260°

Nintendo is Right But You’re Afraid of Change

Ty at Aussie-Gamer writes: "It’s almost as though the articles were written in advance: another earnings release, another million opinions on the doomography of Nintendo’s predicament. Let’s all ignore the strengths of Nintendo’s full year earnings report and discuss only on our entitlement fuelled “disappointment”. Such is the state of the gaming media."

Read Full Story >>
aussie-gamer.com
-Foxtrot2923d ago

Pffft the only people afraid of change is Nintendo.

wonderfulmonkeyman2923d ago (Edited 2923d ago )

Yeah, no.
The last time the other two tried to go all-in on anything that was a truly big new change, that went beyond a bit more power, memory, and graphical ability, in terms of hardware, was after Nintendo made motion controls a hot seller.
it was Nintendo that decided to try doing the Game Pad, which was a big change from the norm, and despite Sony having a prototype wand controller ready first, they only started pushing hard for it after the Wii popularized it.
Nintendo's taken more risks in console design and software direction than anyone other than indies.
Most of the negativity surrounding Nintendo right now is overblown whining from people who dearly wish to see Nintendo exit consoles for their own selfish personal satisfaction.

Nintendo's the one least afraid of taking chances and pushing for a change from the norm.
Their controllers and game designs over the years, and how they're willing to take familiar characters and put them into so many different genres, shows it.
Sure, they make some rehashes too, like NSMB, but compared to others, they're the most willing to go out on a limb with both their franchises and the form of their tech to try and offer something unique, even when the changes aren't all that huge, like in main line Mario games.

-Foxtrot2923d ago

And what happened to motion controls after a while? They faded into nothing that's most likely why Sony, despite having a prototype first, didn't go into it. Sure they could have and had the success of the Wii for the first year or so but then what. Sacrifice power and the like for a gimmicky controller? Yeah I don't think they were going to risk that but then Nintendo did it and opened the way for them to put their concept forward to latch onto a new craze...the best thing was it wasn't their craze so they could pull back whenever they wanted and no one would question why they let their product "fade away".

Just because you do a few gimmicky controllers doesn't mean you full on innovate and push yourself, is it worth it in the end if they fade away and you are left with nothing, Sony and Microsoft for example make small changes in their controllers, some things work others don't they try but even if something fails it's not that bad where it ruins the experience.

Nintendo has been doing the same type of games for decades where they've continued to refine the method for their games, when they release they are solid but I mean despite it being great since there is no bugs or glitches it still sometimes feel like it's lacking despite the gap between games. At their core despite being fun, colourful, pretty games they are roughly the same thing you played years ago. We've even seen with the Super Mario Maker how easy it is to make those kind of games with their tools. Some of the custom fan made levels made you can find are like ones you'd find in an official New Super Mario Bros sequel, minus the new power ups and the like which weren't in the tool kit.

No one wants to see them "exit", that's just an over blown thing you have gotten into your head because a handful of people have said it. Most of us want Nintendo to just get with the times and create a traditional console for once, yeah it might be the same games and experiences with third party games on other consoles but their first party games which they'll keep making is what will always make their consoles special despite if they have the same things as Sony or Microsoft.

Good specs, great power, nice graphics, a traditional controller, third party support, a stable online, an achievement system etc...samey and just like the others but who gives a shit, long as I'm playing this on a Nintendo console with a handful of Nintendo games BENEFITING from these new things in the console I'll be good.

"and how they're willing to take familiar characters and put them into so many different genres, shows it"

OR do that because they are scared the game won't sell well if they aren't Mario/Zelda related. Look at Splatoon they were going to make it a Mario game at first, I'm still amazed they didn't knowing them.

lobocob2922d ago

sure they change the shapes of their controllers but their games remain the same. star fox zeros controls might be different but it's almost literally a game that released 20 years ago.

_-EDMIX-_2922d ago

"Most of the negativity surrounding Nintendo right now is overblown whining from people who dearly wish to see Nintendo exit consoles for their own selfish personal satisfaction"

???

Why do you keep thinking that what folks are suggesting is ude to something personal or emotional? Did you not read that they are selling LESS CONSOLES then ever before, LESS handhelds, LESS GAMES and MAKING LESS GAMES ON TOP of making LESS MONEY?

PSN ALONE made MORE MONEY then all of Nintendo.

Yet.....those that want change hate Nintendo? If I hated Nintendo and wanted them to hurt, I'd suggest they keep doing what they are doing as facts speak for themselves. They can't keep going this route and I don't know how clear that really needs to be for for.

They are going mobile, if it makes them money, why should they stop their? Oh so make less money, but keep spending more money to cater to a 12 million install base as suppose to a 170 plus MILLION install base on PC, PS, XB etc?

I'm sorry but they need to factor going 3rd party for consoles, and only create a handheld. Those have sold better then their consoles, but even those now can't be relied on to make the money SOLELY. They can't just keep making less and less money to make Wonderfulmonkeyman feel better.

They are a business. Fact is, software makes more money then hardware, if they are seeking to go mobile because of the install base to sell software, they are already seeking to create games ELSE WHERE BUDDY! You might have to deal with that realization as I don't see any benefit to them spending money on hardware that won't sell, to move software, when they can just turn into a 3rd party and have a larger install base over night while spending zero dollars on hardware.

Calling right now NX is a handheld that can out to the TV, and their app is a service on PS4, PC, XONE, mobile that lets you download Nintendo games with a subscription AND their games will be on PSN, Steam and XBL.

I see no reason not to at this point. You have the facts regarding this company bud, at least logically and objectively try to understand the situation vs emotionally.

_-EDMIX-_2922d ago

@FOX- 100% agree. What is a innovation that was merely a faded gimmick?

I don't see bluray or any of the new formats fading away.

I don't see online gaming fading away.

Real innovations last and become the norm, motion controls where simply a fad. They came, sold...now its pretty much dead and a joke. What MS and Sony have done in regards to their platforms are not just fading. The impact they putting game still exist.

Evident by how PSN and XBL are, evident by XONE having a bluray player as a format.

"OR do that because they are scared the game won't sell well if they aren't Mario/Zelda related. Look at Splatoon they were going to make it a Mario game at first, I'm still amazed they didn't knowing them"

100% agreed. Nintendo took their foot off the gas YEARS ago and I'd say for the last 16 years or so, they've pretty much been scared to make new IPs. Rare might have been the only team they had that when out to even make new IPs. Banjo was a big deal, Conker was a big deal, and it seemed that Nintendo relied on that team to pretty much make new things.

When Rare left, suddenly Nintendo just stopped supporting new IPs. They have this fear of making them and its something that will hurt them, sorta like Wii U. They need new IPs to bring in new consumers as the 12 million hardcore that are left, can't just support an entire platform.

mikeslemonade2921d ago

Nintendo is hold back the industry with their ideas. They're making it okay to be low specs and gimmicsk. Now sony and ms are chasing the motion controls. A waste of time. Nintendo is bad for the industry.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2921d ago
gedden72922d ago

Really??? Motion controls, Gamepad, Handheld gaming, Analog Sticks, Rumble in Controllers, Triggers.... Yeah Nintendo NEVER CHANGES...

Muzikguy2922d ago (Edited 2922d ago )

Nintendo is definitely the ones afraid, not the consumers. They sold their Wii to millions of people based on some gimmick. They tried another gimmick with the WiiU and that didn't work a second time. Traditional consoles are what sells. What Nintendo tries to do is go cheap and rake in the big bucks. I thought the controllers for all N systems from the 64 on were just terrible. It's like they keep trying to reinvent the wheel. We can only innovate so much then it comes a point where it is just too much. They hinder instead of help.

Many times I do believe that people are afraid of change and therefore holding things back. Gamers in this sense are not the ones holding things back. VR is a great example of this

deathtok2922d ago

Did you hate on PS2 for that gimmicky DVD player? Or that gimmicky Blu-Ray drive in the PS3?

How about Xbox for that gimmicky hard drive?

A gimmick is simply something used to sell a product. Gimmicks have driven innovation and new standards in the industry so please stop with the latest "hate on Nintendo for gimmicks" fad.

Muzikguy2922d ago

There are good and bad gimmicks. Completely changing the game with something gimmicky can be considered a bad gimmick. That Wii did that. Your examples all helped gaming. Storage mediums and a hard drive were very smart. You're really trying to say that completely changing inputs to a game system are the same as putting in a DVD player? Smh.... A Wii-mote or a giant game pad with a touchscreen aren't very good gimmicks.

Game changing things can be good when done right. There will always be bad examples of these though

garrettbobbyferguson2922d ago

Are you disregarding the fact that virtual reality helmets are using the same gimmick that you are now trash talking? I don't like most motion controls myself. When I've played Splatoon and Zero I've learned that gyro is easy to use, but you can't just sit here and deny that one gimmick while conveniently ignoring the same gimmick being used in PSVR, being used in Vive, in Ocurlus, etc.

Stealth20k2921d ago

Nope. Nintendo is the only one who offers any innovation at all

Stealth20k2921d ago

You do not know anything about Nintendo. That much is true

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2921d ago
wonderfulmonkeyman2923d ago

The hatred surrounding the game pad perfectly illustrates just how against change people really are.
Good article; people need to step out of their comfort zone for something other than visual gimmicks.

-Foxtrot2923d ago

Or maybe people just like a traditional good, all rounded controller

Why fix what's not broken.

"Good article; people need to step out of their comfort zone for something other than visual gimmicks"

"visual gimmicks"

Lol. Like a gimmicky controller is any better.

wonderfulmonkeyman2923d ago (Edited 2923d ago )

It's fine to like what's traditional.
But not to the point that you scorn something for NOT being traditional.
People keep clinging to the old adage that Nintendo's "stuck in the past", yet nothing shows that mind-set more ironically than scorning anything that doesn't conform to what's traditional or comfortable, which is EXACTLY what gamers have been doing to the Wii U since its launch, not to mention the Wii, and heck, even the 3DS got flack for trying to do 3D differently by incorporating the different layers of glass-less 3D into actual gameplay bits to affect depth for interact-able objects.
I shouldn't even need to mention how scorned the Move and Kinect were, until first person camera helmets {aka VR] suddenly became a thing that those different ways of playing will connect with.

Changing something and "fixing" them are two different things, and the fact that you are mixing up the two suggests that you're probably one of those people that don't understand the difference, and therefore just hate everything Nintendo does unless it's a perfect copy of the other two.

As for gimmicks?
Gee, which sounds better for someone looking for a bit of change? A boost in graphical capability that's passed off as "innovation", or a new kind of controller that offers a bunch of new ways to actually play and interact with a game, when used creatively?
If you don't hate change, it's the latter.

gangsta_red2922d ago (Edited 2922d ago )

But you did have the option of using a regular pro-controller. Nintendo also gave the option of using the Wii-motes.

I'll never understand the use of the term 'gimmicky', when it works it's innovative, when it doesn't it's gimmicky.

darthv722922d ago

"Why fix what's not broken." okay so none of these controllers were broken: Atari 1 button, Nintendo 2 button, Sega 3 button, SNES 4 button...

They are all evolutions of the traditional controlls. The gamepad is also just that... a very traditional controller that happens to incorporate a screen in the middle. A pretty damn good screen at that. Hell even the wiimote was a pretty good traditional controller that could also do motion when needed.

Thing is, you call them gimmicks. They are gimmicks if not used to their full extent and Nintendo seemed to be the only one to really showcase how it works. So a gimmick by other companies but a stand out product by nintendo.

wonderfulmonkeyman2923d ago (Edited 2922d ago )

"Most of us want Nintendo to just get with the times and create a traditional console for once, yeah it might be the same games and experiences with third party games on other consoles but their first party games which they'll keep making is what will always make their consoles special despite if they have the same things as Sony or Microsoft. "
The fact that you can't see why that's a bad idea ASTOUNDS me.

If they just do a "samey" console, then there will be NOTHING to draw Non-Nintendo gamers to it, because non-Nintendo gamers DON'T CARE about Nintendo's games enough to plop down $400 for a Nintendo home console, and they can get their multiplats without paying for an NX already.
Multiplats are already the life-blood of Sony and Microsoft, and the third parties have made it blatantly clear that even when they are given a controller with all the same buttons as a traditional one, which the game pad had and didn't mandate screen usage, they don't give enough of a care about trying to make those multiplats good enough to sell, let alone make exclusives built from the ground up for the system that would have a much bigger chance of selling better than old ports would, if done en mass.

Until you can come to the realization that exclusives are what will keep Nintendo afloat, regardless of the kind of console they make, there's really no point in carrying on with this conversation.

Also, about their games:
"Nintendo has been doing the same type of games for decades where they've continued to refine the method for their games, when they release they are solid but I mean despite it being great since there is no bugs or glitches it still sometimes feel like it's lacking despite the gap between games. At their core despite being fun, colourful, pretty games they are roughly the same thing you played years ago."

And you can really say anything different about Call of Duty?
Or Ubisoft's AC?
Or Uncharted?
Far Cry?
Battlefield?
God of War?
Hell, even new games like Bloodborne are just taking notes from previous games like Dark Souls and repeating them with new skins.
I could go on, but I don't feel the need to; just that much is enough to show that bashing on Nintendo's rehashing while supporting third parties is a straw-man's delight.

Seriously, the rehash argument does not hold water anymore. Everyone does it, and the people hating on it are doing a whole lot of unnecessary cherry-picking. Time to drop that one in the dumpster.

The fact is, whether the risks they take work in the long term or not, Nintendo has ALWAYS been the most willing to take a chance.

Saying that Nintendo's been the least willing to take chances, is a FLAT OUT LIE.

MrSwankSinatra2922d ago

I'm sorry but this nonsense that you Nintendo fanboys cling to about Nintendo shouldn't do a "samey console" is pure BS. The fact of the matter is that a lot of gamers would love to buy a Nintendo console for their exclusives, problem is that Nintendo has shown time and time again that they refuse to go back to the basics. Instead they rather alienate more people every generation due to their constant infatuation with not only gimmicks, but poor business executions as well. It's pretty sad when amiibos make more money for Nintendo than actual games. I fail to understand how you fanboys don't come to the realization that what Nintendo is doing is not working. If Nintendo doesn't get their shit together this coming generation then I can officially say Nintendo is done. People have ran out of patience with Nintendo, even their own hardcore fanbase have gotten sick of their antics. The NX is put up or shut up when it comes to consoles for Nintendo.

wonderfulmonkeyman2922d ago (Edited 2922d ago )

@ Swank

I'm sorry, but this nonsense that you haters cling to about Nintendo needing to do a "samey" console is even more pure BS.
What you need to come to the realization of, is that doing a samey console would only HURT Nintendo's chances, not help them.

Can you prove to me that third party lovers would go to the NX purely for Nintendo's first party and third party multiplats just because the system goes completely traditional?

Because from where I'm standing, all of the hate that you and others spew for Nintendo's games being nothing but rehashed kids games, shows that you're talking out of your a** if you honestly think that becoming a complete clone of the PS4 or XBone has a better chance of pulling in Non-Nintendo gamers in than creating a useful feature that actually intrigues them, or getting third party exclusives over multiplats.

A samey console with nothing other than Nintendo's games to differentiate it, would not draw in non-Nintendo gamers. It would only make them roll their eyes with indifference and keep playing on the PS4's and XBones.

Prove otherwise with some sound logic that doesn't add up to "but we hated the game pad so change is bad!", or shut up and accept that you have no case.

Imalwaysright2922d ago

@ wonderfulmonkeyman

I believe that a "traditional" Nintendo console with an online service that can match Live and PSN and with full third party support could leave MS in the dust and compete with Sony toe for toe. Nintendo has the brand recognition (that Xbox doesn't have) and their 1st party games easily outsell Sony and MS 1st party games if the fanbase is there to buy them. Gamers prefer their "rehashed kids games" over what Sony and MS offer.

"Can you prove to me that third party lovers would go to the NX purely for Nintendo's first party and third party multiplats just because the system goes completely traditional? "

No, but it would be much easier to get third party support if they went for a traditional console because even though the Wii outsold both the PS3 and the 360, those 2 traditional consoles sold much better and were much more successful than the non traditional Wii U.

Gamers want "traditional consoles" and they are a safer bet for 3rd party publishers than the hit or miss non traditional consoles.

PurpHerbison2922d ago

"because non-Nintendo gamers DON'T CARE about Nintendo's games enough" No, I think we do. I mean I would love to see what some of their 1st party games would look like with some power behind them. They already do a pretty good job on such weak specs.

_-EDMIX-_2922d ago (Edited 2922d ago )

"The fact that you can't see why that's a bad idea ASTOUNDS me"

The fact that you've yet to comment on them making less money, making less games, selling less consoles and less handheld "ASTOUNDS me". Sorry but did doing those gimmicky things help change that?

"If they just do a "samey" console, then there will be NOTHING to draw Non-Nintendo gamers to it"

OH, did Wii U bring in those "non-Nintendo gamers"?

What you are trying to suggest is that having traditional won't help, soooooo having something like Wii U will?

I mean...facts are sorta against you on this one bud. Even Gamecube sold more then Wii U buddy ....maybe you should really, really re-evaluate what you're trying to say.

"And you can really say anything different about Call of Duty?
Or Ubisoft's AC?
Or Uncharted?
Far Cry?
Battlefield?
God of War?"

Yet those are not as old as Mario or Zelda bud.

Mind you, did Acitivition not have Destiny?

Does Ubisoft now have Watchdogs? Hell did they not have Prince Of Persia prior to AC? lol

Far Cry? OH you mean the one that just made a new entry that is in the BC ages and nothing like its previous?

I mean...the list goes on bud, even the companies you mentioned ALL MAKE NEW IPS! LMFAO!

'Saying that Nintendo's been the least willing to take chances, is a FLAT OUT LIE" Nope. This company basically rode Mario, Zelda, Mario Kart, Smash Bros for YEARS to depend on sales.

I've yet to see them release an IP that was brand new, that got that type of exact support every generation.

You got a Mario, Zelda, Mario Kart, Smash...EVERY GEN like clock work.

Did you see that with Animal Crossing? Or is that stupid party game a "Animal Crossing" now? lol

Did you see that with Pikmin? Did you see that with Luigi's Mansion? Soooooo its pretty hard to say they are supporting new concepts, when they are also scared to actually consistently release them in comparison to their regular rehashes. Those series mentioned have skipped several platforms, yet Nintendo's classic milk hasn't skipped a single beat.

Zeldafan642921d ago

Well said man. Nintendo does more to change up gameplay between iterations than anyone else in the industry.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2921d ago
BrandanT2922d ago

Maybe people didn't want that kind of change. The change people want is indicative of their desires.

_-EDMIX-_2922d ago

"The hatred surrounding the game pad perfectly illustrates just how against change people really are" Nope.

Simply illustrates how people are against bad design. At the end of the day, it didn't sell. Sooooo you can't just keep childishly crossing you're arms and blaming consumers on lack of sales. YES oh YES, 90 million just all wrong and dumb and know nothing right?

IF you owned Nintendo would you tell this to the public?

So immature, emotional and childish its not even funny. You legit need to understand that the Wii U failed due to NINTENDO! THEY are why it failed.

It had bad design, was made in a bubble with zero input by 3rd party developers, expensive to work on due to said BAD design, weak hardware etc.

Yet blame the people on its failure? When you're store doesn't do well, you go out and publicly blame the people? LMFAO! They are not ready for um "change"? Sounds a bit stupid to me.

fyi that game pad was just a DS, not sure why you are making it sound like the second coming. PS3 had that feature with the PSP for some games, didn't see that feature making folks go NUTS so not sure why this is suddenly this hidden gem that only the cult can decipher its greatest lol

garrettbobbyferguson2922d ago

"It had bad design"

No, the design is pretty ergonomic. The back feels like a tradtional controller the way it's designed. Not to mention being able to simply look at the game pad instead of looking up at the TV is pretty interesting.

"Weak hardware"

Lol, this is why the console kids make me laugh. You guys are quick to spout weak hardware without realizing that your favorite companies also have weak hardware.

_-EDMIX-_2922d ago

That weak Hardware is in comparison..

there's a reason why several developers have come out to state that they were not supporting the platform due to it not being powerful enough to supply their concepts.

I mean that might explain the mass Exodus of developers abandoning the platform and out right and never even supporting it.

Yet they're moving record millions of units on PlayStation 4 Xbox One and PC

Sure...lol

PlayStation 4 or Xbox One don't need to be the most powerful they just need to be powerful "enough". The Wii U was not "enough" to satisfy most third-party developers...thus most did not develop on the platform.....thus it failed...

Pretty simple buddy. I don't see PlayStation 4 Xbox One or PC having any trouble with support bud.

Zeldafan642921d ago (Edited 2921d ago )

I guess that "bad design" as you put it is the reason why I put 100s of hours into Zombiu at the Wii U's launch. I didn't want to put that game down it was so damn fun and what made it so fun was the gamepad integration. I played through it about 10 times before I finally moved on to a new game.
I had a Gamestop employee lie to me about the Wii U before it even came out. He was an Xbox fanboy. You honestly expect me to believe he was the only person trying to steer people away from Nintendo before the Wii U came out? Good luck with that. There are a lot of people out there with an agenda to steer people away from Nintendo. It's pathetic and it makes me sick to see such childish, selfish behavior.
Third, in your previous post you tried to defend the yearly releases of COD, AC, Battlefields, etc...by saying that Mario and Zelda have been around longer. That makes no difference, the GAMEPLAY of the CODs and ACs etc... are almost completely the same between iterations. And making new IPs? that as well makes no difference when the GAMEPLAY is still essentially the same. They just have new characters and new settings, that's it, with a small exception for Watchdogs. Nintendo does more to change up the GAMEPLAY in their franchises than anyone else in the industry. And I'm not saying the CODs or ACs are bad games, just uninspired.
Lastly, you say that the gamepad just makes the Wii U a DS. That's not true. The DS is limited in what it can do because the two screens are attached to one another. A game like Zombiu wouldn't be possible on the DS because you need the second screen to be independant of the tv screen in order to move it around to scan and hack.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2921d ago
ruefrak2922d ago

Enjoyable article. Haven't laughed that much in awhile.
Investors are selling Nintendo stock because revenue is down, sales are down, and profits are way down. Yes, there was a profit but one that was a fraction of what it was a year ago. Also, their guidance for the upcoming year is abysmal. They are now forecasting that in the next fiscal year, they will only sell 800,000 Wii U's. Those are PS Vita low numbers right there. And what software are they going to sell with it? The biggest title that they've been talking about for two years now is Zelda, and that isn't coming out for another year either.

Nintendo made a huge mistake a year ago in revealing that the next console was coming out soon and it was codenamed the NX. They did it out of panic because they were failing to sell hardware. But once they made that statement, they effectively killed the Wii U and any short term future it might have had. Then they came out and said the NX will be available in March 2017 (aka, don't even think about buying a Wii U now). Since it's heavily rumored to also be a handheld, don't even think about buying a 3DS either. Nintendo's wrong because they made vague declarations way too early. Then they announce that they won't talk about it at E3?? As if to say, "Screw you. We know NX is what you want to hear about, but we're only showing Zelda... which, oh yeah, won't be out for another year."

KaladinStormblessed2922d ago

Well, Nintendo has stated before that they don't like to announce things at e3 that aren't in the near future or are not releasing in the same year.

And no, NX is confirmed to be home console, they've stated that themselves, and the fact that the WiiU console Zelda is releasing on it also confirms it.

And of course forecast for WiiU is at all time low, new console on the horizon, that's always been the case. The WiiU is at the end of its lifecycle, by 2017 that will be 4 1/2 years. Pretty standard for Nintendo. They are tying to "effectively kill the WiiU" as they are leaving the "Wii" name brand behind and starting fresh.

They announced it early just like any other company does, PS4 was known about prior to its E3 showings same with XB1.

ruefrak2921d ago

The PS4 was announced in February (with specifics as to what the console actually was), shown in June, and released in November of the same year. The NX was announced in March 2015 with no specifics. Then re-announced in April 2016, again with no specifics. And it will be released in March of 2017. So for 2 years they've basically said, "Hold off on buying anything because the new thing is right around the corner, but we won't tell you what it is yet." So they effectively killed the Wii U in March of 2015.

As for what NX is, all they've said is that it's a "brand-new concept." We can guess it's a home console based on some rumors of devs making games for it, but we don't know. Is it a handheld? Is it just a console? What does "brand-new concept" mean? Well, keep waiting.

KaladinStormblessed2921d ago

They didn't announce NX, they simply stated they had a console in development, which EVERY company has. They did it because people were getting worried as to whether Ninty were staying in the console business, and this confirmed that they are still in it.

And it's fact that NX is a home console. Reggie said so himself, and as I already said Nintendo came out and announced Zelda WiiU is also releasing on NX, a game like that isn't going to run on a handheld. Kimishima stated that they will probably stop WiiU production around 2018, the only reason for that would be because of the launch of a new home console.

There will be a new handheld releasing sometime in the next couple of years, and the NX may well be a family of systems, but it is a fact that the one releasing in March 2017 is the home console.

ruefrak2921d ago

No, the announced it.
http://www.wired.com/2015/0...

Since March 2015, Nintendo has revealed that the next console was coming soon, so don't worry about buying a Wii U.

KaladinStormblessed2921d ago

They never said it was coming soon, simply that it was in development. Just like every other console company is doing.

sk8ofmnd2922d ago

I agree foxtrot, when the change gets a resounding disapproval from the mass of gamers, its nintendo that needs to change their ways.

The wiiu will go down in history as the worst console made by them, and no the virtual boy does not count.

RosweeSon2922d ago

I'd say GameCube as the Wii U library is fantastic Nintendos output is top notch again where as GameCube we got Mario Sunshine (was good but not to normal high standards of all time greatness they normally achieve) and Mario kart double dash was again not bad but just felt they added that as didn't know what else to do. Doshin the giant? Star fox adventures (I actually played the whole game and did enjoy it) it's not Proper star fox tho is it, the Metroid games were great Resident evil 4 and Wind Waker but yeah I'd say it was worse than the Wii U. VC helps Wii U massively.
Anyway I'm done for the weekend GAME ON!

iNFAMOUZ12922d ago

afraid of change? afraid of change? what a pompous egotistical thing to say, how dare you really
change isn't a good thing if something is fine the way it is, perfect example is halo, halo 1, 2, were fine, but then they introduced change and it lost over 70% of its fanbase or more

Show all comments (53)
80°

Behind The Dangerous Stunts Of Nintendo’s Iconic Mario Commercials

Two married costume designers share stories from a decade of traveling the globe with Nintendo.

Read Full Story >>
gameinformer.com
265d ago
110°

Bowser Is Canonically 34 Years Old

In a YouTube video showing Nintendo Switch owners how to create a Nintendo Account, Nintendo of America revealed that Bowser is canonically 34 years old.

jznrpg327d ago

I saw Bowser when I was a kid and now I’m older than him , sigh.

Brazz326d ago

Wow, i'm as old as Bowser!!

Stanjara326d ago (Edited 326d ago )

He looks 55 to me.

Show all comments (7)
100°

Nintendo Is A Bad Company, But We Can't Help Loving Them Anyway

TG: “Most of us also grew up with Nintendo, likely forming a nostalgic connection with games that have long been crowned as our personal favourites. The Legend of Zelda: Wind Waker was an experience that shaped my view on open world fantasy, and Super Mario 64 changed my life like it did for millions of others. These titles have earned their place in history, and remain loved to this day for so many worthwhile reasons. We replay them and beg for remasters all while delving into their worlds time and time again because they mean that much to us. It’s a shame then that the company behind them often kicks its own sweet darlings to the curb.”

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
Magog335d ago

I never got the love for Nintendo games personally. The annoying vocalizations and ugly character designs do nothing for me.

Kosic333d ago

Don't forget the constant hand holding with tutorials. Learn this new ability by pressing Y, now prove that you can press Y 8 times before you can move on....

Tapani334d ago (Edited 334d ago )

Another very weird article.

Nintendo is a great company by almost all possible normal measures. The biggest one being: their own staff is happy, and they seem to be very happy, well compensated and retain rate is solid. They are also financially very stable, profitable, and cash rich, so shareholders love them.

Overall it is an extremely creative group of people, and their mission statement is fantastic as well "to put smiles on the faces of everyone we touch. We do so by creating new surprises for people across the world to enjoy together." The social impact is also massive, not to speak culturally. Additionally, they have a really strong core business, high customer retention rate and loyalty. Nintendo's reputation is extremely good, I think in the US alone they are 9th most reputable company, their customer service is better than the average company. Plus, the press gives them a pass, because they are Nintendo. But there's a reason why they do that, it's not "because they are Nintendo", there are more layers to the argument.

Then, then there's the random negative gamers online...and their "reputation" which is inside their heads. And their western ideas of how a Japanese company should behave or what they should do. But they have no right to ask a company to do anything for them, because they can vote with their wallets.

There's a small vocal community online who dislikes Nintendo for what they are, but then again, there's always a small vocal community that dislikes something.

Nintendo also disagrees with the Western world about IP, but most people call Westerners "hidoi!" when they emulate Tears of the Kingdom and do not experience it the way Nintendo wanted them (even if it is not the best visual way), because it is a matter of principle to them (Japanese are very much against anything close to plagiarism, and there are laws that are tight about creative works copying etc.)

The Western Braveheart "freedoom!" shouters need to understand that it is not an American company, nor they need to behave like one. They can have their own fights based on their principles (against emulation). And they very well may lose the battle with that and change, or find a new audience.

In the end, it is so very simple. Don't buy the products if you don't like a company, but there's no need to paint a picture that is unrealistic about Nintendo either.

MadLad334d ago

I hate virtually everything about their business practices, actually. Suing everybody for virtually anything, shooting down fan projects, games they never let devalue, their online infrastructure and how they handle BC.

They're lucky they make great games, because that's the only thing I feel they do right.

gold_drake334d ago

my issue with them, is the complete refusal to have decent tech for us.

and their odd censorship and lawsuits for modders.