250°

Driveclub Vs Project CARS Wet Weather Comparison

CGB says "Here is a wet weather comparison video between Driveclub and Project CARS. These two games, in my opinion, are among the heavyweights when it comes to high quality simulated weather effects".

Read Full Story >>
cargamingblog.com
johndoe112113335d ago

Ok, it's official. Driveclub is the best looking racing game ever made, at least up to this point. That game is absolutely ridiculous graphically. It literally looks like real footage.

italiangamer3335d ago

Well said my friend, OFFICIALLY THE BEST LOOKING DRIVING GAME EVER MADE.

tuglu_pati3335d ago

Not surprising seeing that DC is a close Circuit race game and it runs at 30fps.

Very nice looking game.

Why o why3335d ago

I can only imagine how the nexf motorstorm will look like. Bring it

johndoe112113335d ago

@why o why

What the heck is wrong with you? My brain can only imagine so much graphical goodness. You're overloading it.

SilentNegotiator3335d ago

Just you wait until 2071, when Project Cars releases; it's gonna look WAY better than Driveclub :P

nveenio3334d ago

People just need to realize: When you're talking graphics, you just can't go up against a Sony-backed studio. It's almost sad. Driveclub makes Project Cars looks like a last-gen game.

AndrewLB3333d ago

DriveClub has better looking water on the windshield except for how it puddles up even at 100+ mph. lol. Anything over 25mph and water doesn't look like that.

On just about every other aspect of the game, Project Cars is better.

btw... it would be nice if people doing these comparison videos would use recent build versions with MAXIMUM settings. It looks much better on my PC.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3333d ago
Gamer19823335d ago

Driveclub is insanely detailed just a shame to get all that content you need to buy a ton of DLC..

SniperControl3335d ago

Urr, no you dont, the only DLC you need to buy is tracks and cars. Weather and replays are free updates.

uth113335d ago

Tracks are free too, aren't they?

MysticStrummer3335d ago (Edited 3335d ago )

You can buy cars, events, and paint jobs. Some cars are free, the tracks are all free and weather was patched in.

Ninver3334d ago (Edited 3334d ago )

Real gamers know and do their research before making every gamer look dumb by spouting such nonsense. Either change your username and sound dumb or don't comment at all. Save face mate.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3334d ago
ChronoJoe3335d ago

Indeed, but Project Cars looks good too so I think credit is due for both games! You have to consider Project Cars is doing much more than Driveclub in terms of physics simulation. Project Cars also allows 20 drivers on track at any one time, while Driveclub only 12.

VulcanVFX3335d ago

Actually the player count is dependent on the track. For instance on Le Mans, even the console versions, you can have up to 44 drivers. Also PCars is 60fps compared to DC's 30fps so ofcourse they're going to be able to add more detail and to be fair PCars is still in development, even if only a month left they can do a lot in that time now and days.

3335d ago Replies(3)
Dannyh3335d ago

Picked up drive club at best buy for 19.99. well worth it, great driving game

herbs3335d ago ShowReplies(1)
Kiwi663335d ago

Except that when it's guite wet in DC there isn't any spray coming off the rear wheels which you get in real life but apart from that it looks great

Ninjatogo3335d ago

There is spray in DC. It's hard to see in the video above but it's definitely in the game.

specialguest3335d ago

Gotta give it to DC hands down. They managed to get the lighting, effects, and environment coming together in perfect balance. Not one thing stands out more than the other. 6 months ago I would've defended PC as the better overall looking racer, but not anymore. However, I'd still give PC the award for best car model, but that's all.

TheXgamerLive3335d ago ShowReplies(1)
Azzanation3335d ago (Edited 3335d ago )

1 runs at 30, the other runs at 60. DC has to look better or there would be problems if a 60 frame Car racer out does it.

Is DC a better game with a meta of 71?That is the question.

xX-oldboy-Xx3334d ago

Project cars has been delayed 'again' - and DC right now is not indicative of that meta score.

Good luck to Project Cars but I can feel another delay coming on.

johndoe112113334d ago

"Is DC a better game with a meta of 71?That is the question."

No, that is NOT the question. That was NEVER the question in this article. The question was which one looks better with the weather effects and that is clearly driveclub. If you need to invent questions for this article to feel better about your preference then that's good for you.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 3327d ago
ravens523335d ago

Haters have to throw some disagrees somewhere smh.

EazyC3335d ago

I wish their names came up, I always wonder how totally impartial and level-headed comments still get a few obligatory dislikes.

subtenko3335d ago

This comparison has already been done and DC is still better..

PersonMan3335d ago

PCars looks to have plastic cars and last gen lighting.

Driveclub has physically based rendering and looks like real life.

Driveclub looks better to me.

Gamer19823335d ago

The reason for the lighting being pretty bad is the seriously long development time..

madpuppy3335d ago

agreed, for me, the rain on the windshield looks and acts realistic in DC, the rain on the windscreen in PC appears on the glass and just disappears when the wiper slides across it like magic! :P

ion533334d ago (Edited 3334d ago )

Just look at the tracks in DC. When raining, they actually look wet. There are reflections and ripple from rain drops.

What settings was Project Cars running? To me it looked low...

Off topic: Anyone played DC in fog? I think there was a rendering glitch on one of the DLC events and the clouds rendered just above the track, and it was like driving in fog. Unless fog was patched in and I don't know...

level 3603335d ago

Graphics and the progress on DriveClub really boggles the mind!

But am also going to buy Project CARS because I love very good racing games in general and I honestly think this is one of them.

Show all comments (87)
190°

60FPS on PS5: Unofficial PS5 'FPS Boost' mods are radically improving PS4 back compat

Digital Foundry : Whether it's via FPS Boost or bespoke software upgrades, backwards compatibility on the current-gen consoles delivered an unexpected delight - the ability to liberate older console games from their 30fps limits, running them at 60 frames per second or even higher. FPS Boost did the business for Xbox Series consoles on an impressive range of titles, but there was always the sense that PS5 could do more. It's a hunch that checks out as a range of frame-rate unlocks are available for PS5, covering many must-have games - the major caveat being that only exploitable consoles running on older firmwares are invited to the party.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
darthv72130d ago

you love to see new life being breathed into older titles but damn the process to get there. It should be automatic that these work for everyone... not just those who exploit their systems. Really wish Sony and MS would keep this program going officially.

Psychonaut85130d ago

Damn this sucks. I want this shit so bad, but I’m not jailbreaking my console. And frankly I shouldn’t have to. I’m not a tech person, but is it really that hard for developers to unlock the framerate? Or would that have to be a large patch?

dveio130d ago (Edited 130d ago )

"but is it really that hard for developers to unlock the framerate?"

I guess it's not.

But it has become a profitable business if you do so.

So no one would pay for only the framerate patched to being unlocked. So studios need to offer more than that.

But this would take more time, polishing and would cost more money. So they shy away, but won't unlock the framerate, either.

That's just my personal assumption. But from what I can comprehend technically, it shouldn't be difficult to unlock framerates via a patch for older games.

... if it hadn't became a business.

RaidenBlack130d ago (Edited 130d ago )

frame-rate unlock should be free ...
We've seen many devs offer free patches and updates to pretty old PC titles, even bonuses ... so why can't devs offer the frame unlock patch for free (in consultation with the platform-producers) for a title from just a generation earlier?

Einhander1972130d ago

RaidenBlack

"frame-rate unlock should be free ..."

Obviously the result of that thinking is that developers aren't even going to do it.

If they had been allowed to charge $5-10 you would see incentivized developers doing it way more often.

People just always want everything for free, but it's not free to make the patch, people have to code it then other people have to test it, and there will always be other costs involved.

If people want dollar store gaming then expect to get what you pay for.

shinoff2183129d ago (Edited 129d ago )

Raiden I might be wrong but last I thought it cost money to put patches out on consoles.

As far as me paying for it, I'm not all that interested tbh. Not enough to pay for it with older games, and newer games have been pretty decent about it for the most part.

dumahim130d ago

Sounds like the modder has to go in to make changes to unlock it on a game by game basis. "Simple" enough to do it unofficially, but to have it done officially, they need someone to go in a make that change, put out a patch and put it through certification, which I believe is not necessarily a cheap thing to do. It's questionable if going through this would then give them enough sales to make it worthwhile.

Inverno130d ago

Many games still have physics tied to framerate, i think it's cause they wouldn't want to go in and do anything extra. Then there's the 10 dollar upgrades they rather charge. The problem is that there's no compromise, cause if I could mod my PS4 and all I'd lose is online play then id jailbreak it immediately. Mods have done so much for PC games and they could do the same for consoles, but manufacturers hafto be willing to compromise.

shinoff2183129d ago

It's not to hard to do and there's youtube videos that break it down really well. ANyway most of us here arent able to break are console anyway due to being up to date on firmware from playing

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 129d ago
Chocoburger130d ago

Yep, this sucks having to require a jailbreak for something that should be standard in our industry by now. I learned my lesson when PS4 was jailbroken and I didn't keep a console on low firmware for years, but now I'm holding onto two low firmware PS5s specifically because there are features I'll be able to do that you can't do on official firmware, so this will pay off for me soon enough.

Jin_Sakai130d ago

It should be a sin to let these games sit and be stuck at 30fps.

EazyC130d ago

RDR 2 not getting a 60FPS patch for PS5 was a crime.

170°

Why did EA Kill Project CARS?

This video explains why we think Electronic Arts didn't see a future in the sim racing title Project CARS and promptly cancelled the fourth instalment.

Jin_Sakai557d ago

After the last installment I’d say most hardcore fans left. It’s just not that good anymore so I can’t really blame EA this time.

masterfox557d ago

because it was always a project and it never got finished :D

ChubbyBlade555d ago

Every game is a project. Your joke doesn’t make sense

InUrFoxHole554d ago

It makes perfect sense. It's obviously a play on the title. Jesus christ you must be a blast at parties.

ApocalypseShadow556d ago (Edited 556d ago )

Ask Bullfrog or Black Box or Tiburon or Studio 33 or Criterion or any of the previously acquired developers who made racing games as competition, or as developers of EA games, then eventually dissolved into oblivion or reassigned. Just ask them. They'll tell you why.

ApocalypseShadow555d ago

Oh. I forgot. Even Code Masters were absorbed into Criterion. Another racing developer EA took over.

Every racing developer either absorbed by EA or eventually destroyed by them. They either kill competition or have them in the end make Need 4 Speed for them.

MadLad555d ago

EA only cancels projects for one reason.
They didn't see enough money in it.

Kombatologist555d ago (Edited 555d ago )

Not when it's because it didn't meet some crazy margin. It's like if something doesn't make EA a billion dollars on day one (I'm exaggerating that figure of course), they swiftly put it out to pasture.

SurgicalMenace555d ago (Edited 555d ago )

Much like if you're spending money on what's a bad investment for your desired goals, you'd do away with it, if you're wise. We should try to get away from thinking we know more about business than individuals that have been doing it for decades. Perhaps you could benefit from going into business instead of wasting all of your talents in comment sections. It's clear that you're the missing piece that EA's been looking for.

MadLad554d ago

I've made a good amount of money betting on underdog investments over the years.

EA sets unrealistic expectations of their more niche developers, yet continue to fund absolute blunders like DICE and the Battlefield series year after year.

dumahim555d ago

EA butted in and messed with the formula and act shocked when it doesn't work out.

Show all comments (16)
90°

Original Project CARS creator trying to re-hire EA team

Ian Bell, the founder of Slightly Mad Studios, is aiming to hire former Project CARS employees to work on his upcoming GTR Revival project.

Sgt_Slaughter558d ago

If it's just going to be another sim-cade that doesn't do either one correctly then no thanks.

Project CARS 2 was a step in the right direction but the physics still aren't where they should have been, so what did they do for PC3? Go completely arcade. That killed the franchise.