110°

Resident Evil 7 Demo: Everything P.T. Promised to Be : Untold Gaming

Nick from Untold Gaming writes:

"About a year ago we were given the chance to download and play a teaser demo for a game called P.T. It was one of the scariest game demos ever made and everyone was excited for it to release sometime in the future. Unfortunately, this never happened and the game was halted. Since then, gamers have been waiting for that game that captures the same spirit of P.T even with a different narrative. Finally, I feel we have that same lightning in a bottle with Resident Evil 7."

Read Full Story >>
untoldgaming.com
JakeNoseIt2894d ago

Resident Evil 7 is even better than PT for me! Can't wait to try the demo for myself tonight

GrayFox2082894d ago

How can it be better if you haven't tried it?

JakeNoseIt2894d ago

I like the property. PT was just a thing, Resident Evil is a franchise.
The article above starts talking about capturing the lightning in a bottle from PT. I like Resident Evil more than I like the random horror property. The IDEA of that appeals to me more: it's "better for me"

Eidolon2892d ago (Edited 2892d ago )

The demo was great, very creepy, haven't played P.T., though. I thought Silent Hills wasn't really going to end up like P.T.. RE7 will be like this demo.

jessionpc2892d ago

FUCK I didn't even think about that before I liked his comment...

But I agree with him though, even though he hasn't played it, because I have.

EPIC teaser. So much more in it than in P.T. Gonna go back for an hour or 2 tonight to see all the hints and goodies telling more about the story.

Adexus2893d ago

P.T was a 'playable teaser' for Silent Hill so that's also a franchise.

Though why you would prefer a franchise over a new IP just because of the name is beyond me.

RE7 demo was surprisingly enjoyable, however it doesn't feel like an RE game at all,

Eidolon2892d ago

It's like they're pulling a Ghostbusters, piggybacking on the name.

Gaming_Cousin2894d ago

"Everything P.T. Promised to Be"

I'm sorry but if P.T. has been released at full it would of probably of been a better game

jessionpc2892d ago

You have no idea of what P.T would or would not have been. They literally said P.T was only a CONCEPT.

Silent Hills, if finished could have been far different.

BTW, everything Kojima touches isn't gold.. I find much of what he does INCREDIBLY ovver rated. He made a couple decent MGS games, that took an industry by storm because it was, "new", and WACK... Haven't seen him raise any bars this last decade.

Time will tell with Death Stranding.

TIME... Will tell, "not fandom."

150°

Resident Evil Fans Discuss Whether They Prefer First Or Third Person

Players have long debated the merits of third-person as opposed to first-person perspective in games and the topic has recently resurfaced on Reddit, this time concerning the long running Resident Evil series. The discussion so far has generated somewhat heated opinions from users on both sides of the argument.

Resident Evil has a long history of using both perspectives, with some entries in the series like Resident Evil 2 and Resident Evil 3 offering players a third-person view, while others like Resident Evil 7 provided players with a first-person perspective. Some fans believe third-person allows for better visibility and control over the character, while others believe that first-person immerses you more deeply into the game's atmosphere.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
-Foxtrot389d ago

Third always

It's what it's always been and how it's meant to be played whether it's fixed camera angles or over the shoulder.

Rockstar388d ago

There was a time when I would have agreed but if you've got a vr setup the 1st person RE's are on another level.

That being said, they can both exist because they're both fantastic.

Babadook7374d ago (Edited 374d ago )

Exactly. If there was no VR version available or possible I’d say 3rd person. But because of the extreme heightened immersion, VR trounces the flat screen version, so 1st person please.

Sonic1881388d ago (Edited 388d ago )

They should have the option to have both going forward imo. But I do prefer third person view

Levii_92388d ago

I love both and the new mainline RE games should stay in first person for at lest one more game that’s why i hated that Capcom for some reason added third person in RE8 .. like why ? What was the point ? It just lost what made the new games unique and different. Re7 is a gem and already such a classic, it’s RE1 of this generation or well the prevous generation i guess i should say and RE8 is bonkers and so fun. Such great games.

Goozex388d ago

First person. It just ramps up the intensity for me

Show all comments (22)
50°

What horror franchises could learn from Resident Evil

Resident Evil has remained the most popular horror franchise in video games for a long time. These are the reasons why.

Read Full Story >>
pcinvasion.com
-Foxtrot526d ago (Edited 526d ago )

The remakes are good examples

Resident Evil 2: "Here's how you do a remake"

Resident Evil 3: "Here's how NOT to do a remake"

NecrumOddBoy526d ago (Edited 526d ago )

I think RE3 was actually pretty good but just short and flawed a bit. If Capcom would’ve just put the RE3 campaign and it’s dodge mechanic into RE2 (maybe called it RE Raccoon City Chronicles) and placed the the game in a canonical order LEON A, CLAIRE B, JILL C; then dropped the multiplayer nonsense, it would have been the most perfect package. I enjoyed RE3’s ties in to 2 and they streamlined it well. It just was a flawed deliver.

-Foxtrot526d ago

Oh don't get me wrong, it was a good game but compared to RE2 it was a step back

It was lazier, felt rushed, shorter in comparison and totally the wrong way for Capcom themselves to do a remake

Luckily they got the memo because I'm sure I read RE4 was supposed to be done by the team that did RE3 before they rebooted development.

RE3 needs a directors cut, it needs to be longer, they need to include the choices, add the other locations in by expanding/reworking the current story and also rework how Nemesis works. I want to explore more the city, even if areas have nothing to do with the main objectives and only exist to explore for collectibles or to find new gear.

staticall526d ago

Punching huge bolders while being in a volcano sounds cool on paper, but looks very dumb.
More QTEs = worse experience (RE6 mostly)
Sometimes big doesn't mean "better" (RE6 bosses mostly)
Not every game's suppose to have a multiplayer component (RE3 remake, Umbrella Corps). But sometimes it just works (Outbreak)
Small stamina bar for melee attacks is dumb (RE6)
Locking better skills behind drip-fed skill point drops is awful (RE6)
Do not give your flagship IPs to outside studios. But if you did, heavily control the game quality and direction (Resident Evil: Operation Raccoon City)

FallenAngel1984525d ago

For me Resident Evil’s biggest impact on the gaming medium will always be that over the shoulder control scheme pioneered by RE4

80°

Death in the Family: A Look Back at Resident Evil 7

VGChartz's Evan Norris: "With Resident Evil Village out imminently, it seems like an ideal time to revisit its immediate predecessor, Resident Evil 7: Biohazard, a game that steered the franchise back to its roots. After replaying the game this past week, I can say with confidence it remains one of my favorites in the long-running series, due to its scary and disturbing atmosphere, challenging boss battles, twisting narrative, breathless action, and old-school survival-horror gameplay. It's certainly not perfect — there isn't much enemy variety and the final boss is a letdown — but overall it's a great game worthy of the name Resident Evil."

Read Full Story >>
vgchartz.com