bouzebbal3325d ago

I really question the point of a Batman remaster since all consoles without exception got each one of them.
I understand consoles exclusives getting next gen ports for people who never had the chance, but not multiplatform games.

TheFox873325d ago

I don't have either of the previous consoles, so would not get to play these games otherwise. Makes sense to me. If you aren't interested in these games, don't buy them. I am sure the sales figures for these games will prove that there is a market for them.

Palitera3325d ago

The point is VERY cheap production cost and market demand due to the lack of AAA games in all consoles.

In the end, the same point from any company move, profit. When it can be made with barely any risk, it is irrefutable.

SpringHeeledJack3325d ago

This is getting ridiculous. I got a next gen console to play new games not last gen games that look a bit better.

I wouldn't mind but they are not even that old the games they are remastering.

Ezz20133325d ago (Edited 3325d ago )

Gamer:
"WTF?!!...Sony remaster one of it games..DIE DIE DIE ,SONY..you are cancer to gaming..we don't need remasters ...where is teh new games?!..i'm gonna tell my mom."

The same Gamer:
"Holy batman nipples, they are going to remaster Batman games ?!...My Batman credit card is ready...Robin, ready the Batmobile."

Yi-Long3325d ago

Good news. These are classic games, and the chance to pick them up again with improved graphics and all content included, is nice.

I don't have any problem with great games getting re-released in new generations. We don't complain about classic movies and books getting new re-releases every few years, do we...?

As far as these Arkham games go, I'm disappointed they won't be bringing a next-gen version of Arkham Origins. I know it was 'more of the same', but I skipped it because of all the DLC-milking so I never got to play it. I was waiting for a GOTY-release that never happened, so I was hoping for a next-gen release including all content.

Apollosupreme3325d ago

I won't be purchasing this... I played it already and nicer graphics aren't going to bring me back around again.

_-EDMIX-_3325d ago (Edited 3324d ago )

I see...another slow N4G gamer that thinks ports exist due to "giving" the game to those that couldn't play it.

It exist to be sold.

Soooooo do N4G gamers just....not get business? Do you fully not get this exist solely to make the publisher money? This has nothing to do with being exclusive, multiplat etc.

They don't exist due to um.."gamer logic" ie all systems didn't get it, thus lets make it for that reason...it exist to make money.

Ports exist based on making money. Consider 160 million PS3 and 360s exist........no game last gen sold 160 million units...consider THAT is the reason why you even see a port.

Owning a system, doesn't mean you owned every game ever made on it.

We get PC remasters and reskins all the time despite PC itself being fully BC (even with many, many work arounds)

With ports...there is nothing to understand other then its there to make money. Dear god don't waste time trying to figure out "why" its made. If its not about making money, you clearly don't have a clue about the industry business wise.

Consider we are still getting Zelda ports, consider we got a GTAV port despite its sales last gen.

I mean...160 million could have had a chance to play it last gen right bro?

Would you as a publisher neglect sales based on such strange logic?

Again...do you not fully get that such reasoning makes little to zero sense in terms of business?

Thats like saying why should McDonalds make a Big Mac XL, as I'm full from the Big Mac....I'm sorry but why on earth did you think it was created purely with the understanding to solely have you enjoy it?

What business course did you take were you heard such a thing? lol

3324d ago
BattleAxe3324d ago

These remasters are starting to get way out of hand.

PONTIAC08G8GT3324d ago

Maybe someone can correct me if I am wrong, but I didn't think the last generation of systems had this many, if any, remakes.

- Last of Us
- Halo
- Borderlands
- Dark Souls 2
- Diablo 3
- Batman
- GTA

I may be missing some others, but the systems are like 16 months old and already 7 remakes (more if I missed any). I just think the remakes are getting out of hand.

Perjoss3324d ago

This generation so far has been BS.

ifistbrowni3324d ago (Edited 3324d ago )

@WTFDIAF,

Remastered Borderlands comes out tomorrow.... You can mark that off of your suspected "coming soon"

@Pontiac,

Tomb Raider
Walking Dead Season 1
Walking Dead Season 2
Wolf Among Us
Dead Nation
Hotline Miami

There tons of PSN titles that were re-released.

Finally, a "reliable source at IGN Italy." So, this isn't a rumor? Because, IMO, this looks more like a rumor than an article (sure, it's an article about a rumor).

Also, if they do an Arkham collection without Origins, they can forget my purchase. I originally skipped Origins because I had a strong belief it would be ported to next gen. Then, when it bombed, all hope of that disappeared. Now that this news is appearing, I would be slightly annoyed if it was only a "Rocksteady" collection since I have already played those games plenty.

Sy_Wolf3324d ago

I played them a very long time ago and don't have them anymore. Wanted to replay them before Arkham Knight and would GLADLY pay extra for a higher frame rate alone. The other graphical upgrades will be a plus as well, but holy crap was the frame rate on the 360/PS3 versions of the game horrible.

starchild3324d ago (Edited 3324d ago )

I don't have too much of an issue with "remasters" in and of themselves. What I have an issue with is fhe fact that the success of remasters basically destroys any chance of us getting backwards compatibility in our consoles ever again.

Why give us backwards compatibility when they can just sell us the same games twice?

Tsar4ever013324d ago

It's a cash grab, being so many current-gen games being pushed yet again into next year. P4 & X1 needs to keep gamers entertained. Notice all these remasters are big last-gen sellers, they figured we'd buy'em again if the graphics are upgraded to near pc standards.

DAMN IT, When's Bethesda is going to announce Elder Scroll V: Skyrim remaster and BioWare announce Mass Effect Trilogy remaster? They were last-gen big sellers! Weren't they!?

3324d ago
Sevir3324d ago

Warner Bros Montreal must have been given the go to do this to get their bearings with the PS4 and XBO because RS is done with the IP and moving on to something new. And given Warner's take on B:AO it would seem fitting to get them more experience with The Bat man Arkhamverse and even though RS is leaving it, I'm sure WBI sees the brand as a popular brand and want to continue making games in its universe. Best way to do that is to have that team porting the previous games to the PS4/XBO and then giving them free reign to tackle new games in the ip while RS goes on to create a new IP.

XBLSkull3324d ago (Edited 3324d ago )

Hope they are sold individually. Never played Asylum so I'd pick that up for the right price but I don't have any desire to do City again.

Also strange they are coming out after Knight, I would think they would want them out beforehand to get some hype going.

iSuperSaiyanGod3324d ago

Shut up . Don't be a buzzkill

antz11043324d ago (Edited 3324d ago )

There's a whole lotto hate here for two of the best last gen games coming to current consoles. I could understand if this was in lieu of a new installment, but this is IN ADDITION to Arkham Knight coming out in June.

Lol "please Rocksteady stop giving us addition stuff to buy!!" Seriously? People just need a reason to complain I guess.

badz1493324d ago

seriously, WTF? just like Tomb Raider, Watch Dog, and Borderlands before this, what the fuck are they thinking? these games are already available on pc and with good enough pc, you can already play them with better performance than these REMASTERED versions from the point they were released back then. no need for the PS4 or Xbone for these games to p@lay them in their full glory.

I can understand exclusives like Halo or GoW but doing it for multiplats scream cash grab because they can easily port the higher setting pc version over and call it a day! disgusting!

ChronoJoe3324d ago

I just hope that all of these remasters are bringing new jobs to the industry. I wouldn't like to think that they were drastically deferring development of new games to work on porting old ones over.

Gaming1013324d ago

If you're too child-like in your thinking to understand why remasters are popular for companies to make, then you will never, EVER run a business successfully.

There is more at play here than the low-brow, self centered, crybaby politics that gamers rant on about.

There is absolutely nothing political about remasters. It has nothing to do with which console something got released on.

It has everything to do with finding markets. If there is a market of people who don't own gaming PC's, who didn't play every single game on a previous generation console (or didn't even own a previous gen console... yes there are more people who didn't own those consoles than do), and would actually like to experience a game that perhaps they already played but would like to re-experience it with all the DLC and better graphics and frame rate, as a company this is a massive untouched market, and there is money to be made in untouched markets.

To put this in perspective, the remastered GTAV sold 10 million copies. That puts it in the top 1% of game sales for the last year. Rockstar and Take Two would have to be out of their mind not to tape into that market.

Get it now? It's called Economics.

gedapeleda3324d ago

console remaster race ftw

+ Show (21) more repliesLast reply 3324d ago
ThunderPulse3325d ago

I've never played these games on PS3 but the graphics looked great on the PC versions so I hope it looks great on the PS4.

WitWolfy3325d ago

Sigh... Dont expect any thing too breath taking. Will probably just be yet another 1080P 60fps release with all the DLC... Nothing more.

Razmossis3325d ago

Well it was just the Unreal engine. How good could it really look?

3325d ago
hiredhelp3325d ago

ANOTHER REMASTER...... I never saw many remasterd games when ps3 xbox 360 was launched and threwout lifecycle.
We are only 2nd year in Remasters should be games of old in my opinion now Games that been out few years or so.

Blaze9293325d ago (Edited 3325d ago )

PS3 and Xbox 360 had backwards compatibility, at least for awhile on PS3 and some titles on 360.

Take that option away and call it a "technical decision", $$$$

DLConspiracy3325d ago

Actually there were a few. Red Faction 2 and BurnOut Revenge. Just off the top of my head. I am sure there were others but I doubt they sold nearly as many copies for the newer editions.

MrBeatdown3325d ago

If Sony and MS offered backwards compatibility, they could offer thousands of games their back catalog and make a killing. They aren't leaving that feature out to sell some remasters that plenty of people would be interested in buying even if they could play the old versions.

Nearly every remaster I ever bought was a game I had on an older system.

hiredhelp3325d ago

Sorry guys I kinda lost it there for moment. but in all seriousness I much more be into new ip's and sequels on our new next gen consoles.

masa20093325d ago

Publishers just realized the market existed inadvertently during the SD to 720p shift which was the original justification for these remasters.
They just keep on doing it with 720/1080.

_-EDMIX-_3324d ago

...yes you did. Burnout Revenge, Need For Speed Most Wanted, King Kong,BF2, Bully, Gun, Tony Hawk Wasteland, Dynasty Warriors (one of them released later for PS2 was then re-released on 360.

and many, many more, hell look at PSN and XBL under PS2 classics and XB originals.

Also consider that a port is merely a game that didn't get made day and date when those systems released, ie why I consider Gun and many of those games ports.

Sorry but releasing day and date or later on doesn't some how make it less of a port.....

http://kotaku.com/the-xbox-...

MrBeatdown3324d ago

Wow, eight disagrees and one agree for my comment.

You people are delusional if you think a back catalog of thousands of PS1, PS2, and PS3 games downloadable via PSN, requiring no additional development, couldn't be more profitable than a couple dozen remastered games.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3324d ago
callahan093325d ago

I never played either one, so this is cool for me. I'd love to play them. I liked Arkham Asylum a ton, just never got around to the sequels.

medman3325d ago

I have always owned almost all the consoles, and yet I have never played any of the Rocksteady Batman games, as I'm not really that into playing comic book characters in games...I love comic book movies, but not so much in my gaming. So despite having the opportunity to get the previous Batman games free with xbox live and psn at various points, I downloaded them but never played them, mainly due to backlog...but somehow the option to play them on ps4 is appealing to me, in a way it never was for 360 or ps3. If they release both games in the remaster together for a reasonable price, I will probably buy them.

TheRedButterfly3325d ago

Is it? Yes, the games are absolutely amazing, but do they really /need/ to be remastered?

At this point, I'm getting fatigued by how many 7th gen titles that are being re-released on 8th gen. Backwards compatibility is one thing, and generation transitions are always difficult for developers (letting go of a 160+ million install base is never going to be easy), but we're pushing two years into the new cycle of consoles.

Assuming the XO/PS4 last as long as the X360/PS3 did, that would mean that we've already been getting old (but pretty) games for 20% of the hardware cycle... And that's a depressing thought.

Titles like TLOU make sense because of people who switched over at the turn of the gen, and collections like TMCC make sense to put 14 years worth of lore that is still being expanded upon onto a single platform, but getting the odd ports like God Of War 3 and the rumored Alan Wake... Sure, they're great games, but we don't /NEED/ them on 8th gen hardware.

I expected a bit of bleed through thanks to simple fiscal requirements, but that is usually satiated via cross-gen development, not cross-gen porting. I hope this trend comes to a close sooner rather than later.

_-EDMIX-_3324d ago

" but do they really /need/ to be remastered?

At this point, I'm getting fatigued "

....I see you have not clue about business bud.

Yes they do, if they sell, they will get ported and will make money. Thats it...

Its not being done out of gamer necessity. Thats like NOT porting GTAV because it sold well...as if to say they don't need more sales and its some how enough.

Does McDonalds stop making Big Macs because YOU'VE had enough? Oh because YOUR fatigued? LMFAO!

Please....sit down and have a business course one day bud.

"but we don't /NEED/ them on 8th gen hardware"

Might be the dumbest statement I've read all day. Most of you guys on N4G have no clue about business or gaming in general....

Who the hell is this "we"?

I'm sorry but what game last gen sold 160 million units?

Whats funny...is even if one did, it doesn't mean it wouldn't get ported. If you think games are ported for any reason besides making money....you legit need to get your head examined.

Most games during the PS2 era got ported over last gen, its actually pretty hard to even find some PS2 games that didn't get ported in some form.

"hat would mean that we've already been getting old (but pretty) games for 20% of the hardware cycle... And that's a depressing thought"

Not really bud, have you seen PC? Why do you care ports are being done if new ips are being created too? Those teams that are porting would not have been doing new games as porting isn't the same as creating.

Look at PSN, look at XB in terms of ports from the generation prior....yet....we live.

To cry about ports despite them NOT being made as the same teams making new games, happened last gen and happens on PC all the time, makes money for the publisher to make more money for more new ips etc.

"but getting the odd ports like God Of War 3 and the rumored Alan Wake"

Yet we got God Of War collection last gen, yet we got both Max Paynes ported LAST GEN! You don't know what your talking about....

More games is good, more money for publishers is good, you don't need to buy them, they are not being done by any main teams as those main teams are still making new ips or sequels to other ips.

I'm sorry but its a win/win, for the publisher, gamers, teams porting and the teams creating new games.

I would legit like to know how logically one is being hurt by a port?

LOL_WUT3324d ago

It's not like they canceled the new batman game over these remasters jeez people... ;)

starchild3324d ago (Edited 3324d ago )

@_-EDMIX-_

Sure, but the same could be said about DLC, Call of Duty and many other things gamers complain about.

DLC wouldn't get made if it wasn't selling. That means some people, gasp, actually like DLC. Same goes for the Call of Duty games and any other series that gamers like to derisively call "milked".

_-EDMIX-_3324d ago (Edited 3324d ago )

@Starchild- ", but the same could be said about DLC, Call of Duty and many other things gamers complain about"

Yes...same can be said about them too...they are made by separate teams. Most DLC isn't made by the main team....

I can see by the disagrees and not real comments that most of N4G actually doesn't really know what they are talking about and can't really explain how its hurting anyone.

To hear someone state they want "new games" or a "new IP" or that they played it last gen, merely shows JUST how little they really know about this process. Once again...Not the same teams. It cost very, very little to actually port a game, these are PORTS not REMAKES! I don't believe ANY game was actually remade this gen other then Halo MCC...mind you, Unitied Fronts along with some of 343 worked on that game, ie MOST of 343 is making Halo 5.

Soooo Tomb Raider was ported by United Fronts...the team that ISN'T MAKING TOMB RAIDER!

Halo was helped by United Fronts.....a team that ISN'T MAKING HALO 5.

Halo 1 and 2 where ported by Gearbox....a team that DIDN'T MAKE HALO 3 and was NEVER going to.

Gears was ported to PC.....BY PEOPLE CAN FLY, at team that ISN'T EPIC! (Epic did buy them later on though...besides the point lol)

Aspry porting Doom 3 or Borderlands...didn't mean no Borderlands 2 or 3 or no Doom 4 as that team was NEVER GOING TO MAKE THAT!

Another thing to factor, cost.

http://www.gamesindustry.bi...

Mind you...Wii U cost MORE to port to as its harder to work with compared to PS4 and XONE.

Some of theses teams can port in mere weeks.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

Now...I want you to not really look at the price of development...merely look at the damn marketing cost.

Consider it cost less then a million to port a title....

By a team that isn't the main team...

With the idea of seeking profit to fund more expensive games.

I ask again...who is getting hurt by this?

Original team works on a new ip or sequels, gamers get a port, smaller teams get practice and business, publishers don't have to force release titles as they are getting money steadily etc.

I'm sorry but I don't buy into the whole "no next gen" games bs as the market is still competitive, no publisher is going to just hand over the next gen only market for some ports.

They don't need to choose as they can and are doing BOTH!

Porting older titles, releasing newer next gen only ips.

Sounds like gamers are getting mad legit...for no reason.

The emptiness and vagueness of most gamer's response only tell me just how little they actually know regarding gaming.

Read At Dawn...

They are a team I think many need to look up, they stared out doing ports...

Not having ports won't some how make a next gen only title come faster or better as again...games are contracted out, those teams ported had 1 job...to port, not to create next gen games.

There is no "instead of" they did both last gen, they are currently doing both this gen.

1 million for a port vs 70 to 80 million for a full fledged game, doesn't mean its either or, merely that full next gen games take longer and are still coming.

I agree with you too Starchild!

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3324d ago
UKmilitia3325d ago

it has to be before the new one comes out though,otherwise no point surely?

i would love to replay them.

CerebralAssassin3325d ago

Batman games are great games. No doubt about that. My problem is that they aren't old games. Why aren't we getting remastered games from the ps2 and original Xbox generations? And another issue I have with this is i wouldn't be surprised if it is a $60 remastering. Which is ridiculous when I can buy them both for under $30 at gamestop. This is getting out of hand. Remastered edition. Definitive edition. More like money grab editions.

twiggytree123324d ago

Because we got all the ps2 and xbox remasters during the 360/ps3 generation.... Splinter cell trilogy, God of war 1 and 2, Halo anniversary, silent hill 2 and 3, devil may cry trilogy, Metal gear solid 2, 3, and peace walker + many more were all remastered in HD on ps3 and 360. God of war and Halo were obviously exclusive to their respective consoles.

CerebralAssassin3322d ago

@twig

There are man games in history that can be remastered that are worth playing more than batman that game out MAYBE 5 years ago. Legacy of Kain comes to mind. Games that didn't see their way to PS3 and 360. More of my point is Id like to stop seeing so many remastered games and more games that haven't touch our tvs yet. Give us new games or sequels to these great franchises. We don't need something to hold us over like replaying a game from years ago. Just focus your attention on making that game. Gamers will entertain themselves with other games til the new ones come out.

XanderZane3325d ago

The only way I'd get this is if both games were included in one package and ALL the DLC was included as well. Otherwise I won't bother.

Corpser3324d ago

I already played 1080p/60fps versions of these games.. These new consoles probably can't even run on that

Tzuno3324d ago

well if more people are liking this they will go this path :)) no wonder that we don't have new games if people keep buying same games over and over.

NuggetsOfGod3324d ago (Edited 3324d ago )

Backwards compatibility is a great pc exclusive.

Gta4 ice mod a lot of the time looks better than gta 5 lol

Remasters left and right 1080 60fps.
Current games vanilla 900p 30fps + paying for multiplayer smh

Console market keeps punishing gamers lol

Halo sold a million. If remasters keep selling then no point in sony/Microsoft add backwards compatibility if they can sell 500k+ one more time.

Only good game related trends are low level apis and hbm memory.

Thank your master for remasters lol

I have to say I am very surprised EA hasn't have a lot of remasters.

CaptainObvious8783324d ago

As a trophy hunter, I quite like going back to old games and plating them.

But for anyone else, I really don't see the point.

showtimefolks3324d ago

i will play the original batman again because to me that's the best one. but i will get this around blackfriday or some huge sale

and to those complaining, production costs little to nothing to remaster so why not take advantage or new consoles not having that many AAA games. If you ask me its smart business, no one is forcing any of us to must buy these games

speak with your wallets not on N4G

RaidensRising3324d ago

Instead of backward compatibility we get this.

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 3322d ago
Angainor73325d ago

Yes, these two titles deserve a remaster!!!!

carlingtat3325d ago

Why do they deserve a remaster?

RosweeSon3325d ago (Edited 3325d ago )

Probablly something to do with them being Fantastic games? GOTY contenders on original release so yeah much more deserved than say superman 64 remaster. No one has to buy these but can't see if the price is right and they throw in all the DLC why I wouldn't want 2 of the best games from last generation on one disc and now polished for PS4. Not that it'll be a day one or anything but defo grab at some point.....
Or what Socol said ;) options are good Uncharted 4 has been delayed so what better way to fill the gap some of the best games. As long as they don't cancel the new one or effect what they are doing there then I don't see the problem.

Hellsvacancy3325d ago (Edited 3325d ago )

As I said in a previous comment, remasters are only ok if it's a game you want remastering, I want Fallout 3/NV, Max Payne 3 and Skyrim to be remastered

I'm not going to be a hypocrite (not saying you are)

God Of War, Batman, TombRaider, Sleeping Dogs do nothing for me but other gamers who love these games probably don't mind paying again for a slightly better version

I can't count how many times I've bought Star Wars

Rainstorm813325d ago

I agree Hells but I feel like these remasters and definitive edition invalidates last generation..... Its pretty much saying every game last gen wasn't really the level they wanted it. Not to mention that less current gen games are being released and developed in favor of the easy remaster..

carlingtat3325d ago

@RosweeSon

But why a remaster? They are just basically a port. Graphics wise there will be little to no difference between the two. Arkham City is only 3 years old! Not much has happened tech wise to
deserve a remaster from these games. Its not like they were released 10 years ago when graphics werent as good.

Angainor73324d ago (Edited 3324d ago )

Basically i meant that i'm happy to be able to finally play these two titles on my Xbox One because i hadn't the opportunity before.. Not so that they need a graphical upgrade. But i apologise since my comment was a little bit misleading.

3324d ago
+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3324d ago
Sokol3325d ago

So many remastered games in this new generation, i guess more options for everyone, as long it doesn't impact the new games resources :)

GarrusVakarian3325d ago

That's the thing that some people don't take into consideration when whining about remasters - many devs are outsourcing these ports, meaning that not only is no time being taken away from their main project(s), but they also get the revenue from the remasters to put towards their main project(s). It's win-win.

Unless the port team is garbage. *Cough* Saints Row remaster *cough*

GribbleGrunger3325d ago (Edited 3325d ago )

Yes, I agree. We're actually getting MORE games because of the remasters, not less. The more the merrier in my opinion. Uncharted 1/2/3 next please.

andibandit3325d ago (Edited 3325d ago )

"meaning that not only is no time being taken away from their main project(s)"

Im in the SW business, trust me that statement could not be further from the truth.

Theres a huge overhead just setting up the external project, not to mention the countless hours of video conferencing, trying to explain implemented ideas, and the 1to1's, later on, on the telephone, not the mention the occasional travelling to guide them in person.

and it's not gonna be your low level grunt programmer doing this stuff, it's gonna be someone like an SW-architect, or of similar knowledge.

bloodybutcher3325d ago

Yeah, but it is getting a bit ridiculus. I wonder when we're gonna see an article saying sth about new games.Or even new ips.

And lucas, stop watching Bloodborne streams if you intend to buy this game, gonna spoil it for yourself xD

LordMaim3324d ago

Hell yes, GribbleGrunger. I would buy the crap out of a remastered Uncharted trilogy.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3324d ago
christian hour3325d ago

This should be an easy enough task anyway, overall just a simple port. Take the PC version with locked settings between high/ultra (whatever the xb1/ps4 can handle anyway) and make some coding adjustments for the very-similar-to-pc architecture of the new consoles.

I wonder if they can even bring over the physx enabled stuff you'd get via Nvidia GPU's? That volumetric smoke (among many other things) looked amazing, was always envious of nvidia gamers.

ginsunuva3324d ago

It will barely impact new game resources..

BUT THAT'S NOT THE ISSUE, KIDS.

A publisher now has to release fewer new games to make the same amount of money (which could also mean fewer rushed games).

So instead of:
NewGame1, NewGame2, NewGame3, NewGame4
it can be:
Remaster1, NewGame1, Remaster2, NewGame2

starchild3324d ago

Yep, and people don't realize that one way or another remasters ARE taking away resources from the games industry that would otherwise be spent bringing new games into existence.

WESKER20153325d ago

they need to fill them gaps somehow, but to be fair i am not bothered, i never played them last gen surprisingly, so as long as they dont try and rip gamers off with the prices i see no issues

3325d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (203)
80°

Batman Arkham City in 2024 – How Well Does It Hold Up?

GB: "With this feature, we take a look back at the incredible Batman: Arkham City with the aim of analyzing it from the perspective of a 2024 release."

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
500°

Spider-Man 2 Metacritic review score means Marvel still hasn’t beaten DC

Reviews are finally out for Marvel's Spider-Man 2, and the game's Metacritic review score means Marvel still hasn't toppled DC.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
CrashMania195d ago (Edited 195d ago )

The Arkham games are largely excellent, a shame they are being followed up by that god awful looking suicide squad game.

RaidenBlack195d ago

All 4 Arkham games are just amazing...
With the Gotham Knights turning out sub par, hope the Suicide Squad fails as well... So that both Rocksteady and WB Montreal goes back to creating good single player DC games ...
A batman beyond game maybe?

anal_vegan_moans194d ago

Having the game fail would make it harder for them to get funding for their next game, please don't wish this on them. They already delayed the game a whole year after backlash, so we still have to wait and see how it will turn out.

GhostScholar194d ago

I think asylum and origins were great. City was good. Knight was horrible.

195d ago
Ezio2048195d ago

You can't expect a game to match 96-94 meta apple for apple. Different era and different gen. No need to diminish either game's achievement. Arkham City and Spiderman 2 are both amazing sequels that improved upon their already incredible first parts.

Tacoboto195d ago

To back that up, there are major websites that adjusted their review scales.

IGN used to have a 100 point system; now it's a 10 point system. I remember GameSpot back in 2004 was razed for giving Halo 2 a 9.4 when IGN gave it like a 9.7 or 9.8

darthv72195d ago

Arkham Asylum was great, but when City came out... wow what a total overhaul that was. Nothing has had that type of night/day difference in scope and scale since.

SM2 is looking to be a great game in itself. Definitely an upgrade over the previous entries. Just from the opening battle with sandman, it gives me god of war 2 vibes with how that one opened with the battle with colossus of rhodes. That is still one of my favorite sequels of all time.

Zeke68195d ago

Thanks for the spoiler how the game starts loser...

darthv72194d ago

Zeke... you've had plenty of time to play god of war 2.

GaboonViper195d ago

And right on cue, here comes the downplaying of Insomniacs masterpiece, not gonna work, this game is gonna be beast in success.

BehindTheRows195d ago

From the same folks who gave it a 10/10 no less.

Aloymetal195d ago

'' here comes the downplaying of Insomniacs masterpiece''
You know that train is never late.

isarai195d ago

Oh look, another trash article from Videogamer

Show all comments (48)
230°

10 Best Games to Complete 100%

GF365: "These are our picks for the ten best games to complete 100%. This list includes good games that don't feel like chores to complete."

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
Knushwood Butt303d ago

I got 80% trophy completion on Ragnarok but left a few of the battles. Will come back to it one day.

Miraak82 302d ago

Dragon Quest 11 is my top pick

RpgSama302d ago

Dragon Quest XI was such an AMAZING game, I had a blast from the very beginning all the way to the very end, it actually got better the more you played, full of surprises as well.

Another game that I enjoyed from the very beginning all the way to the end of the 100% completion was Yakuza: Like a Dragon. Really, really, really fun game with a great heartfelt story.

badz149302d ago (Edited 302d ago )

Where is Horizon Zero Dawn?? where is Ghost of Tsushima?? I just got my Platinum on HZD and is now trying to finish the Frozen Wild expansion. so much care and love went into that game and it really shows. I especially adore the lore and have sunk many hours listening to the logs and reading journals. the back story is great and the gameplay is awesome. can't wait to replay on the hardest difficulty on NG+. next in my list would be to finish GoTsushima

Tacoboto302d ago

Ghost was fantastic especially after Iki Island and the PS5 upgrade. 100%'d that, Horizon Forbidden West (not ZD), GoW (not yet Ragnarok), Spider-Man, and R&C: Rift Apart.

Each one absolutely worth it.

Aloymetal302d ago (Edited 302d ago )

100% I would like to add to you list RDR2, amazing as well and the perks from getting the Legend Of The East outfit is awesome.
Sekiro as well, have to play twice to get it but it's worth it!

Demetrius302d ago

I agree I'm on my 2nd playthroughs of both horizon forbidden West(zero dawn I played also) ghost of Tsushima except I'm replaying it on PS5 this time, the iki island expansion is amazing

ClayRules2012302d ago

Yeah, GoT was already an AMAZING game on PS4, but playing it on PS5, along with that expansion, just even better.

Elda302d ago

I just started my copy of GOW:R, enjoying it so far.

DefenderOfDoom2302d ago (Edited 302d ago )

Okay the title of article should be top 10 , 3rd person games to complete 100 percent. Nine 3rd person games and 1 racing game on this list .

Show all comments (15)