140°

Exclusive: Project CARS "Simply Too Much For Wii U", Developer Now Waiting On New Nintendo Hardware

London developer Slightly Mad Studios will no longer be committing resources to a Wii U edition of its acclaimed racing sim Project Cars, according to new comments attributed to an executive at the studio.

"The official line is that we're awaiting an announcement from Nintendo on new hardware," Bell was quoted as saying. "As of now Project Cars is simply too much for the Wii U."

Read Full Story >>
nintendolife.com
Shnazzyone3215d ago

Ah well, kinda figured. Shame they committed to it. However I had a feeling when every version released except for the wii U version. I'll just keep playing mario Kart then.

pcz3215d ago

they never intended to make a wiiu version, they just wanted nintendo fans money to help fund their game.

ShadowWolf7123215d ago

Dude... that's just being silly, c'mon.

They could barely get this game optimized for the other consoles for crying out loud.

Nick_The_Slick3215d ago

Hooray for conspiracy theories!

freshslicepizza3214d ago

this pretty much confirms the wii u is dead and the new system will be out soon.

MSBAUSTX3215d ago

This developer can officially rot in hell. They took our money and even said that the Wii U version was looking good and would surprise people as to what the Wii U coukd do. These guys are liars and will never get my support again. Good thing I didnt buy it for XB1 because I hear it is crap when compared to other racing games.

Angeljuice3214d ago

The WiiU is too weak to play the game, blame Nintendo for being cheapskates not the devs for trying their hardest with what little they were given.

light693214d ago

@Angeljuice

Blame nintedno? My god, I haven't logged in here in a long time but I had to respond to your stupid comment. First of why should nintendo be blamed for a developers promise on a game that nintendo had nothing to do with? You do realize that as developers they had to see what they could do and if they knew they couldn't finish the project then why lie (and yes I do believe they lied) about the Wii U version and take peoples money? From what I can see, which Is nothing since they didn't even bother showing any type of footage or development process, slightly mad studios is not worth my time and I hope they can in the future understand what limits are. I also hope in the future you become more knowledgeable and understanding of these kinds of manners.

ChickeyCantor3215d ago

Must feel great to be the kickstarter backer that gave them money for a Wii U version.

RiseofScorpio3215d ago

Tbh these hacks want people to pay for Project Cars 2 aswell even though they sold a million+ copies.

ChickeyCantor3215d ago

I cant find the link but one of the developers even insulted nintendo fans in the forums and was happy they didn't get the game.

Simply asinine.

Lamboomington3215d ago (Edited 3215d ago )

The majority of the profits didn't go to them. For those of you who don't know, which is basically all of you, this isn't kickstarter. It's WMD - World of Mass Development.

Backers don't just donate money. They invest in the game. Correct me if I'm wrong, but unless things have changed, the majority of the profits went back to the backers depending on how much they invested.

Yep. That basically completely invalidates "What about all the profits they got from the first game?"

Nonetheless, it's still sad how the WiiU owners were treated here. Some of them really wanted this.

Nick_The_Slick3215d ago (Edited 3215d ago )

And? Does selling a million copies mean they have the money for a sequel? What were their expenses? What were the end profits, if any? Right.

Armchair businessmen and developers right here on N4G...

Lamboomington3214d ago (Edited 3214d ago )

@Nick_The_Slick
It's common sense.

It was the majority of profits, the figure in my head was 70%, but probably around 60-70%, maybe less. Sorry, but that's already more than enough to invalidate mindless criticism for a second crowdfunding campaign

What if the ambition of the second game simply requires a lot more funding ? So it needs additional crowdfunding ? Did that ever occur to you ? because it's pretty obvious that's the case. Any sensible person would come to that conclusion.

Common sense will tell you that. Unless you just straight up assume that they are somehow criminals who won't use the money from sales... which is exactly what so many of you are doing.

I'm not defending SMS from valid criticism (like the WiiU version), but this particular one - "where did all the sales money go?" is ignorant and stupid.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3214d ago
Medora3215d ago

Project Cars was crowdfunded, but not through Kickstarter.

AKR3215d ago

Like I've said before; their behavior with this is what's "too much".

How could you go from praising the system's capabilities to saying it's too weak? They were one of the first set of third-party developers to announce that they'd be bringing a game over to the system; even before the U was launched we knew that pCARS would be coming.

Somewhere in their "quest to look the best", they obviously went above and beyond their original level of quality. I'm not disputing that the Wii U is weaker than the PS4 or XBO, but considering would other studios, like Shin'en Multimedia, have been able to accomplish, it's obvious that SMS pushed it aside not too long after they got their hands on the other dev-kits.

Even if the NX comes out next year; who's going to want to by a year-old port, especially when it's already available on 3 other platforms? Please SMS, grow some brain cells. UbiSoft screwed over the fanbase once, you guys definitely ain't gonna away with it a second time.

Ark_3215d ago

Totally agree ... after being initially excited for their general attitude and towards the WiiU, they lost my purchase long time a ago. Also on PC btw.

mcstorm3215d ago

I really whish I had not got the game on my Xbox one as it is a mess. I am a big fan of racing games but I hate when they are unfinished or don't work right on a console. I was excited for Project Cars on the WiiU and when they said it was not coming until later on I thought I would get the xbox one version as I wanted a new Sim game and thinking PC would be on the same lines as GT and Forza I was so wrong.

In a way in glad the WiiU is not getting this game as it will save some people being burnt like I feel I have been with PC on the Xbox One.

Nick_The_Slick3215d ago

Yes, because Shinen was able to make a simplistic hovercraft racing game with the physics of a N64 title, that means Project Cars with 40 cars on screen and advanced physics should be able to run smoothly as well... The WiiU is probably too weak to even process the physics alone for this game, much less graphics and sound.

Neonridr3214d ago

lol, clearly you don't know Shin'ens work Nick_The_Slick. But not surprising, they have made mostly Nintendo titles all their lives.

Spotie3214d ago

You've gotta be out of your mind if you think they'd have talked bad about the console while making a game for it.

Angeljuice3214d ago (Edited 3214d ago )

@AKR

They can't port the game because the WiiU is not powerful enough. Do you suggest they remake the whole game from the ground up with a less ambitious version?

Then you'd get an inferior version 2+ years from now, how appealing would that be?

Nintendo say that they don't like realistic graphics in games because it "makes games all look the same", but the truth is that realistic graphics take a lot more processing power than cartoon graphics.

And that's just the graphics, add physics into the mix and an already pushed WiiU is just going to crumble into a jittering mess.

Realism doesn't come cheap, Nintendo hardware does.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3214d ago
M3TR01DFANBOY3215d ago

sms really screwed over Wii U owners.

MSBAUSTX3215d ago

Read this article and then read others where they initially praised the Wii U for being more powerful than people thought it was. Now they simply dump the idea of a Wii U version that a ton of U owners were looking forward to. If you dont think that is screwing over U owners then you obviously dont know what the term means. Or you just like to disagree for no reason.

M3TR01DFANBOY3214d ago

Basically what MSBAUSTX said, also they pretty much stole Wii u backers money as they're not delivering what they promised

OC_MurphysLaw3215d ago

Hmmm..... definitely not the news any WiiU only owners want to hear. And not about the racer but about a dev saying "We'll wait for the new hardware".

Show all comments (83)
170°

Why did EA Kill Project CARS?

This video explains why we think Electronic Arts didn't see a future in the sim racing title Project CARS and promptly cancelled the fourth instalment.

Jin_Sakai544d ago

After the last installment I’d say most hardcore fans left. It’s just not that good anymore so I can’t really blame EA this time.

masterfox544d ago

because it was always a project and it never got finished :D

ChubbyBlade542d ago

Every game is a project. Your joke doesn’t make sense

InUrFoxHole542d ago

It makes perfect sense. It's obviously a play on the title. Jesus christ you must be a blast at parties.

ApocalypseShadow543d ago (Edited 543d ago )

Ask Bullfrog or Black Box or Tiburon or Studio 33 or Criterion or any of the previously acquired developers who made racing games as competition, or as developers of EA games, then eventually dissolved into oblivion or reassigned. Just ask them. They'll tell you why.

ApocalypseShadow542d ago

Oh. I forgot. Even Code Masters were absorbed into Criterion. Another racing developer EA took over.

Every racing developer either absorbed by EA or eventually destroyed by them. They either kill competition or have them in the end make Need 4 Speed for them.

MadLad542d ago

EA only cancels projects for one reason.
They didn't see enough money in it.

Kombatologist542d ago (Edited 542d ago )

Not when it's because it didn't meet some crazy margin. It's like if something doesn't make EA a billion dollars on day one (I'm exaggerating that figure of course), they swiftly put it out to pasture.

SurgicalMenace542d ago (Edited 542d ago )

Much like if you're spending money on what's a bad investment for your desired goals, you'd do away with it, if you're wise. We should try to get away from thinking we know more about business than individuals that have been doing it for decades. Perhaps you could benefit from going into business instead of wasting all of your talents in comment sections. It's clear that you're the missing piece that EA's been looking for.

MadLad541d ago

I've made a good amount of money betting on underdog investments over the years.

EA sets unrealistic expectations of their more niche developers, yet continue to fund absolute blunders like DICE and the Battlefield series year after year.

dumahim542d ago

EA butted in and messed with the formula and act shocked when it doesn't work out.

Show all comments (16)
90°

Original Project CARS creator trying to re-hire EA team

Ian Bell, the founder of Slightly Mad Studios, is aiming to hire former Project CARS employees to work on his upcoming GTR Revival project.

Sgt_Slaughter546d ago

If it's just going to be another sim-cade that doesn't do either one correctly then no thanks.

Project CARS 2 was a step in the right direction but the physics still aren't where they should have been, so what did they do for PC3? Go completely arcade. That killed the franchise.

220°

EA dropping Project CARS

From GI.biz: "EA is dropping Project CARS, GamesIndustry.biz can reveal.

The Slightly Mad Studios-developed series was launched in 2015, with EA confirming today that it has made the decision to "stop further development and investment" in the franchise.

The announcement was made internally and it's unclear at this stage to which extent staff could be affected. EA said that employees working on Project CARS will be moved into "suitable" roles "wherever [they] can.""

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
Terry_B548d ago

Typical for EA. They buy studios that created nice games..and are sooner or later destroying them and move the people to work on the old same 5+ EA series.

italiangamer548d ago

They will put the developers on the 1000th Need for Speed for the rest of their entire careers, just like Criterion.

SurgicalMenace548d ago

To be fair, it's not EAs fault it falls directly on the consumer. Everytime these companies choose to drop a series they're met with backlash though the gamers didn't support said series enough to justify its continuation. Attempting to paint every company as evil all because they're in it to succeed is ridiculous. They have to make money just like each of us typing in this section. If a job wasn't supporting you well you'd quit and find a new one, this is the same mentality concerning series.

TheColbertinator547d ago

@SurgicalMenace

No it is their fault. They don't listen to fans and burn the franchise to the ground by introducing elements that nobody wanted instead of increasing support for said respected franchises.

I order a steak, they make a steak. 1st sale
I order a steak again, they vomit on my steak and charge me more for it. No sale.

EA in a nutshell.

Tapani547d ago

@TheColbinator Well how do you think they make the billions then?

Their fans ARE buying their games. You are just not their focus group, and I can guarantee their customer insights team is more thorough and detailed in their reaearch than any N4G commentors’ opinion on the matter. Otherwise EA would not exist as a company, and they’d be bankrupt.

deleted548d ago

The one that still hurts the most though was Criterion w the Burnout series. Acquired Criterion's tech for their own existing IP, then shut em down. It's basically parasitic. I sure do miss Burnout's crash mode!

Hofstaderman547d ago

Sounds eerily similar to another large unnamed corporation hey. I believe some EA bigwigs shifted to that company back in the day, would explain the similarities.

rlow1547d ago

Must be talking about Sony

peppeaccardo548d ago

and instead they come out with that piece of shit of Need for Speed which looks like an Anna & Barbera cartoon. C'mon .... PC2 was my go to game for VR racing and the first one i played for tens of hours. i was so lookiing forward to PC4 after that failure of PC3 ... what a shame EA, they are bombing all the good games and stick to the garbage ones. EA when you think you have reached maximum of disappointment they top it off with style .... screw them!

SurgicalMenace548d ago

Need for Speed continues to sell so why would they get rid of what's producing what they need to maintain stability?

EazyC548d ago

What they did to this series was idiotic. The premise was great -- a sim/simcade game that GENUINELY got developed in line with its community. There is a huge gap in the market for this...I mean, PD hasn't listened to fans at all over the last year with regard to simple Gran Turismo 7 tweaks. Sim racing fans are screaming for a title where they actually give a shit about their users.

Project Cars 2 was genuinely on to something, it just needed some refinement. But instead they followed up by selling off to EA with a braindead GRID clone with Project Cars 3. Again...idiotic.

SurgicalMenace547d ago

Well since you're the authority on properly managing a million dollar company, why don't you just call them to let them know of your divine wisdom?

Hardcore sim racers are the ones who are competing acrossed the globe, no company in their right mind would focus on a forever moving casual market. They have to focus on those dedicated to supporting their efforts. Notice how you're speaking from a perspective of self opposed to the collective. Perhaps they sold out because they, like us, needed the money knowing that they could reinvest it into something new. PC was a decent racer but very few people mainlined it over GT or Forza.

EazyC547d ago

I'm not a divine authority but I notice a pattern where these huge corporations turn completely tone deaf of what the "average fan" wants.

vallencer547d ago

Hate to break it to you but project cars 3 was published by Bandai in 2020. EA didn't buy codemasters, which owned slightly mad studios, until 2021. Either way the sales were super poor for the game and it's not surprising EA would just drop the game. BUT it still sucks because it's one less sim racing game on the market. Especially because the first 2 were really good.

Tzuno548d ago

and focuses more on cartoon network games

Show all comments (19)