1150°

The Chinese Room Accuses The Witcher Developer CD Projekt RED Of Sexism

Everything happened after GameSpot tweeted an image from the making of the first teaser trailer of CD Projekt RED’s Cyberpunk 2077. Developer The Chinese Room replied with its official twitter account commenting on the image and implying that the game appears to be “just as sexist” as The Witcher.

Hoffmann2925d ago

...and?

Someone posts his opinion on twitter. I see it as the bigger thing that various gaming sites including big ones like dualshockers and destructoid are using it for clickbait articles.

fallacious2925d ago

that's sjws for you. it's like their life's mission to try and be or get people offended.

Hoffmann2925d ago

Nah..the sjw here MAYBE was whoever tweeted that comment, but the many sites there that write their short stories about it, knowing that the average gamer will of course write how dumb that comment is just does it knowing that it means a good amount of clicks.

N4G000012925d ago

while people distracted by "sjws", anti-sexy religious nuts in congress are on offensive trying to ban everything sexy.

BrandanT2925d ago

@N4G

And the atheistic SJWs are also trying to ban sexy things. Go figure.

TheOneWhoIsTornApart2925d ago (Edited 2925d ago )

@BrandanT: The people that you are talking about aren't doing it in the name of atheism. Religious people that call for censorship mostly do it because it doesn't conform to their holy books teachings. Atheism is just a lack in belief in a deity and that's it.

annoyedgamer2925d ago (Edited 2925d ago )

@N400001

New account created : 28 Apr 2016 ( 1d 5h ago )

Already spamming regressive leftist defection comments. Go figure.

BrandanT2925d ago

@theone

I said they were doing the same thing regardless of intent.

Eonjay2925d ago (Edited 2925d ago )

I can understand a woman having issues with this image. They have a right to express it, but I would prefer them to not do so under the company's name. Thats all. Unless of course she owns the company in which case fire away.

Eventually some of you may have daughters one day, and if she tells you that an image like that makes here feel uncomfortable, you will be able to explain how the freedom of speech works without attacking here or calling her names.

Morgue2925d ago

Aside from meaning ' Social Justice Warrior ' I'm beginning too think it actually stands for ' Single Jaded Women '

TheCommentator2925d ago

Women all over the world exploit "sexism" to get ahead in life and I don't see SJW's doing much to stop that. Look at that gamer girl dressed up like an anime character with the "wardrobe malfunction", Paris Hilton or Kim Kardashian screwing their way to fame, or the majority of all women that use their bodies as currency to get what they want out of their sugar daddies.

God forbid that a game company (full of sexist men no doubt, lol) would try to paint a woman in that light though. Apparently, most SJW's only think it's appropriate for sex to sell when a woman benefits from it. Think about it. Who did Paris Hilton make her sex tape with? What about Kim Kardashian? I don't know because those men didn't get famous from it. For that matter it's just as sexist for a man to have to pay for everything when he's out on a date with his girl, who only has to look good, when they're both just trying to get laid. Why doesn't she pay for it sometimes? Seriously though, if a man generally has to pay for sex by taking his date out and paying for everything, why is it illegal for a man to cut out the dating part and just pay for the sex? Isn't it the same thing in the long run, just without the middle man?

The problems with sexism are way too big for SJW's to keep bitching about the little stuff. What they're doing seems like the equivalent of telling someone at a garbage dump not to litter. The real problem is the way society trains our children how to behave and there's nothing we can do to stop it. My 11 year old daughter, for example, is already showing signs of the influence social media and pop culture is having on her style of dress and attitude in terms of sexuality. It's just the way people are brainwashed to behave.

jer11222924d ago (Edited 2924d ago )

It must be stressful to be sjw to go through life offended by everything. I mean if everything bother you must be miserable lol

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 2924d ago
DarXyde2925d ago

I don't know if I'd call those two big ones though. I've only heard of Destructoid prior to joining N4G, to be honest. Even then, didn't really hear from them much about anything. Dualshockers, not until I joined. It's just the sensationalist headlines I take issue with (which in a way makes it clickbait).

I don't know if I can agree with The Chinese Room though; The Witcher III reminds me of Game of Thrones a little where, sure, there's certainly some sexist elements given the elven/olden times vibe they were going for. But there are female characters who are incredibly respectable in both universes (Arya Starrk and Ciri, for example).

The image used from Cyberpunk 2077 for TCR's argument could, for all we know, be taken out of context. I think it's pretty pre-judgmental of them to say that.

OoglyBoogly2925d ago

So because you haven't heard of Destructoid or Dualshockers they're not that big? Are you serious?

DarXyde2925d ago

And that was your takeaway from my comment? Are you serious?

I specifically began with, "I don't know if[...]"

And at what point did I say I never heard of Destructoid? I said I hadn't heard much from them. It was DualShockers I hadn't.

Before making brash assumptions, be sure to understand what others mean. There was nothing cryptic about my statement. Very black and white.

2925d ago
Palitera2925d ago

Well... Every single comment and click here is making sure their clickbaity job is successful.

What would these sites be without our neverending support?

Congrats to us all.

MRMagoo1232924d ago

well half the people or more problems don't even click the article so not that successful. if an article has a stupid opinion I don't ever click it.

Zeref2925d ago

OMG, Can somebody tell these sjw to f**k off?

Christopher2925d ago (Edited 2925d ago )

***I see it as the bigger thing that various gaming sites including big ones like dualshockers and destructoid are using it for clickbait articles.***

Says the first person to respond to the submission itself, let alone help to propel it to the top spot on the site right now.

Not sure how you're helping if that's your argument.

Hoffmann2925d ago

Well, when over 60 N4G members clicked on that agree button I think I made a pretty good point.

If I would be one of the site admins who posted a whole article about this tweet I would be as guilty - in my opinion - as the websites that did it. But as someone who simply comments about the content of the article instead of being the first who yells insults at the Chinese Room - as seen in many comments on mentioned websites - or writes how terrible their opinion I don't think I was hurting my point.

I get what you mean though and when I wrote the comment this morning I was not 100% sure if I should do it as well.

jer11222924d ago (Edited 2924d ago )

Whats funny if its to gay characters having sex or anything its considered Progressive and its applauded. Men and women its sexist. I have no problem with whatever its up to the game creators to make what they want. Sjw are so hypocritical

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2924d ago
Skate-AK2925d ago

Absolutely ridiculous. Guess they have never heard of Cyberpunk 2020. They are getting slammed for this sad SJW attempt.

N4G000012925d ago

pfff, "SJW" decoy buzzword again, while the anti-porn religious nuts in government, congress trying to ban everything Sexy.

Skate-AK2925d ago

That would make sense if The Chinese Room wasn't a British developer.

BrandanT2925d ago

There's a bunch of atheist leftist groups that are trying to do the same thing. SJWs and feminist extremists are doing the same thing on the grounds of..."it's degrading to women " or whatever buzzwords may appear.
It's the same goal, so at least get along.

And by the way, this isn't the first SJW stuff ended up censoring "sexy" things in games.

annoyedgamer2925d ago (Edited 2925d ago )

@N400001

New account created : 28 Apr 2016 ( 1d 5h ago )

Don't feed the SJW troll.

opinionated2925d ago (Edited 2925d ago )

Name one bill. You can't because that's blatantly false. The religious zealots were destroyed in the Supreme Court when it came to video games. Sjws do not go through courts they protest like the gutless wonders they are.

N4G000012925d ago

"Sjws do not go through courts they protest like the gutless wonders they are." and that's why they're not the government, they are "trolls", a distraction from the real centuries old effort of anti-sexy religious nuts, their oppression can still be seen in Afghanistan. Freedom of Speech! Freedom to make sexy games!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2925d ago
senorfartcushion2925d ago (Edited 2925d ago )

But it is sexist. There is no imagery like this but with men in the chair unless it IS porn.

Games get sold with shiny graphics and blood. This is how they sold Lara Croft.

divinealpha2925d ago

You need to proof read. Also what are you saying that there are no men dressed like this only women that's sexist, are you ok in the head

senorfartcushion2925d ago

Hot women in games are for us men.

Hot men in games are also for us men. To help us feel masculine.

rocketpanda2924d ago

You must be very insecure to think that every gender in a games are for men. The last few years have shown the market is split almost down the middle between men and women gamers. Hot women can be for women too, muscular men can be for muscular men because believe it or not some people are attracted to the same gender.

Tomb Raider was never sold because of shiny graphics and violence. The violence was made into an issue with SJW for the reboot because it portrayed a female lead in violent situations.

Tomb Raider was always sold on having a strong female lead since the ps1 era and she became a gaming female sex symbol because of that. Not just because she is a pretty face.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2924d ago
cfc832925d ago

This is one of these times where everybody clamours to say how wrong chinese room are. People hunt for these articles in packs.

Ogygian2925d ago

It's important we know which studios to boycott. When the Chinese Room apologise for being intolerant, perhaps they'll win back the customers they upset.

kraenk122925d ago

Who is they?! It was one f'in guy on Twitter!

annoyedgamer2925d ago

@kraenk12

One comment is all it takes for SJWs to demand an apology for being offended. Well....now the SJWs have offended us and WE demand an apology.

Rachel_Alucard2924d ago

But that would imply people actually bought their games.

_-EDMIX-_2924d ago

? Do you actually buy games to actually have fun? Sounds pretty stupid and childish to me.

Smh. Idiots. ...

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2924d ago
rainslacker2924d ago (Edited 2924d ago )

Didn't really have to hunt. It was right there at the top of the page this morning.

Are they wrong?

Well...yes. Sexism is not showing sexy women, or using them to express a narrative. Sexism is the act of discriminating against women....which a game isn't capable of doing, unless CDPR didn't allow women to play their game, or the game lobbed insults at the women while they were playing, or something along those lines.

A game can convey sexist messages, but that doesn't make the developer, the game, or anyone else sexist unless it's done from the point of trying to influence common consensus on the issue to believe what the message conveys....something that is really hard to do...and is still very much more an expression of ideas, rather than a form of sexism.

The proper thing to say would be that it objectifies women, but objectifying women in media is not in itself sexism or sexist.

The word sexist, and sexism, are way too misused nowadays, and many people who try to say something is sexist, have obviously learned the meaning of the term from the media's misuse of the word, as well as the misuse of the word from uneducated people who want to jump on a trend which they typically only have a one semester sociology or political science course knowledge in. In other words, they are idealistic without having all the facts, or understanding how everything fits into a bigger picture, and base their opinions on reactionary stimulus which is either false, or blown out of proportion, along with the inability to realize that the world is not as black and white as they want it to be.

Truthfully, if more articles, and SJW types could use their own terminology in it's proper way, it'd be a lot easier to take them seriously.

Ristul2925d ago

The Chinese Room, come back when you have made a game as great as Witcher 3, now run off with your sad sjw bullshit.

garrettbobbyferguson2925d ago

This. Instead of ruining sequels to decent games. I don't understand how you can ruin such an easy formula as corridor horror. A Machine for Pigs was terrible.

Rachel_Alucard2924d ago

They make walking simulators and political statements not tense and exciting games.

ChrisW2925d ago

When "Chinese" and "accuses" are used in the same sentence, it's most often about censorship and politics... Not sexism.

**This political statement was brought to you by ChrisW**

aquaticDonut2925d ago

...The Chinese Room is a British game developer. They made Dear Esther and Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs. I think you slightly misunderstood this article.

Mikefizzled2925d ago (Edited 2925d ago )

It's not that he didn't understand the article. He just didn't read it.

ChrisW2924d ago

I'm not surprised that went over heads. Oh well... We can't always expect people to understand lowbrow, off-topic humor.

As for reading the article... What article?!? It's a Twatter feed!!!

Show all comments (219)
80°

It Looks Like Kerbal Space Program 2 Dev Intercept Games Has Been Shut Down

Intercept Games, the developer of space sim Kerbal Space Program 2, appears to have been shut down by parent company Take-Two.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
140°

Take-Two Interactive is closing two studios, including Rollerdrome developer Roll7

As part of previously-announced layoffs, Take-Two Interactive is closing Intercept Games and Roll7.

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
LucasRuinedChildhood7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

I loved Rollerdrome and was looking forward to a Rollerdrome 2. 😐

Don't want to be melodramatic but as far you can be upset over video-game news ... bit heartbroken.

I feel like there's a trend of well made games like this going largely ignored by the gaming audience. It's quite frustrating. I hope the devs form a new studio but I suppose they'd have to start again from scratch.

JEECE5h ago

"I feel like there's a trend of well made games like this going largely ignored by the gaming audience."

Yep. I'd love to know how many of us actually bought this game, rather than just getting it on Gamepass or PS Plus. Probably a shockingly low number. Steam concurrents topped out at 419.

I know it's anecdotal, but when I think of my favorite indie games, I still largely think of titles that came out in the 2009-2015 range. Maybe with less competition it was easier to stand out then, but I just felt like at that time there was more recognition of the really great indie games that were worth your time.

senorfartcushion3h ago

Plus would have gotten them some extra money.

TheLigX7h ago

Olliolli 2, olliolli world and rollerdrome are some of my favorite indies of all time. This industry is disgusting lately.

solideagle7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

it's not industry's fault, it's the consumers fault. Audience just wants to play shooter/Battle Royale etc...

Christopher5h ago

No. It's the publisher's fixation on profit margins. They only want the most profitable of products. It's greed.

Inverno5h ago

I wouldn't blame consumers entirely either. If shooters and Battle Royal is all we're given then it's all we've got to buy. If the AAA industry wouldn't follow trends so obsessively it'd be better varied.

JEECE5h ago

There is fault to go around. Some of it is on consumers for sure. We whine constantly about live service games, but then we play them anyway and ignore better smaller titles.

But publishers and platform holders bear some responsibility too. You hear stories come out from indie devs who had big hits in the late PS3/360 to early PS4/XONE window who can barely move units now, and some of that is definitely failure to advertise and poor discoverability. During that era I felt like I reliably heard about the worthwhile indies, and now I don't.

Then there is the game pass effect (and PS Plus to a lesser extent). So many consumers have now been trained to expect to get indies with their subscriptions, they don't want to pay $20-$40 for them anymore.

ZeekQuattro3h ago

When voting with one's wallet goes wrong. I prsonally have no problem with AA or indie games. Often times those are some of the best experiences to be had in gaming. Unfortunately a lot of gamers thumb their noses at indies however. There are success stories but there are just as many casualties or at least it feels that way sometimes.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3h ago
Gamble207h ago

If the games made money the studios wouldn’t be closing. Blame consumers for not supporting “indies”

Killer2020UK5h ago

I've got to disagree with the comments blaming consumers. Yes that is a part of it but by and large the money men are closing studios and sacking staff to increase profitability. Let's not forget the obscene salaries they're on compared to the people who actually make the games. Take 2 are not short of cash, this didn't have to happen.

JEECE5h ago

The thing is, some of the Indie devs closing are really independent. In other words, we can blame Take 2 here, but who can we blame other than the consumers when a fully independent dev shuts down because their games aren't selling? There is an answer to that question, it just isn't greedy publishers, even if they are the most fun to blame.

TiredGamer19m ago

We created the industry by our purchasing decisions/actions. The industry is slowly imploding. At some point we may be left only with safe mainstays (COD, Fortnite) and franchise/movie tie-ins (Indiana Jones, Spiderman, Batman, Star Wars), along with a contingent of very low budget indie stuff if it can turn a profit.

Sad.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 19m ago
notachance7h ago

ah damn, I loved olliolli series

monkey6026h ago

I loved Olli Olli.

I wanted to like Rollerdrome a lot more than I actually did. Shame about the studio though

Show all comments (17)
310°

Batman: Arkham Shadow - Official Teaser Trailer

Watch the Batman: Arkham Shadow teaser trailer for the next game in the Batman: Arkham franchise, releasing exclusively on the Meta Quest 3 in late 2024.Evil stalks the streets. Gotham City is in danger. And you’re the only one who can save it. Check out the teaser for the upcoming Batman VR game.Tune into Summer Game Fest 2024 on June 7 at 2pm PT/ 5pm ET/ 10pm BST/ June 8 at 7am AEST for the official Batman: Arkham Shadow world premiere reveal from Camouflaj and Oculus Studios, in partnership with Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment and DC.

Petebloodyonion21h ago

Nice to see some VR games following Batman Arkham!
Was a huge fan of Batman Vr on PSVR :)

Cacabunga13h ago

Quest 3 only is a letdown.. need to see what the experience will be like.

Looks like Ratcatcher will be the main villain in this game.. you gotta love thos rat waves in VR. Was already too much with A Plague Tale Requiem…

Also gives hope WB is not giving up on Arkham series.. hopefully a Rocksteady full blown Batman game after the suicide mission they just got..

Petebloodyonion8h ago(Edited 8h ago)

I would not be surprised if a PSVR2 version is announced after.
If there's none, It would mean that devs truly believe that PSVR2 is dead.

And really loved Plague tale Requiem (feel bad about the ending)

Babadook73h ago(Edited 3h ago)

"If there's none, It would mean that devs truly believe that PSVR2 is dead."

Not really. It would mean Meta pad for exclusivity.

Regarding PSVR2 dying don't believe the FUD, it's healthy, has a lot of great things coming, and won't die for many years.

But that being said it looks like a great game.

Petebloodyonion1h ago

@Babadook
Not every company uses Sony's tactics of paying with the idea of removing content from others platform
case in point of Meta releasing a " Free" update PSVR2 patch for Beat Sabers while publishing games like Starwars Tales from the Galaxy.

But since we should not listen to the FUD how about listening to the devs of Rec Room the most popular social VR app about the PSVR 2 version of the game

"No current plans to bring RR to PSVR2. We’ve looked into it, it’s a non-trivial port, and we haven’t found a way to make it make economic sense. In an ideal world we would love to bring RR to PSVR2, but we just can’t justify the cost based on the numbers. Sucks I know, but that’s the truth.”

https://www.roadtovr.com/re...

shinoff218318h ago

Shame that something like this won't be on psvr2. Sony really has to step up on this front. There's a bunch of neat and nifty games out there for it. I'll end up getting one once I get caught up buying all the rpgs I've missed these last few years. Anyway I can't justify spending money on this with only a couple major vr titles. Re4 doesn't cut it for me since I was never a huge fan of the game. To see this batman as an exclusive, unless I'm wrong. Sony gotta pump something up

mooreneco216h ago(Edited 6h ago)

Sadly Camouflaj was acquired by Meta in 2022 when Sony allowed the psvr Iron man game to be ported to the quest, but given the amount of cash meta is losing never say never…..

Toecutter008h ago(Edited 8h ago)

What if Gotham Knights was a direct sequel to the Arkhamverse and was a battle for the cowl storyline, but the the traditional fighting mechanics while still being coop optional? What if SSKTJL wasn't set in the Arkhamverse and a wholey elseworlds story? What if this new batman game wasn't just VR cobblygook?

thejigisup2h ago

All vr games need to be muliplatform. In order for the medium to grow we need as many hands on the software as possible. Dick around with exclusives once vr as a format it's established and the general public perception is more accepting.

EternalTitan2h ago

Why cant we have a BATMAN BEYOND GAME, you corporate jabrronis?

Show all comments (13)