Game reviews have existed for as long as games it would seem and with so many review sites and games available now a days, they aim to provide a service to the gamer that answers the ancient question of "Is this game worth my money?" As Too Human reviews have begun to break in gaming media with lower than expected scores with at least one at 4/10, perhaps it is time to examine the review system as a whole.
Huzaifa from eXputer: "2008 was home to the likes of Call of Duty: World at War, Dead Space, GTA 4, Far Cry 2, Left 4 Dead, and many other hits, which is outright remarkable."
Just about every year in the 7th generation was great and something we most likely won't experience again.
2009 for example had Assassin's Creed 2, Batman: Arkham Asylum, Dragon Age: Origins, Uncharted 2, Halo 3: ODST, Killzone 2, Borderlands, Bayonetta, and Demon's Souls to name a few.
Hey Poor Player's James Davie Takes Us On A Bio-Shocking Deep Dive Into Irrational Games' Nautical Nightmare.
Not every Halo game has been a banger, but the franchise still has a raft of the greatest games of all time.
Infinite is a dumpster fire and as much as I like ODST, in no universe it ranks above Halo 2. This list is trash.
Best to worst: Halo 3, Halo 2, Halo Reach, Halo CE, Halo 4, Halo ODST, Halo Infinite, Halo 5.
One thing that stood out for me was the fact that Assassins Creed got no mention of it repetitive nature in it's Gamespot review. A blindfolded blind man can see how repetitive that game was. Gamecritics.com has probably the best reviews, specially for AC.
Funny how this has appeared on Too Human day. :P