980°

Square Enix President Shocked by The Quality of PS4 Exclusive Spider-Man; Surprised by God of War

Square Enix President Yosuke Matsuda is a gamer, as he demonstrated multiple times. He isn’t shy about showing off his gameplay online, and he often mentions his appreciation for western games. In an interview in the latest issue of Weekly Famitsu, he talked about E3 and the games that impressed him the most.

Read Full Story >>
dualshockers.com
ShadowKnight2851d ago (Edited 2851d ago )

Both games will be a big hit for Sony

Shubhendu_Singh2851d ago

GOW simply blew me away. Love the new direction.

and correct me if I'm wrong, previous Spiderman projects were all by Activision and presumably with they tight schedule and rushed attitude going into those games.

Though Sony is known for giving the appropriate money and time to any of their projects. I have no doubts this game will drown every Spidey game before it by a long long shot.
Next someone make a space exploration game with Silver Surfer please.

Yui_Suzumiya2851d ago

Yeah I think Spiderman contract with Activision ended if I'm not mistaken, hence the Sony game and possibility of a Telltale game (all we know is that it's Marvel related at this point).

_-EDMIX-_2851d ago

Absolutely agree. I'm shocked at all the new direction of older Ips this E3 from God of War to Resident Evil to Zelda this E3 is like some sort of resurgence of reboots lol

-Foxtrot2851d ago

This is why I really want James Bond to be made by Sony instead of Activision. The trailer alone for Spiderman shits on anything Activision has done imagine what Sony could do for James Bond.

Either that or NaughtyDogs next game should be James Bond inspired like how Uncharted was Indiana Jones inspired. Get their own theme songs and intros along with a good British secret agent character and they'll be good to go.

IamTylerDurden12851d ago

Activision Spidey games are forced to be movie tie in games.

Sony was given permission from Marvel, but it can not be a movie tie in game (thank goodness). Presumably, Marvel allowed this bc Sony is allowing Spidey to appear in other Marvel movies.

Finally a great looking Spidey game. Unfortunate for xbox fans and pc gamers, but great for the 50m PS4 owners.

kneon2850d ago

@-Foxtrot

That would be too close to James Bond, it would be called a Bond rip-off, and rightfully so. How about going back to the original real James Bond

https://en.wikipedia.org/wi...

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2850d ago
Chevalier2851d ago

@Tyler

" Activision Spidey games are forced to be movie tie in games. "

Shattered Dimensions and Web of Shadows were based off movies?! Seems if anything Activision didn't put money into the projects if anything.

WelkinCole2851d ago

I was honestly more impressed with Sipiderman4 trailer than Death Stranded that showed just before it.

Fullmetalevolust2851d ago

Talk about two major titles about to hit the PS4.

UltraNova2851d ago (Edited 2851d ago )

If Spidey Ps4 turns out to be good I will not be surpriced to see a 50% spike in ps4's sales the month it comes out. Double that if they release it along the new Spiderman movie reboot!

As for the new GoW... well what can I say, if that wasnt the perfect re-imagination done and presented right then i dont know what the hell it was!

CaitSith2851d ago

I feel like, releasing it the same day as the Spiderman movie, gives the impression to the consumer that it's a movie tie-in, when it's not. I also equate such moves synonymous with other movie tie-in games' overall quality, which is bad. So I think, if Sony's focused on quality, they should release it when it's ready.

UltraNova2851d ago

Agreed. But then this is 2016, if Sony cant get the message out-being Spiderman the ps4 game is a AAA standalone entry then they need to take some marketing lessons asap.

morganfell2850d ago

@CaitSith,

I understand your concern but the average gamer that makes purchases doesn't care if it appears to be a movie tie in - even though this game is not. That is one of the reasons they want it. The seasoned aware gamer will get it regardless of the release date because of the subject material and/or the pedigree of the development studio. Just because they decide to maximize sales by timing the release date will not prevent the intelligent gamer from purchasing. Particularly when they have stated the game is not bound to MCU thus letting us know that it is its own particular animal.

CaitSith2850d ago (Edited 2850d ago )

@UltraNova

The fact it's Spiderman they're dealing with effectively broadens their market, potentially to people who are fans of the comic series but are not 'gamers', so I think Sony shouldn't worry about that aspect in trying to sell the product. The only thing they have to market, as I've said before, is it's distinguishing quality from other bargain bin movie tie-in games.

EDIT: Actually, I have a cousin that's getting a PS4 because of this game, and he's a big Marvel fan (big is a huge understatement).

@morganfell

Agreed; and to reach out to these 'average' gamers*, and to potentially keep them within the market, they have to have exposure to high quality games, and there's no better way to do that than with Spiderman. Taking that into account, if Sony really cares for this industry and it's bottom line, the outcome of this game will show their true colours as to whether or not they care about, and want to show, quality to potential customers, or if they're just out for a quick cash grab. But since Insomniac's behind the game, we all know the answer to that.

*Hopefully you and I have the same understanding of what an 'average' gamer is.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2850d ago
IamTylerDurden12851d ago

GoW and an exclusive Spider-man are about as big as it gets. These are massive system selling games that will help maintain Sony's dominant stance.

The amount of huge exclusives still to come is jaw dropping for PS4.

No Man's Sky (rated as the most anticipated game)

GT Sport (biggest racing franchise in games)

Horizon Zero Dawn (game of show 2015 e3)

Persona 5 (it's Persona)

God of War (game of show 2016 e3)

Spider-man (exclusive AAA Spidey game from Insomniac)

Days Gone (new ip, AAA open world from Bend, e3 show closer)

Death Stranding (Kojima)

Then we other AAA exclusives and big games such as...

Nioh (Dark Souls with Samurai, spectacular demo already released)

Dreams (Mm's follow up to LBP)

Gravity Rush 2 (Japan Studios PS4 follow up to the excellent Gravity Rush)

WiLD (open world game with a Far Cry Primal setting, from the makers of Beyond Good n Evil)

The Forest

Rigs

Detroit

JEECE2851d ago

Agree for the most part, although I think GT Sport may have lower sales numbers than some people think. It isn't going to have as much of a fleshed-out single player as other entries, it hasn't been marketed super well, and it isn't a numbered sequel (this matters). I'm sure it will sell well, but I don't think it will touch the sales of 1-5.

I'm also not sure how well Horizon will do. It is massively anticipated by the people who frequent video game sites, but that isn't most console owners. I'm sure it will have a really big first week due to hardcore PS fans, but it usually takes several great entries in a series before it reaches mainstream, system-selling success (see: Uncharted, Elder Scrolls (console-wise), Battlefield (console-wise), The Souls Series, Far Cry, etc). I hope to be wrong though; great advertising could certainly go a long way.

Mystogan2851d ago

Spiderman is definitely a huge hit in the nuts to Xbox. Unless Microsoft can get Ironman or Superman.

Xavior_Reigns2851d ago

Those two have terrible track records in games, MS would be wise to steer clear.

Rimeskeem2851d ago (Edited 2851d ago )

If anything MS will pay Rocksteady for an exclusive Batman game.

EDIT: it's very unlikely knowing that Sony currently has Rocksteady making exclusive VR but I'm just putting the idea out there.

Mystogan2851d ago (Edited 2851d ago )

So does spiderman. Only good spiderman games were ps2 era. Even then. They should take the challenge. Both Superman and Ironman games can be incredible IF done right. Imagine a VR Ironman game where you're actually in the suit. Or a superman game with destruction like crackdown 3.

_-EDMIX-_2851d ago

@rime- I do not see Warner Brothers okay about a license anywhere else or even allowing one of their own teams to create a title for one platform I don't really know why a company would do business that way..

medman2851d ago (Edited 2851d ago )

@Rimeskeem
I find it highly unlikely that Microsoft will be in the business of buying 3rd party exclusivity anymore, seeing as how all their first party games are coming to pc now. It would make less financial sense for them to do that now than it ever did. Sure, they would be keeping it out of the hands of some ps4/Neo owners, but people like me that game on pc as well as console would just pick up the "exclusive" on pc, negating much of the benefit of having exclusivity to begin with.

The only true exclusives left are on pc, ps4, and what will be the NX, where you actually have to own the system to play the game. Microsoft is leaving that behind for a different strategy of getting their software into the hands of more gamers, so I believe they will leave the paying for exclusivity strategy behind as well.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2851d ago
xfiles20992851d ago ShowReplies(9)
thatguyhayat2851d ago

Yeaaah superman owned by warner brothers so thats definetly a no. And i think it was marvel who came to sony with the spiderman game? I think i read that somewhere unless im wrong. But marvels going into the game business supporting best devs. This whole time i thought it would be sucker punch

Yui_Suzumiya2851d ago

Speaking of Suckered Punch, I wonder what the devil they're cooking up.

Mystogan2851d ago

Why is it a no? They can license it.

Darkfist_Flames2851d ago

I hope sucker punch still working on another Infamous game, and not a licensed game

rainslacker2851d ago

They would need something akin to Xmen, be an open world game with numerous different styles of play, and a way to co-op, along with an online component to go against Spider-Man. Batman and Spider-Man are some of the few comic book video games which get people excited, and MS won't get Batman. Spider-Man just screams great game play if it's done right, because it can be very diverse. Everything else is going to be marginal at best. Even if they're popular comics, they don't have a history of doing well as a video games, and many don't translate well. I could see maybe a Wolverine game doing quite well if done properly, but beyond that, I think a company really has to go to great lengths to make a satisfying game based on a comic book.

xfiles20992851d ago

Here is the thing Microsoft has no first party studios really who is going to make a Superhero game for them,What Turn 10 going to make Forza meets Avengers Oh I know Forza The Avengers Racing adventure. Microsoft buys first party games. Marvel already stated that they want partners that treat there games like it was a first party exclusive they are not interested in Money They want partners who are passionate about the game and comic and project they are working on. That right there leaves out Microsoft They are not a company that can be trusted with a Marvel or DC flagship title

Angeljuice2851d ago

Somebody could always come out with some kind of "create a hero/villain" game.
With a good enough character creation mode people could either create new heroes or recreate famous ones.

That's one way around licencing issues.

rainslacker2850d ago (Edited 2850d ago )

@Angel

DCUO is kind of like that in a way...although not quite as "create your own" as I assume you are implying.

However, it is a matter of IP appeal. Sure, anyone could make a superhero game. Doesn't mean it's going to have the mass appeal that a Spiderman or Batman game would.

For instance, Infamous, allows you to pick a side, and is what I would consider super-hero/villian-ish. But despite being a popular Sony IP, it has nowhere near the mainstream appeal as licensed material. Crackdown is kind of a superhero game, although I'm not sure the level with which you can create your own character. Again, despite being a popular IP(now more than ever), it's appeal is going to pale in comparison to any licensed product....except maybe Aquaman.....hate that guy.:-P

@xfiles

MS doesn't really need a 1st party studio to make the game. Insomniac isn't a Sony 1st party studio, but they're making the game for Sony, for exclusive release. MS could do the same. For the purpose of my comic, they just need the license to be able to make a super hero game. While MS has the money to afford such a thing, if they managed to snag one that has broad appeal and huge mainstream recognition, the costs involved probably wouldn't be worth it to them just to have something to go against this one game from Sony...although Sony apparently has more than one planned going forward.

Superman, an example given by the OP, has that appeal, but not in the gaming segment, and honestly, the costs to license are going to be pretty damn high.

Other than that, I agree with Marvel IP's. They seem to be taking great care with how they handle their franchises. Some slip ups here and there, but what they're doing is resonating quite well, and while I can't speak for how DC would feel about such things, I think they also see how taking care with their IP's is a more profitable path going forward, because Marvel has shown that there is a huge market for quality comic book licensed content.

Zorkaz2851d ago

I think Sony own Ironman and the Avengers now, but I might be wrong. Microsoft will be able to do any DC heroes though. I'd love to see the Arrow or Superman ...

Kaneki-Ken2851d ago

Wrong, they allow to use those characters/ appear in Sony Spider man movies. Other hand, Warner Bros are making DC games themselves

Exvalos2851d ago

Oh man the last ironman games where such trash, ironman needs to retire his gaming

javauns2851d ago

lol the reason he shocked is cause he knows ps4 best studio couldn't get heir franchise game to look so good but the second and 3rd can? something isnt right there. but time will tell. i wonder if they'll ever make a spiderman game where the suit is made of nanotech like in a few of the universes?

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2850d ago
NapalmSanctuary2851d ago

I'll be shocked by the quality on "Twisted Metal: World Tour Part Dos" when they announce it, then I'll probably be disappointed when they make the driving too fast and too easy which will force them to make every weapon homing, reducing the series, yet again, to a back seat driver combat game... Spider-Man looks cool though.

Artemidorus2851d ago

But it's E3 so a downgrade is to be expected, anyone who disagrees doesn't have a clue how this works.....

Rimeskeem2851d ago (Edited 2851d ago )

No, that's Ubisofts job. We gotta be honest here. BF1 looks great with Alpha gameplay, Battlefront looked amazing, Uncharted was jaw dropping, FF15 demo looked astonishing. It really is only Ubisoft who downgrades. So far every game I have played that isn't Ubisoft has looked as good as ever when they showed gameplay of it.

LordMaim2851d ago

Anyone who says "anyone who disagrees is X", isn't confident in their argument.

Artemidorus2850d ago

Considering it's usually facts, i wouldn't need any confidence to provide the truth.

Enjoy the future downgrade.

Trez12342851d ago

That's ubisoft and microsoft's job. Since the killzone 2 trailer Sony has been careful with showing their games and there have been alot of their games that got better after the first gameplay footage. I just find it funny how people point fingers at ubisoft alone tho. The downgrade on QB was massive and maybe the biggest downgrade this gen but somehow it went kinda undetected ( I like the game tho).

Majin-vegeta2850d ago

Funny thing is....no PS4 exclusive has had a downgrade try again :).

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2850d ago
Show all comments (88)
80°

Phil Spencer trends on Twitter amid calls for him to resign

Phil Spencer and Microsoft have come under fire following the closure of multiple Bethesda-owned studios including Tango Gameworks.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
gold_drake1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

wow haha.

i dont think he will resign. or will be kicked off.

if hes still here after everything in the past, this wont affect him unfortunately.

northpaws19m ago

Where are the Xbots that cheer for MS to buy everything? They destroy everything they touch... MS only cares about AI now, the MS CEO could care less if all the studios get closed.

FanboysHateFacts13m ago

Of course Christopher would submit this lol.

The unbiased site admin strikes again!

KwietStorm_BLM5m ago

Fanboys hate facts. This type of irony is so obvious it's not even funny.

FanboysHateFacts0m ago

It’s almost as ironic as how the unbiased site admin only ever seems to submit negative Xbox news 😂

mastershredder3m ago

Nothing Micro about this Chut. Russel Crowe is so gonna play him in his stream flick.

180°

Xbox Has No Idea What They're Doing, and I'm Not Sure They Ever Did

Nirav from GL writes: "If the makers of a GOTY competitor that outdid sales and Game Pass expectations and owned by the richest company in the world cannot stay open - what hope is there for everyone else?"

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
Christopher4h ago

***If the makers of a GOTY competitor that outdid sales and Game Pass expectations and owned by the richest company in the world cannot stay open - what hope is there for everyone else?***

None if you stay in an arena of corporate driven metrics. And this is what happens when you allow publishers to buy up massive amounts of studios and IPs. There's only so much internal competition and the focus in the end will remain on those who look best on a spreadsheet.

Players can be so driven by what is best for them and only see what is put right in front of them. But that's not what is best for them. They are being lied to constantly, as seen by Microsoft's ridiculous praise for Hi-Fi Rush and Phil's lies about Redfall prior to release and how big of a supporter of both studios he has been. But, instead of thinking "wait, this corporation wants me to think this way, should I be listening to them and believing them?" players eat it up and go "OMG, did you hear what they said! They're just like us and they know what's best for the industry."

And because of this single-mindedness of the majority of gamers, we are where we are now. Massive layoffs. Massive studio closures. Games that we were told were representative of the core values of said corporations shelved and studios behind them shuttered. The truth is coming to bear because the truth all along was only what the numbers in an excel spreadsheet told the corporate suits.

If you truly want what is best for the industry, what is best for developers, then you need to support Indie games, support developers that maintain control over their IPs and direction, support boutique publishers who only exist to help Indies make it out the door and don't own the IP. Stop supporting major corporations with your money or you devotion. Stop playing their games, and I don't mean video games, but their marketing, their double speak, their guy without a tie who says things you want to hear PR, their future of video gaming concepts as if we were hurting for new ways to play games other than installing/downloading and playing them, and especially any slogan from them that gives the impression that they are for you, the consumer. They are not. You're merely a value on a spreadsheet.

Christopher3h ago

Sure, I'm the one drinking the koolaid. Keep believing in the corporations. They definitely have your best interests in mind. All hail the Big Green, For You Blue, and Nostalgia Red! All praise big corporations buying up other publishers. All praise the inevitable spreadsheet adjustments. For greed, not the players.

anast55m ago

"then you need to support Indie games"

Get punk rock with it.

Tody_ZA1h ago

This should not be surprising to any of you. We have been saying for MONTHS that Game Pass is not sustainable and that these acquisitions will come at a massive cost to the industry. People refused to grasp the difference between buying and investing in a developer like Insomniac or Housemarque, and buying the entire publisher. People refused to accept that spending billions to acquire the biggest publishers in gaming means you have to RECOUP those costs, and you aren't going to do it without consolidation, focusing on core IP that sells, creating revenue streams via ownership and releasing on other platforms, and closing down studios that are superfluous to the budget requirements. You will not recoup those costs by investing in risky new IP or creative new games and studios.

No, people cheered Microsoft on like they were delivering GOTY titles to their door and pouring money into the industry to grow Indies and triple A projects.

You are getting what you deserve. You take the consequences of the practices you supported.

Layoffs happen. Some games don't succeed. Everyone has seen it happen. Happens even to the winners.

This, however, is goddamn shambolic and if you can't see it now then there's no helping you and you should keep enjoying the "value" of Game Pass while contributing nothing to this industry.

I've never seen the developer of one of the best games of the year get axed before.

Ninja Theory is next after Hellblade 2, I can see them going independent again. There's more to come from MS.

TiredGamer57m ago(Edited 57m ago)

This is exactly it. There is more of this coming. MS runs from one bad idea to the next, and GamePass is an unsustainable train wreck that we get to watch in real time.

GamePass is stalled for subscriber growth, and all that they can hope for is to either A) Reduce the quantity of games (i.e. shutter game studios), B) Reduce the quality of games (to make more mediocre but lower budget offerings), or C) Raise prices on existing customers. Or some combination of those.

MS does not have a passion for the industry. The XBox project, from the beginning, was sparked from the fear that someone else would eat their PC market lunch by making a games machine that replaced the PC. THAT was the entire motivation for getting into the games industry.

MrBeatdown56m ago

But hey, at least we get Call of Duty free on game pass*

*eventually?

anast48m ago(Edited 44m ago)

They know what they are doing. If 'you' treat them like "good 'ol simple minded folk", then 'you' are relieving them from blame via ignorance. They knew that they were going all live service, streaming and mobile a long time ago, The Oracle tends to see the obvious. While companies patronize gamers like they are children, which most of them are, may be confused for stupidity, they are also not so stupid they don't understand the decisions that they are making toward the overall direction of their company.

*None of their games were even close to competing for GOTY. They paid for names to be mentioned.

340°

Former Blizzard President Says Closures Hurt Phil Spencer 'as Much as Anyone Else'

The former president of Blizzard Mike Ybarra in a statement on Twitter says Microsoft Gaming CEO is hurting just as much as anyone else following the closure of three studios under Bethesda - Arkane Austin, Tango Gameworks, and Alpha Dog Studios. Roundhouse Games is also joining ZeniMax Online Studios.

Read Full Story >>
vgchartz.com
jambola12h ago

Yeahhh I doubt it's hurting a millionaire as much as it's hurting fans and people who lost their jobs

VenomUK58m ago

Mike Ybarra‘s defence of Phil Spencer is the dictionary definition of tone deaf. Even Alanah Pearce, who’s close to Aaron Greenberg and Phil called him out on it.

“Mike, I have a lot of fondness for Phil and don’t doubt he’s incredibly bummed about this, but CEOs can handle some “shots” amidst people having their lives destroyed. Your sympathetic posts should solely be directed at those who’ve lost their jobs.”

https://x.com/charalanahzar...

Name Last Name7h ago

Phil is the only guy in the industry that has plot armor.

Tody_ZA7h ago

Hahahahahahaha! xD Legendary comment.

lelo2play5h ago(Edited 4h ago)

At this moment, even Xbox fanboys are starting to hate Microsoft. It's fu**up, after fu**up, after fu**up... that's the state of Microsoft gaming.
Purchasing developers left and right, then killing them off...

Phil was the worst thing that happend to Xbox. Might as well just shut down their gaming division and fu** off

Jingsing9h ago

I can already hear Jim Ross.. He has a family damnit!

Barlos7h ago

Poor Phil. He must be crying into his bonus cheques. Makes your heart bleed doesn't it?

MrDead6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

I'm sure he'll be upset that those cheques contain a small percentage of money MS is still making from the closed studios games too. Next time someone purchases High-fi Rush or Evil within all that money is now just Microsofts, just think the former devs at Tango who made Hi-fi Rush MS's most highly acclaimed game in years will get nothing more.

MS are buying these publishers for the big IP's like Elder Scrolls and Call of Duty they have little interest in the ones that don't make huge profits... and firing thousands and closing studios looks good on the next quarterly shareholder report. Gotta protect the share price.

Eonjay10h ago(Edited 10h ago)

This is all coming from the executive who thinks we should have the option to tip devs... apparently so publishers can pay devs minimum wage. Will someone think of the C-suite executives!!!

dumahim6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

That was from a former Blizzard exec. Did Phil make a comment on that also?

edit: Oh, it wasn't Phil who said this himself.

LucasRuinedChildhood10h ago(Edited 10h ago)

Yeah, the guy making $10m a year is hurting as much as those who have lost their jobs and are worrying about their future and supporting their family. /s

It takes a real lack of shame to even try put the Good Guy Phil™ spin on this. It's not going to work this time.

Profchaos10h ago

He's sitting around feeling sorry when he should of been doing everything in his power to get people jobs in other studios you're telling me after toys for Bob split from Activision there wasn't a opening in the call of duty mines for arkane it's just woah is me.

Show all comments (53)