SR
Still, despite its glaring issues, there’s no debating the addictive nature of The Division’s pretty looter shooter co-op experience. It’s a foundation to build upon in updates, expansions, and sequels, but outside of the endless search for better things and bigger numbers in the inventory and stats screens, there’s not much game to enjoy if you’re one for story and quality shooters.
from paulsemel.com: In this exclusive Q&A, the author of the new technothriller based on "Tom Clancy's: The Division" discusses how it ties to the games while also bringing its own story to a close.
If you're looking to try out an exciting, team-based shoot 'em up, The Division is currently on sale on Steam!
TIM WHITE WRITES: "Multiplayer or single player? Developers, you can do both, just not willy-nilly."
I hate when I see single player games and see people begging for multi-player. Jeez guys it don't need to be on every game. Latest one I seen was atomic heart.
Multiplayer or even co-op
If it was always a single player game then that's how it is
It's a trend that never really went away. For me multiplayer in a primarily SP focused game was an excuse for DLC. Then there's the mentality gamers had that adding multiplayer makes a game worth the price, otherwise it should be half price for half a game. A way of thinking devs reassured when they started adding multiplayer to their sequels. We see the same with multiplayer focused games getting SP in their sequels.
I remember when certain single player games had them as included optional modes that was played on the couch. Had brilliant times with Syphon Filter and Golden Eye. Me and my bro used to used to fight over who would play as Gabe even though it was technically just a skin. Good times.
The Division is NOT a bad shooter. Infact if you judged the game purely on the shooting mechanics you'd see that it is actually a Good shooter. The game has other issues - true. But the actual shooting is one of the best aspects of the game.
is just a boring shooter, I only needed the beta to acknowledge this ;)
And your a bad reviewer wrapped in a failing website!
Meant to say you're before you criticize my grammar