Just in case the PS3 version came out tops. And if it would, they would change the images around... you know - like some other racing game?

azurechaos5714d ago

@mohib

I think you're assuming that most people who buy ps3s are too stupid to setup their internet connection. A lot of people still use wired routers and you have to be connected to the net to be able to access the store, so I don't think you're giving people much credit.

Dark General5714d ago

I just set the setting to Limited for a second and i have to say i don't personally like how the display looks now. The blacks look to light and not dark enough for my liking. Everything started to look a little more faded so i switched back Full. I have a 50 inch 720 Samsung and it can be used as a PC monitor (it has the inputs for it). So maybe that might be the reason it looks better at full.

InMyOpinion5714d ago (Edited 5714d ago )

So the 360 has a more vibrant video signal by default? =/

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 5714d ago
heyheyhey5714d ago

ok this time around... there is absolutely no difference at all (or at least that's what you could tell from the video)

unlike the also recent Mercs 2, which looked better on PS3

it's good to know that PS3 development worries are well and truly over

TheMART5714d ago

Exactly.

Funny though there is a difference:

You can play this game on a

199 Euro/Dollar gameconsole

or a

399 Euro/Dollar gameconsole

Quality for 99% of all multiplats are better on the 199 bucks one.
So actually the mighty PS3 needed 2 years in its lifecycle to just get on par with the 360? o_O

heyheyhey5714d ago

*faceplam*

i thought you were better than that MART... that was reeeeal stupid

for your 399 you get a lot more value..... yeah some games run better on the 360, but the difference is negligible except for a minority of games like the Orange Box and Madden 08 (which is irrelevant now that 09 is out)

don't forget, the PS3 has better versions of some games like Alone in the Dark, BioShock, Mercs 2 etc

that value i mentioned- it's things like Blu-Ray, wi-fi, free PSN (and many free services to go along with it), PSP connectivity, ultra-reliability

plus the PS3 now has an excellent line-up that will leave the 360 in the dust... starting with LBP

oh yeah and 199 is the really sh!t version of the 360 that is horribly pathetic.... more like 249 if you want a half-decent experience (all come with RROD, disc scratching and excessive noise...yay!!)

TheMART5714d ago (Edited 5714d ago )

aawwww my dear wodka kid I thought you were better then that...

"for your 399 you get a lot more value....."

You just turn things around. It means you pay double that arcade for features that don't make a different in the gaming experience. Isn't that where its all about? And even better: the mass doesn't care and they don't see those features. They just want to play the games.

"yeah some games run better on the 360, but the difference is negligible except for a minority of games like the Orange Box and Madden 08 (which is irrelevant now that 09 is out)"

Not so fast now kiddy. There are more, much more games. Its shown in allmost all games and you just mentioned a game that is rated very, very high in its score The Orange Box (which also don't get updates on the PS3), but also great games like Skate suffered and many, many more.

"don't forget, the PS3 has better versions of some games like Alone in the Dark, BioShock, Mercs 2 etc"

So why are they better lets see... Because they are not released on the same day maybe for example for Alone in the Dark and Bioshock? Hahaha same like with Oblivion the PS3 fantards keeps mentioning those games. Dude: Oblivion came 1 year later to the PS3, Bioshock comes 1.5 year later to the PS3. I MAY HOPE THEY GET UPGRADED
And still we have to see the endresult on Alone and Bioshock. I mean, I've heard those stories more, wait untill the PS3 versions arrived it will be the better version. And in the end it sucked donkey balls! moahaha

"that value i mentioned- it's things like Blu-Ray, wi-fi, free PSN (and many free services to go along with it), PSP connectivity, ultra-reliability"

You pay pay pay for stuff thats not needed for the core gaming experience, thats what you do.

You try to get away from the point I made. You saying the PS3 gets on par. Yes after just two years RIGHT.

"all come with RROD, disc scratching and excessive noise...yay!!"

I know Russians aren't the smartest around, the combination with a PS3 fantards makes total morons though.

Since may 2007: extra heatsink on the GPU. Since summer 2007 the 65nm CPU. But PS3 tards can only use it because they can't think of anything else to hit with

Oh wait a droid like you can. Disc scratching. Error made by Toshiba/Samsung to forget to include rubber bumpers around the laser of the DVD drive. Funny though MS stopped using them early 2007. So actually you can't run into that problem as BenQ/Lite On drives have those rubber bumpers.

199 Euro for the same and sometimes a better game then a 399 Euro machine. Its pathetic. Freaking PATHETIC

@ zo6_lover27

hahaha you freaking retard. It says that the price is 199 Euro in Europe and 199 Dollars in the states. Jees. IDIOT

You forget USA is the main continent for the 360. The pricedrop there will have more effect then in Europe. You'll see next month with the sales numbers, you'll see

@ Juuken (below)

Girl nah don't think so. POG might like your ass though because he's American and everything is supersized there moahahaah. I'd say you need to get on that WiiFit your uncle gives you AND FAST

zo6_lover275714d ago

Mart, i bet you didn't know that Euros and Dollars are 2 different currencies.
Something can't be 199 euro/dollars
Idiot.
And BTW the 360 has been cheaper than the wii in europe for some time now, and it hasn't helped it a bit.

pwnsause5714d ago (Edited 5714d ago )

Mart, stop spewing garbage, if you where in court and the evidence is displayed, would you still keep talking sh***y lies, cause that is the case here, the PS3 and the 360 version are the same, EA has managed to do what they should of done for a while, going PS3 lead. and here you are Talking Sh8t like always. get that LBP avatar off your profile dumb*ss.

juuken5714d ago

I love how PoG alternates between both accounts guys.

He's still running around his little wee-wee chopped off, trying to prove that TEH 360 ISH SUPERIOOOOOOORZ!

gambare5714d ago

uh? POGMart!!11 Why do you have a LBP image as avatar? you gonna make me hate sack boy

Shane Kim5714d ago

lol the fart, there are some superior games on fúckbox and some superior on PS3 (GTA4, Dark Sector, Burnout, Battlefield: BC to name a few) and those games came out the same fúcking day. And one more thing, you can argue all you want that we payed 600$ and so on. But PS3 owners will get games that you'll only dream about. And deep down both you and I know that you're itching to get a PS3 and you will as soon as it reaches mass marcet price and mommy recives her welfare.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5714d ago
Show all comments (117)
110°

How is Real Steel Still Getting Updates?

The ultimate reason is both shocking and disgusting.

Read Full Story >>
gamercheeese.com
SilentNegotiator4189d ago

How is anyone still playing to find that out?

GamerCheese4189d ago

Sometimes bad things happen on accident

brish4189d ago

From the article:
"Real Steel is, believe it or not, one of the top 10 best selling games on XBox Live Arcade. Considering the prevalence of the DLC, and the number of people playing, it’s a safe bet that Real Steel has become a surprisingly steady source of income for Yukes."

So a company is continuing to update and support a popular title.

... and the problem is what exactly?

SilentNegotiator4189d ago (Edited 4189d ago )

TOP TEN??!?
That mediocre game is in the TOP TEN?!?

:O

GamerCheese4189d ago

In the same way that Harry Potter had 20 games

mayberry4189d ago

My 9 year old LOVES him some REAL STEEL!

palaeomerus4189d ago

I think it was originally developed as smartphone game.

Stuntman, Facebreaker, NFL tour come to Games On Demand

3 new games added to games on demand (albeit average games)
Stuntman
Facebreaker
NFL Tour
Check after the break for region specific pricing

Read Full Story >>
majornelson.com
10°
5.5

GFB Reviews FaceBreaker for Xbox 360

GFB writes: "Facebreaker could have been a spectacular game. I couldn't help but believe that the developers made a genuine effort to create a fun game worth playing. Unfortunately, bad AI and broken elements create an ugly experience that turns most away within minutes of popping the disc in."

Read Full Story >>
gofanboy.com