660°

Microsoft clarifies Xbox One DRM strategy following Far Cry 4 issue

Xbox One users will still be able to download and play games they have purchased digitally even if the title is removed from the Xbox Store, Microsoft has confirmed to VideoGamer.com.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
MasterCornholio3412d ago

"Microsoft's comments, that seems to have been a glitch rather than a new approach to digital rights management on Xbox One."

Well I would hope that its a glitch and not something left over from their previous policies.

Anyways I'm glad that they are going to fix this.

:)

Gazondaily3412d ago

"Well I would hope that its a glitch and not something left over from their previous policies. "

Do you honestly think that this could be the case? That it would be some sort of lingering DRM than a glitch?

MasterCornholio3412d ago (Edited 3412d ago )

Well it could be a glitch caused by some line of code from their DRM system. But they dropped that a long time ago which is why I'm sure they will fix this.

P.S In other words I'm happy that they will fix this.

Gazondaily3412d ago

Well I think it could be. The way they rushed the last minute changes, I wouldn't entirely surprised if it the old lines code or whatever reared their heads.

Not intentional on their part of course but forgive me for being pessimistic about their proficiency, even if it is Microsoft.

MasterCornholio3412d ago

Glad you understood me.

:)

I remember a while back Major Nelson said that turning off DRM wasn't as easy as flipping a switch. Which is why I formed the theory that they had to do something to the code to get rid of it. Getting rid of code so quickly can cause side effects in the system.

I'm sure this wasn't intentional though since they dropped their DRM plans a long time ago.

It will get fixed.

:)

Volkama3412d ago

DRM for digital games wasn't changed. It was the policies on discs that were changed.

I know bad code can have unexpected consequences and there is obviously some overlap in disc and digital rights management, but really none of the "lingering code" should impact downloads, as that code is unchanged.

SilentNegotiator3412d ago

You have to admit, cutting off access to a digital game after the game is removed from the store doesn't sound like some random glitch.

HiddenMission3412d ago

@volkhama

I don't believe you've ever typed one line of code before because depending what commands the code calls for and where it's entered in a string of commands can cause lots of problems even years later if you don't go back and scrub every line of code.

Someone who is very skilled and organized will name different portions of code so that it's easier to do clean up...glitches happened when the code writers aren't structured and a bit messy with how they write/sequence strings of commands.

Gazondaily3412d ago

@Silent

"You have to admit, cutting off access to a digital game after the game is removed from the store doesn't sound like some random glitch."

What does it sound like then?

Volkama3412d ago

@hiddenmission I have dabbled in a few things, but certainly nothing major. You haven't said anything there that contradicts what I said though.

I would hope Microsoft have some well organised coders, that's kinda necessary for any project that has multiple cooks.

But if the problem was a legacy of the old policies I'd expect something more like "I can't play even though I have the disc!", as that was the policy change..

Having said that, I don't really know all the details of the system that wasn't released. I don't know how those discs were "registered" to a user account, or whether downloaded games had 24hr checks. So anything is possible really.

Godmars2903412d ago

"What does it sound like then?"

Like a bit of code that was left in that you're not likely going to realize was there until servers are cut off years later, or an instance such as this.

Gazondaily3412d ago

"Like a bit of code that was left in that you're not likely going to realize was there until servers are cut off years later, or an instance such as this."

http://assets.diylol.com/hf...

Docknoss3412d ago

Septic I honestly don't understand your disagree's. It's illogical to think it is a DRM instead of a glitch. Even with MS old stand on DRM that is clearly not the case anymore.

XBLSkull3412d ago

It was a glitch. I played the game offline plenty of times without issue until that happened.

Magicite3412d ago

MS as a whole is a glitch.

ZombieKiller3412d ago

DRM policy coming back to haunt us?! AKA why I haven't bought an xbox. I am literally freaked they will change policy again and go back on their word.

No thanks, I'd rather keep it simple. Hopefully this is just a glitch because the smoke hasn't cleared for me with them.

rainslacker3411d ago

The more obvious reason that this happened is a database input error on the part of whoever was responsible for deactivating the game on the store. it's possible they just accidentally deactivated the license updates, which is likely a complicated system. Or something along those lines...hard to say for sure since I have no clue how their back-end systems are set up.

I'm not disputing that lingering code can cause all sorts of problems should it not be thought about, and taken care of, and that with all the changes things likely exist that can cause all sorts of problems, but clerical errors such as above are much more commonly the problem of issues like this.

Also, MS has very stringent rules on organizing code and documenting it in some way and how it connects to everything else. I doubt an unorganized coder would be allowed to work on big projects like anything involving back-end management of system services.

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 3411d ago
DLConspiracy3412d ago

Actually my buddy bought a used Xbox one and he has been able to play all of the digital games from the previous owner for some reason. He never even bought the games and the oroginal owner was not on the xbox. So there is that. Bonus.

SonofGod3412d ago

That is because the previous owner set his Xbox as home console in the settings. If the previous owner decides to buy a new XO, and makes the new one his home console, the games will no longer work for your buddy.

xXDerickXx3411d ago

This happened to my friend! Haha he is getting a bunch of games for free. So far he got gta, far cry and cod season pass. Lucky Dude

XanderZane3412d ago

The problem has already been fixed. Microsoft is quick!! This was obviously a glitch that only happened with this game and only for a few gamers. It didn't even happen to EVERY gamer who bought FC4 digitally on the XB1. So obviously, it was a glitch probably on one of the servers for a certain regional area. It happens and M$ is usually very quick to fix the problem without blaming the customer (like some other company we know and love so much). Problem solved. Time to move on.

TheSaint3411d ago

The naivety of some of these posts is great.

AJBACK2FRAG3411d ago

When drm is discussed in relation to Microsoft I don't think these are bad ideas I think what were they planning beyond this. What was the next step. It's my belief that Microsoft is a negative company and they're only trying to corner the pc market. My buddy bought a Xbox One and believe me he didn't want to hear my opinion at all. When I asked him what's coming out down the line for the Xbone he shrugged his shoulders! He really didn't know!!! I'm a CAG for sure but I wouldn't take a Xbone if it was offered to me for free.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3411d ago
Why o why3412d ago (Edited 3412d ago )

Kinks, yeah but I'm not super ready for a digital only gaming future. Too many external factors and not enough benefits. A balance of both physical and digital can coexist for ages before the older format becomes pointless.

Charybdis3412d ago

There definitely are some kinks digital wise the game stores on the consoles are lagging behind steam.

SteamPowered3412d ago

Hard to beat the subscription price of Steam as well.

s8anicslayer3412d ago

Our internet is too vulnerable to cyber attacks for anyone to be committed to a digital ownership. Especially here in the states where our isp's are still for behind in terms of competing countries for speeds. But yet we pay premium prices.

AceofStaves3412d ago

It's the same here in Canada as well. Bottlenecks on download speeds, monthly usage caps, we have a way to go before digital-only gaming can ever truly take off.

nitus103412d ago

I think you will find this worldwide unless you pay for unlimited download however even this can be a "got you" if there is throttling and/or caps as well.

As an example you purchase a disk with a 49GB mandatory install (eg. Call of Duty and GTA V to name some). That's fine if the data is coming from the disk since it's an integral part of the console, however if that same 49GB has to be digitally installed the download times will be dependent on your ISP plan (it's not free) and the point to point performance of the internet.

hkgamer3411d ago

not sure what prices you pay in the us, but here in uk we have to get a telephone lone in order to get internet.

kinda sucks for people who has no use for a home phone.

internet speed is pretty decent though but it really depends where you live.

Volkama3412d ago

If games keep coming out half finished and broken then you are still relying on digital either way :)

Fez3412d ago

That's actually a really good point, games are almost never released in a fully finished state anymore.

The only problem I would have with an all digital future is PSN and Live overcharging. For convenience though it is fantastic - downloading Infamous First Light from work on to the PS4 so I can play when I get home, try doing that with physical media!

rainslacker3411d ago

I still find that outside some glaring recent examples, games are about as complete as they always have been on release. Most of them anyways. most games are completely playable without some sort of update, and updates usually fix small issues, or things that only affect a small number of users. That's not a bad thing, since before you couldn't really fix those small issues that 99% of the players never noticed.

Otherwise, I do agree with you.:)

hello123412d ago (Edited 3412d ago )

Digital has been great i hated having to go a store to buy a game, just preorder, off i go download it and play it. It was also cheaper up till October but Microsoft stopped people buying games from other regions, i was annoyed with to be honest and left a comment at the Major Nelson blog. I not going to buy lot of games that cost 70 Euros. I was saving 20 Euros when i was buying them from the American store.

Digital had three benefits for me, i don't have to go to the store, the games i bought got at a cheaper price( unfortunately thats now gone like i said)

One extra benefit remains and so far Microsoft has left it alone. I game share with a friend and i don't have to buy every game that comes out. If he buys it i can just download it similar if i buy a game he gets it has saved lot of money that way for him and me.

IrishSt0ner3412d ago (Edited 3412d ago )

They only stopped us buying digital games from different regions with credit/debit cards. They didn't stop the ability. Buy US instant codes (I used pcgamesupply.com), switch region, redeem code and buy whatever you want at US prices. I done this as late as December.

It's completely legitimate, your funds are seperated into two regional currencies on your Microsoft account. Xbox Director of marketing said this method is OKAY.

Bigpappy3412d ago

Well that is cheating your local government out of their cut, and a company doing business in your country has to conform.

hkgamer3411d ago

@bigpappy

technically its cheating local government out of their cut. but to be honest i doubt most companies even pay local taxes.

lots of big foreign companies in the uk dont pay taxes. big example is starbucks.

3412d ago
bleedsoe9mm3412d ago (Edited 3412d ago )

guess it will happen like its happening on pc , one of the console makers will decide to throw their brick and mortar partners under the bus and do deep discounts on digital downloads (like steam) driving consumers to more digital causing less and less physical stores to carry more expensive boxed games . if people want physical copies to stick around buy them from physical stores whenever there is an option and avoid buying games that don't give you the option .

Reaper29r3412d ago (Edited 3412d ago )

That's what I do. I always have the boxed version of all my PC (and console) games or get them from GoG. If it's not boxed, I don't buy it unless it was like $3 on Steam. Though it's very unlikely for them to go down anytime soon, I just don't trust any digital provider to have our best interest at heart if things were to go south for them. They are corporations first. Due to the EULA you have no proper ownership, just the license so they wouldn't be required to give you squat in the end and you can't sue. At least with my boxed version if that happens I just put it in, and if they require steam download whatever crack someone comes up with because I'm pretty sure people aren't going to just willingly lose all their games. There's also backing up the files but I like both in case something gets corrupted. When (not if) that time comes they decide to be awesome about it and hook us up with a patch cool, but I'm not taking any chances. I still play games like Mechwarrior, Baldurs Gate, Morrowind, Age of Mythology etc.. Only require a CD key and they work fine :)

rainslacker3411d ago

Not sure what you mean by "avoid buying games that don't give you the option". The cost to retail a game can be quite unobtainable for some developers, or may not be recouped with a retail release, so I find in some cases that a digital only release makes perfect sense. I see this a lot from NISA who releases smaller JRPG's that would never get a retail release, but can make a decent profit with a limited localization and digital release.

For the time being, I'm unaware of any major release that doesn't have both a retail and digital release.

Otherwise, it seems that people that want physical to stick around already buy mostly physical anyways. Digital proponents rarely seem to want retail to stick around(generalizing of course). I don't really care where people buy their games personally, I just don't like others that tend to think their way is the only way.

bleedsoe9mm3411d ago (Edited 3411d ago )

@rainslacker indie devs putting games out as download only is fine when the games are small / bit size games but as these indies devs grow and start filling the void left by the closing of all the B level devs , they need to be held to the same standards of offering physical options , especially as the games grow in size and complexity . if people are truely committed to keeping physical copies around they have to be careful what ground they decide to give . in a year when AAA games are being boxed half finished with giant 10+ gig patches the ground is being taken away fast .

Muzikguy3412d ago

These companies need to realize that just because music and movies went digital and do well, games are a lot different. I'm not looking forward to a digital future where I'm told where and when I can play. Not to mention music and movies aren't relying on PSN or Xbox Live to run

rainslacker3411d ago

And after all these years, movies and music are still available physically and can take up major sections at big retailers.

Nothing wrong with digital if people prefer that, but also nothing wrong with physical if people swing that way.

Unfortunately, all digital content...legally purchased...is reliant on some service provider, and none of them are immune from issues or the fact that content could disappear without notice, and most of the time, with no recourse for the consumer.

Muzikguy3411d ago (Edited 3411d ago )

Yes having both is and should be an option I agree. Digital music and movies though are not reliant on any service provider. Remember when iTunes had that nasty DRM? It's been completely gone for about a decade now? Anyway you can buy music and movies through iTunes or Amazon or whatever and play them with whatever you want. They aren't reliant on where you got them from.

rainslacker3411d ago

One's ability to download them is reliant on the service provider however. One may be able to play them anywhere, but if they need to download it, and where they brought it from shuts down, or removes the ability to download it, then you are left without the content you purchased.

Take for instance when Games for Windows shut down. They released a patch for the games to allow them to be playable, but AFAIK there is no actual way to download those games should you delete them and have no back up copy. Obviously there are ways around that for the more technically minded, but officially purchased content is no longer available.

Muzikguy3411d ago

I get what you're saying, and that's why I'd be that technically minded person and back that stuff up. The example with Games for Windows is why I don't trust companies that much. No company has earned that. As for music and movies you can buy them anywhere not just iTunes or Amazon. I wouldn't corner myself in purchasing windows games just for windows in the event they could shut down. They're so big I'd doubt that would happen in my lifetime. Physical or no go for me. Unless of course they're extra cheap or something (like the new RE game for $20 I might buy digital).

Since we're talking about things shutting down I really miss Gamespy. Oh well, thanks for the memory!

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3411d ago
+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3411d ago
shotime973412d ago

it's nice to see Microsoft doing the right thing...for a change

gamer78043412d ago

It's been this way since the 360, even if a publisher loses the rights to a game and its take off the store, if you've purchased something, you can always re-download it.

Pogmathoin3412d ago

How does that work? If its not on the Store, how do you download? Or is it part of your gamertag profile and it will show there?

ifistbrowni3412d ago

@pogmathoin, It's in your account management, download history.

forgive me if I'm not exact, it's been awhile since I've re-downloaded old games like traditional Mortal Kombat on my Xbox 360

gamer78043412d ago

It doesn't happen often by I did it last through the website for ninja turtles which was removed. Just search your purchase history and there is a download button.

torchic3412d ago

every console makers DRM strategy should be: "there is no strategy"

Volkama3412d ago

Yeah, I'm sure the majority of people would be willing to pay for games just because it is "the right thing to do".

MadLad3412d ago

And that's the point where you would realize piracy isn't just a PC thing.

pompous3412d ago

Just more growing pains for these consoles that appear to be on newer networks than their older siblings.

Show all comments (70)
290°

More Job Losses At Xbox, “There’s More To Come”: Paul Thurrott

Paul Thurrott in a recent episode commented on the on-going Microsoft fiasco hinting at more job losses and that "there's more to come".

Read Full Story >>
spieltimes.com
Sonic18811d 20h ago (Edited 1d 20h ago )

There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future . Xbox has to pay Microsoft back. It might take two decades to do that.

sagapo1d 17h ago (Edited 1d 17h ago )

I don’t understand what you’re saying. Xbox IS microsoft so there’s no “paying back “.
And MS gross profit in 2023 was over 140 billion dollars so forget your 2 decades.

Unless you mean the money MS invested in Xbox (acquisitions included) and the time it will take for xbox as a brand to gain that money back on it’s own, then yeah, that could take a while.

romulus231d 10h ago

The better term to use might be return on investment, xbox is simply a division of Microsoft one that MS can easily do away with if profit margins are not met. So in that regard he's right, if xbox isn't showing the expected return on investment the higher ups are expecting than it's unlikely Microsoft will acquire any other studios any time soon, especially if they are spending billions buying developers just to shut them down in the end.

MrBaskerville1d 3h ago (Edited 1d 3h ago )

Xbox is a division that they discussed shutting down but doubled down on after Gamepass was pitched.

It needs to make money at some point. Big money.

KwietStorm_BLM1d 2h ago

So you do understand it or..?

rokos1d 1h ago

According to Statista the net income of Microsoft is about $72.4 billion dollars which is a bit lower than last year profit. That is almost as much as Activision's acquisition but I assume that would be a one off since it costs so much plus I see how their focus has been shifted to AI, thus any major future investments will probably be in that area.

Markusb331d ago

i think you are really missing the point

VariantAEC14h ago

@romulus23
That is not why MS buys studios. They might continue to buy because it's about taking that sweet sweet IP out of the corporate husks of their acquisitions.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 14h ago
SonyStyled1d 16h ago

“There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future”

No bro, there do be is for Microsoft not acquiring for what is now if not what it be is 😂

1d 14h ago Replies(2)
ChasterMies1d 4h ago

Xbox isn’t a separate company from Microsoft. It’s all Microsoft.

Abear2122h ago(Edited 22h ago)

Let’s be real, this is the media spinning all the acquisitions and liquidations of said developers and spinning it to make M$ the villain.

This was bound to happen, a bigger slice of pie and cut costs, when the games come they stand to make more and that’s their agenda—it was the writing on the wall when the sales went through and legally all those who approved the sale and mergers knew this would happen.

Snowflakes need to realize business is ugly and you can cry all you want but this is how capitalism works. And it works.

That said, M$ needs to steer the narrative and grab hold of all this, make their plans known, hype the hell out of all those dead IP’s they plan to revive, and be honest about the timeline. This is likely to involve mobile and IP on other consoles, and most people realize that.

The problem is this company is incapable of being transparent and seems to often want to dissuade and confuse is customer base. The lack of E3 has hurt Microsoft and I don’t think they know how to properly or effectively market their brand anymore.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 14h ago
jwillj2k41d 20h ago

There really needs to be a class action lawsuit here. You buy these companies just to put people out of jobs. And it’s not like something happened to derail their plans this WAS the plan. Microsoft has no business in this space at all.

franwex1d 19h ago (Edited 1d 19h ago )

Microsoft has been doing this for years. They simply want the IPs. Look at Nokia. Look at Skype. This time it simply expanded to games. Gaming is not as important to Microsoft’s executives as it was to the founders too. Bill Gates was willing to sell the og Xbox at a loss. Steve Balmer approved the red ring of death fiasco. This CEO isn’t really a gamer.

-Foxtrot1d 18h ago

Maybe it's time though to put a stop to it and use a big giant like Microsoft as a huge example to the rest of these big companies.

There has to be a line drawn somewhere.

People like the FTC and the like went against Microsoft yet their Actvision deal was still allowed to go through yet look what's happened...it's not even Acitivisions studios aswell, it's Bethesdas.

VariantAEC14h ago

Years?

Try several decades, and in the gaming space 2.3 decades.

Jon6158623h ago

You do realize this happens in ALL industries? Or are you just saying this because it is Microsoft? In any case I feel for those that are being let go but the trch industry is suffering right now.

jwillj2k419h ago(Edited 18h ago)

This absolutely does NOT happen all the time. Let me know the last time 1 company with a terrible product track record spent 100 billion onto acquire MULTIPLE successful companies in under a year only to shut them down and stop making their products regardless of how successful they were. Not merge them, completely shut them down.

And you can’t use Microsoft in your example.

Notellin19h ago(Edited 19h ago)

Class action lawsuit? The law is on their side and protects them at all costs. There are no rules to protect the people at the bottom.

jwillj2k419h ago

Not true when it comes to mass layoff do your research.

RNTody1d 19h ago

Ninja Theory, Perfect Dark, Crash Bandicoot, Spyro, Wolfenstein 3, Dishonored, Prey, Doom, Quake... something tells me that bad things are going to happen to these entities under Microsoft.

MrDead1d 8h ago

ID software, the makers of Doom and Wolfenstein that have been with us since 1991 could be gone and MS will keep the IPs.

I hope some of these studios can buy their freedom from MS otherwise this is going to be even more devastating for the industry and gamers.

Yui_Suzumiya1d 6h ago (Edited 1d 6h ago )

That's exactly what I'm worried about. I've been a fan of id since Wolfenstein 3D and I'm honestly afraid.

lodossrage1d 2h ago

Toys for Bob saw the writing on the wall and bought themselves out.

Wouldn't be the first time a company did that under MS either. Bungie and Twisted Pixel did the same. Considering what just happened, I can see some other devs trying to buy themselves out too.

anast1d 18h ago

Good thing the bosses of all those small studios made their money.

glenn19791d 18h ago

they cant do it right now they will get burned

XiNatsuDragnel1d 9h ago

Phil and his team need to be gone

lodossrage1d 2h ago (Edited 1d 2h ago )

Won't make a difference.

The whole structure needs to be overhauled. Anyone that replaces Phil will be no different than him, Mattrick, or anyone else.

Until the company changes how they go about business, nothing will change

glenn197923h ago

I just don't have any idea what they would do , they have done sooo much damage on their xbox brand, they have a show at July or June I think, but will it even matter even they show amazing games, idkn

lodossrage1d 2h ago

True,

But they may as well get it over with. Whether it happens now or later, the burning is going to hit the same.

Reality is the ONE move that can alleviate a lot of this is the one move they can't make. Remove day 1 from gamepass.

Show all comments (68)
90°

Microsoft Opening Xbox Mobile Game Store in July

The Xbox brand is expanding, as an Xbox mobile game store is opening this coming July where Microsoft will brings its "first-party portfolio."

Jin_Sakai3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

“Bond adds that they will start on the web”

This will go nowhere.

Nice knowing you Xbox. This is what happens when the house never gets cleaned.

MrDead3d ago

The only this MS is expanding is the amount of feculence it sprays on everyone who just want to enjoy gaming and make games.

The best thing MS can do for the gaming industry is leave and never return.

XiNatsuDragnel3d ago

Good luck with this even it might not succeed.

Show all comments (7)
210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel4d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow3d ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo1822d ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie2d ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

2d ago
Hereandthere2d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2d ago
Notellin2d ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

2d ago
Hereandthere2d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

ApocalypseShadow1d 11h ago

Lying to yourself is unbecoming.

Article link tells you all you need to know in Sarah Bond's own words.

Hereandthere2d ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

ApocalypseShadow1d 11h ago

At least you and others get it. Note drank the Kool aid and asked for seconds thinking it was refreshing.

Most don't even know how it all played out but it's there in black and white for all to see. Microsoft brought it up for years until the MLB forced Sony's hand. It was a win win for Microsoft. Kill one reason to buy a PlayStation or kill the game by dropping it in a cheap service to kill Sony's sales numbers on PlayStation.

OtterX2d ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Cockney1d 6h ago

They chose well, Sony gave them the backing to pursue their dreams with no restrictions even tho their games especially dreams have very niche appeal. Media molecule and Sony deserve respect for this in an age of risk averse publishing.

RNTody2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno2d ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Inverno2d ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

2d ago
fsfsxii2d ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno2d ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (29)