110°

Why common sense tells us to avoid Rainbow Six Siege: Yet, I can’t pass this one up - VGFirst

Excerpt from the article

"At its finest, Rainbow Six Siege offers a brutally visceral, tactical experience that’s absolutely unrivaled on current generation hardware. The thoughtful class based design, coupled with the intense, moment to moment gunfights creates an experience that’s absolutely unrivaled in what it offers. Comparisons between Siege and games like Destiny or Call of Duty feel akin to those between Kinect Four, and Chess. Siege offers a brilliantly strategic platform where communication and intelligence are rewarded above all else, the definitive ‘thinking man’s shooter’ of this generation.

Unfortunately then, it’s with considerable dismay that Siege is impossible to recommend as a launch day purchase. "

Allsystemgamer3086d ago

It's not rainbow 6. There's no story. There's no team rainbow with fleshed out histories. It's just a CS wanna be. It's way worse than CS.

The game is boring. Should have kept patriots going.

TLG19913086d ago

The sad thing is when this flops, which im sure it will, it will probably be the last we see of the rainbow franchise. Which is terrible.

Allsystemgamer3086d ago (Edited 3086d ago )

I know. UBI has been ruining so much lately. The game would have sold millions as an actual r6 game but they're too stupid to see that.

Imagine this gameplay with an actual story. Planning different route through different scenarios. Freaking Tactical teams don't go around blasting holes in every goddamn wall they see.

TLG19913086d ago

What makes it even worse is how long have they been working on it (im including the time since patriots was announced) and in all the time they have made a few multiplayer maps and turned into a small team generic FPS.

3086d ago
Natversion13086d ago

Counterstrike has no story, crates you have to buy and it's always the same thing on 1 or 2 maps. Rush A on Dust 2 Rush B on Dust 2.
Sorry but that game is way way more overrated than any other fps.

Allsystemgamer3086d ago (Edited 3086d ago )

Sorry but there is something called a server selection. Don't want to play dust then don't. It's that simple.

This game isn't rainbow 6 and the fan base knows it. They're trying to sell it to the CS crowd and it isn't going to work.

That and CS is only $15.

$15!!!!

This is $60 and exactly the same!

solar3086d ago

As an old CS player who doesnt care to play enough to get back to being a good player, ill take the over the top Siege. CS truly is the best tactical game out their, but ill take this Siege garbage for $15, probably no more.

cooksauce3086d ago

It's not the same. Last time I checked, CS did not have different "operators" to choose from. CS is outdated. At least R6 is trying something.

Allsystemgamer3086d ago

@cooksauce

Yea wow adding characters that are literally faces for preset load outs. That's really "trying something"

It plays like counter strike with destructible walls. Whoopty doo. It plays like a $15 outdated game. It's bland and uninspired. The only thing remotely close to being rainbow 6 is dying quickly and peaking around corners.

You don't get enough time to plan anything. You get 1 minute to mark where things are. There's no map to pull up. No single player with planning and execution of said plan. No AI to command. No "open flash and clear on Zulu". No selecting a team for the job ala the originals. Hell even Vegas was more r6 than this crap.

Every match I played just ended in "which room are they in this time" and shooting through the walls.

"Oh but its strategic!"

Blow that wall open and shoot everything inside. That's all the game comes down to on every single level.

Even the graphics are bland.

Patriots looked great and this is what they come up with after 5 years. Give me a break. $60 ($90 CAD) for a Rip off of a game that costs $15 that allows modding.

ZombieKiller3086d ago

@Natversion1- Call of Duty says hi.

Valenka3086d ago

When I played the beta for RS Siege, I wasn't really impressed. I had a good time for awhile until boredom struck, but that stemmed primarily from the fact that everything I was seeing, I'd seen before...numerous times. It's generic, uninspired and unfortunate; it doesn't feel like Rainbow Six at all and that's because the developers fell off their path while trying to compete with Call of Duty and Battlefield. It's a terrible shame; Rainbow Six never had to compete with anything in the past because it was on its own, exclusive playing field. I can almost guarantee the only people who will be playing the game when it launches are the COD and Battlefield players who want something "new."

solar3086d ago

UBI knows the new way to gouge the idiotic consumer, and that is online only. we have seen the system work over and over again. it works for max dollars.

it sucks and this is what happens when an industry goes mainstream. the mighty dollar rules all, not the game.

I know developers want to make the game in their vision, but their vision isnt paying the bills.

Allsystemgamer3086d ago

It's more like counter strike than anything else. Literally CS with destruction. It's copying a $15 game with the R6 name to sell it with a price tag of $60. What the actual F***?

Ra30303086d ago

I've played the beta and I had fun with it and I'd like to get it but I'll wait and see how it sales. It'll need to move enough units to hold the community for a while. I don't think it has much if any single player component so it's pretty much always online, multiplayer so this being a huge hit may be a tall order. I always enjoyed the Rainbow games I hope this does well but time will tell.

DEAD-DEVIL-DISCO3086d ago (Edited 3086d ago )

I decided to buy it. It is flawed but fun. Few gripes. There will be a community im sure. I loved bf4 but the community on psn dropped. Dont want anothe cod, and i desperately need a new fps. Im in,,fuck it. Its nice to acully talk to your squad about the situation at hand instead of a racist a biget a whiny brat a arrogant asshole a frustrated person that doesnt understand its just a video game, rap music blasting through someones mic, getting burned on, a lil kid cussing you and so on and so on._._._.._yall get what im sayin

Allsystemgamer3086d ago

Considering the r6 community is blasting it for not being rainbow 6 and the CS crew (their obvious target audience) thinks it's a cheap over priced rip off I doubt it will last long online.

They're using the r6 name to sell a counter strike wanna be...how does that make any sense? Who are they trying to make this game for? Not us r6 fans that's for sure.

Yes. I'm salty. Very salty. Think of the amazing scenarios that could have come to be with this game but NOPE. Tiny ass houses with walls to blow open and short rounds mp only.

Slow clap Ubisoft. Slow clap.

170°

All Hopes I Had For A Prey Sequel Have Been Crushed — Well Done, Microsoft

The magnificent Prey was once again abandoned as Microsoft disregarded Arkane Austin's achievements and crucified it just for Redfall.

RaidenBlack22h ago

well, not entirely ... the main Arkane studio i.e Arkane Lyon's still there ...
Its only that, the sequel will take more time now ... after Blade & Dishonored 3

MrBaskerville2h ago

But who knows, Dishonored 3 could have been Austins next project, so might be cancelled.

-Foxtrot21h ago(Edited 21h ago)

Not even this Prey

Still longing for a sequel to the original Prey with Tommy

The studio didn't even want to call this Prey, it was just Bethesda being dicks to them for some reason.

RaidenBlack16h ago

MS closed Roundhouse Studios (ex-Human Head Studios) as well

Yui_Suzumiya5h ago

Yeah, that's who was going to do the original sequel.

isarai12h ago

Came here to say this, my hooes for a Prey sequel died when this "Prey" came out

Profchaos3h ago

Prey 2017 still hurts to play because what could have been looked so incredible

Profchaos3h ago

Same Bethesda basically screwed over the original developer team human head back around 2011 so it was really never going to come despite a honestly amazing trailer. I liked prey 2017 but it always held a stink of disappointment due to what we never got

LostPotato21h ago(Edited 21h ago)

Keep dreaming then as Prey and Dishonored 2 did not sell well enough to get sequels.

Hence we got Deathloop and Redfall instead.

RaidenBlack16h ago

lol, Deathloop came from Prey: Mooncrash idea

Unknown_Gamer57945h ago

To everyone who cheered MS’s acquisitions, we told you so…

Inverno3h ago

Those people will just argue that Arkane Austin and Tango would've been shut down either way.

MrBaskerville2h ago

Zenimax allready put them in a tight spot by demanding them to do a multiplayer title. So it's not unlikely, considering how bad the game performed. They didn't stand a chance. MS had the money to save them and to correct Zenimax' mistakes.

130°

Helldivers 2 Star Wars Mod Looks Pretty Insane

Star Wars is coming to Helldivers 2, unofficially that is, as a new mod revamps in-game models and sends players to a galaxy far, far, away.

thejigisup6h ago

To you. What makes them interesting?

repsahj5h ago

This is the reason they cancel the psn link.

150°

Would It Have Even Mattered If Redfall Were Good?

Even if Redfall were a good game, the closure of Hi-Fi Rush proves even that doesn't matter in the industry.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
Profchaos9h ago

Yeah it would have mattered especially since their huge game that year wasn't all that it was cracked up to be remember redfail was almost heavily promoted and hyped not to the level of starfield but still more promoted than the average game.

There was still a decent marketing campaign behind the game I'm sure millions were spent advertising it on websites and I saw a few billboards and bus stop signs in real life

jwillj2k49h ago

No it wouldn’t matter it wouldn’t bring in enough profit to offset their 100 billion dollar acquisition. It would maybe delay the inevitable by some months.

Profchaos11m ago

Pretty much no game in Bethesda stables makes cod numbers instantly even fallout 4 Bethesda's best selling game sold 12 million at launch and over the next 10 years climbed to over 32 which cod would do rapidly

CrimsonWing698h ago

I would f*cking think so. Good games are what draws people to your platform. It’s why I adored the 360 era with Gears of War being one of the highlights for me. You make sh*t games and it just makes your platform that much worse and you start gobbling up studios I like and then killing them off it also makes me hate your platform as well… just sayin’

franwex8h ago

Unless the game would’ve been War Zone, or Fortnite level. No. Maybe even Hell divers 2 I doubt would’ve been enough.

Exvalos8h ago

No it would not have, the ABK deal was great for Microsoft but horrible for Xbox. Over 100 billion dollars in acquisitions. That money has to be made back. That ABK deal essentially destroyed Xbox as we know it.

Show all comments (23)