An EGMR writer addresses the complaints about the graphical quality of Fallout 4 given the series' history, arguing that we should be picking a better battle and instead be acknowledging the accurate representation of the game.
It may be years away, but whenever it arrives, Fallout 5 needs to improve on its predecessor in several areas.
They really need to get rid of weapon mods and bring back more unique weapons that are hard to get / find
They won't improve it other than a slight graphical upgrade. They have always been better at live action than making games.
Only way it could improve is taking it away from Bethesda and regroup Classic Fallout (1&2) devs with decent budget and time to make it.
Weirdly undercooked, despite resolution and frame-rate improvements on console.
So PS5 is the only version that has any real improvements and that's in the quality settings, those modes are busted on the Xbox.
For PC they added ultra widescreen and then broke everything that the mods fixed.
They did give us some basic new missions and some boring weapons though, so thanks I guess.
I never once tried quality mode, I only use performance mode on SX. So I cant even tell if there was supposed to be a difference or not.
Should have got a finger out and remade Fallout 3 and New Vegas as a duo.
With the new show, it would have sold MASSIVELY.
Bethesda should have been more on the ball with contracting other studios to make spinoff Fallout games. Hell, if they just got the New Vegas team back for another one it would have been an absolute triumph.
I have a theory that Bethesda has a major insecurity about other studios outdoing them though (especially after Starfield) so would explain why.
Playing through it on PS5 Performance and it looks and moves great imo. I’m in the Institute, just finished the Cabot House sides. No hiccups or bugs as of yet.
The Nerd Stash: "In Fallout 4, there are a wide variety of melee builds, but you'll need the best weapons for the job in order to dish out the most damage."
People will always have something to complain about. Especially on the internet. The same individuals who are bashing the game are the first who are going to buy it.
Just don't mind them. They are irrelevant.
I find nothing wrong with the trailer. And The people who are crying probably have never played a fallout game
How are the visuals disappointing? I find the new color palette and draw distance quite spectacular. It also looks as gritty as Fallout 3 which is great (it was the thing that made the game's distinct in the first place).
Fallout has mostly never been about the visuals but about journey,the experience. Can't wait for this baby
I'm actually glad the trailer is like that. At least, Bethesda don't try to lure you with CGI, target renders or live action trailers. I wont have to think "Yeah that's what the trailer looks, how will look the game?".
After Watch_Dogs and Alien: Colonial Marines fiascos, plus the nunerous overly epic game trailers for underwhelming games (EA, Activision and Ubisoft say "Hi"), I think gamers deserve more fairness about the correct representation of their upcoming games.
Yes, the Fallout 4 trailer wasn't a huge graphical powerhouse, but at least Bethesda seemed honest with gamers, it didn't seem like a photorealistic CGI trailer, it wasn't a live action trailer that shows nothing of the game. It was just honest and not overpromising.
The game isn't out yet so we can't say if this is how Fallout 4 will look like, but it's more likely.
(and let's be honest, Bethesda games have always been technically average, but they had a great art direction and much content)