ThisGenGaming says "Sometimes, DLC content can bring a lot of fun into great video games. Other times, however, a lot of great games bring in unnecessary and useless DLC. Whether this DLC brings in content that’s practically useless or gives the player too much freedom, DLC really hits some rough patches with certain games. Here are 5 times players were totally ripped off with DLC"
TheGamer Writes "It’s not often we get to attend parties in The Elder Scrolls. After we slay Alduin and thwart his attempts to eat Nirn in Skyrim, we’re thrown back into the snowy wastes, and after Mehrune Dagon is shoved back into the Deadlands to… kind-of-die, the best we get is a pat on the back from the Blades."
It was a great quest and the sad part is they NEVER did some sort of "spiritual successor" like quest in Skyrim. Made no sense to me.
We explore the 5 best Elder Scrolls: 4 Oblivion mods out there, as we all know Oblivion is the best Elder Scrolls game out there...
If in the Kvatch Rebuilt mod you could have the castle as a player house as the castle and became the Count of Kvatch. That would have been epic.
One of the ‘pipe dreams’ I’ve toyed with is getting into the actual modding scene. However with all the other projects going on, there’s not been the time. That being said, these essential mods are often enough anyway!
Cheaters & hackers have been causing grief on Battlefield 1, Hardline & BF4 servers, with nonstop DDoS attacks among other things. Unfortunately, EA has remained silent about it.
Not even if they paid me.. EA always do this with old games with less money potential, if this was Ultimate Team, they'd address and sort it faster than stories could spread. Why invest time in their products when they will just dump it in the following years? Then again EA never could see the forest for the trees.
I imagine after those games were given out for free a couple months back through Amazon, anything that makes people go to 2042 is a plus for them
Nah. I think they can't do anything about it or they want to sink money into fixing it.
EA owns all BF servers so yes, they can do something about it but they refuse to because they dont want ppl playing their old games instead of the new one. Its EA we’re talking about here
if this happened in 2042, they'd have something to say. which is weird, considering battlefield 1 has more players on steam right now.
Its so obvious that EA is doing this or hired ppl to mess up the games so that we’d be forced to have just 1 Battlefield working.
Honestly it’s probably the devs themselves. They did an update to bf4 way back that kinda made assault rifles doo doo in hopes that people would flock to BF1 cuz BF4 was too perfect
Agreed, and shortcuts suck as well, we see rich n00b kids at the top of the leaderboard early on like in need for speed
The real answer is every time. Every single game that comes out now has some kind of DLC, a lot of times even day one. It might just be a skin or a extra weapon or whatever, but that doesn't matter. We used to call those unlockables, It was a reward for playing the game. Now you just buy them or you wont get them at in some cases.
DLC that comes out further down the line as a way for developers to expand on their game is okay, if priced accordingly and actually adding great value and quality to a game. Day one DLC, Season Passes, and preorder incentives are not okay in my opinion, as publishers and developers are purposefully restricting content for the sake of maximizing consumer spending.