310°

Zoe Quinn: 'All Gamergate has done is ruin people's lives

Quinn is in the UK to talk about her work as a games designer, but most people at the event have come to know her as patient zero of Gamergate, the vociferous video game “protest movement” that exploded across the internet in August. Leaderless and chaotic, this ragtag community of self-identifying “hardcore” gamers sees its culture under threat from insidious outsiders – usually feminists and academics – who are challenging the industry on its sometimes questionable representation of violence, minorities and gender. Gamergate wants video games to be left alone.

Read Full Story >>
theguardian.com
3465d ago Replies(8)
yarbie10003465d ago (Edited 3465d ago )

Gamergate made me aware of how the media has secret groups where they gather and discuss which stories they are going to talk about and which ones they are going to slide under the rug.

Gamergate made me aware of just how corrupt many of these news sites are who allowed journalists to donate money to the very people they are suppose to be critically reviewing.

Gamergate also made me aware of how many people will try to distort a movement - and how we have quite a few people who are "Professional Victims"

I don't think anyone dislikes Zoe Quinn for being a woman - I haven't found anyone who hates this person for having 2 X Chromosomes.

But acting like a slut - and portraying a boohooing victim every day - distorting facts and reality could probably ruin your life.

Anon19743465d ago (Edited 3465d ago )

Wait? So game journalists aren't allowed to talk to each other about the industry? You don't think journalists everywhere have groups where they discuss their work with each other, or the latest news?

And you don't believe that people in the industry should be allowed to donate their personal dollars to any cause or project they see fit? Having a financial interest in a game is a completely different from simply backing a project via Kickstarter or the like.

But go ahead, you judge people and tell them who they can talk to, how they should conduct their personal lives and where they can spend their own money. See how far that gets you in life.

Edit below: Well sorry to break it to you, but journalists, like anyone else, are allowed to associate and talk with whoever they want. No one is going to play big brother and stop that, and there's nothing wrong with it. Every industry does this. As for political contributions, that varies from organization to organization. Many have no objections to where their staff chooses to contribute. If game journalists choose to donate to a project, as long as it doesn't impact their ability to report on other projects, what's the issue? Again, this isn't the same thing as having a financial interest in a title that they'd profit from. That's completely different.

yarbie10003465d ago (Edited 3465d ago )

No I don't think its okay for a group of trusted media to conspire to keep some topics hidden from the public while pushing an agenda for other topics. Glad you're okay with that.

No, donating money as a journalist is unethical and why all news organizations ban the practice. You can't be a journalist and donate money to any political party for instance.

And if it was right - why did some sites come out and say they were banning the practice?

-Foxtrot3465d ago

Jeez all the defending you do towards these corrupt journalists is the reason why the think they can do what they like.

Anon19743465d ago

@-Foxtrot. Please explain to me how I'm "defending corrupt journalists". Where's this widespread corruption you speak of, and my defense thereof?

If a journalist does something wrong I'd be the first in line to condemn them. Talking to other journalists isn't corruption. Spending your own money on projects you want to support isn't corruption. Failing to disclose close personal relationships (like the journalist/dev roommates thing) I completely think is inappropriate. But let's face it, we've had months now of GamerGate digging through journalists trash and they've come up with bupkis overall. There's no widespread corruption among game journalists.

I completely support the call for more transparency from game journalists, and I think they should be held to a certain level of journalistic standards. I just think GG is a witchhunt that's ruining real people's lives for few gains.

Death3465d ago

If you are basing your decisions on a journalists opinion there is a much bigger issue you aren't seeing. You should be able to make your own decisions and form your own opinion. A journalist or reviewer should not have the kind of influence you are claiming they do on a reasonable person. Not to mention Zoe didn't sleep with every person that reviewed her work. The alleged "corrupt" journalists review was inline with the others.

Dramacydal3464d ago (Edited 3464d ago )

Secret groups. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Over video games. That they didn't make. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Makes total sense.

Spotie3464d ago

More and more disappointed in you, darkride. Not at all surprised by Death, given how he defends other crappy practices in the industry.

Here's the bottom line: Quinn and her actions were the tip of the iceberg. At the same time, they were the tipping point. You're both being intentionally obtuse, pretending like we weren't all complaining about shitty journalism long before we ever heard of Quinn, her abhorrent game, or the gamergate hashtag.

The movement has, from its very start, been about a lack of impartiality in gaming journalism. People with obvious- and not so obvious- biases pushing their opinions on us, who rely on them to give us news on the industry.

Yes, journalists can converse amongst themselves and talk about whatever. Nobody is saying they can't. What should not be acceptable is them deciding what subjects to cover, and which ones to bury. They should not be donating to games they then cover in any way, be it a full review or just an endorsement. That presents a conflict of interest any other industry would more than frown upon.

Sleeping with a developer most definitely falls into that category, even if "developer" is a bit strong of a word.

I'm most baffled by your willingness to disregard EVERYTHING out there saying #Gamergate is more than just hating on Quinn or women. It's like their efforts with TFYC and other such organizations, other such causes don't even exist.

How about actually taking the time to educate yourselves on the other side of the story? Cuz it's clear you've both- among many others- heard a small bit of it here and there and decided you'll follow the same line as the mainstream media: gamergate is just thinly veiled misogyny.

http://techcrunch.com/2014/...

EVERY bit of green text is a link proving just how stupid your defense of this attention whore is.

The question is: will you even bother to take that evidence into consideration, or have you already made up your mind based on the fragments others have chosen to divulge to you?

Honestly, it's pathetic that it even has to come to this.

UnwanteDreamz3464d ago (Edited 3464d ago )

Thank you spotie

I encourage gamers to read what is at the other end of that link.

InTheLab3464d ago

Don't you run a website? Or is it a different darkride I'm thinking of. The one I respected had 1 bubble for a year because he went hard at corrupt sites that shown bias for a particular console.

Perhaps I'm mistaken.

Anon19743464d ago

@Spotie. I disagree. I think gaming journalists have every right to discuss among themselves what topics are interesting, what to cover, etc.. It's conversation. It's not like there's some shadowy group that hides behind the scenes and dictates to all game journalists what to report. That's nonsense, yet that's what Gamergators would have you believe they're fighting about.

As for donating money, they should be able to support whatever cause they want to with their funds..as long as they don't have a undisclosed financial interest in that project. If I'm a journalist and I see an interesting game in the works, why wouldn't I write a story about it if I thought others would find it interesting? And if I personally wanted to chip in $10 or $100 to a Kickstarter, who the hell is going to tell me I can't? I'd even be up front about it in my articles! "I love the look of this game, I'm an unabashed fan and I personally kicked into their kickstarter." How on earth could anyone take issue with that? Why shouldn't journalists be supportive of the game industry and projects they're interested in? As long as it's not impacting their reporting on other topics, what's the harm?

Just like you're article mentions, it's about bias. Bias isn't corruption. It's bias. If you don't like the bias displayed by a site, or media organisation, use another site you're happy with. Trying to say journalists shouldn't have bias, you might as well be an old man yelling at a cloud. And as for all the "good" in the article Gamergate has accomplished, it doesn't erase the mountain of bad. It's like "Hey, there's a daisy growing out of that mountain of shit." You can't simply ignore the facts. It's not illegal for mods to censor their forums. It's their forums, they can do whatever the hell they want. You certainly can't deny that a lot of GG behaviour is a clear violation of the terms of use on most sites when it comes to language, harassment, etc. If forums want to shut down all discussion due to the toxic turn the debate inevitably takes, that's their prerogative. Don't like it, make your own forum, which is what they did! The system works.

The sad thing is you think this one sided article somehow outlines Gamergate's justification for their harassment of industry figures. It doesn't.

@InTheLab. I did run a game news aggregate site years ago but simply don't have the time for it and sold the domain. Don't think they did anything with it. And having one bubble for a year...try more like 5 years out of the 7 or so I've been on this site! If sites show a bias, if sites display questionable ethics, if reviewers use one set of rules for one game but not another...damn straight I still have issue with this. But that's not what gamergate is about. If it was and they had any evidence whatsoever of wrongdoing it'd be right there with them. But it's conspiracy nonsense for the most part, or issues of so little import all I can do is shake my head.

elninels3464d ago

You have some fair points.

"And you don't believe that people in the industry should be allowed to donate their personal dollars to any cause or project they see fit"

No they shouldn't. Their ability to cover a subject objectively becomes impaired.

It goes like this.
I am a journalist.
I invest in a start up.
I review said start up's product or service positively, even if said project or service sucks, to drive sales.
I collude with my peers to proliferate misleading reviews.
I make more money.
I abandon journalistic integrity.

Anon19743464d ago

@elenels. But that's not what we're talking about here. I've been very clear on that. If a journalist has an investment in a company and would profit from a game's success, that's a conflict that needs to be addressed and that journalist shouldn't discuss that game.

Supporting a game via kickstarter or by other means where there's no benefit to the journalist if the game succeeds or fails. ..that's a completely different situation obviously. There's no earthly reason a journalist, developer or anyone else should be told they can't donate to a cause or project they want to support. That's not the same as an investment where a return is expected in the end.

Dee_913464d ago

It appears @darkride66 can't quite grasp the thought of a journalist and a person whose not a journalist can't do the same things.It appears that he believes that since 'teh everybudy else duz it, it is therefore okay!' It appears he doesn't know anything about journalist ethics most journalist learn about early on in school, that clearly state a majority of the stuff you personally see no issue with ( because of your ignorance) as being against journalistic ethics..You can try to make it seem as innocent as you want by ignoring the specifics of exactly what that group was doing until your face turn purple, but the fact is that group goes against journalistic ethics.. So actually.it does not matter what you personally feel, what matters is the reality.

Also wellsaid @yarbie1000

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 3464d ago
donwel3464d ago

What gets me is how she's supposed to be "afraid for her life" yet keeps going on these worldwide misogyny tours, which surely would make her an easier target?

jspsc1233464d ago

its not just gaming media, its all media. thoes who control the money control everything and will do anything to keep contol.

ReconHope3465d ago

So there was never an actual review by kotaku. Can't believe everything you read on the internet.

-Foxtrot3465d ago

There was never a review but there was two articles by the same guy praising her game telling us to go and buy it. Someone else did the same thing on another site, I think it was Rock, Paper, Shotgun

ReconHope3465d ago (Edited 3465d ago )

She conveniently left that part out I suppose. Can someone post a link to these two articles that the guy was praising her game that she slept with.

gamey3464d ago (Edited 3464d ago )

Oh seriously, LINK IT. I thought it was free to play? Raise money for charity? Jesus. You have made a mountain of the the tiniest molehill. Most of it is based emotionally in this idea that she slept with people to "get ahead" somehow. People have sex. Gamergate hasn't accomplished anything but giving a little protective cover to the idea that it didn't start out as a vicious rabble with severely touchy ideas about women. All your assertions and timelines ultimately mean nothing important. It really doesn't matter how many pieces of "evidence" you have if they don't add up to an actual picture. You're doing a good job of giving the IMPRESSION something catastrophic happened. It didn't. It is time to move onto productive things. Like ethics in journalism. Like calling out bigotry and sexism. Those are great. Stop focusing on trying to prove this started out clean. It didn't.

Anon19743465d ago (Edited 3464d ago )

You're correct. There was never a review by Kotaku. Grayson mentioned Quinn in an article regarding a indie game reality show she was on but never favorably mentioned the game. This was prior to any romantic involvement between the two. You can see the article here. This was the only article Grayson ever wrote about Quinn on Kotaku.

http://tmi.kotaku.com/the-i...

For Rock Paper Shotgun, Grayson wrote an article about 50 recently greenlit games on Steam in which Depression Quest was on the list. That was it as far as a search on the site goes.

Here's the thing about these claims. If there was any legitimacy to these claims, wouldn't GamerGate be linking these articles and quoting them non-stop to prove their point? Of course they would. They don't because they're dead wrong. The evidence doesn't exist. It's just conspiracy nonsense.

So right there...if GamerGate were about ethics in journalism, shouldn't it have ended the moment it was revealed that the original claims weren't true? You'd think so. But instead, the mob just packed up their pitchforks and torches and moved onto condemning another target. Ethics in journalism indeed....

Edit below: Clearly both are talking about her.

Death3464d ago

The fans and the mob mentality that seems to follow are a much bigger problem than journalists. Fans don't require proof before going off the deep end and are never held responsible. Who is it that is still talking about Zoe anyway? Is it the fans or the journalists?

ReconHope3464d ago

Very informative. Thanks for the facts.

mixelon3464d ago (Edited 3464d ago )

Nice to see people going against the status quo here. :D

Maybe there's some hope for the commentariat after all!

... The fact you're getting such a ratio of disagrees/agrees pretty much proves how reality-averse these guys actually are. Still.

creatchee3464d ago (Edited 3464d ago )

The thing about GamerGate that amuses me is this:

If you check the comment history of the people on this site who support GG, you'll find that a majority of them are fanboys for one console or another. Not fans, but fanboys. They are the ones who repeatedly go into rival console-related threads and talk trash and start flame wars. And it's understandable, because the same mentality applies.

It's the "my thoughts are the only ones that matter and I will go to obscene lengths to disrupt and disparage anybody who disagrees with me" mentality. Basically, the idea that somebody else thinks they're right or at least being treated unfairly means that they should be treated WORSE and constantly reminded that they are foolish and horrible people for committing the grave offense of having a different point of view.

Honestly, I would have given GamerGate more credence when it started, but when I saw the who were supporting and propagating it, I knew that it was simply just another avenue of hate veiled under a supposedly worthy cause.

-Foxtrot3464d ago (Edited 3464d ago )

@creatchee

Are you actually going to try and make GamerGate which affects all gamers into a thing about fanboys

Nobody gives a shit what console you own or support in all this.

@ReconHope

<sigh> They are not facts

creatchee3464d ago (Edited 3464d ago )

@-Foxtrot

Facts are facts. I implore anybody who doubts what I say to check your comment history, as well as anybody else's who supports the GamerGate movement and see how you and they treat anybody who disagrees with you. Repeat for the other extremely vocal members of "the movement".

And no, it's not just Sony or Microsoft fanboys, but fanboys in general. My point was that the mentality is the same, regardless of topic or which sides you support. If you were debating anything from politics to choice of soft drink, it would be the same.

It's all the same because your mentality and attitude are what define you - not your point of view on any particular subject.

mopground3464d ago

why dont you reply to spotie's comment? or do you avoid actual arguments that seriously question the stances youve taken like Anita?

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3464d ago
Concertoine3465d ago (Edited 3465d ago )

Its time to move on from Quinn and get on to the real issues at hand, I could care less about this woman's sex life. People are focusing on the scandal of it all and slut-shaming when we should be looking at the bigger picture.

Bottom line, people do it with each other. Get over it.

Halo2ODST23464d ago

Way to miss the entire point, if your sleeping with people so they give your products praise, rather than the product itself deserving that praise then its misleading consumers who buy the product in question - bad ethics

gamey3464d ago

Way to miss the entire point. You are speculating that she slept with people to get products praised. You have no idea. Even worse, you completely ignore that a bunch of people are speculating to a obscene degree about her sex life and calling her a whore and a slut. Says a lot about how we let people talk about women in our society. Truly what is a more important issue? I think you're burying the lede.

rainslacker3464d ago

The only people focusing on the the Quinn scandal are Quinn and those trying to discredit GG. GG supporters only talk about it when Quinn decides to say something to bring herself back into the spotlight.

GG supporters would love to move onto the real issue, but the press in general can't move past the catalyst for GG starting, and the sexist and misogynistic claims used to slander it.

gamey3464d ago

Funny you phrased it, "the sexist and misogynistic claims used to slander it" when there were actual sexist and misogynistic activities that slander it. The reality is sexism/bigotry and internet threats/abuse is the REAL issue and THAT's why the media covers it. It's not a conspiracy, it's simply the more important issue. Exemplified perfectly (and sadly, shamefully) by a bunch of turds in the gaming community. Confirmation bias is a scary thing. It keeps people from having good perspective.

Concertoine3464d ago (Edited 3464d ago )

The one who dug all this up is an ex who posted private issues online and cowered behind their supposed importance to the industry as if it justified his last act as anything more than a thing of spite. Let's be real, his blog is 99% look at this girl that screwed some guys, and 1% industry commentary. Ideally he wouldn't have stooped himself to her level, and ideally we wouldn't have needed a scandal such as that to kickstart these issues on a wider level.

It was never about proving she screwed guys to advance her career, it's about the notion that she COULD possibly do that. The Quinn scandal WAS not and SHOULD never have been a focal point. The source to all this admits himself that he is biased, the evidence is debatable, and in the end it's a footnote to wider issues that deserve people's effort much more.

rainslacker3463d ago

Sexism and misogyny and journalistic ethics are all issues that should be addressed. Which one is more important is rather moot. The "conspiracy" came in when the GameJournoPro's group of journalist decided to discredit the GG movement by colluding to discredit gamers as a bunch of sexist misogynistic a-holes in order to avoid the issue that GG was about.

Perhaps I phrased it wrong, but my point was that the GG side would love nothing more than to have a discussion on what the topic of journalistic ethics. If the gaming press had better ethical behaviour, then perhaps the issue of sexism and misogyny could actually be addressed in a mature way, and not the constant finger pointing bullying and libelous manner in which it is now, which is only causing the community to dig their heels in further as they are constantly trying to defend themselves against attacks on their character.

Before all this started, sexism and misogyny were already being talked about by the community, and I can say the tone of the discussion was much more reasonable outside the trolls who made stupid comments, who are the same trolls that make the same stupid comments now. Now the tone is just hateful, and nothing is being achieved on that side because it's been hijacked by people who only have their own self interest in mind.

I don't personally see how Quinn is even relevant to GG anymore, other than her initial actions which caused the whole movement to steamroll into what it is today. She was the catalyst to get it started, but not the cause that people are fighting against.

-Foxtrot3465d ago

This sort of thing has been happening a lot

You get chunks of Anti Gamer Gate articles going up at the same time, sometimes focusing on different people but the main issue is still the same it's to try and make GG look small and something it's not

It's one big smear campaign, they leave out so much info and exaggerate the stuff they have

Look at the one with Wu and her dead dog, that sort of thing would happen to anyone, I'm sure if you get a celeb on twitter and she or he posts something sad you'd get the odd troll saying something horrible....in this case it doesn't mean it's Gamer Gate. They are clutching at straws.

Show all comments (122)
950°

Zoe Quinn's Allegations Against Alec Holowka Called Into Question by New Evidence of Inconsistencies

While many people familiar with Zoe Quinn’s history of duplicity were initially highly skeptical of the allegations, reporter Anna Slatz at The Post Millenial was the first to report on the inconsistencies in an article titled Zoe Quinn’s allegations are falling apart.

Read Full Story >>
boundingintocomics.com
yarbie10001721d ago

She has blood on her hands! So does ResetEra. People were making posts saying I hope he gets what he deserves right before he took his life. Evil parasites

Eonjay1721d ago

I'm new to this whole story. Why was everyone on ResetEra so upset with him?

kenpachi1721d ago Show
yarbie10001721d ago

Because they believe it's Guilty until Proven Innocent in all cases of #MeToo

Mr Pumblechook1720d ago (Edited 1720d ago )

The games media websites need to recognise the role they all played.
They all wrote about Zoe Quinn's claims without using proper journalistic standards of objectivity - instead, they wrote about the allegations as if they were proven facts. Why? It is okay for individuals on the internet to have an opinion and believe one side or the other but it's not okay for a professional 'journalism' website. This led to mounting pressure on a vulnerable guy who was being attacked by everyone on the internet, EVERY website, no individual spoke up for him.

Alec Howloka was a troubled guy who in his past interviews always came across a good natured. The poor guy was abused as a child, and the recent tweets reveal he was submissive in the relationship.

Polygon.com contacted the husband and wife team that ALEC had hired to help him make Night in the Woods and Polygon effectively asked them 'what are you going to do?' They then parted with Alec and he killed himself. Two days later his former friend and colleague wrote a long post condemning Alec. Disgusting human beings.

People came out of the woodwork to attack him and promote their brand and websites.

But the problem is that if and when allegations come out about somebody else, individuals and the games media will pile in without professionalism attacking the character of an individual. What happened to Alec must never happen again.

ginganinja1720d ago

So, Mr Pumblechook, a lot of the people who knew and worked with Alec agreed with and supported Zoe - including Alec's own sister.
But, you and the other internet Sherlocks who've never met anyone involved, know different..

Mr Pumblechook1720d ago

@ginganinja. You misunderstand the point of my post completely - this is not about you or I taking sides with the alleged abuser or the alleged victim. This is about the games media recognising that they should report on allegations - but must do so professionally. The reporters on these games websites were not witnesses to the relationship but by declaring one vulnerable person guilty he likely saw no path to clear his name. In actual newspapers in the UK, real newspapers would not be allowed to that as it is considered both ethically and likely legally wrong. If the games websites had reported this story with balance rather than writing as if he was guilty (as is right in real journalism) he might have felt brave enough to release a statement.

Orionsangel1720d ago Show
ginganinja1720d ago

@Mr P
Firstly, the sites I've seen (such as kotaku, IGN, PC gamer, etc. not blogs or bedroom youtubers) just covered the stories as is. Laid out who accused who of what and didn't pass judgement.
Secondly, have you ever read a UK tabloid ?
You'll struggle to buy a Sun in Liverpool because of all the BS it wrote about Hillsborough.
You can't use the Daily Fail as a source on Wikipedia because it's so unreliable and prone to sensationalist BS.

The Wood1720d ago

UK tabloids can be just as trashy as any other country's tabloids so I totally disagree with that. . Just look as recently as when Rahim sterling exposed their hypocrisy in regards to race. . . .

But in regards to this women she's clearly told a fib or twm. just because the guy wasn't perfect there's no need to pile on crap to justify the assumption of guilt. Some sites were just point scoring and tried to paint themselves as 'for the victims' . . . .bs. . .report fairly or don't report at all. An inspector calls springs to mind here

bumbleforce1720d ago

Because everyone on reset era is a bitch

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 1720d ago
Welshy1720d ago (Edited 1720d ago )

There 100% needs to be legal ramifications for people who make false/misleading accusations that lead to ANY loss of the accused. Whether that's financial/reputational loss from being fired or all the way at the extreme that someone harms themselves or ends their life.

Any sane person obviously wants victims of abuse to have justice, but the scale has been tipped all the way to other side now, it doesn't even matter if there's evidence anymore. All it takes is an accusation and you're pre-judged as guilty by court of public opinion.

Enough is enough, we need reasonable middle ground. If you abuse someone, you go to jail. But also if you accuse someone falsely you should go to jail because it ruins and costs lives as much as abusing someone does, they need to be treated equally.

Edit: I normally keep things factual/logical, but this genuinely pisses me off so im allowing this one personal rant through. Look at the absolute STATE of her too. That "I'm invincible and can do what i want" look, you can tell from a 1,000 paces she loves to abuse double standards to further her own agenda on a daily basis. Stay away from f***ing cretins like this and show them no more attention. What a monster of a human being to contribute to a person death like this.

1720d ago
rainslacker1720d ago

Making false claims is a civil offense, and there are laws for it. In some cases, the damages may be more extreme than what can be recovered financially...like in cases where people lose their job or ability to maintain their way of life. But it's really rare for it to be a criminal offense, and requires more than what quinn did, and is usually prosecuted as part of a bigger criminal fraud case.

Victims of abuse can get justice, and while it isnt as easy to get justice as it should be...same as many crimes really...these kinds of accusations being about informing are spreading the idea that there is no way to get justice otherwise. The first step would be to call the police, or visit any number of free public or private services that help abuse victims for free.

Unfortunately, the legal system doesn't move as fast as the world does though. There have been an increasing number of cases in the past few years of false accusations leading to ruining a person's life, or potentially leading to deaths, so it may be something lawmakers start to try and look into. It becomes hard in the internet age though, because with everything being online, it almost requires a federal law since a lot of accusations are across state lines, and then of course there are international laws which would have to be accounted for.

There is no easy fix for the law itself I'm afraid. But while these things may take time to be remedied, any victim of abuse should seek aid. There are many sources which can refer you to who you need to speak to, and if one cant help, ask somewhere else. It isnt until everyone is saying they cant do something that people should seek other forms of recourse if they feel they've been wronged.

NarooN1720d ago

Well said. I forgot what she looked like since that GamerGate thing all those years ago, and wow, she just inherently looks like a stuck up piece of shit by default. What a terrible waste of oxygen. Every time her name pops up it's ALWAYS something negative attached, a controversy.

ilikestuff1720d ago ShowReplies(1)
rainslacker1720d ago

Kind of a shame that it took so long for someone in the press to point it out.

I dont know if the press is giving her as much attention as they did years ago, and she seems more like she living off Twitter fame, but the press is at a point where they have to probably distance themselves from her. I havent seen any ardent defense of her actions in a long time, and it usually is just some report about whatever claim she makes. But at the same time, i haven't seen the press also taking accountability for making her relevant(relatively speaking) as they made her in the first place. Doing so would only implicate then in their own failings as journalists in the whole gamergate thing, and we all know they arent going to do that.

In the end, many of the things she and those like her ushered in have left lasting effects on the game industry and press, and has changed the landscape about what is talked about when it comes to games. Many of us in the community see this, and dont like it. Worse, their actions have led to talented people being pushed out of the industry because they decided to create something they wanted to create. It's a shame that they were ever allowed to get so much influence, or that the gaming press has ever gotten so much influence over the industry or games that get made.

rainslacker1720d ago

Nope. I can see just fine, thanks.

PCgamer981720d ago Show
IamTylerDurden11720d ago (Edited 1720d ago )

I never believed her story, it always seemed inconsistent, nonsensical, and like attention seeking. I'm happy that there are actually some real journalists who are willing to do research rather than simply hang a guy based on a headline.

I implore every gaming journalist who has ever written a story about this to dig deep and do the research because you all contributed to a man dying. Every headline that judged Holowka before the facts were out and the story assessed contributed. Every person who immediately condemned the man and ran to Quinn's defense as if every word of her shaky story was granite fact. The fellow developers and former friends who immediately turned on him, trashed him, and quit his team. You all contributed. A man is dead. Her story is being proven as bullshit. You better hope for a smoking gun that miraculously proves her right because if this story is indeed bullshit and a man is dead because it, all of you cowards deserve to burn. Shameful.

Even IF her story is true, which i very much doubt, this is a tragic result regardless. Is this how we handle serious legal matters in 2019? Use Twitter to drive a man to suicide? This crazy bitch is wrong any way you slice it. Go to the police, seek justice through legal avenues and use facts and evidence to support your case. This whole situation is a travesty and it makes me sick.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1720d ago
Blu3_Berry1721d ago ShowReplies(2)
-Foxtrot1721d ago

"While Marvel and Vertigo author Zoe Quinn"

Marvel and Vertigo? She got that kind of job? Are these people serious? Jesus man.

His blood is on her hands and she needs to pay the price, if this was a male developer he'd have his head on a spike by now.

Count_Bakula1720d ago

She/anyone who does this should face jail time or at least a massive fine. They must be punished if found they're lying and attempting to destroy someone's life.

Smokehouse1720d ago

That would explain the marvel high dive into the toilet bowl.

Welshy1720d ago

James Gunn made crude jokes on twitter more than 10 years ago and gets the boot.

But cretins like this who make false claims about sexual abuse and contribute to a person taking their own life get jobs in media because they are "brave" and "progressive". It almost makes me physically sick that industry's love this kind of person and are seemingly oblivious to double standards.

Batnut001720d ago ShowReplies(3)
KeenBean3451720d ago

What gets me is that this keeps happening. How many more suicides or ruined careers is it going to take for these people to realise that baseless accusations are a serious matter and can destroy someone.

Snakefist301719d ago

She working for DC Comics now her upcoming comic is Dona Troy turning into joker!

1719d ago
+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1719d ago
Leeroyw1720d ago

I got to say I'm heartened by the biggest show in solidarity N4G has ever seen on this issue. Perhaps the tide is turning. I'm hopeful but not optimistic. Nice to see people agreeing on such an important issue.

rainslacker1720d ago

I doubt it. N4G is generally against people like her, outside some that want to antagonize people. But, the press will do whatever they want to keep making headlines, and they won't take any accountability for their part in their careless reporting. This will blow over like it always does, and about the best we can probably hope for is that the press won't give her any attention in the future. She fled from twitter after Holowka's suicide, but knowing her, she will not be able to stay away from the attention it gets her when she goes through one of her phases of needing to feel important.

She's obviously depressed and bipolar based on her attitudes and other reports from other people she's had relationships with, and people like that can't really stay away for very long.

Leeroyw1720d ago

Yeah agreed rainslacker. I meant maybe the tide turning in the media away from attention seeking nut jobs but point taken.
So good to see common sense prevail in this community but the video game media has been absolutely hijacked by people with social justice agendas lately and that comes at a huge cost.

Samus7071720d ago

100% upvotes. I'm so proud of this community.

Show all comments (146)
330°

Night in the Woods Creator Alec Holowka Accused of Abuse by Zoe Quinn

Night in the Woods creator, Alec Holowka has been accused of abuse by fellow game developer, Zoe Quinn, creator of Depression Quest.

Read Full Story >>
mobile.twitter.com
Jimboms1736d ago

Yea just read about this, it's awful.

1736d ago
Mr Pumblechook1736d ago (Edited 1736d ago )

This is an awful situation. It's not right if I or any other un-related person uses our personal feelings to determine innocence or guilt; public opinion and social media must not be used to determine the role of either party, the best thing is to involve the police and let this go to trial. People on the internet shouldn't attack or abuse her or him.

It's important to let the courts get involved because sometimes the internet can wrongly condemn a person.
YouTuber Andy Signore had an allegation of sexual misconduct made against him by a woman he was in a relationship with. He had many on the internet condemn him and he was fired from his job. Fortunately for him, proof was discovered that disproved the allegations and Defy Media settled a lawsuit he bought against them paying him an undisclosed amount of compensation.

Speaking generally, the law is not perfect but police and lawyers do everything they can to get justice for victims of sexual assault so it's important that victims get the police involved to start proceedings.

rainslacker1736d ago

While I agree that police should be involved, or at least some authority depending on the situation, when someone goes to social media as a first resort, or before retaining a lawyer, then it calls the whole accusation into question.

I understand the need to have support, but people need to realize that anonymous people on the internet are not a proper or sufficient support group.

That said, leaving all bias aside, when someone has been exposed as propagating false claims in the past, and has made extreme exaggerations about the treatment they received from a community to try and vilify that same community, anything brought to social media is going to bring even more unwanted attention.

My guess, having watched Quinn in the past, she will use that as yet another reason to vilify the community, thus devaluing the claim. Whether it's true or not is rather inconsequential when it comes to social media.

That said, you talk about the law, but my wife is a lawyer who has seen more cases fall apart because people take these things to social media prematurely, or at all. First thing she would tell any of her clients is to not talk in public forums about it.

ginganinja1736d ago

@rainslacker
'leaving all bias aside' - proceeds to be biased as fu..
If you read through the replies to her tweets there's several other people making similar accusations against the same person.

It's strange how everybody here is 'doubtful' of her story, yet believed everything her ex said without question all those years ago (even still, when large parts of it have proven to be bs).

rainslacker1736d ago (Edited 1736d ago )

I'm not saying I'm leaving bias aside, just that the following sentiment is based on the practical nature of how people react to others. My personal feelings about it are that no one deserves to be abused, but I don't really just take quinn at her word, because she is the very definition of a drama queen, and has purposefully made statements to discredit others, and get attention for herself. Her history is against her, but if she has valid proof, and wants more than just to cause public outrage towards this person for whatever reason like she's done in the past, then there are much better outlets of recourse than going to twitter to defame someone.

I'm personally not taking a side with either of them about who did what. I don't know this holowka guy, and never heard of him before. I also wouldn't really listen to any twitter reply support either. It's not conclusive of anything.

All I can say is that taking it to twitter doesn't do anything but spread trouble. There's a pervasive idea that nothing can be done about this, so some people don't seek real justice. All I know is that people who run to twitter to accuse and try someone in the court of public opinion often ruin any chance they ever had at getting justice. A public trial proving this would mean something. A bunch of he said/she said, means nothing, regardless of supposed witnesses who have not been verified in the least.

In any case, I question if this is even gaming news. This was a personal relationship between a game developer and a self proclaimed game developer. It's one thing if this is happening within a studio, and that may have some effect on a game, but in this case, that's not the case.

ginganinja1736d ago

@rain...
Have you ever considered that all your beliefs about her are founded on nothing but bs. What if their was a wolf every time and you were just too blinded by the internet rabble to see?
You take every allegation against her as gospel despite any proof, yet are unwilling to believe in this case despite corroborating stories from colleagues and others in the business.

TK-661736d ago (Edited 1736d ago )

@ginganinja

"It's strange how everybody here is 'doubtful' of her story, yet believed everything her ex said without question all those years ago"

Let's just address the elephant in the room which is CON. Her organisation which only cares about you if you're a big name public figure and was shown to actually be guilty of doing the sort harrassment they claim to be fighting against. Also well known for telling people to not go to the police which is the dumbest advice you can possibility give.

The story she's tweeting about could be 100% true. But If you're trying to say she's not equivalent to a Gloria Allred in regard to her desperate levels of attention seeking, by injecting herself whenever possible into a story then you need to rethink your position.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1736d ago
IamTylerDurden11736d ago (Edited 1736d ago )

What exactly does she claim? She says the two dated and she was staying with him and then goes on to lambaste him for being a controlling jerk with mental issues. She vaguely mentions sexual assault and claims someone saw it and he threatened her Visa or wouldn't pay for her plane ticket home? Am i missing something? I dug a little, but am i missing the smoking gun? They were dating, he was manic, and she vaguely refers to some sexual assault or..? Idk..

Were they dating while she claims he assaulted her or was it at the office? Were they broken up? She says she flew home and emailed him a breakup letter. Wtf? This makes no sense. She was assaulted but didn't breakup until after she flew home and she was assaulted while she was living with him? So he assaulted his girlfriend?

Why is she going on Twitter as opposed to the authorities? This woman seems off in the way she describes things, almost petty in some cases. She denigrates him for berating her for the tone in her voice once. You accuse the man of sexual assault and you drone on in the same paragraph about how he reprimanded you about your bitchy tone? That seems petty, why bring it up?

I have no idea what happened, but Quinn has a tainted past and this series of tweets appears strange.

1736d ago Replies(1)
Smokehouse1736d ago

Since when did twitter become the place to air out your dirty laundry? If your boyfriend is abusive you need to call the law. Posting the shit on twitter just screams shady attention whore. Trying to make some indie developer look like Harvey Weinstein lol.

1736d ago Replies(4)
1736d ago Replies(3)
IamTylerDurden11736d ago ShowReplies(1)
Rachel_Alucard1736d ago

The best part is how she says he stuck his fingers in her then walked around her around the house as if this was a consensual thing.

1736d ago
Xaevi1736d ago

I can't take accusations like these seriously. Report it to the authorities, not on a Tumblr/Twitter post. All this does is send an angry mob of idiots to attack who you're accusing, it's happened before. This isn't how things of this matter should be dealt with, it isn't brave, it's reckless.

mixelon1736d ago

That’s not how it works. You can’t prove this sort of thing legally and she’s not interested in him being criminally liable. People want to move on, but people also want to protect others from the same happening. It’s very good to speak up about stuff like this to shine a light on behaviours that keep happening.

You seriously think people are supposed to report things like this at the time when the whole account relies on one person controlling the other and breaking them down?

SuperRaccoon1736d ago

That's exactly how it works, because that's how the legal system works. Unfortunately for the victims, something like this is closer to libel than anything else. No one said it was easy, but if you can't gather the courage to speak up in a timely manner then no one can help you.

Innocent until proven guilty is the way we operate. If a court of law can't pass a verdict, then he is innocent, unfortunately. Thus, this is libel seeking to incite mob justice. A better way to protect others is to talk about how you should ask for help when it happens, so people actually have a chance to find justice.

Imalwaysright1736d ago

SuperRaccoon

" If a court of law can't pass a verdict, then he is innocent, unfortunately" You lost me with the word "unfortunately". It's not "unfortunately", it's fortunately otherwise it would be anarchy and chaos.

BlackTar1871736d ago

@mix you're a demented person. Wake up or someday your assumption of guilt will bite back.

rainslacker1736d ago (Edited 1736d ago )

Bullshit. Stop spreading this ignorance. Going to the authorities will give you an infinitely higher chance of getting justice than just saying something on Twitter. If she doesn't even try, then that's wrong. The police, and her lawyer if she retains one, and any prosecutor, would tell her to not go around telling everyone her story. That only hinders any investigation.

There are ways to prove abuse through systematic investigation, and outside some really rare cases, there is always some evidence, or witness, even if after the fact. Even if it seems that the evidence is thin, it can lead to much more if the person actually did abuse someone because abusive people typically aren't abusive only to one person in their life.

I wouldn't think this is Quinn trying to protect others, because her history doesn't support anything more than her being a self-serving drama queen. All she wants is attention, and even if this is something that's true, her own actions in the past, on Twitter no less, make any accusation she makes instantly questionable. If she wants to protect others, then try to do it right and get his ass thrown in jail, or at least have an official public record of it. Even if she doesn't get justice, at least if he does it again, which abusive people usually do, there will be an official record of it to give the potential the next person can get justice. Sex offenders, which some of this abuse would be classified as, are never going to be free of people knowing what they did. With Twitter, what he did will be a distant memory in the near future.

But, what it comes down to is that she has tons of resources that don't involve going on Twitter and publicly shaming someone. She is trying to try this man in the court of public opinion, and the public is irrational and never bothers to know the facts. I'd take attempted and failed justice over public shaming which will achieve nothing but making her feel better about herself, and find support from random anonymous people on the internet.

Servbot411736d ago

You basically just said "guilty until proven innocent" in a roundabout way. This woman is a notorious liar and is known to do things like this to get attention. Sorry, but you can only cry wolf so many times until people stop ever believing you.

IamTylerDurden11736d ago

She claimed there was a witness, why not go to the police?

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1735d ago
Show all comments (60)
100°

Zoe Quinn Returns with Kickstarted in the Butt. A Game About... Butts?

Serena Nelson writes:"Apparently, Kickstarted in the Butt, or "Project Tingler", is an FMV adventure game inspired by the works of a Chuck Tingler. I really don't know who this guy is, but from what I've seen here I'm kinda afraid to even look him up."

garyanderson2771d ago

What an amazing waste of time and money this appears to be.

TC7312770d ago

Chuck Tingle's hilarious.

FullmetalRoyale2770d ago

It's actually based off a fantasy of Tina Belcher's. At least it sounds like it.

Cy2770d ago

Zoe Quinn leeching off someone who's actually creative to get money? Color me surprised.