LBG - The art of the video game review is an ancient one. Here's why video game review sites need to keep up with the times and modernize their review system.
GF365: "These are our picks for the most iconic armored suits in games. This article only includes suits from games set in modern times or the future."
I’d take the Space Marine power armour off the list due to it not originating in a video game.
Video game sequels like Assassin's Creed Origins, Doom (2016), and Fire Emblem Awakening were just what these franchises needed to be revitalized.
Lmao what’s Halo Infinite doing on this list?
Who would ever say Halo Infinite saved the Halo franchise
Resi 6 was and still is the worst entry in the series.
7 was a great turnaround, despite people’s concerned about the switch to FP perspective.
DMC5 definitely helped the franchise after the whole DmC debacle. Whilst it was a decent action game, it was a far cry from the series and the characters we knew.
AC Origins is my favourite in the entire AC series. Despite the switch to a more RPG style of gameplay - the setting, soundtrack, length, etc were all amazing. sadly followed up by the ridiculously long and “more of the same” Odsyssey.
I don’t feel it’s fair to say the franchise slipped with Doom 3, Doom 3 was incredibly atmospheric and took the game in a different direction but there’s no denying Doom (2016) was sensational.
Halo 4 & 5 were disappointing but Halo Infinite definitely didn’t save the franchise? What?
I'm going to have to go with SMB 3. I was around when SMB 2 first came out and people hated it. 3 is still arguably the best mario game created.
"Halo Infinite"? Worse Halo ever. Whoever made this list just lost all credibility.
In future lists of a similar nature I have a suspicion Final Fantasy XVI will feature.
BLG writes, "Plug in your electric guitars and start shredding; we’re making a list of the DOOM games ranked.
Trying to decide the best DOOM game is like deciding who your favorite child is. You love every one of them, imperfections and all."
game reviews are not that bad, you read 3-4 from trusted sites and you get the general idea
I think this is a bit of a stretch. While I agree that reviews should consider future possibilities for what the game can be fix, I'm not going to review what could have been. Dark Souls III absolutely awful framerate dips got patched, but that's not the product they shipped out to reviewers. If they send out a buggy game with server issues, then we should review the product they initially sent out. I'm not reviewing a game based on the companies good will to maybe fix it lol. It took years for BF4 to work correctly. Though I fully agree that reviews should either be amended or wait for full tests of multiplayer/servers on launch.