180°

New "Qorespondant" Babe Audrey Cleo

She is the new correspondent for Qore, or Qorespondent. She will be covering NBA 09: The Inside in Qore Episode 003, available tomorrow.

Read Full Story >>
ps3mods.blogspot.com
Silogon5760d ago (Edited 5760d ago )

What kills me about videogames anymore is this... They try to sell them to boys/men by using Sexual imagery. To me this seems like a waste cause the only people who buy videogames are males anyways. < by and large.

More over, hot women who whore themselves out for a buck and spot on tv or things like this are pretty absurd cause we all know they don't game.

Veronica "PALE ALE" Belmont probably does, cause she looks like she came out of a washer mixed 6 parts bleach and 2 parts water.

NewScratch5760d ago

i think whoring might be a bit strong of a word. looks like she does tv work and thats sorta what an interactive magazine would need no? plus, how else is anyone going to pay attention to news about nba 09? :)

mikeslemonade5760d ago

Come on guys do your part in putting Silogan back to 1 bubble...

I prefer veronica bellmont being the sole female on the show. Too many different girls is an unorganized mess and the show would lose its soul.

ikiru33855760d ago

and how do you know this specific chick doesn't game? maybe she does and that's why she's on it? and if she doesn't who cares. gal or guy, why should i care who is informing me about games.

Bolts5760d ago (Edited 5760d ago )

What a completely moronic post.

The fact that a hot babe game or doesn't game is completely irrelevant. If that actually matters then there wouldn't be any female reporters covering the NFL because they don't play football so they're basically there just to "whore". So are you also offended by beer adds and import car shows? There's a lot more flesh on display there so you might as well go bug them and get the f@ck off NG4.

SL1M DADDY5760d ago

It’s easier to teach a good looking woman capable of acting on TV to game but you cannot make an ugly chick that knows how to game good looking. You just can’t polish a turd bud so yeah; I’ll take the better looking chicks over some ugly gamer girl. In the end, I would care less if the correspondents were just average and knew a little about games. Besides, it’s not about how good at games they are but rather how good at interviewing they are. Good looks just mean icing on the cake.

mistertwoturbo5760d ago

When I see a guy complaining about an attractive chick like this, it just tells me one thing.

He's not into girls.

Laexerias5760d ago

Try to bait Gamer with Sexy woman.. sure. I mean.. im not f*cking interested in NBA or something else, BUT SHE IS FREAKING HOT.

Silogon5760d ago Show
mistertwoturbo5760d ago

lol Who ever said I was drooling? I already have a girlfriend that I'm soon going to get married with.

Just because your guilty of liking the same sex.

Leathersoup5760d ago

Hahahahahaha... since when have guys judged women on their gaming abilities? ;)

Cenobia5760d ago (Edited 5760d ago )

Wait, are you saying Showtime has porn at night? Because if it does, I have been totally undervaluing the benefits of getting the Comcast premium cable package.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 5760d ago
name5760d ago

It's not sexual imagery just because she's attractive. It's not like she's wearing a bikini or something playing little big planet.

Silogon5760d ago (Edited 5760d ago )

My post was for the broader spectrum. It applies here, but in a different way. We've all seen man-jaws toss on a bikini and pose for pics while playing games. Don't act like they don't do it.

However, having women pitch and talk games is absurd. They don't, by and large play them and they don't sell the product, more than they sell themselves for other outlets in the business of entertainment.

It's like this... I'm a skilled computer savy guy. Why do I want Geek Squad telling me how to fix my computer when I know more than they do? See where this is going?

Girls don't game on the average. Men/guys do and to have girls pitching games to us is for 1 reason and 1 reason only. Sex sales. Back in the 1800 all the way to 1980 it was rare to ever see a female bartender. Now, you're lucky to find a male bartender. I am one of the few I know in my area and thank god I don't plan to stay doing it for long cause I'd be out of a job at the rate women are willing to strip down for cash on a Thursday night.

But more than that I am in a full time band and we play bars in 3 different states and it's the same everywhere you go. Sex sales and like the bartender, the female is taking the position and half the time they don't know what the hell they're doing other than expecting money.

You know I'm right.

Bolts5760d ago

No, I have no idea where you're going with this post and I don't care because I like boobies. I like boobies in games, I like boobies making games, I like boobies talking about games. I like boobies in football (cheerleaders) and I like boobies talking about football.

If I can have boobies with my pies then it'll take them too.

TradingWarStories5760d ago

On this rare ocassion.

He is speaking the truth, im not saying every single woman does it and niether is he, he is pointing out the ones that do it and will do it for some money. Some people will say that it is the only thing they can do, well ermm no it isnt cos people ALWAYS have a choice.

@Fanboi, who the hell doesnt like Boobies!?, hes talking about the boobies that show you how to play a game when they never even play it themselves other than when they show you, the only joystick they touch is their boyfriends or one night stand boys. Dont get me wrong she is sexy, but I hate it when they use sex symbols to sell games, heck it works! but for the people who game for enjoyment and gaming purposes they dont need boobies in them although the odd game should have them.

Masta_Killa5760d ago

Am I the only one who wants Veronica back?

Bolts5760d ago

I want her back too. I like Veronica.

Ninja_9tails5760d ago

You are not the only one. I like Veronica Belmont.

divideby05760d ago

desperation to sell something, which noone wants to buy

Nodoze5760d ago

First lets just pretend that Siligon is...well gone. I cant even make sense of his stupid post about bartenders?

Anyway

Is Veronica really gone? If so it would be for shame as she is a good host, and a great presenter. For those that like her, be sure to check out Tekzilla.

http://revision3.com/tekzil...

Show all comments (27)
110°

7 Deserving Games That Never Got Backward Compatibility

Backward compatibility works for many games on newer consoles, but titles such as The Simpsons: Hit and Run have been left out.

90°

20 Best Survival Games of All Time

From base building to swinging willies, here are the best survival games around, which include a couple of less than obvious picks.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Vader823d ago

No 7 days to die is criminal

210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel6d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow5d ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo1825d ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie4d ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

4d ago
Hereandthere4d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4d ago
Notellin4d ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

4d ago
Hereandthere4d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

ApocalypseShadow3d ago

Lying to yourself is unbecoming.

Article link tells you all you need to know in Sarah Bond's own words.

Hereandthere4d ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

ApocalypseShadow3d ago

At least you and others get it. Note drank the Kool aid and asked for seconds thinking it was refreshing.

Most don't even know how it all played out but it's there in black and white for all to see. Microsoft brought it up for years until the MLB forced Sony's hand. It was a win win for Microsoft. Kill one reason to buy a PlayStation or kill the game by dropping it in a cheap service to kill Sony's sales numbers on PlayStation.

OtterX5d ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Cockney3d ago

They chose well, Sony gave them the backing to pursue their dreams with no restrictions even tho their games especially dreams have very niche appeal. Media molecule and Sony deserve respect for this in an age of risk averse publishing.

RNTody5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno5d ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Inverno4d ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

4d ago
fsfsxii4d ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno4d ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (29)