740°

Just Cause 3 Runs At 900p Resolution On Xbox One, 1080p On PS4

As if it was a surprise to anyone, Avalanche Studios has revealed that its upcoming open world action title Just Cause 3 will have differing resolutions on the Xbox One and PS4.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
gameseveryday3099d ago

Seems like developers are now aiming for better post processing effects and better fps performance over pixel count.

bullproodhead3099d ago (Edited 3099d ago )

They can achieve both of those on ps4.

Crimzon3099d ago Show
Eonjay3099d ago

I don't understand your comment here. Are you saying that the PS4 has worse effects and only higher resolution? Or do you mean they are aiming for better effects over resolution on Xbox One?

lsujester3099d ago

He's saying that both consoles are aiming for a better picture and letting the resolutions drop a bit if necessary, versus cutting effects and such just to hit a pixel count.

bf0007779663099d ago Show
Pancit_Canton3099d ago (Edited 3099d ago )

@Crimzon

1080P 30FPS on Single Player
900P 60FPS on Multiplayer

Do some research before you start trolling.

Crimzon3099d ago

Exactly, you've just proved my point lol. 900p. I know it, you know it, everyone else knows it. Why are you getting upset about it? It's fact.

So either 900p is awful and Uncharted 4 sucks because of it, or 900p isn't a big deal and Uncharted 4 is fine for using that resolution.

All I'm doing is pointing out how silly it is to be a fanboy over resolutions when welp, Uncharted 4 runs at 900p.

Aloy-Boyfriend3099d ago (Edited 3099d ago )

Crimzon

Uncharted is an exclusive. Say if it was multiplat, U4 on Xbox would be even lower in resolution compared to PS4 similar to this case and many others, which is embarrassing for the xbox like it or not. Twist this all you want. That's how it is!

ND is doing both with SP mind you, while the Bone is doing it in neither:P

bleedsoe9mm3099d ago

absolutely @Crimzon stating a fact even if its one they don't want to hear isn't trolling . i don't think anyone is arguing that it isn't easier to get multiplats to 1080p on the ps4 , naughty dog only has one platform to worry about . if 900p is good enough for naughty dog its good enough for my xb1 lol

dcbronco3099d ago (Edited 3099d ago )

The problem isn't multi plat or not, it's whether 900p matters. If it doesn't matter for a ps4 game it should never matter period. These articles written by pimps looking for street walkers to click on their article and bring them their advertising money is shameful. If 900p means Xbox One is a weak console and PS4 only hits it sometimes then they are both weak consoles. At least have the class to stay off the corner and stop pretending. If resolution really matters to you get a PC. I hear they do 4k now.

#clickbait hookers

JamesBroski3099d ago

@Crimzon

The point is not that PS4 has no games that output at 900p, it's that the same exact game can achieve higher resolution on the PS4.

GordonKnight3099d ago

IMO both PS4 and X1 are under powered for what they are supposed to handle. Why can't both consoles handle all games at 1080p @ 60fps? That's what I though these console would do. This is why I feel both consoles were rushed to market, because of the early launch of the Wii U. Now Nintendo has an opportunity with the NX to have the only console that could potentially play all games at 1080p@60fps. Hopefully the PS5 & X2 can handle 4K at launch.

I'm purchasing JC3 on my X1.

_-EDMIX-_3099d ago

When haven't they? MOST developers seek this before a resolution number. XONE just happens to be lessor then PS4 so they are able to have a better version for PS4 by default.

If both system where the same in power, you likely would see 900p on both platforms.

PS4 being stronger allows for them to always have better performance after the fact without much sacrifice if any on the base game.

MrSec843099d ago

@Crimson: Actually Naughty Dog outstrips basically every other studio for image quality, hell Uncharted 4 has the best looking AA and AF techniques of any game seen on the current gen.

Despite pushing for phenomenal visuals the MP still manages a more demanding output.
For reference 1920X1080= 2,073,600 pixels, at 30FPS that means the SP is packing 62,208,000 pixels in a second, the MP runs at 1600X900= 1,440,000 pixels per frame, but it's running at 60FPS, so it's actually more demanding than a 1080p 30FPS, outputting 86,400,000 pixels per second.

Halo 5 spends a large chunk of it's time running at 1152X810= 933,120 pixels per frame, for reference 720p is 1280X720= 921,600 pixels per frame, so Halo 5's main native resolution is barely any better than Halo 4 on the 360, IQ is way worse on the XB1, hell the level of jaggies and poor AF in that game does my head in every time I see it.

Despite Halo 5 running 60FPS, at it's main resolution it's only pushing 55,987,200 pixels per second, way less than Uncharted 4's single player and massively worse than the single player.

Halo 5 still needs to make other concessions to the game, like running animations at half the frame rate, doing nothing but scripted physics events and the animations are absolutely terrible, definitely not on the level of Uncharted 4.

Horizon Zero Dawn is arguably an even more impressive feat, given it's open world setting, with full dynamic physics, lighting and weather.
That's packing some ridiculously great IQ techniques.

Actually as far as IQ goes PS4 definitely dominates, along with using actual advanced physics in game.

Just Cause 3 is packing the same kind of physics that Crackdown 3's developers and Microsoft are touting as massively advanced, yet what's funny is that game doesn't need the cloud to make it a reality.
I suspect that Avalanche will have to have made some big concessions on XB1's physics to get the game working on that platform.

Forn3099d ago

@MrSec84

Quit talking sense! 😜

nix3099d ago (Edited 3099d ago )

One thing I'm happy about this gen is that the devs are not shying away from giving better games to better consoles. If i have a powerful console, i might as well get a better game. I'm happy they're not trying to make games look similar.

If you're getting inferior games for the same price then it's your fault that you own an inferior machine.

Simple.

Death3099d ago

The game will be displayed at 1080p on both systems. The PS4 will be doing this natively while the Xbox One will be using the consoles upscaler to achieve the same results. I think it would be more impressive to see higher quality textures and more details on the PS4 that would push the system and maybe even use the systems upscaler to achieve higher fidelity graphics. It's sad that people are content with native "superiority" that isn't visually noticeable. The extra power of the PS4 is being wasted, but as long as fans are happy there is little incentive for developers to use it.

InTheLab3099d ago

@death

What you're saying is that taking an image that is this large

----------

And blowing that image up to this size

--------------------

Is the same thing and its clearly not. What confuses me here is why this still matters. The Xbox 1 was cheaper for a while and will most likely see another price drop to "win" the holiday for PR purposes. Who cares unless you own both consoles?

This should really surprise no one at this point.The PS4 is stronger than the X1. The only way we will see parity is if it's intentional.

zeuanimals3099d ago (Edited 3099d ago )

@dcbronco:

1080p does matter, but so does 60fps. Those are two important goals for devs and this gen, they tend to only hit one or the other, almost never both. So, does it matter that Uncharted 4's MP isn't 1080p? Yes, but it is 60fps, so it hit one of those important goals while most other games (including its SP) have chosen to focus on resolution instead.

Most 900p games on the Xbox One don't happen to even hit 60fps, so they fail to hit both goals.

S2Killinit3099d ago

Is this with or without DX12? Did it do anything for xbox?

Death3099d ago

@In the lab,

Upscaling is not blowing the image up or magnifying it. Todays upscalers are very powerful and able to render the pixels very similar to the way a graphic artist does. There is a reason both the PS4 and Xbox One have an upscaler built into their consoles. If you want a current example of how far upscaling has come, take a look at todays 4K HDTV and see what they are doing with their 1080p images when they are upscaled to 4K. It's a very impressive process with even more impressive results. Upscaling from 900p to 1080p is pretty trivial in comparison.

cd13099d ago

Just Cause will look fine at 900p, as did the Battlefront Beta. The Order doesn't run at 1080p and that's probably the best looking game I've ever seen.

Some of my fellow PS4 gamers are starting to sound like PC elitists - shame on you!

SniperControl3099d ago

@Death

1080p sources upscaled to 4K look horrible, as if the sharpness on TV has been yanked up to full, i have a Sammy 4K and i've turned off the upscaler due to this affect.

Ch1d0r13099d ago

They don't have an option really. I wonder what happened to that parity clause MS had?

ziggurcat3099d ago

@death:

"Upscaling is not blowing the image up or magnifying it."

yes. it is.

GTgamer3099d ago

So yall bring up 900p on uncharted multi-player like xbox hasn't been rocking 900p on allot of games from the start of this generation okie dokie smfh stop embarrassing yaselves

3099d ago
APexGamer453099d ago

@Death

My PS3 and X360 both shows 1080P image on my TV. Tvs have upscalers...

Jesus that was pretty sad damage control

LamerTamer3099d ago (Edited 3099d ago )

@Crimzon

I like how you guys just pick out the "900p" part to get to the conclusion you are trying for which is PS4 does it so xbone doing it too is no big deal.

The problem is that it is also 1080p in single player which is the main thing for Uncharted games. You say "UC4 is 900p" I say UC4 is 1080p. See I can pick the part that makes my argument too. Since I only play single player games UC4 is 1080p for me all day.

Death:
" Upscaling is not blowing the image up or magnifying it"

That is EXACTLY what upscaling in these consoles do. It just stretches the lower res image to fit the screen so you don't have a big border. Then it adds a filter to blur out the resulting jaggies. Unfortunately it doesn't work very well and details blur out especially distant ones and it ruins texture sharpness. It doesn't magically add the missing details. Native resolution with 1:1 pixel mapping always looks best.

You need to learn the difference between upscaling and interpolation. These don't do interpolation as it is MUCH too intensive. Ones used in home theaters to do it cost more than the xbone and PS4 combined. These console upscalers are just cheap stretch-and-filter scalers, they have to be at the price they sell for.

Stop spreading nonsense. Go "upscale" a SNES game to 1080p and see if that looks just as good as a native 1080p image.

BattleAxe3099d ago

Nice to see that at least some Xbox One titles are hitting the same resolution as Uncharted 4 as a sort of base pixel count.

Ezz20133099d ago

@BattleAxe

That's strange
Because Uncharted 4 is 1080p in Single Player...you know that part?!...The most important part of uncharted games..the part where they push graphics beyond any thing on consoles
and if Uncharted 4 MP was on Xbox as well it would have dropped to 720p at least

Xbox fanboys trying their best to bring Uncharted into this is such a fail attempt.

UltraNova3098d ago (Edited 3098d ago )

@BattleAxe

Its strange cause U4's multiplayer while at 900p/60fps will look miles better than any xbox one game, even exclusives that run @ 1080p, quite possibly until the end of this gen.

In other words>>> My 900p is bigger, badder and better than yours.

Hell even Killzone SF runs circles around Halo 5 (visually) and its a 2 year old game! There I said it.

PS: Whats even more terrifying for you is the fact that U4 wont be ND's last on ps4...and I dont even have to mention Guerrilla or Santa Monica... oh wait.

+ Show (29) more repliesLast reply 3098d ago
TwoForce3099d ago

@Crimzon Really ? The Reason why Uncharted 4 multiplayer was 900p, 60 fps. Because Naughty Dogs pushed The graphics on Single Player which to be best looking game, and multiplayer was downgraded to be more smooth and fun. Remember Uncharted 3 MP, the reasons ND downgraded the MP because it need more performance. Last of Us graphics engine was their new upgrade , they tried their to made The Last of Us on PS3 which look great. When the remastered came out, you can see why The Last of Us engine was improved. Now, ND want to push their engine on PS4 to be look good. Want me to say more ?

TwoForce3099d ago (Edited 3099d ago )

@Crimzon i used to understand you. But now, you gone too far. Remember what i told you, you can complain Uncharted 4, but gone too far. Then your complain become a troll. I will explain you again. Uncharted 4 is 1080p 30fps on SP, 900p 60fps on MP. See the difference, hmm ?

UnHoly_One3099d ago

Mad Max was 1080 on both, so I'm a little surprised.

UnHoly_One3099d ago

Why the disagrees?

Mad Max was 1080 on both PS4 and Xbox One. And it's made by the same developer as Just Cause 3.
What better comparison do you guys want??

http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...

GUTZnPAPERCUTZ3099d ago

I know, it is the same engine too?! GTA V looks better and more detailed than JC3 and runs at 1080p? Must be all the explosions and physics plus a huge open world

_-EDMIX-_3099d ago

Mad Max was also a PS3 and 360 game at one point...

This title is a 100% current gen title, not cross plat.

Its naturally going to be more demanding then a title like Mad Max.

I'm not surprised as that is what developers are seeking this gen, demanding performance.

Your trying to apply the results of a once cross gen game, with a current gen only title....

UnHoly_One3099d ago

Have you looked at Mad Max?

It's one of the best looking games I've seen on the new consoles.

Stringerbell3099d ago

The game was optimized well n the PC too - they did a great job with it.

PreAtaric3099d ago

"Mad Max was 1080 on both, so I'm a little surprised."

Some devs will go for parity, some will try to use each console's hardware the best they can.

UnHoly_One3099d ago (Edited 3099d ago )

Same Developer.

Same Engine.

So it's not that.

GTgamer3099d ago

Well just cause destruction is on a level higher than mad max so yeah

dantesparda3099d ago

Why do you people automatically assume that just because its the same engine and a previous game was 1080p, that all future games will be 1080? As the games push the systems harder, more and more you're going to see that something has to give. In this case it was the X1's resolution. And you people do realize that the PS4 is overall more powerful right?

LamerTamer3099d ago

Maybe the xbone was the lead platform. They just made for that then ported to everything else. It is easier that way just make it for the lowest common denominator as then it will work on everything more powerful with the minimum effort.

It takes work and time to tailor effects and performance for every machine. In the games industry "work" an "time" are four letter words.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 3099d ago
Relientk773099d ago

Yeah to the surprise of no one

jb2273099d ago (Edited 3099d ago )

Honestly the surprise to me is that they were able to even get that high. Considering the size of the open world & the level of destruction in this game, those numbers should be celebrated, not juxtaposed to create some conflict.

This is most likely the only open world game I'll get for the holiday...absolutely respect the players willing to sink the time into FO4 & the patience into MGSV but for gamers like me who enjoy just having some good solid action packed fun for a few hours at a time, JC3 is that game for the holidays.

XanderZane3099d ago

Not surprised, but don't really care. I'll probably still get it on the XB1 because I like the XB1 controller better for games like this. It's more about gameplay, control and fun for me. There were 720P & 900P games last gen that played great and we very fun. I didn't care that they weren't 1080P native or not. I have multiplat games on both my PS4 and XB1. Enjoy playing them.

hades073099d ago

Xander, Hahahaha how pathetic are people on this site. You state your preference and how you are NOT a fanboy yet get phantom disagrees. If there were more people here like you maybe it would be more fun to come here and read comments and partake in an intelligent conversation. Not read whiny fanboy comments.

dantesparda3099d ago

Well, I own both system too, but im getting it on the PS4 cuz I much rather have the higher res (and probably better framerate too) and I like the DS4 better than the X1 controller.

@hades
Stop being a fanboy and its cute that you think Xander isn't. You're not the sharper tool.

GamerfromOz3099d ago

I agree with hades07 - XanderZane's post was purely opinion, bereft of extreme bias, and without malice. Just stating a preference. And hades07? Your comment is, for me, the best I've ever seen on here :)

XanderZane3099d ago

@dantesparda
Good for you. I like JRPG like FFXV, KH3 and Touliden Kawami on my PS4. Fighting games like Mortal Kombat X and Guilty Gear Xrd are best on the PS4 to me with the DS4. FPS, Action/Adv, Sports and 3rd person games I play on my XB1 cause the controller feels better with those type of games. Don't care about resolution much since games are upscaled to 1080P anyways. As long as the game is enjoyable and the gameplay isn't effected much, I'm good. I'm happy to play exclusives on both systems.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3099d ago
Angerfist3099d ago

@Pancit
But having a 30 and 60 fps will feel weird. Everyone knows this when he plays a 60 fps title and then a 30 fps or vice versa. Should have sticked to 900p 60 fps in campaign and MP instead of mixing it up. My opinion but mOst people will know that 60fps feels better

Tsar4ever013099d ago

RESOLUTION-GATE, strikes again!!

awi59513099d ago

Is 1080P so great im using 1440P?

Christopher3098d ago

I think we're getting to the point where this type of submissions just aren't really newsworthy anymore.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 3098d ago
Genuine-User3099d ago (Edited 3099d ago )

A fair trade-off for achieving similar graphical features.

Here's hoping we see some console footage before release.

LamerTamer3099d ago

Unless you don't need to trade off and have both like in the PS4 version...

Genuine-User3098d ago

Some people don't have that option.

MJunior3099d ago

I'm just thinking about the framedrops with all that explosions.

FoxyGotGame3099d ago

When does this stop becoming news?

900p, 1080p, 4K ...same gameplay /

3099d ago Replies(10)
JasonKCK3099d ago

It only matters to a select few. They use it to attack others while they ignore the shortcomings of their system of choice. It's hypocrisy at its finest. You only see it when it's console vs console. When it's PC vs console suddenly it no longer matters.

ShottyGibs3099d ago

Haha too true. Suddenly 30fps is enough and 900p is terrible. But no one see's a big difference on PC conveniently..

Here's the thing.. It's 2015 and neither are doing 1080p @ 60fps.. Sony fanboys shouldn't be bragging, it looks so petty once you game on a decent PC.

Ohh the PS4 fanboys are an entertaining bunch.

raggy-rocket3099d ago

Instead of arguing in the comments, can't you all just accept this is the norm now because yes, PS4 has more raw power for graphics and such, but no, the difference is so negligible it wouldn't affect your experience while playing more than, say, what UI or controller you're using. Play it on the console you like to play games on the most, that simple, fanboys on both sides just stop being bitter and petty.

FlexLuger3099d ago

I think people have accepted it as the norm...however fanboys of a certain console like to remind us at any chance they get, in spite of that. See...this is what happens when your pride and confidence are attached to a console...makes people feel like 'winners'.

BlackTar1873099d ago

i hope you championed this behavior last gen when comparison sites popped up every week proclaiming some missing grass was OMG amazing and Superior. I highly doubt you did that though.

Death3099d ago

@Tar,

The difference last gen is the PS3 was supposed to be much more powerful than the "Xbox 1.5". http://www.ign.com/articles... With some even claiming it to be a super computer. http://gizmodo.com/215203/p... The expectations before launch were very high as Sony downplayed the 360's performance. In your opinion, should there have been even a couple extra blades of grass in a 360 game when the expectations were set so high for the PS3?

PreAtaric3099d ago

@Death - If power was the only difference and all else was equal you'd have a point. PS3 was much harder to develop for and it took longer to see the difference in power, but it did eventually manifest itself. 360 was less powerful, no one denies that, but it was also much easier to develop for. PS4 is both more powerful and at least as easy to develop for as XB1.

Major_Glitch3099d ago

@Death Stop trolling. The PS3 WAS MORE POWERFUL then the 360. The problem was that the Cell was very difficult to program for, and when it came to multi-plats, most devs just couldn't be bothered to redo their games just to take advantage of the Cells power. However, Sony's first party studios produced some of the most visually stunning games of last gen. Studios like Sony Santa Monica, Guerialla Games, and Naughty Dog produced Sony exclusives that we're in a visual league of their own. I challenge you to name ONE 360 game that is is just as visually stunning as "The Last of Us".

BlackTar1873098d ago

@death

ooooooooooooo okay so it was okay last gen becasue you've set parameters ooooooooooooo k then

Glad we got that out of the way hypocrite

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3098d ago
aftershock3099d ago

The difference is more than negligible to some, me included. Playing @900p actually hurts my eyes. After a short time I start to get eye strain and that effects my experience

creeping judas3099d ago

Last gen must of been really bad for your eyes?

babadivad3099d ago

No uncharted for you then *though I'm fairly certain you're kidding*

Software_Lover3099d ago

Oh gawd please. Just stop it people. Just stop the BS.

audiocafe3099d ago

@creeping judas Lol I was thinking the same thing

Volkama3099d ago

Last gen must have been horrific, but even today this poor guy can't watch TV :(

2cents3099d ago

lol.

great comment. Even better replies!!!

But seriously, how big is your tv and how close do you sit from it? If your problem is indeed true, you might want to get your eyes checked.

_-EDMIX-_3099d ago

lol, this man physically can't play 900p LMFAO!

I'm not sure what you played last gen then =)

But 900p in a sea of 1080p games doesn't sit well with MS, even though we got lessor last gen and lived......

This isn't last gen now is it?

Mind you, what is MS to really do, developers set that resolution not MS.

deafdani3099d ago

With all due respect: that's a big load of BS right there.

I don't even have a Xbox One (PS4 and Wii U for me), but come on. Do you seriously expect any of us to believe what you said?

Come. On.

>_>

hades073099d ago

If 900P hurts your eyes, your head would expolode if you ever played classic NES and SNES games or watched a DVD in *shocking* 480P.

aftershock3094d ago

I guess I should have put /S at the end of my statement. It was fun to read your replies though!

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 3094d ago
Mega243099d ago

It won't stop, it's easier to get use to them. When you finally get used to it, you'll start to have fun reading the comment, just seeing the lies they type about their plastic boxes entertains me for hours.

On Topic: It's a shame, but you can't magically push weak hardware to reach a new limit. Telling ya, them weak tablet apu's aren't good enough.

UnHoly_One3099d ago

And nobody would ever know or care if there weren't articles like this one. (Except for the lying guy above that claims 900p hurts his eyes.) lol

G20WLY3099d ago

It's the same game on both, but performance, resolution (let's not forget that's essentially the perceivable clarity of the image) and even graphical effects can differ on Xbox and PS4.

If you have both consoles, it's worth understanding what cuts were made for the Xbox version, even if you'd enjoy it fine if that's all you played.

For me the issue is simply if I have both consoles and pay 60 for a game, I want it to be the best version. Only if they are identical would I then consider other factors before deciding what to buy, since it's a question of value.

If you only have one console or the other, then fine, this is not necessarily of interest to you and you'll have fun with either version. But there are others who think this is worth knowing and do very much care. They are happy to know in advance of their purchase. Not everyone has the same outlook or options, but that doesn't mean they should be belittled (except for the guy above with the hurty eyes!).

UnHoly_One3099d ago (Edited 3099d ago )

I'm not belittling anyone. If all the rest of the things are the same to you, then by all means, get the "better" version.

But to me, the "better" version is the one I can play with my preferred controller, with my friends if it is multiplayer, and all of those things point to the Xbox version.

I literally can't see a difference between the res anyway, as I would never put both versions side by side to compare.

I have a PS4 for exclusive games, and that's all it will ever get used for. I hate the controller too much to voluntarily subject myself to using it when I have an alternative.

But I have no problem with anyone choosing the other direction.

My only issue is the people screaming from the rooftops about 900p vs. 1080p being some monumental difference like comparing Atari 2600 to an N64 game or some such crap. It quite literally is not noticeable to a lot of people. Even IF you were to compare them directly, which nobody ever does.

Neonridr3099d ago

@G20WLY - that's a fair statement for the less than 5% of gamers out there who own both consoles, sure go with the PS4.

But it's getting tiring listening to Sony Attack Force Alpha Fans pretending like Xbox One gamers are now suddenly playing a completely $hitty game because they have to "suffer the ordeals" of 900p.

UnHoly_One3099d ago

That's kinda how I feel, Neonridr. It's pointless and not liable to change anyone's mind at this stage of the game.

PS4 guys are going to get the PS4 version, Xbox guys are going to get the Xbox version.

And if you showed any of them the other version, they probably wouldn't notice any differences.

I'm not saying there is no difference at all. There is. The PS4 version of some games is technically superior. But it's reached the point where you need a magnifying glass (figuratively) to pick out the differences.

Even most of the people who swear they can tell a difference haven't really done a side by side comparison. Not in a "real world" environment. They read these comparisons, look at screenshots online, and happily brag about PS4 being better. Meanwhile they could be playing the Xbox version and would never know it if it wasn't for the controller in their hands.

I'm sure I'll get a ton of disagrees from all the guys out there with 20/10 vision that can spot a missing pixel 12 feet away from their TV, and that's fine. The non-fanboys know that I'm telling the truth.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3099d ago
3099d ago Replies(1)
LamerTamer3099d ago

I don't know, I spend hours playing GAMES not UIs. I am in a UI for the 5 seconds it takes to load the game. So do I want 5 seconds of flashy UI and 40 hours of low res game graphics? No, that would be dumb.

Controller maybe, until you realize you can get controller adapters.

ShottyGibs3099d ago

Same argument as yours for me.. Except why would I want to subject myself to 30fps for hours on end. Hence PC is the only option for me if I value my free time.

ShottyGibs3099d ago

Well said. Petty is what it is.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3094d ago
Show all comments (275)
260°

Games with average storylines but great gameplay

Some games make up for a lackluster story with excellent gameplay. These are some games with average storylines but great gameplay.

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
shinoff2183381d ago

Who decides if a games story is average idefinitely ain't listening to no reviewers. I don't agree with most of then anyway. I think alot of them are to harsh on games so they can get clicks

banger88380d ago

Every Soulslike game ever made.

refocusedman380d ago

zelda has a story line? Actually do any nintendo 1st party games have decent (not even good) storylines?

NotoriousWhiz380d ago

Does Xenoblade count as 1st party? That's the only one I can think of.

NotoriousWhiz380d ago

Also, Ocarina of time definitely had a decent (but not great) story.

Brazz380d ago (Edited 380d ago )

Zelda average story line!? Zelda Story sucks, most time It comes to "save the princess", Nintendo sucks at story outside Fire Emblem and perhaps 1-2 other IPs.

DOMination-380d ago

Actually the Souls games and Zelda games share something in common, which is that they reward gamers for seeking out the story rather than thrusting it in their faces. Not saying this is better or worse, but it's unfair to say they don't have them.

People will be surprised to learn that if you dig a bit deeper into Zelda games, there's a whole lot of really dark and crazy stuff happening.

RaiderNation380d ago

@DOMination

Thrust in your face??? I assume by that you mean basic story-telling 101? Lol.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 380d ago
P_Bomb380d ago

I platinumed both Niohs but for the life of me, couldn’t tell you what happened in the story lol! I can namedrop Nobunaga, but that’s about it.

ChasterMies380d ago (Edited 380d ago )

The pinnacle of bad story but great gameplay is Destiny and Destiny 2. What is the Traveler? What is the Darkness? What the heck is happening? No one knew. But shooting the aliens and robots felt so good.

Brazz380d ago (Edited 380d ago )

Article os about "average" story. But If you wanna talk about bad story but great gameplay you need to look at Nintendo, they are the masters at making poor shirt story on great gameplay.

HeliosHex380d ago

@deus. If you want more of the story fleshed out in detail I'd recommend the destiny grimoire anthology 1-6 25 bucks each. It's really good I loved the backstory on the guns.

Relientk77380d ago

"I don't even have time to explain why I don't have time to explain."

Is my favorite line from Destiny's "story" lol

GotGame818380d ago

Sorry, but the princess is in another castle.

Show all comments (21)
70°

Deals: Just Cause 3, and Mass Effect Legendary Ed. Cheap This Week

This week in gaming deals we have Mass Effect Legendary Edition the cheapest it's been so far, along with great deals on other games

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
120°

Top 10 Most Overpowered Guns in Gaming

Overpowered guns can often ruin the balance of a game but they can also be a ton of fun. Unless you're on the receiving end, of course.

Read Full Story >>
fictiontalk.com