270°
7.5

Halo: The Master Chief Collection review for Xbox One | Gaming Age

Gaming Age write: "So, as of now, I’d strongly suggest holding off on picking this up. This month and last aren’t lacking in quality games to pass your time with at least, so there’s that. Hopefully, for those that bought Halo: TMCC a permanent fix comes along sooner than later, or you can get some enjoyment out of the single-player experience for the time being. But it’s certainly not fair to wait for the product you purchased to work, and because of that, I want to be sure that my review score for this retail product reflects that."

Read Full Story >>
gaming-age.com
Blastoise3471d ago (Edited 3471d ago )

Before people flip out and suggest it's click-bait, it got this score because the reviewer couldn't access the multiplayer because the servers were down and other issues

Neonridr3471d ago (Edited 3471d ago )

even for just the single player alone it's worth more than 58/100

and how do you put a value on a C+ anyways? Where does a score of 58 = a C+?

To be honest, in my schooling 50-59 was a D, 60-69 was a C, 70-79 was a B, and 80+ was an A

So a C+ should translate to a score around 68 shouldn't it?

u got owned3471d ago (Edited 3471d ago )

Based one the Metacritics ranking, C+ has a value of 58 points in a scale of a 100. But i changed the value to grading so that there is no confusion.

Neonridr3471d ago

@u got owned - thanks for clarifying

WeAreLegion3470d ago

80+ was an A in your school?!? Our A was 94+.

VforVideogames3470d ago

This site is rated BBS (Bais Bull S#!t) this site give DriveClub 91 with broken online so don't click on their website, don't give them a reason to keep doing this.

Neonridr3470d ago

@WeAreLegion - yeah, but this was like grade school. Universities were different. We had a 12 point scale similar to the US's 4 point scale.

guitarded773470d ago (Edited 3470d ago )

The reviewer failed to understand the conversion between 0-100 to F-A grading systems. I have never really liked Halo, and I know it's better than that even without MP. Plus, it's not like we don't know what the MP is like on those Halo games... it's just better having it all integrated.

EDIT: I thought we all agreed that Metacritic is not something we go by on this site.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3470d ago
u got owned3471d ago (Edited 3471d ago )

Yes, that is correct and i think its a fair score because of this. We as gamers should demand that our gamse work day one, not a week or month after they launched, and the worst part is that this is becoming a trend.

I'm the biggest Halo fan here but this is not right. 343 get it together.

darthv723470d ago

frustration is understandable but trying to assign blame is not really warranted. especially when people say its the game or its 343. The game and the company are not at fault. Its the service which is experiencing issues not just related to this game but several games.

something happened to the service prior to this games release and because of the demand it gives the impression that it is related when its not. I certainly wouldnt blame the game or system if my power went out. I'd blame the power company but even then its a hard sell because sometimes things happen beyond our control.

Rather than harp on "who did it" I look at how fast it can be fixed. Those are the ones to watch...the repair time and people behind it. They are the ones with all the pressure on them right now.

spicelicka3470d ago (Edited 3470d ago )

That makes no sense, the review scores stay permanent forever, while any server issues are very short and temporary. There's no way the game will still be having the same problems a month or two from now.

While I agree a game should be working perfectly at launch, there should be a probationary period, and reviews should factor that in. You can't rate a game on impulse if it's actually an amazing game.

If next week the game is running perfectly is he going to change his review? I doubt it.

Ezz20133470d ago (Edited 3470d ago )

@u got owned

i agree
what even more odd is that IGN and GS are waiting for the remaster to get fixed before they done their review which is complete BS because they never done that to any game before
this just show how bad gaming sites have gotten

Angeljuice3470d ago (Edited 3470d ago )

"it got this score because the reviewer couldn't access the multiplayer because the servers were down and other issues".

As most people are buying this for the multiplayer experience, it's only fair to give a review score that reflects how broken it is.

MS blundered big-time here.

@spicelicka

The same goes for other titles such as Battlefield and DriveClub, if you don't want poor reviews, don't release broken games.

No_Limit3470d ago (Edited 3470d ago )

Dude..Halo MCC was a 90 before this review of 58 dragged it down to a 89. It is the only 'poor reviews" of the bunch in Metacritics. NBA2k15, GTAV, Batlefield 4, and Driveclub all got B+ and above from this very same site and yet all 4 of those games have massive online issue at launch. How do you explain the disparity of the scores for those reviews from the same site? Halo MCC does have 4 campaigns and it is not a strictly a MP game like the 4 mentioned above games.

darthv723470d ago

also, just to be fair, it's not the game that is broken. a broken game would be AC:U with all its gameplay glitches. MCC plays just fine in most respects. The matchmaking side (handled by the servers...not the game) was experiencing issues unrelated to MCC prior to release that is also effecting titanfall and destiny.

So, yeah its not the game or 343 but the service that has issues.

Assassingamer1363470d ago (Edited 3470d ago )

@No_Limit The game got a 6/10 from Gamekult and that site is registered on metacritic, for some reason metacritic didn't add gamekults review of this game to the list so either way it should be below 90.

No_Limit3470d ago (Edited 3470d ago )

@assassingamer,

What is your point? Gamekult is hardly used in any metacritics review. It scores Driveclub a 5/10 and that game is currently at 70 on meta and would be 69 if thar score is added. Why didn't you complain about that but pick and choose on Halo when it fits your cause?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3470d ago
DeadlyOreo3470d ago

I agree. Hopefully we can get an updated Polygon review too, not holding my breath though.

Ezz20133470d ago (Edited 3470d ago )

there is more chance of you going to the bathroom only to find Bigfoot sitting on the toilet reading news papers
than Polygon update the review

Dudebro903471d ago

Its impossible to of played the entirety of this game..it hit stores yesterday, and the multiplayer servers went live less than a week ago..so....

Whatever, garbage website anyway.

Angeljuice3470d ago

"Its impossible to of played the entirety of this game"

Does he really need to? If he's played all the campaign missions before, and all that's changed are the graphics, surely a few hours on each title will tell him everything he needs to know?

3470d ago
No_Limit3470d ago (Edited 3470d ago )

Wait a minute...are you telling me this is the same Gaming-Age (which is owned by NEOGAF) that gave the broken Driveclub game with network issue that lasted over 2 weeks a A- while giving a game with 4 great HD remake with campaigns but has matchmaking issue that was launched only 2 days ago a C+? It is funny enough even 99% users comments for that review on the site blasted Gaming-Age for such hypocrisy.

Stiffler3470d ago (Edited 3470d ago )

The site is a joke and everyone already knows that. All about those clicks and nothing more.

Love it how they didn't hold the same restrictions against DC, NBA and gta -- All of which got A's, all of which had online issues at launch which were all equal to if not worse than MCC.

Bias at is finest and I hope they enjoy all the bad rep that their clickbait of a trash score gets.

gangsta_red3470d ago (Edited 3470d ago )

@No_Limit

Very interesting right? Where are all the "media is biased" critics on N4G now?

Should we start to assume that Sony paid for this review as MS seems to do every Sony game?

@Angeljuice
Naw, no knickers in a twist. just doing my usual sarcastic shtick of how a certain fanbase would over react and declare nuclear war on the dance floor if this was a sony game.

But you do have to admit that Driveclub getting an A- over MCC is suspect beyond belief.

Angeljuice3470d ago

Thats not such a bad review score, I don't know why you're getting your knickers in a twist.

Ezz20133470d ago

If Neogaf is soo baised to Sony then
why they sh*t on Uncharted3 since day 1 till today ?!

lunatic00013470d ago

I've been playing the single player part of the game for right now and its awesome to go back to these games...I can wait for mp to be in working order

Show all comments (44)
140°

Five Games to Play While Waiting for Armored Core 6

The newest From Software game is just around the corner. These are five excellent games to play while waiting for Armored Core 6.

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
Si-Fly275d ago

Can I suggest BG3 as a 6th? It’s helping me pass the time quite well.

anast274d ago

I'm still trying to finish WotR.

DivineHand125274d ago

With the release date being just a little over a week away, it may not be a good idea to burn yourself out on mech games until then.

RavenWolfx274d ago

i want a Chromehounds sequel so bad...

raWfodog274d ago (Edited 274d ago )

Surprised that the article didn’t mention Mechwarrior 5: Mercenaries if we’re talking about mech-related games.

ZeekQuattro274d ago

It was an odd article imo. Like why are games that feature a handful of mech themed levels in there. When I think of mech games I don't think Halo and Wolfenstein no matter how fun those levels were.

Show all comments (8)
180°

Best Xbox Game Studios Franchises

These are some of the best and most popular video game franchises now owned by Xbox Game Studios and Microsoft.

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
Sciurus_vulgaris284d ago (Edited 284d ago )

Microsoft was involved with Halo, Gears, Forza, Ori, Flight Simulator and Fable from early development, I will give them credit for those franchises. Fallout, Elder Scrolls and Doom were established franchise before being acquired by MS.

Crows90283d ago (Edited 283d ago )

Exactly. They had nothing to do with their most popular franchises now.

Their old franchises are dwindling and pretty much non-existent.

They've had perfect dark in the chamber this whole time and haven't done squat...that tells you the kind of company they are. Fable is another franchise that's been destroyed and ignored...let's see how the new game turns out.

Profchaos282d ago

Yeah perfect dark, banjo conquer ms seems to kill more franchises then they like to admit while pretending to care about others like hexen

Sitdown283d ago

Given the article specifically says "now owned", what made you feel the need to do a break down?

thesoftware730282d ago

Sit-down,

Because it's N4G and any opportunity to shit on MS is never missed.

Rude-ro283d ago

Gears is not.
It was the same as mass effect:
Just contracted.

closed_account284d ago (Edited 284d ago )

Ah yes, feels like forever ago since Microsoft created Skyrim. So much so, I had actually forgotten they had created it and the other Elder Scrolls games! 🤔

*They really shaped my preteen years w the original Doom too!

ocelot07283d ago

Don't forget the original Elder Scrolls way back in 1994 or fallout in 1997.

Sitdown280d ago

So you don't understand the combination of "now owned"?

Crows90283d ago (Edited 283d ago )

I fully expect all these popular franchises to be killed off by Microsoft. Just a matter of time.

Unless they take a huge distance approach which pretty much means they don't ba e anything to do with the games being made ...in that case the franchises should be fine. But then...they shouldn't really get credit.

DOMination-283d ago

"I fully expect all these popular franchises to be killed off by Microsoft. Just a matter of time."

Based on what?? Microsoft usually gets stick for releasing too MANY games in their franchises, to the point where it's quite a long-running joke - one I'm sure you've partaken in before.

Pretty much all of their major IP has had releases in the last five years or have upcoming releases scheduled so I see no evidence whatsoever for this claim.

"Unless they take a huge distance approach which pretty much means they don't ba e anything to do with the games being made"

But.. They HAVE been very hands-off for a long time and have drawn lots of criticism for it?

fr0sty282d ago

See: All of Rare's games

DOMination-282d ago

I really wouldn't say that MS have let Rare franchises die. They've just had the freedom to create new IP in Sea of Thieves and Everwild. MS are currently developing a Perfect Dark game, licensed Killer Instinct out, Rare themselves released several compilations and several Banjo games as well as PDZ in the past.

I'm not sure what else you could want. They can only make one game at a time. You can't say MS let all their franchises die but also be annoyed that they allow their studios to make new IP.

Profchaos282d ago

If that's the case where my banjo or conquer sequel why didn't I get sunset overdrive 2 oh yeah not enough bro in those games

ChasterMies283d ago (Edited 283d ago )

EA is a good example of what can happen to a franchise when a larger corporation buys up studios from a smaller corporation. Quarterly earnings should never matter more than quality.

wiz7191282d ago

@Crows that is the case , Zenimax is operating independently of MS and have full creative freedom to do what they want. Zenimax games aren’t being published under XGS ,

ravens52283d ago

Soon Microsoft will be known for making Crash Bandicoot, Spyro, Candy Crush, Call of Duty etc. Lmao they know what they're doing. Especially with the archiving issue the gaming industry has.

closed_account283d ago (Edited 283d ago )

Microsoft built the game industry. Microsoft invented games. Didn't you know? ;)

**What a bizzaro world we live in where the losers can become the winners overnight.

Hypertension140283d ago

@ravens52

What are those franchises you're talking about?
Activision/Blizzard only makes Call of Duty and Bethesda has Elder Scrolls and Starfield only, stop making it seen that is much more anti competitive/consumer than it actually is.......

Profchaos282d ago

Zero creative vision and the ability to bankroll it by purchasing everything that everyone else had success with even Halo wasn't technically theirs Bungie had to sell it to them to become independent

Atari6052B283d ago

You mean any studio Microsoft could acquire to flog last gen games on game pass ... What happened to HD-DVD that Microsoft pushed so hard ...

Show all comments (22)
70°

Games with the dumbest NPCs

Non-playable characters in certain games are meme material, thanks to their foolish behavior. These are the big-budget games with the dumbest NPCs.

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
closed_account285d ago (Edited 285d ago )

Bethesda makes the most consistently stupid NPCs, like really bad... yet I still can't help but love playing their games. Guilty pleasure, I guess. *sigh* 😩

Flawlessmic284d ago

How did redfall not make the cut.

anast284d ago (Edited 284d ago )

Every Bethesda game and Every Halo game. This list needed to have Cyberpunk somewhere.