1010°

Sony At E3: God Of War III Presents Lame Trailer Time

Steve West writes:

"Of the big 3, Sony always seems to be the one having trouble making course corrections. Take the E3 God of War III trailer this year. Time and time again Sony makes the mistake of putting out CGI only trailers."

Read Full Story >>
cinemablend.com
pwnsause5762d ago (Edited 5762d ago )

the new standard for sony is to show CGI target renders to prove that they can get close to the trailer

Edit:

to the people that are disagreeing with me, look at the 2005 KZ2 trailer, that was a target render of what Guerilla Games was envisioning, look at MAG, that was a target render on what Zipper was envisioning, look at the original Assasins creed trailer, that was a target render that Ubisoft was envisioning. look at the first Trailers for Motorstorm 1 and 2, that is the target render that Evolution was envisioning. Look at the very first Gran Turismo 5 trailer (it was called vision Gran turismo), that was a target render that Polyphony Digital was envisioning. Look at the very first Street Fighter IV trailer, that was a target render that Capcom was envisioning. look at the very first Halo 3 trailer, that was a target render that Bungie was envisioning.

Target renders dont have to be about graphics BTW, they can also be what you want your game to be about and revolved around of, like the assasins creed trailer. That trailer showed what the game was going to be about, which was stealth. Target renders leave clues. They leave a purpose for the developer and gives a sneak peak to the consumer to see what the game is going to be about and what its going to push on a console.

PoSTedUP5762d ago

i agree somewhat, that makes sense.

AngryXbot5761d ago

The stupidity of people doubting Sony, is just that: STUPIDITY.

Killzone 2 is almost as gorgeous as CGI and in many ways surpasses the 2005 CGI trailer.

Gran Turismo looks even better than real life.

Uncharted is still the best looking game out in the market at the moment.

And MGS4 showed that PS3s is indeed vastly more powerful than any competitor.

With that in mind and God of wars history, anyone doubting GOW3 is a fool plain and simple.

Im beginning to think that most of the people writing negative stuff are hardcore xbots who owns 360 and have made it their personal mission to see the PS3 fail.

Sir_Ken_Kutaragi5761d ago (Edited 5761d ago )

Your one BILLION % Correct when you said -

'Im beginning to think that most of the people writing negative stuff are hardcore xbots who owns 360 and have made it their personal mission to see the PS3 fail'

Of course it is, they have been Sl*gging off the PS3 since it's been out :-/ (On this site and others) And will do forever. The Funny thing is tho...IT'S NOT WORKING!!! ;-D Worldwide PS3 sales are going up and up;) That must HURT the xBot Lemmings HARD!!! ;-D Well they started it!!! ;-D

Lame = These Sites = NEGATIVE NEWS4PS3Gamers :-/
I'm happy with my SEXY;)PS3!;-P So couldn't care less what they say.

+I wish Micro$oft would just erm go away(was going to put a 4 + 3 letter words there!!!) ;-D But they got unlimited money :-( So they will be back with xBox 4(Something) It's got to have a '4' in it, to Fool people this is there 4th Console, so when PS4 comes out they will have a '4' in there name!!!
;-D
Just like the xBox '3'60...HOW ******* SAD IS THAT!!!!!!!!!!! +It didn't work!!! ;-D

PooPooPlatter5762d ago

Killzone 2 original 'impossible Sony lies' trailer vs Killzone 2 realtime PS3 footage:

http://generationdreamteam....

God of War fans got the message from the GoW3 teaser - yes, this is what it's going to actually look like realtime.

SixTwoTwo5762d ago

people still doubt Sony. They should have learned from Killzone 2 already.

Domenikos5762d ago

In the end, there will be ONLY CHAOS.

BigBaehr5762d ago

And even those comparison pics are from last years graphics, the graphics now rape the original trailer.

PooPooPlatter5762d ago

@BigBaehr, totally. Not only that, I am pretty sure all the new footage from KZ2 is all multiplayer.

sonarus5762d ago

WTF do they want. Its a teaser. How do you tease with gameplay trailer. This guy is a fool

Playstation Man5762d ago

God of War III is just next on the list to silence the doubters, this time by dual-weilded blades rather than a rifle. Go for the Jug Kratos!

staub915762d ago

It's called a teaser trailer....I'm no expert, but I believe that means that it is suppose to tease us.

zodiac9095762d ago

finally someone with some sense!

lilgringo5762d ago

The killzone gameplay vids does NOT look like the prerendered e3 05 video. And those images u showed PooPooPlatter are bullshots and most of them are not ingame but inengine. The resolution is to low which makes them look cleaner and they're probably photoshopped with AA and what not. I've seen the gameplay video and i can't say i'm impressed at all.
I don't own a ps3 and never will, mostly because of e3 05. If they think they can show a prerendered video and claim it's actual gameplay and think that everyone will just forget about it later, they're f***ing mistaken. No, i'm serious, because of that toghether with smug statements like 4D etcetera, i will NOT buy a ps3. Although i will play many of the good games coming out for the ps3 at my friend place

Black_Jack5761d ago (Edited 5761d ago )

i feel sorry for you gringo..

how about the halo 3 cg teaser (which was balls anyway) compared to in game footage. i'm sure you were very disappointed then as well... wait i guess you overlooked that.

gaffyh5761d ago

Yeah KZ2 gameplay looks a lot better than the CGI trailer they showed in 2005. The only thing that looks a little worse is the smoke IMO, but everything else looks much better.

So I don't doubt that GOW3 will look great.

StephanieBBB5761d ago

I admit that cgi trailers are kinda worthless and missleading "sometimes" but atleast sony showed some amazing footage of exclusives that no other console could pull off.

I am confident that GoW3 will look out of this world and that it will further prove that PS3 is the system for the core gamers and entertainment addicts.

IzKyD13315761d ago

halo 3's first trailer was CGI

robep35761d ago

Best reply is this

http://www.n4g.com/events_e...

Item above should have stopped this BS item from being posted.
PS3 owners will have the last LAUGH!

Shroomy5761d ago

The Killzone CGI trailer still looks better, look at when they are in the sky, the characters lack depth and look plain, and the environment down below also looks plain "in the demo popup was crazy". Nice try.

The Halo 3 video was in ENGINE, it was showing the huge draw distance Halo 3 was capable of, and in the game you can see out to a very far distance.

They toned down the chief, as it was a waste of resources, and a golden chief would stick out like crazy I'd imagine. The real time reflections on his visor were cut due to waste of processing power, to go to the AI no doubt. If you don't believe me it's in engine, you can see the Bungie staff working on it in one of their earlier Vidocs.

trikster405761d ago

It is kinda annoying how everyone says the first killzone trailer was CGI. It was, in fact, a TARGET RENDER bases upon the supposed final specs of the PS3. It was actually running in REAL time on PC. IT was running at only 5 fps but sped up to 60 but it was indeed rendered in real time, just not on a PS3. That Halo trailer...yah that was CGI.

Shroomy5761d ago

Just never put in, because really, what gameplay do you get there?

Look at the new Halo Wars video, that's CGI, but the Halo trailer was in engine, because if it wasn't it would be the same style as the Halo Wars trailer, but it isn't.

Bungie weren't lying when they said it was in engine, Sony said it was in real time and that was a lie, it wasn't running on the games engine so it's CGI.

trikster405761d ago

Lol just because it wasn't running on the final game engine doesn't mean it was CGI. It was being rendered in real time, just on a PC because the final specs of the PS3 weren't even complete. And like I stated, a PC could only render it at 5 fps, so they sped up the frames to 60fps.

BISHOP-BRASIL5761d ago

@lilgringo

And you want...?

What do you expect, for us to trow away our PS3 whining about KillZone 2 is not exactly as the 05 trailer?

Or maybe you want for us to beg "oh please gringo, buy a PS3"...

Come on, get your act together! People like what they see in KillZone 2 and most here look pleased with their console already before it coming, this is a GoW teaser tread about how they teased with a CG, like if this wasn't dumb enough, come you with this pathetic bashing?

Get out that way! -->

+ Show (16) more repliesLast reply 5761d ago
Lanontscuz5762d ago

maybe what u saw was not cgi ..... lol

Domenikos5762d ago

GOW 2 graphs were amazing, i mean AMAZING for a PS2 game.

No doubts with GOW 3

DaTruth5761d ago

Didn't they do this with RFOM2, and then it turned out to be using in game assets. Looked like cgi to me, but Sony's been known to surprise us(GoW2).

BananaSlug5762d ago (Edited 5762d ago )

it's a teaser video!

Hagaf225762d ago

yeah most people dont know the difference between 'TEASER' trailer and gameplay footage. the point of the teaser trailer was to let fans know its coming, give enough info with out giving anything away. i mean really come on is any one really worried that this game wont look amazing???

Max Power5761d ago (Edited 5761d ago )

the trailer didn't have 'gameplay' in it like the killzone 2 trailer. if they showed Kratos doing some crazy sh!t during that cgi trailer and claimed it to be gameplay, then i would be all sorts of up tight about it.

DaTruth5761d ago

Sorry, just couldn't resist that one. The killzone game is reasonably close enough to silence naysayers and it really only falls flat on the brighter visuals of the target render, which could just have been a change in ambiance decision since 3 years ago.

toughNAME5762d ago

Hopefully the Xbox 360 trailer for God of War 3 will be gameplay.

I mean, when does Microsoft lie?

255762d ago

the monster that is kratos. = )

RememberThe3575762d ago

Yeah, I really hope that was a joke.

dragunrising5762d ago

Of course this is just healthy speculation. I don't think its a cardinal sin to show CGI but gameplay gives you a better idea of what to look forward to. I want a true sequel to God of War that transcends how we think of story driven action games. I must admit though...I don't think current gameplay of Killzone looks as good as the first CGI. It looks darn good though...dare I say better than Uncharted. CGI "in game" won't be touchable by any console (or PC for that matter) until next gen.

Bubble Buddy5761d ago

God Of War 3? On 360? You're funny.

Yipee Bog5761d ago (Edited 5761d ago )

God of War on xbox 360, holy crap, that was either the funniest thing I have read today or the dumbest.......or both? I had you on my ignore list for a reason I guess

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5761d ago
Show all comments (140)
70°

The Best Video Game Opening Levels In Gaming History

The Opening Levels that hooked gamers from the outset.

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com
240°

Ranking Every God of War Game From Worst to Best

Cultured Vultures: Let’s delve into Kratos’ long and rampageous history and find out which games are worth the hype and which are better left buried under the weight of Kratos’s might.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
JL2930172d ago

Both requels over 2 and 3? Clowns. Those are two of the most boring games I've ever played.

Snookies12172d ago

GoW 3 was amazing, but I personally hated just one thing. (This is on me alone, because I was dumb, lol.) I hated that you couldn't skip cutscenes on repeat playthroughs. I had to go back through the game a third time because I missed one trophy accidentally on my way to the platinum... The cutscenes were great the first go round, even the second... But the third was pretty agonizing.

Haven't played Ragnarok, but I still think GoW 4 is a wonderful game in its own right. Not sure how I would stack them up against each other honestly.

Monstieur172d ago (Edited 172d ago )

I don't consider the reboot part of the original series. The original series were high-skill games with combos and rewards for mixing things up.

solideagle171d ago

lol square, square and triangle is the only combo you needed. I have played all of them on the hardest difficulties...

Golfcoachh172d ago

Maybe I’m just old school but I just couldn’t get into the last two. Maybe it’s the slower action and more story telling but the original trilogy was by far my favorite.

Crows90172d ago

It's not that youre old school. They're different genres

JL2930171d ago (Edited 171d ago )

Me either, at all. It's just yap yap yap. They try to be a RPG's instead of being action games like they used to be.

Fluke_Skywalker171d ago

I'd put the two psp games over 3 in terms of story any day. But not over 2.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 171d ago
TheEnigma313172d ago (Edited 172d ago )

My favorite was part 2 and I think Ragnarok is better that 2018.

Shane Kim172d ago

The newer games are better imo.

ravens52172d ago

There is no worst. Except for Ascension, only cause I didn't play it lol. They are all masterpieces. 1,2,3, 2018 and Ragnarok. 1 of, if not the greatest video game franchise...besides MetalGear.

Snookies12172d ago

Oh wow, I actually forgot that Ascension even existed... I never played it either.

Crows90172d ago

I like ascension. It was different and some interesting combat additions.

darthv72172d ago

If you didnt play it, how could you call it the worst? Its not as bad as the media portrayed it. Honestly the worst are those flash games. they arent even considered true GoW games but in name only. At least Ascension is a real GoW game.

ravens52171d ago

Not saying it's a terrible game. Just mean it's at the bottom of my list. I played a little bit of it. Jus to me, compared to the other main games, it's last.

Fluke_Skywalker171d ago

Ascension is the only GOW game I never finished. Hated it.

Inverno172d ago

Can't agree, older games do so much more than the last two. More weapons, magic abilities, enemies are more varied, level design is also more aesthetically pleasing, and agree with those who say that they shouldn't have removed jumping. Was a time I'd agree, but those old games are so so much better, that they really should've looked into bringing into the reboot/sequels.

Crows90172d ago (Edited 172d ago )

If a game is good then a game is good. Doesn't matter what came before or what comes after.

Inverno172d ago

Of course it matters. If not for what what came before there wouldn't be an after. And if something is great before then you strive to make it just as good if not better, after. I personally don't think there's a fair way to judge the new with the old because the newer games are still essentially a reboot, and went a way different direction. But I still believe the old games did it better. I'm probably bias though since I've been going back to old games and have been finding that they lack all the annoying aspects that devs have shoehorned into new games to fluff out game time.

Crows90171d ago

@Inverno

Im not talking about the passage of time here. Im talking about individual pieces of software. If a game is good then it is good. Thats not a controversial statement. You can compare good with good...sure. But you still end up with good. Now if there is a bad game in the mix and you compare you do end up with some differentials between them...makes sense to compare and see where it went wrong.

But theyre different genres and styles which were individually executed very well.

And no. The new games are not a reboot. Theyre a new direction but simply a continuation.
Tomb raider was a reboot.

Inverno171d ago

The new games are definitely a reboot, and a continuation, it can be both which it is. And a good game might be good, but my point is that if there are things done better before it then there's plenty of room for critiquing and trying to make whatever comes after better rather than just good.

Show all comments (31)
170°

God of War 3 Remastered Has Sold 4 Million Copies To Date

God of War 3 Remaster has sold 4 million copies since its inception, making the franchise PlayStation's most profitable gamer merch brand.

purple101333d ago

Haha I still remember my brother playing the opening scene on ps3!!!

Yeh he had to put the controller down his heart was beating too fast trying to get past first 10 minutes. He said "it's too much". Best thing I've ever seen in gaming. Haha

robtion333d ago

A great game from an era before things went politically correct and gaming turned serious/'mature'.

It certainly wasn't concerned about upsetting or offending anyone and was more fun because of it.

The boss battles and set pieces still top most games released today.

SullysCigar333d ago

This game was absurdly good for it's time. The very definition of 'epic'.

robtion333d ago

Yes. The graphics were just ridiculous compared to most other games on the market at the time.

masterfox333d ago

I wished Ascension had the same treatment.

Heavenly King333d ago

Ascension SP had some things better than GOW3, and also some things worst than GOW3. But in general it was a really good game, for me it also deserves a REMASTER. The problem per se with the game is that most people were satisfied on how GOWIII ended, so Kratos got his revenge, so in order to rise the interest in the game how have to make it MORE EPIC is that the game did not had the epicness of fighting huge bosses (I guess due to technical difficulties,the game had actually a lot more colors (because the world is not dying like in GOWIII) so it is graphically more demanding that is my guess), but it compensated with having in general a more complex combat system, and an amazing soundtrack. but in general the game needed to be more epic than GOWIII somehow, and that did not happened, after GOWIII people had expectations through the roof. They should have waited and release it for PS4 so the vision of the game is not compromised.

My list of good and bad compared to GOWIII

GOOD: THE COMBAT
The combat was more elaborated, which allows you to be more immersed in the fights. Also every enemy was more resistant, even those that you could usually kill in 2-3 attacks in previous games. THE LAST BOSS is so damn epic!!!, but there is only one moment like this in the whole game.

GOOD: LESS QTEs
I love the fact that "cicle" in the new enemies (killing animations) are not QTEs, in Ascension they are mini-games on their own, depending on the enemy, making it more engaging. You had to dodge and hit when the window was open in order to eventually do the killing blow.

GOOD: The Soundtrack
it has the orginal trilogy musics, but with a new perspective since the game had a new composer. The ST was amazing also the new music written specifically for this game were badass

GOOD: The puzzles actually require you to think.

BAD: There are bad camera angles during the game, like zooming way too out of vista, and then swarming you with "light units" that like I said before had better AI and did not die of 2 attacks. those parts a few, but are a mess.

BAD: EMPTY ARENAS
Other thing that really annoyed me is that when you fight a sub-boss/heavy unit in a big arena; that ARENA WAS EMPTY, it was just you and against the medusa, or against the manticore. They should have zoom in into the action to avoid noticing the void scenario. I guess emptiness was because of the game having a lot more colors (because the world is not dying like in GOWIII) so it is graphically more demanding. My guess is that it was not possible technically, since in most of those cases you had huge vistas or intricate scenarios that needed to be rendered. The fact that the cerberus is smaller in this game disappointed me.

BAD: Only one BADASS EPIC moment, the others moments of the game were great but, they needed to set the bar even higher than GOWIII and they failed miserably.

BAD: The graphics did not improved much. I was GOWIII with more colors, and that's it.

So 4 good things against 4 bad ones. The problem is those 2 last BAD aspects are actually why the game was received so poorly. Everyone expects the next game to have a really BIG improvement in all aspects in contrast to the previous one, and that was not the case in ascension. And also GOW is the definition of EPIC, and that was not there neither. The jump on every aspect from GOWI to GOWII was huge being on the same console, and the jump from GOWII to GOWIII was humongous (obviously because a more powerful console). While the jump from GOWIII to Ascension is too little, and people expected more.

On it's own is a good game; but is not sufficient when GOWIII was released before it.

CrimsonWing69333d ago

I know this is unpopular opinion, but I prefer these over the new ones. I’m not saying the new ones are bad or anything, but they sort of get boring to me, whereas the older games were like non-stop roller coaster rides.

ChiefofLoliPolice333d ago

I love the new ones but I understand what you mean. The older ones had more action and was more arcady like.

MIDGETonSTILTS17333d ago

Ragnarok was not BIG at all… GoW1 had larger set pieces, and it was on ps2.

GoW 2018 had big moments in its own way…. Ragnarok abandoned these aspects though

robtion333d ago

I agree. It was just less serious and more fun.

victorMaje333d ago

One of my all time favourites.

Show all comments (16)