870°

Bloodborne takes 40 hours to complete

It has been reported that Bloodborne takes around "40-45 hours to complete", however the Dark Souls games took on average around 65 hours to complete the main quest plus extras, so the likelihood is that Bloodborne will last at least up to 50 hours depending on how much you want to get out of it.

Read Full Story >>
gamespresso.com
GribbleGrunger3345d ago ShowReplies(12)
uth113345d ago

a game length that long means I'll never finish it.

chrismichaels043345d ago (Edited 3345d ago )

As a huge Demons Souls fan, Bloodborne is easily my most anticipated game of March. With Bloodborne, The Order 1886, MLB15 The Show and some excellent indie titles in between (like HellDivers), the PS4 is already off to a pretty good start in 2015.

kreate3345d ago

Hope platinum trophy isnt too hard.

S2Killinit3345d ago (Edited 3345d ago )

Yup, Bloodborne and Helldivers are the games to have if your a true gamer.

GMR_PR3345d ago Show
Helios863345d ago

The indie titles alone is a major pain in the wallet. Hotline Miami 2, Helldivers, Titan Souls, Axiom Verge and then some.
I'm not much for indie titles usually but these aren't your typical hipster indies.

madworld3344d ago

In my humble opinion I think it good enough for almost all players 40-45H and that for professional players but other players they will take more then 60h

40-45 is good for hard games!!!!!!!!

showtimefolks3344d ago

damn its gonna take forever

Forn3344d ago

Knowing how long it takes me to finish a playthrough on a Souls game due to me wanting to find as much as I can before a reset, Bloodborne will probably at least take me more like 60+ hours to beat my first playthough.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3344d ago
Mega243345d ago

Stay positive, play 1 hour each day for 40 days. If this is true then it's a great improvement over DS and DS 2 which we're short if the player was really good.

uth113345d ago

yeah, that's the only way I'll get through it. I haven't played a Souls game before, I'm concerned I'll get sick of dying and give up.

morganfell3345d ago

The 40 hours in the article above is still subjective. Edge did not get to play all of the game and one of their staff still logged 45 hours.

AKS3344d ago

@uth11 Set realistic expectations for yourself. FROM's recent action/RPGs aren't designed to allow you to button mash your way through them, but they are generally pretty fair. In the Souls games, if you kept your shield up and developed skill instead of trying to button mash your way through, it was not nearly as tough as many would lead you to believe. Compared to the games I played as a kid, such as Ghosts 'n Goblins, Shadow of the Beast 1 and 2, Ninja Gaiden, and Battletoads to name a few, the Souls games are very fair and far less difficult. Shadow of the Beast 2 was a friggin' nightmare by comparison.

Bobertt3345d ago

Wtf do you throw a game away after the first day? If you play the game for 2 hours a day you can beat in 3 weeks. That is a decent length and great value.

uth113345d ago

There are a lot of other games vying for my limited time. Still haven't even finished the Order.

wolf5813345d ago

i spend 55 hours on dying light and i m planing to spend much more on bloodborne i will search every corner i will play it single and coop...still not enough i hope to give us dlc too...good timing for new update 2,50 too restmode aaand back where i stoped YES

Bobertt3344d ago

If you really didn't beat The order yet you have too many games your trying to play or your too busy to play games. The order is the shortest game I've ever played. It took me 6 hours to platinum, you could do in less if you don't go for trophies too. You need to choose one or two games and stick to it. If you keep jumping around you never gonna finish any of them. If you don't have time to finish the games you have now don't buy the new ones until your ready. They will probably be patched and cheaper by the time your ready and you get to enjoy the games more.

uth113344d ago

yes I have too many games and not enough time, so when I see a game that says it takes 40 hours, it's a turn off, I don't want to buy it because I know I'll never get through it.

Blasphemy3344d ago

thats an incredibly long time for me, ill probably never finish it. i can understand why you guys complain about only 9 hour games but if you have a wife, kids, other priorities in life, 9 hour games are plenty enough if they have online component to.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3344d ago
JMaine5183345d ago ShowReplies(3)
jrshankill3345d ago

40 hours is just about enough for me.

However, I am seeing blind comments here that reminds me of The Order. Stay tuned folks, and watch yer mouths... wouldn't want to look like a jackass at release day now.

Show all comments (153)
140°

The 7 Best Souls-Like Games - Mastering the Challenge

The Souls-like genre remains popular, along with FromSoftware's classics there are many contenders. But which are the best Souls-like games?

toxic-inferno41d ago

Hmm... In my opinion, the 7 best are the 6 made by FromSoftware (DeS, DS1, DS2, DS3, BB and ER), then Lies of P. But each to their own.

kevco3341d ago

Still DS1? You don't feel it's been surpassed yet?

Demon's Souls has the remake of course, but DS1 has surely been outdated?

Smellsforfree41d ago

I think that the DS1 remake is better looking than DS2. The interior lighting matched with the low resolution textures in DS2 is very garish, IMO.

Besides graphics, what do you mean by DS1 being "outdated"? I'm someone who played through Elden Ring and just recently played through the DS series, and as far as gameplay went, there were all very similar.

Cacabunga41d ago

I haven’t played many but Bloodborne and NIOH1 are on top of my list.. had a blast with these 2

toxic-inferno40d ago

For world design and interconnectedness (that's a word, right?) DS1 is yet to be beaten.

anast8d ago

All great games beside DS2.

toxic-inferno8d ago

I would agree, but there are some things in DS2 that are great and incredibly memorable. It tries to do things differently, and there are some amazingly cinematic moments.

Of course, there's also poor level design (particularly the interconnectivity of the world), questionable combat choices and some of the worst boss runs since the early days of video games...

anast8d ago

True. I can't disagree the game has some moments.

290°

9 Years Later, Does Bloodborne Deserve All The Praise It Gets?

Saad from eXputer: "Almost a decade later, it's time to take the nostalgia goggles off and accept that Bloodborne has long been surpassed by its successors."

jznrpg42d ago (Edited 42d ago )

Yes, yes it does. It’s still a great game. Elden Ring isn’t better just different and a bit easier . I like that you have to be aggressive but smart in Bloodborne

thorstein42d ago

I literally replayed it recently and it's better than I remember. I think it's like going back to a beloved book and noticing things I hadn't before.

raWfodog42d ago (Edited 42d ago )

Yo! I was getting ready to reply with the exact same four words you started with lol. Yes, I think Bloodborne has withstood the test of time and remains a great game. That’s why all the fans are hoping for a sequel someday. Hoping that we can catch that magic again with a new storyline.

Leeroyw42d ago

Yes. Just replayed it a few days ago. My first Platinum. And yes. I rage quitted so many times and called it BS too when I started. It's tight. The combat is amazing and the lore is rich.

GamingSinceForever42d ago

Elden Ring was easier? I don’t know about that at all. I remember leveling up in Bloodborne and breezing through it. In Elden Ring no matter how powerful I got I was still catching a beat down from every boss.

thorstein42d ago

That's due to scaling enemies. I remember not doing Haligtree untill near the end and having enemies withstand almost a full blast from Azur's Glintstone Staff Comet Azure. My level was quite high.

Melee characters are not fun in that game, especially for the Elden Beast.

MeteorPanda42d ago

Considering l did a run 2 months ago? Yes.

Show all comments (54)
160°

Bloodborne's Potential Remaster Continues To Be Sony's Biggest Missed Opportunity

"Sony is missing out on a hugely profitable opportunity by ignoring fan demands for a Bloodborne remaster and PC port," says Ahmed from eXputer.

thorstein71d ago (Edited 71d ago )

Bloodborne came out on the PS4. It is owned by From Software. What missed opportunity? I am sure the people at From Software know what they are doing. Especially since they are hiring devs instead of laying them off.

Maybe do an article about that instead of writing a hit piece on them acting like they don't know how to run their business.

71d ago
-Foxtrot70d ago (Edited 70d ago )

To be fair Hidetaka Miyazaki said in an interview

“Unfortunately, and I’ve said this in other interviews, it’s not in my place to talk about Bloodborne specifically. We simply don’t own the IP at FromSoftware.”

So the ball kind of is in Sonys court, it feels like a missed opportunity because it’s something people really want and Sony just hasn’t really been bothered to get it off the ground. There was rumours it was at one point but it all went silent.

Cacabunga69d ago (Edited 69d ago )

Sony has been missing nothing but opportunities for a few years now.. since GOW release, it’s worrying silence we’ve been getting..

As for Bloodborne, imo it would be too soon to release it because PS4 game still looks phenomenal..

Bloodborne REMAKE I think will be PS6 launch title by Bluepoint. I truly hope so! 2 gens later we can get the same wow effect as Demons Souls.

Eonjay69d ago

He is right because it is Sonys IP but a little further back he also explained that they only work on one game at a time. This means that From must also be available. In other words it could already be in the pipeline. Ecen if that is the case, it's still up to Sony to reveal it when they are ready. As ever, I prefer not to hear about it until it's about 3 to 6 months from releasing.

CrashMania70d ago (Edited 70d ago )

'Bloodborne came out on the PS4. It is owned by From Software'

Actually Sony owns the IP, same with Demon's Souls. I think they'd prefer if From did the work on any future of both of those though, but if Sony wanted to they could have those off to anyone else to work on them, like the DS remake.

thorstein70d ago (Edited 70d ago )

Yeah. Thanks for the info.

But I still think that remasters should wait a generation. And Blue Point did Demon's Souls which was superb.

It can be a huge risk. And I think Hidetaka Miyazaki hinted that it would be a PS6 title. I don't he has no say in what happens, it's a partnership.

--Onilink--69d ago

To be honest, if there is a remake/remaster (not that it needs one) I would prefer someone else to handle it, like they did with Demon Souls

From many perspectives From Soft is an amazing developer, BUT, on a technical level they are far from impressive, both in terms of dated visuals (again, on a technical level, not art/design) and usually poor performance.

And what is the point of a remake/remaster if not to provide a visual and performance enhancement to a game that already nailed the rest?

Michiel198969d ago

@thorstein what huge risk? Part of one of the most well known ip's in gaming nowadays, there's not much risk there when it comes to a remake.

thorstein69d ago

@Michiel

I meant remasters in general are a huge risk, not Bloodborne.

Bloodborne isn't, but I think it's going to be on PS6, like how Demon's Souls went from PS3 to PS5.

Sorry for the confusion.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 69d ago
thesoftware73069d ago (Edited 69d ago )

Thorstein,

Wow, your post seems angry..relax it's an opinion.

And btw, it is on Sony, they have the exclusive right to the game, on top of that, they could have easily, at bare minimum, offered an official 60fps patch, with a few extras and charged people $10 to upgrade or $30-40 for new buyers.

I believe I saw an interview where , FromSoft said it was all up to Sony on a sequel and other dealing with the game.

A "hit peice", that serious huh?..relax lol.

thorstein69d ago (Edited 69d ago )

Wow you seem angry. I responded to crash 2 days ago about the remaster and who did it.

Why do you care what other people think in a moment about some journalism. Calm down, buddy, it's just my opinion. From 3 days ago.

Edit: I just went back through my comments and found 2 where I call out the author in the past month. Wow, I'm a rageaholic.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 69d ago
potatoseal70d ago (Edited 70d ago )

It will be a launch title on PS6 just like the remake of Demon's Souls for PS5 launch

OhReginald69d ago

Sony realizes people will flock to buy ps6s for a bloodborne remake. Easy money.

jznrpg69d ago (Edited 69d ago )

Rumored it’s slated for PS6 launch. Some say PS5 Pro. Who knows ?

P_Bomb69d ago

Highly requested, unfortunately neglected.

jznrpg42d ago

Some say we didn’t need TLOU2 remake but that was a PS4 game and now we need a BB remake but that was a PS4 game. We send mixed signals

Show all comments (23)