270°

Fallout 4's "basically done" - Bethesda explains that 2015 release date

We all knew Fallout 4 was coming. But despite the whispered rumours of a 2015 release, it was more hope than belief that would actually happen.

Read Full Story >>
gamesradar.com
aLucidMind3252d ago

I knew it was going to be this fall, just as I knew it was going to be announced at E3 this year. It didn't take a rocket scientist to see it lol.

AliTheSnake13252d ago

Let's hope it is not a Bugfest. Giving their history.

yellowgerbil3252d ago

yeah hated all those radroaches...

3252d ago
aLucidMind3252d ago

It will be... I hate being cynical sometimes lol.

Zeref3252d ago

It's Bethesda. It's gonna be infested with bugs.

mikeslemonade3252d ago

Wow it's basically done!? Did everyone really turn their eye when they saw more gameplay at the Microsoft E3 conference.

WHen I say that looks like Fallout 3 quality, I'm not lying. Robotic looking enemies, bad graphics, and underwhelming gameplay.

Y'all are drinking the koolaid and need to pump your brakes.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3252d ago
Hold_It3252d ago

That's cool and all but when are we getting Final Fantasy Dissigia?

aLucidMind3252d ago

Not enough information to judge. It was obvious with Fallout 4 because Bethesda has said they planned to work between TES and Fallout in a cyclical manner (obviously, I'm paraphrasing) back around Fallout 3 was the new thing. FO3's GotY edition released, Skyrim releases two years later. Skyrim Legendary releases, I hypothesized that it was most likely going to be FO4 two years later.

Bethesda announced their first ever E3 conference, which confirmed it for me as we all know FO4's anticipation was already at fever pitch. Then it was said they're going to discuss an RPG, which proved to me that I was right.

The information was there, and it was rather obvious to me.

_-EDMIX-_3252d ago

lol, agreed. It was one of those known things gamers sorta all knew was happening.

JamesBroski3252d ago

That was a freaking good move from Bethesda. I just hope everything goes according to the plan and it doesn't get delayed.

ZaWarudo3252d ago

Yep. Bethesda came out of nowhere, officially announces Fallout 4 with a gameplay trailer, shows a ton of gameplay at E3, and drops a friggin bomb with the 2015 release date.

oasdada3252d ago

Lets just hope that bomb doesnt explode in our faces! I dont want to download patches the size of a full game

Cra2yey33252d ago

Basically done, then it comes out broken with glitches and bad framerate...

VJGenova3252d ago

They have 4-5 months to get the kinks out. Hopefully that's long enough. The Witcher 3 needed quite a bit longer when it was "basically done".

deadpoolio3163252d ago

Except we know Bugthesda doesn't look for bugs and glitches EVER in any game hence why EVERY Fallout and Elder Scrolls game comes out broken for 3-6 months on every platform...

Maybe they should spend the extra time actually doing QA on their game, instead of their usual.. Does it start up, YES sweet ship it.

VJGenova3252d ago (Edited 3252d ago )

For people that disagreed with me, let's look at my comment:

1. They have 4-5 months to get the kinks out. Fact! Doesn't mean they will, but they that's how long they have.

2. Hopefully that's long enough. Opinion. You hope it takes longer then?

3. The Witcher 3 needed quite a bit longer when it was "basically done." Fact. It was delayed twice to get the kinks out.

So everyone who disagrees with my prior comment hopes it takes longer than 4-5 months to get running well. I for one, hope it runs well at launch. Won't be a day 1 purchase just in case, but I can hope! :-)

JamesBroski3252d ago (Edited 3252d ago )

@Genova84

I bought Fallout 3 and Skyrim both at release and even though I encountered bugs, none of them were game breaking.

Bethesda literally waited the last moment to announce it, I'm sure they know what they're doing and if the game won't be acceptable for a launch, they will delay it.

What people don't get, like deadpoolio316, is that those worlds are freaking huge (and I'm not talking about the actual size of the map, but the quests, items, loot, etc) and since there are so many possibilities, it's impossible for them to test everything. Todd said that he has more than 400 hours into the game and still discovers things that he didn't even know were in the game. And he's working on it.

Most of the bugs are going to be found by the gamers and reported to Bethesda so they can work on them.

And "basically done" is a pretty vast statement. Not because CD Projekt Red said that means that Bethesda won't be ready. But I get what you mean man. Seriously, everyone here is on a "disagree" rampage.

sweendog3252d ago

People are disagreeing with you because its Bethesda, not because of what you said. Give them ten years to polish out the bugs and it will still be a buggy mess.

Oblivion is one of my favorite games ever and I will pick fallout 4 up on release.

But I know I will end up with quest items in my inventory that are pointless as the recipient of said quest items wont accept it. Ill just shoot said person in the face instead. Its all part of the Bethesda charm.
My main fault with the Witcher is when the same bug happens that I said above I cant lose my temper and just kill everyone, I have to take it out on the goats and geese in the villages

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3252d ago
JamesBroski3252d ago

They've been working on it for a while... it's not like the PC version is being outsourced by 12 people.

camel_toad3252d ago

They have to be fully aware of people's perception of their history of releasing bug-ridden games so Im really hoping they are testing the hell out of it. Bugs or not though Ive no doubt this game is going to consume me.

aLucidMind3252d ago

They were familiar with their reputation before Skyrim was announced... The Civil War main quest line still has a bug that can prevent it from continuing past a certain point.

WizzroSupreme3252d ago

Wow, well, hopefully these next few months will mean them polishing it like crazy.

TheColbertinator3252d ago

All Fallout fans are just asking for polish. Bethesda games are known for heavy bugs on launch. Not counting Fire Ants.

immoracle3252d ago

As long as bugs aren't game breaking, ie important characters falling to their deaths without interaction from player, then I don't mind them so much.

Show all comments (32)
140°

Fallout 4 – Next Gen Update 2 Notes

A new update is now available for Fallout 4. This update adds the ability to manage your control over graphic fidelity or performance and addresses some further stability and visual issues.

Read Full Story >>
bethesda.net
Tacoboto6d ago

How nice of them to give us more control over graphical settings as a way to *completely* avoid taking accountability for the broken Xbox settings.

bondsmx6d ago

Well, I still crashed like 5 times last night within two hours. So there’s that.

anast6d ago

I had to stop. The game is not good. I'd rather play Skyrim and that game isn't that good either.

460°

Brad Hilderbrand explains the reason behind the recent Xbox studio closures

There are two reasons why all those Bethesda studios closed, and neither of them have anything to do with Bethesda (directly)...

Game Pass and Activision.

Read Full Story >>
linkedin.com
Christopher11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

The guy confirming what we've all (well, most of us) been saying since the latest purchase.

crazyCoconuts11d ago

Remember the relatively common counter that went something like "I'm sure you arm-chair CEOs know better how to run a company than the biggest company in the world"?

I mean - there's a lot to running a company for sure, but on this topic it's hard to understand how Phil and team didn't see this coming.

RNTody11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Phil and team knew it was coming and planned for it. It's not even a conspiracy, it's simply the business of cutting costs and superfluous studios after a major acquisition. They don't give a damn about Tango Gameworks or other small creative studios that won't recoup their losses. They don't care about investing in this industry. They have no interest in risky and expensive new IP. They are only interested in profiting off ownership of Bethesda IP, Call of Duty and Candy Crush.

I guarantee you that not one single game under their banner will improve or become bigger and better.

Welcome to the Xbox family, what a pathetic joke.

Anyone who continues to support this, enjoy your future, because this is it. Ninja Theory is next, and Perfect Dark after that.

Christopher11d ago

Especially not with the evidence of tons of existing movie streaming subs out there and how they fail to make a profit with over 100m users each quarter.

fr0sty11d ago

Xbox releases more first party studios than first party games.

Crows9011d ago

It's actually really simple. CEO don't have it hard at all...they make decisions that everyone else has to accomplish. It's the actual low level employee leadership that makes things work well.

Besides that it is obvious when you use simple math that something was going to break.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 11d ago
Lightning7711d ago

Apparently they're debating if they wanna put the new Cod on Gamepass or not.

Either grow GP with Cod or don't put it on GP and grow the revenue the traditional way while GP will suffer.

The mess that MS puts themselves in.

badz14911d ago

LOL the cheerleaders for the ABK acquisition were all cheering for CoD to be on GP day 1 and they were adamant that Jim Ryan was scared because of THAT and was fighting for the survival of the PS brand if CoD is taken away or given day 1 on GP. hahaha...now suddenly MS is unsure if they wanna put CoD on GP day 1??

isn't this false marketing? they said ALL (not some) 1st party xbox games will be released on GP day 1 and CoD is now 1st party starting last year! it's right there still on their website.

https://www.xbox.com/en-US/...

lawsuit time??

Outside_ofthe_Box11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

@badz149

People were being blind fans. Things is if you look at things objectively and logically since inception, gamepass from a business perspective was never going to be good idea unless you had hundreds of millions subscribed, which Microsoft was never going to get in a timely manner.

People kept pointing out the cons and people kept having their hands over their ears. I wonder how guys like Orchard and Septic who were rooting for the acquisition to go through like people do when their team makes it to the Superbowl are receiving this news lol

ziggyzinfirion11d ago

@badz149

Looks like MS removed the page.

VariantAEC7d ago

@badz149
And it's gone now... that was fast.
Maybe quote it next time?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 7d ago
mkis00711d ago

Just think its a bit insane to close their ?only? Good japanese studio...so much for caring for that market.

Crows9011d ago

And a great studio too....love evil within...still have ghost wire Tokyo in my backlog but will get to it soon enough.

XiNatsuDragnel11d ago

I'm not surprised Microsoft guys are crock nuff said

isarai11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Honestly i think Bethesda needs to buy themselves out of zenimax/MSs hands and do their own thing, i honestly think that would fix a lot of issues and save them from a potential closure.

Zeref11d ago

There's a reason they sold in the first place. And Bethesda is not closing anytime soon lol. As much as I hate the studio closures. They were all small studios 2 of them were mobile studios.

I think these are growing pains and Xbox will get back on track. But they're not getting any more passes.

jwillj2k411d ago (Edited 11d ago )

I’d like to see your reaction to being growing pained out of your job after the launch of a successful product.

Mr_cheese11d ago

Excuses, Excuses, excuses.

If growing pains have been happening for the best part of a decade, they're not growth.

XiNatsuDragnel11d ago

Zeref nii San
I'm sorry but xbox has been rightfully bashed due to constant incompetence

romulus2311d ago

Yet you literally just gave them a pass, being "small studios" or "mobile studios" is irrelevant. There's no excsue for closing Tango, none. They praise the game, they PR talk about it's the kind of game the company needs and yet they shutter the developer, that's foul on every level.

Chevalier11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Ah Zeref head in the sand like a idiot. Gamepass is a absolute failure like we all told you. Nothing at this point will turn this around. It's not growing pains, the growth is done. Even streaming with 100 million subscribers can't turn a profit and you think Xbox with Gamepass will turn it around? Lol.

It's not a coincidence that Xbox stopped announcing Xbox Gamepass numbers just like they stopped announcing Xbox One hardware numbers and no Series S/X numbers which are behind the Xbox One even.

Remember when we said Xbox customers don't buy games?! Lol. Well this confirmed literally everything we told Xbox fans that said Gamepass was very profitable? Sorry revenues and lack of profit suggest otherwise

Can't wait to see your reaction when their 2nd round of closures happens. Perfect Dark studio and Ninja Theory will next.

Barlos11d ago

No, this isn't growing pains. Xbox has been on the scene for over 20 years.

This is Microsoft not being content with competing, they want to own and control the industry. Buy out as many major devs/publishers as possible so that they own all the IPs. It's only the IPs they care about. Not the Studio's, not the people. They're an insidious, cancerous company and are the worst thing to ever happen to the gaming industry.

shinoff218310d ago

There's no getting back on track. Their releasing games on ps5. That's a wrap.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 10d ago
Tacoboto11d ago

Bethesda greenlit Redfall, launched Fallout 76 in the condition it was in (and the fiasco with the bonus bag), and spent all that time on Starfield finishing it as it was with that same engine. Wolfenstein Youngblood exists because of them too, not Microsoft.

Are you *sure* leaving them alone would actually result in a better outcome, not just a different one?

isarai11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

A lot of this excessive monetization, and GAAS crap started when Zenimax decided to start looking for a buyer. Not a coincidence that there was a sudden shift in prioritizing profits above quality or even coherence at the same time. They wanted big numbers to attract buyers, now that they've been bought, MS wants exactly what they were baited with.

However even under Zenimax they made enough to self publish sometimes, so i would imagine it's not too far fetched that they could pay their way into independence if they REALLY wanted to.

Also even people at Bethesda and Arkane were hoping MS would cancel the game as again, they were forced to make something they didn't want to make.

mkis00711d ago

Havent seen any decisions since the buyout that lead me to believe MS knows what to do with them either . Easiest one would have to be the fallout 4 upgrade...with minimal effort it could have been a big win for leadership...but nope we got a standard Bethesda release for a patch.

shinoff218310d ago

Tacoboto. Bethesda greenest it to be made. Ms greenest the release. Remember phil telling us he don't know what happened because it polled well behind closed doors. Nice try on that one with redfall. In the end it was on Ms not Bethesda

Einhander197211d ago

Ah, we can see how the Microsoft media machine works.

Every article I read now is some kind of attempt to shift the blame off Microsoft and paint them as the victims or convince people that Microsoft mistakes were just some kind unforeseeable unfortunate twist of fate.

The shills are out in full force today.

Christopher11d ago

This is not at all what this article is saying. It's saying that honest and useful studios are getting closed because of big money deals elsewhere and the faults with game pass as a model.

Einhander197211d ago

I understand what the article is about.

It's a deflection, it's a putting the cart before the horse article.

Let me tell you how this problem wouldn't have existed in the first place.

Microsoft not creating a service funded by subsidization and having the foresight to see that it would disrupt consumer spending habit to begin with. Then not buying Bethesda and undertaking costs for a service that was already failing to pay for itself because their own expectations of Game Pass having "billions" of subscribers was unobtainable from the very start.

And if you don't think that was the case go back to the article on the day Game Pass launched and read the comments from people from day one who foresaw that this would be an unsustainable model and would cause people to stop spending in the same way.

Christopher11d ago

***Microsoft not creating a service funded by subsidization and having the foresight to see that it would disrupt consumer spending habit to begin with.***

This article literally supports this opinion. He's not praising Game Pass or the ABK purchase.

Einhander197211d ago (Edited 11d ago )

This is an explanation of why it failed, there is zero blame put onto Microsoft itself.

Yes, it talks about what went wrong, but it doesn't say Microsoft shouldn't have done it. It doesn't say Phil should have foreseen this outcome and stopped before it got to this point.

"convince people that Microsoft mistakes were just some kind unforeseeable unfortunate twist of fate"

shinoff218310d ago (Edited 10d ago )

Thats what I took from the article. Maybe we're mistaken Christopher lol

It saying why it failed puts enough blame on Ms imo. Eben if they didn't come put and say fk Ms etc.

Christopher11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

***but you're seeing the impact; all those smaller studios making really interesting games are going to fall away, simply because as good as games like Hi-Fi Rush are, they're never going to make enough money to make up that $70B hole that Xbox now has to dig itself out of.***

If you see that as support or you explicitly just want people to end their argument with "and, in conclusion, Microsoft bad" then that's on you. This article does not support Microsoft's choices and highlights the faults. Nothing it says is good about these choices, even saying that putting CoD on Game Pass would be money losing for them because they've set themselves up for failure (and not putting it on there will drop subscriber numbers like crazy, meaning their Game Pass plans were shit to begin with).

No matter how you look at it, they're saying Microsoft made decisions that hurt the bottom line, force closures, and leave Game Pass in a situation where they lose no matter what they do. It's all negative.

Einhander197211d ago

Christopher, if Microsoft hadn't made Game Pass and bought a bunch of publishers would this article even need to exist?

Christopher11d ago

***Christopher, if Microsoft hadn't made Game Pass and bought a bunch of publishers would this article even need to exist? ***

How is this an argument to anything being discussed? This is just as valuable of an argument as "if fish had stayed in deeper waters, they wouldn't have evolved to tetrapods, adapted to shallow water and then to land, and we wouldn't even exist and have to worry about game pass at all."

You're bringing nothing to this argument and then complaining that other people are highlighting the issues with Game Pass and spending tens of billions on studios because what we should be discussing is what it would be like if Microsoft hadn't done any of that.

Well, they did do it. Now pull up your big boy pants and join in on the discussion of what that has meant for the industry since then and, especially right now, how that is affecting the industry and game studios under Microsoft. None of us are able to go back in time and change what was done.

Einhander197211d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Christopher, this isn't me not understanding what the article is about, it's you not understanding what I am saying.

If you want me to make excuses for Microsoft's bad decisions you're not going to get that or just agree with people who are doing that, it's not going to happen, nor are you going to convert me into thinking xbox "needs to exist".

Ya know what, maybe "Microsoft bad".... maybe their decisions ARE having a negative effect on the industry, and instead of deflecting from their actual actions and making excuses for them we stand up and say "no" "Microsoft is hurting the industry"

And maybe, just maybe, it was so obvious that this was going to be the outcome that even nobodies in comment sections on websites were able to easily predict this outcome, yet Microsoft did it anyway then kept doing and even when it became undeniable that it was having a negative impact on their business and and the industry itself, then they knowingly made even bigger purchases and caused more problems.

And the one thing you're right about is that I can't go back in time, but I CAN speak up and try to keep it from happening again...

Maybe if the people who were speaking up 7 years ago were listened too we wouldn't be having this discussion and Tango and Arkane would still be in business along with all the other people who have lost their jobs due to Microsoft's actions.

Do you like analogies?

What you're saying is like an alcoholic crashing their car then trying to explain it by saying it was caused by everything except the fact that they were dunk because they are an alcoholic and don't want to stop drinking.

Chevalier11d ago

Why the excuses here? Microsoft did one thing no other company can do which is subsidize Xbox with these insane purchases in hopes of suffocating the industry out in hopes to be the last one standing so they can charge whatever they want.

How are you excusing this crap even and putting your head in the sand here? It's pretty clear who is at fault here for the situation they built and put themselves in. It's them trying to push everyone around with cash that no one else can compare.

They knowingly did all that and now are trying to pretend the market is to blame? Lol. That is absolutely rich irony. That you can't see the forest for the trees here too.

TiredGamer11d ago

The article is essentially focusing the blame on MS. GamePass was a hail mary play to change the gaming paradigm and carve out a special niche for themselves, emulating the Netflix model, that might have led to MS becoming the leader in the long-term. Unfortunately, the subscriber growth isn't really there, and the model isn't really built to weather that lack of revenue. MS is now in a restructure mindset to figure out how they balance out their model in a way that can still make them money.

've always believed that GamePass was a high risk shot that had a very low chance of long-term success. But the problem with it, whether it succeeded or not, is that it accelerated the proverbial "race to zero" consumer expectation that ran its course in the mobile gaming industry in the late 2000s. When consumers start thinking that games should be "cheap" (as in through a $10/month all-you-can-eat subscription model), it turns the narrative against games being priced at realistic levels. So with the GamePass failure, they've not only sabotaged their market share, but they've impacted the entire industry and devalued the cost of game development to the average consumer. So now it's harder to develop mega-big budget games and to earn the revenue needed to pay for them.

XiNatsuDragnel11d ago

Again terrible excuses in the 1st place

Christopher11d ago

***If you want me to make excuses for Microsoft's bad decisions you're not going to get that or just agree with people who are doing that, it's not going to happen, nor are you going to convert me into thinking xbox "needs to exist". ***

No one is asking you to make excuses for Microsoft's bad decisions nor is anyone asking you to convert to anything.

***Ya know what, maybe "Microsoft bad".... maybe their decisions ARE having a negative effect on the industry, and instead of deflecting from their actual actions and making excuses for them we stand up and say "no" "Microsoft is hurting the industry" ***

Literally no one here is doing this. They're literally discussing how Microsoft's decisions have hurt the industry. Except you. You're rambling about why people aren't complaining about Microsoft when people are in fact complaining about Microsoft.

*** And the one thing you're right about is that I can't go back in time, but I CAN speak up and try to keep it from happening again... ***

Then perhaps actually add something to the conversation other than calling people shills when people are complaining about the decisions and repercussions of Microsoft's actions.

Tacoboto11d ago

Christopher, you're fighting a block wall here - Ein will continue twisting and contorting any remark to fit his self-created narrative.

Einhander197211d ago (Edited 11d ago )

"Then perhaps actually add something to the conversation other than calling people shills when people are complaining about the decisions and repercussions of Microsoft's actions."

Cristopher, in no way is the author of this article complaining, they are explaining what happened it's literally the title. They never once say that Microsoft shouldn't have bought Zenimax or Activision or that Game Pass was a bad idea to begin with. They think the problem with Game Pass is that it didn't grow fast enough, not that it was a bad idea from the get go.

BTW this is his job title.

"Public Relations and Communications Leader"

What do you think a Public Relations and Communications Leader does to make money?

Edit: I have read a dozen of these articles that just started coming out in the last 24 hours that are trying to shift the conversation away from blaming Microsoft, the shift here and in several other articles is trying to say it just didn't gain subscribers fast enough, not that it was a bad idea to begin with that was doomed to fail or placing the blame on anyone.

It was all just an unforeseeable outcome, no one should be held responsible it was just a billion dollar oopsie that's costing thousands of people their jobs and has caused a downturn in the entire industries sustainability.

Oopsie!

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 10d ago
MrDead11d ago

It's greed. MS has the IP's it wants now it's dumping the studios that it's raided, MS will still make money from Tango's games unlike the people that made them. If anyone follows MS outside of gaming you'll see this is what they do, buy companies take what they want consolidate some of the workforce and shut them down. I don't know why people are acting so surprised when this is Microsoft being Microsoft.

MS is a three trillion dollar company, if it enters a market it has no need to compete, they take what they want and with the financial influence it can bypass laws that are meant to protect the consumer and the workforce. Just look at how they are cornering the AI market right now with buyups and investments.

shinoff218310d ago

Mr dead spot on as fk. Ms has been doing this it's whole time around.

Show all comments (68)
100°

I Think It's About Time We Realize Fallout 4 Wasn't That Bad

Ahmed from eXputer: "2015's Fallout 4 received harsh criticism upon launching, but I think it was unwarranted and the game deserves more praise than it got."

helicoptergirl12d ago

It was totally that bad. I couldn't finish the campaign it was so bland and boring as I recall. Got so sick of it. 1000 stimpaks on hard. It is very rare that I play half a game and then just quit. I usually always finish it. But i was so bored with this game I just stopped and never went back and never regretted it. Just thinking about that game makes me shudder

Furesis12d ago

That's exactly what happened to me too lmao
Fallout 4 is not a fallout game period it's a bethesda game

Vits12d ago

The comparison with Skyrim is mind-boggling. Yes, Skyrim has streamlined many of the systems that Morrowind introduced. However, it did not tamper with the core of the Elder Scrolls franchise; it did not diminish the freedom and sense of exploration that made Bethesda RPGs famous. Fallout 4, on the other hand, did exactly that to the Fallout series. It eliminated what made Fallout such a beloved series to play. There are no consequences for your choices, no reason to explore, and barely any interesting set pieces in the game.

It's not terrible, but it's a painfully mediocre game in a franchise that typically doesn't produce such mediocrity. So that is why people see it as bad, the bar is just much higher.

anast11d ago

They both feel the same because they are, it's just that one has swords and magic and the other has swords and guns.

anast11d ago

I'm replaying it now. It sucks. I'm about 30 hours in and thinking about quitting again. I am so tired of the dialogue I just spam a random button because it doesn't matter. The upgrade just feels like a graphical mod, everything else is not good.

Good-Smurf11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

I couldn't play the game as-is it was insanely boring and grindy and the grind itself are not fun at all.
Mods helped me stomach the game a bit better but after a while I just stopped playing and uninstalled it because the game did nothing after the first few hours to give me any motivation to keep playing it, it just became a mindless looter shooter with obsession in settlement building and defending.
Compared to F3 and FNV, F4 was barely a mediocre game it wasn't bad but it's also very forgettable entry.

MrDead11d ago

It's not that bad after 300+ mods that fix it's issues and make the game fun... but lets not talk about mods right now as they are f****d.

Show all comments (13)