UM writes: It’s been just over four years since I wrote one of my most popular posts ever, Why Fable 3 is an Embarrassment to Video Games, and the series has never recovered since.
Fable 4's development seems to be well underway, and a look at the original trilogy reveals a few elements the upcoming title needs to reprise.
One of the biggest reveals at this year's Xbox Games Showcase was the latest Fable trailer. After a lengthy stint of silence, Playground Games gave us a look at bits of the title, albeit in a trailer that was mostly made up of CGI nonsense headlined by comedian Richard Ayoade, who is playing a rather frustrated giant.
Molyneux asked about what he thought about the Fable reveal.
The original Fable games were flawed masterpieces. How can the new Fable game keep the best parts of its prequels while avoiding the same issues?
"What The New Fable Needs To Be Better Than The Original Trilogy"
-pfft who wrote that title?
-Anyway if what they mean is "What the new Fable needs to *do better than the original trilogy", then I'd say stop trying to dictate what the new Fable should and shouldn't do or be. All I ask is that it has the spirit of the original but do their own thing and hopefully its good, thats good enough for me.
They're gonna jack it up, they always do, and really, bringing someone on board to pick up where someone left off, especially when Fable had the reputation it did (because the Xbox 360 during it's time put up a fight against the PS3 and really made PlayStation's job a rough one going), and that's a tall order to fill, it really is. Sure, it'll be pretty but it's not gonna be the same. Australian humor is quite different from British humor, it's cons getting dumped on a desert island by the truckload.
I'm sure it'll be okay, but not award winning
A potion created between some ideas
- the first two Fables
- a high fantasy setting
- an open world like the two new 3D Zeldas
Well in my opinion they have a very good thing going now since they are doing Fable Legends
For me Fable suffered because they focus on too many co-op interactions. Instead of fine turning the RPG goodness in each new installment, they spent too much time on co-op interactions with your friends.
However since they are doing Legends which is a online focused, co-op game where you team up to over come the bad guy they can now make Fable 4 a pure single player experience without co-op or online play since Legends is already covering that
They basically have spilt it up and in my opinion this is what they should of done ages ago.
I'd be disappointed if they still added co-op in Fable 4 as that seems like the whole point of Legends.
My only gripe with Fable series alltogether is that they are a cake walk . If they upped the challenge or at least let us have a difficulty option then i would have liked it more because it was so damn easy.
Fable needs to go back to the drawing board and re-invent themselves. Fable 3 is a far, far cry from the first game.
I think this all has to do with the leadership of Peter Molyneux. The guy just over sells his game and they never turn out what he promised. Not to mention the very odd design choices he had done for part 3 and extremely boring gameplay just made me scratch my head. It's as if he wanted to sabotage this game just so he could make a cube game for smartphones.
Lets hop some new eyes and fresh hands gets a crack at Fable. I would love to see this game take on a more serious tone, set it in the same type of Victorian era(??) but set it against a lot of true Fable like creatures.
I didn't have any problems or issues, I've enjoyed them all.
They need to release a Fable 2 Anniversary. Recently finished Fable 1 on PC. It was so good.
As for Fable 4. If they do think of making it, they better release it on PC. That would be one Xbox One exclusive that'd make me regret not getting it.