Gaming Central says, "With all the excitement around the remastered version of Call Of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, we decided to play the game again and see how well it plays compared to today's modern shooters, and figure out if the remaster will be worth buying."
FPS (First Person Shooters) have become a staple of a gamer's healthy diet. But where did it all begin?
The minimal effort of any genre is being FPV. And shooter is even less. As example COD, Skyrim, Destiny etc. They are pure casual and flat. Of course there are exception like Doom and Bioshock. But in general not as decent.
Andrew says: "The intrinsic values of COD are the following: memorable campaigns, meticulous multiplayer marathons, and lobbies populated by screaming 12-year-old kids that think puberty is the evolved form of Jigglypuff."
What makes a game eligible for such a prestigious honor as being seen as the greatest of all time? There are four criteria: the game must be widely recognized and remembered, it must exhibit longevity (remaining popular over time), it must enjoy international recognition and success, and it must have exerted significant influence on other games or the industry generally. Some historic titles that deserve credit that aren't just Mario and Sonic.
Fallout 76 should be on the list for quickest price drop, $59.99 at launch to $35 ten days later.
Would love to play the remaster, specially if they upgrade the shooting to how it feels today..
I would love to play and be shot in the face, knifed, and noob tubed with nostalgia
You can play it now. It's just ruined to high hell by modders, even on consoles.
It would but not to pay for another game that most people don't want. #RIPCOD
I can't wait to play "shipment" map again in all HD glory.