3403d ago Replies(10)
polow got sol3403d ago

Ms gonna show whose pockets really go deeper

3403d ago Replies(3)
DarkOcelet3403d ago

I think Bioware already stated it wasnt an exclusive. And wasnt Mass Effect 1 a 360 exclusive but ended up on PS3 couple years later? Even though MS logo was on the screen when you started the game on the 360.

Nekroo913403d ago

I love this site how you get disagrees from stating facts. Yes you can play the Mass effect trilogy on the PS3.

If anyone thinks EA is going to miss the biggest part of the market, they are delusional.

They regreted making titanfall an exclusive to xbox one,the game wasted tons of money in marketing and TLOU remastered still sold more copys...

3403d ago
hello123403d ago (Edited 3403d ago )

Dev said it was rumour did he not? So what Microsoft buy exclusives so does Sony. Sony had lot of betas before the x box 1 last year just get over it the way of gaming nowadays. They are businesses looking for people to buy their consoles.

imt5583403d ago (Edited 3403d ago )

Yup, Bioware is stupid they chose Xbone for exclusivity. I mean, exclusive game for 9.5~10 mil. sold trough ( and outside US/UK DEAD CONSOLE ) and throw away 18.5+ mil. PS4's. Great business solution.

christocolus3403d ago

i totally agree with what you are saying Knws. MS will keep investing in first and third parties this gen just like sony and nintendo are curently doing. Phil even stated there would be more announceents in the future. the sales difference between both consoles wont be an issue as long as MS makes the deal worthwhile and both parties get what they want. sony made similar deals during the ps1,ps2 , ps3 era and even again with the ps4, nintendo did same with gamecube,n64 and even the wiiu. as you said its all about business.

OrangePowerz3403d ago (Edited 3403d ago )

Very very doubtful. With every month the gap is getting bigger. Meaning with every month it costs more and more to get the exclusive deals from companies like EA. Sure MS has lots of money but it's a publicly traded company and just like EA the shareholders demand profits. Not releasing on the most popular console cuts out huge portions of profit. Square could do that because Uncharted 4 comes out at around the same time so they won't take much of a hit in profits by releasing later so MS probably overpaid for that.

I know people like to say Titanfall was a huge success altough it didn't come out on PS4, but if EA doesn't make a statement of how great it sold and throw around numbers of sales and profits it underperformed for their expectations. EA made the deal because MS promised them DRM and no second hand game sales and EA expected the X1 too beat the PS4. Neither of that happened so that relationship won't be as good anymore.

As for Mass Effect if we would assume it sells 7 million copies on PS4 that would mean MS would need to pay at at least around 200 million just to make up for lost profit. Obviously EA would demand more than just the minimum and try to squeeze out as much as possible since MS is somewhat desperate to catch up in sales. Would over 200 million be really worth it? Doubtful that it would boost X1 sales enough that it would be worth it so the shareholders would have a problem with that. If you don't keep shareholders happy the CEO will be kicked out by them. I think the MS CEO wants to keep his job.

Keep in.mind that ME4 won't release this year so by the time it comes out the PS4 sales could be above 40-50 million meaning the potential amount of sold copies would increase and so would the cost for MS to get the game as exclusive.

_-EDMIX-_3402d ago

Not sure its worth it to MS or EA. Consider the series is multiplatform and MS sorta showed their timed hand a bit too much.

How many will even believe a timed deal when announced?

EA has no reason to do one as they still need to make back that 700mill they spent on the team to begin with.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3402d ago
Ryan7413403d ago

To be fair, Xbox is Mass Effect's natural home. Probably a rumour but you never know. Congrats to Microsoft and Phil in particular if true.

q8kik3403d ago

And TR's home is Playstaion, so is it unfair for ms to make it exclusive for god knows how long ?

Dudebro903403d ago

TR is not Home to Sony. It did not start out only on Playstation.

q8kik3403d ago

Without the original PS TR wouldn't have been a successful franchise, period.
So don't start with the "oh it was on the sega saturn too" Bullsh!t.

EvilWay3403d ago

You guys don't need to TR you have Uncharted which is better. I like both regardless, I hope MS will buy Tomb Raider and Capcom as well

DarkZane3403d ago

@EvilWay

In the end though, we will get both Uncharted and Tomb Raider.

Nice try though, Square-Enix isn't gonna let go of tomb raider and MS won't buy capcom either.

UltraNova3402d ago (Edited 3402d ago )

When 2 out of 3 ME games got simultaneously released on both PS and Xbox how one game releasing first on one make it home to that console especially when it was released on PC too? Plus even the 1st one got released on PS later on.

Mass Effect has zero attachment to xbox, however many self-entitled xbox fanboys like to see it.

Same goes for Tomb raider and SF5 which have been on both consoles for a long long time (even if one started on either console 100 years ago)but one is secured to XB1 and the other on PS, in my book that's fair.

Now if games of the magnitude of GTA or COD or FIFA turned exclusive to either console then yes the outrage would be totally justified.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3402d ago
Omran3403d ago

to be fair tomb raider belong to Playstation :)

Haki11123403d ago

Tomb raider started on Sega Saturn though

OmegaShen3403d ago

No, I think PC was. Better luck next time.

spicelicka3403d ago

That's definitely not "fair", that's the dumbest reasoning I've ever heard.

dolphin_supreme3403d ago

it was on ms first because they helped fund it. also this was already confirmed to not be console exclusive. i dont know why everyone is having this coversation

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3402d ago
Hibsboy853403d ago ShowReplies(3)
DougLord3403d ago

I would expect "timed" exclusive like the first few Mass Effects. Mass Effect 1 eventually came to PS3 (5 years after 360). Mass Effect 2 had a 1 year delay on PS3/PC vs 360. But it totally makes sense. All 3 games sold 3 million copies each on 360. Mass Effect 2 and 3 sold around 1.5 million copies in PS3. I don't trust PC numbers anymore due to digital, but Mass Effect sold 1 million hard copies on PC, while 2 and 3 sold much less.

MasterCornholio3403d ago

Well with the PS4 having a much larger install base I doubt that EA will want to miss out on the platform.

Infamous2983403d ago

After titanfall medicore sales , I doubt that too.

Dudebro903403d ago

Titanfall had mediocre sales?? News to me. Nice troll attempt.

SmielmaN3403d ago

It would cost a lot of money for a as to secure these aaaaaand exclusives because of that install base dif. They basically have to provide EA with proper compensation for opting to not sell their game to the possible 19-20 million PS4 users. Would prob end up being the most anyone has ever paid for console exclusivity.

Why are ppl talking about Titanfall? Realistically MS released no info on the sales of that game.

DeadlyOreo3403d ago

Dudebro90

Titanfall sales were mediocre though. For all of the hype and money involved in the exclusivity, to be then outsold by Infamous Second Son too, mediocre is spot on. I know you love your Xbox man, but come on, just because you wanted big sales doesn't mean it happened.

EvilWay3403d ago

@DeadlyOreo

Of course Infamous was going to outsell Titanfall PS4 had a huge lead in install base at the time

DarkZane3403d ago

The fact EA actually regretted that exclusivity deal means they would have made much more money going multiplatform. They won't make this mistake again, the PS4 is gonna lead for the entire generation, most third party won't go with Microsoft only again.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3403d ago
_-EDMIX-_3402d ago

I'm not sure where any of you get your news from. Its been stated many, many times....

ME1 was NEVER a timed game. MS owned the publishing rights, didn't own the team, didn't own the ip.

EA bought the IP and Team, later on they bought the publishing rights from MS. (That is by the way the ONLY thing they actually bought from MS)

EA later publishes ME1 on PC.

Why not port it on PS3?

Many, many reasons. Small install base at the time, they just spent close to a billion dollars on 2 teams and a hand full of ips.

Bioware was working on many systems and games (ME2, PC, 360, PS3 for the first time, along with KOTOR MMO)

The game came to PS3 later on when EA had the time and money to actually do a port.

So..this idea that something was "timed" doesn't make much sense and no evidence supports such an idea. In fact, if Bioware was ever going to make Mass Effect on another system after the fact, they clearly would not have sold the ip to EA to make more money on more systems if they felt they could do it on their own (ie selfpublish)

Show all comments (198)
100°

Mass Effect 4 and The Challenges of Canonicity in Choice-Based Games

Game Rant Writes "Canonicity can be a tricky nut to crack in franchises with continuing narratives, and that's something Mass Effect 4 will need to contend with."

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
just_looken386d ago (Edited 386d ago )

wow gamerant forgot mass effect 4 came out years ago number 6 and 7 were cancelled.

The new mass effect which can be called number 5 will not have any of your choices why you might ask?

Well dragon age keep were your choices from number one can been seen in number 3 got unplugged from number one and number 2 is finicky.

Dragon age on pc requires a mod to get past the server login and non of your choices get uploaded to the keep even the dlc no longer works sense it needs a server check.

On xbox i teseted this only though local saves i was able to transfer choices from one to too but 0 of one dlc would work.

So if the more popular dragon age series is in this state why would they care about your mass effect choices?

Oh and that remaster that was tossed out still has day one issues and number 3 is still hard to play on pc do to lighting issues and ram limits imposed from 2014.

My expectations for the next bioware 2.0 titles is very low.

phoenixwing386d ago

They should redo the main trilogy

just_looken386d ago (Edited 386d ago )

They should redo the dragon age trilogy for sure on pc DA1 the ui is messed up sense it was for 4080p/720i days back in 2005. Getting to run is also very hard

The only way to play dragon age one is via xbox one backwards compatable state.

The ps3 version of dragon age one is pre throphy/ in game xmb so it has the freezing/crashing issues or just will not run.

just_looken385d ago

Well i am not American so please enlighten me on usa education before your country invades mine and forces us into your society

GhostScholar385d ago (Edited 385d ago )

@ just_looken

Did I mention education? Never said America did have negative points. I know for all you “enlightened” people you think everything is either all good or all bad, but in reality that’s not how life works. We have a government that traded a known terrorist for a basketball player who moonlights as a drug dealer. We aren’t perfect by a long shot. If you want to go political though how about your leader leaving his own country when the truck driver strike happened?

porkChop386d ago

Dragon Age is not more popular than Mass Effect.

shinoff2183385d ago

Yea I read that and was like I've heard way more people talk mass effect compared to dragon age. Personally I'm more into mass effect. It's got the whole dope ass sci fi thing going on while dragon age has the same old medieval thing

gold_drake385d ago

andromeda is a spin off tjo and not considerd a numvered title. as it has to 99% nothing to do with the trilogy.

i think they need to make the destroy perfect ending canon.
we need more of shepard. haha.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 385d ago
50°

Mass Effect 4 Can Explore Post-Apocalyptic Themes

Game Rant Writes "Mass Effect 4 will likely treat Mass Effect 3’s Destroy ending as canon, and this gives it an opportunity to explore a post-apocalyptic galaxy."

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
Rebel_Scum539d ago

Destroy is the best choice. Bring the relays back over the course of a new trilogy, maybe right at the end of the first game. Say it was Cerberus, Salarians or a bunch of keepers that created a relay.

80°

Mass Effect 4 Needs to Make One Major Change with the Protagonist

Game Rant Writes "Mass Effect 4 has plenty of opportunities to change a lot about the franchise, particularly in the protagonist players can create."

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
BrainSyphoned539d ago

Tons of opportunities since most anyone who made it special is long gone

ClayRules2012539d ago

“Mass Effect 4 Needs to Make One Major Change with the Protagonist“

To make sure the main characters face isn’t tired with the released game?