Battlefield: Bad Company: Xbox 360 vs PlayStation 3 Video

VideoGamer.com has put together a video comparing the Xbox 360 and PS3 versions of EA DICE's Battlefield: Bad Company.

[Capt CHAOS]

The contract seemed higher on the 360 but that's prob just down to some settings. Good port.

Love the way the physics work on both.. Especially the tree splitting..

[Britjadg]

yeah tree split looks good. looks impressive on both, dunno whats going on with ps3 version though, summit dont look right with colour. probably just way its filmed / tv is configured.

what does it matter? pick up the game for whatever console you have.

[Domenikos]

Ill get the PS3 version cause the best part of BF games is online.

And PSN is free (and thats an advantage for ME, i dont want to start a fanboi war)

[kewlkat007]

I didn't think there would be any doubt about your statement..

[RudeSole Devil]

Dowloaded both demos and compared side by side and the 360 version is better. Heres what I found if you plan on buying this game.
1. All the textures are identical, but the PS3 version has no normal mapping on all textures example ( http://www.driverheaven.net...

2. When I shot down a tree the reaming stump on 360 version had shredded pieces of wood, PS3 version has the texture but the alpha was missing (need to see for you self).

3. Missing props, on top of the hill where all the smoke and fire is, the fire on the PS3 version is comming right out of the ground, 360 has something there I'm not really sure what its is but the fire is not comming right out of the ground.

4. EA is a POS publisher and developer and things listed above are not limitation of PS3 just lazy porting.

[boodybandit]

where are the articles about how broken the connections issues are? When is Dice and EA going to get on it? It will work flawless for a few hours and then BLAM you get booted from the game and can't connect for hours.

It works. Then it doesn't. Then you can connect, get booted (after a few minutes), connect, get booted, connects, get booted, runs fine four hours, rinse and repeat. WTF!

I want to play this game online! The odd thing is it seems to happen more during the day. You would think the problem would be worse at night when everyone is off work.

[Real Gambler]

I really, really wish they would do video comparaison like those, but saying A and B (for about 2 days) instead of 360 and PS3.

Instead of seeing fanboish comment like: Version A look WAY MUCH BETTER or Version B as way more leaves in the 4th tree on the left, we would finally get comments like: Wow, both version look almost identical. No fanboy would take a chance to pick one version over the other. Then, 2 days later, those guys could say which console was A and which console was B. Only a fanboy, looking at this video, would say one version is WAY MUCH BETTER than the other.

Personally, I don't care if one tree has more leaves or not, or if one explosion has to more sparks. While playing, I don't have the time to count leaves. Both game look very, very good. Keep bringing them on.

P.S.: There's one more peeble on the ground, around 1 minute 37 seconds and 12 hundred of a second, but you have to freeze frame to see it. ENJOY! Me, I'll be playing the game!

[prunchess]

Both versions look like sh!t compared to MGS4.

[power of Green]

If you can't see that the 360 version is superior in more ways than one you're lieing to yourself. Even some of the effects and objects are missing in the PS3 version.

[romemac7]

how this gamer site when doing video comparing they always seen to turn off the PS3 RGB FULL RANGE(HDMI). i have both the PS3 and the 360, just got a 360 to play lost odyssey lol and have play both demo. believe you me both game looks and play the same, only different is my ps3 has RGB FULL RANGE so both looks the same.

@power of green: every game is going to look better for you on the 360 bro, let face it you a 360 fanboy. i read almost all you comments here on N4G and all you ever talk about is how the 360 better, how the 360 more power, how the 360 this and that, etc...its hard to imagine you every saying anything good about the PS3 ever. after being here on N4G so long and reading you comments they have become boring and repetitive to the point that they sound like advertisements for the 360, just how much is Microsoft paying for?

[C_SoL]

Also, super white is not turned on......

[KimboSlice]

This website seems to be full of fearfull sony loyals that are always logged in and ready to make the first "spin" posts in every news piece that makes the PS3 look bad but the thruth is that: THE XBOX 360 VERSION LOOKS BETTER THAN THE PS3 VERSION.

[dantesparda]

Let's not exaggerate, they look almost exactly the same, however, i do have to say, that the 360 version does look a little bit better overall, but we are talking just slightly better. The main thing that the 360 version has over the PS3 version is less screen tearing than the PS3 version and better textures (especially the ground textures), otherwise they look basically the same. And why do all PS3 games always look so washed out on these comparison videos? the same is not true in real life on your tv.

[chasuk08]

I still dont understand why we are doing frame by frame comparisons of ps3 and 360 versions of games to look at minimal brightness and contrast settings and then claim that one is better than the other due to a slight increase. Dont you all think its kind of sad ?

They are the same game regardless of what platform its on, and any increase/decrease in brightness shouldnt be a reason not to buy it, and if it is your a joke.

Just buy the game and enjoy it. All these videos do is attract viewers to their site and get alot of gamers arguing over "which platform is better"

[Moto13]

I own both consoles. The 360 always has better colors and rougher edges. The PS3 has smoother edges and washed out colors. I prefer the 360 version. Also the 360 tends to have better textures.

[Willio]

Xbox is superior in softlocks and hardlocks.

[Pnuts]

except that thay havent changed the colour and contrast on the ps3 version.

[ice_prophecy]

I wonder if they even attempt at configuring the TV.... T_T

[Mr Marbles]

if they didn't configure the TV, that means they didn't configure it for the 360 either, so now what is your excuse? Games look better on 360, why is that so hard to beleive, why do people literally make excuses for an inferior product? If graphics are so important to you, then just buy as 360. PS3 exclusives still look great, so whats the big deal?

[Ssxtreme36]

GT has a comparison of the game and its the exact opposite of whats shown here...check it out

http://www.gametrailers.com...

i wonder which comparison is true?

[dcbronco]

But you're right that the PS3 version looks much better than it does in the demo on this site. It does seem with adjustments to the TV the PS3 can look as good, but if you have to make adjustments for each game or for gaming and then for when you go back to TV, that's a pain.

[ice_prophecy]

No need to get so worked up hahaha.

@2.2 Well thats what my comment was based on.

@2.1 Why are you getting so defensive? Its not like im eating your children. I merely asked a question in form of a question, take it as rhetoric if you must.

[Proxy]

Is it a matter of adjusting your TV every time you switch games? Or just a matter of taking 10 seconds to turn full RGB on and be done with it, forever?

[ice_prophecy]

oops

in form of a comment, that is.

[P4KY B]

IMO.

[Sez]

i going to get the 360 version. just looks better IMO

[GiantEnemyCrab]

haha I guess 21 people don't believe you have an opinion.

[Variable]

No dumbass, 21 people disagree with his opinion... what's wrong about that? -.-

[LJWooly]

GianyEnemyCrab is apparently not familiar with the definition and appropriate usage of the term "disagree".

[Silogon]

I got the xbox 360 version yesterday after playing the demo on both and seeing it was far superior. The xbox 360 version has way more particles and debris and the textures are more detailed.

It's just, once again, the better version. It's normal for the xbox 360 to have the best version cause it isn't a port. Bank on xbox 360 multiplatform games, guys.

[Angelitos]

Siligon

That's just the devs incapable of making the game on a superior complex hardware.

[Domenikos]

PC?

Right ;)?

[NO_PUDding]

Silogon, whne did you become a raging fanboy?

Nevermind. Dead Space is leading on PS3, lets see how that turns out.

[shazam]

First of all do you really think the developers would spend all that time and money making new, lower res textures for the ps3 version? They use the exact same textures. Besides, texture resolution isn't even that important for making a surface look good. What's important is the shader programs that go on the surface. Without shaders there would be no normal maps, specular maps, parallax maps, reflections, or refractions etc. Without shaders he surface would be just like looking at a flat, fuzzy, low res bitmap image. And the developers would not spend time writing new, less expensive shaders for the ps3 version. The shader program is just recompiled to run on the two GPUs. Since they are two different architectures the pixel comes out slightly different on each. Even if you ran Crysis on two PCs that are identical other than one has a Radeon HD4870 and the other has Geforce GTX280, even with all the same settings, the two screens would look slightly different. The GPUs simply have different ALUs for pixel processing and different algorithms for anti aliasing and so on.

Secondly, the games use the exact same physics code. And particle physics processing scales extremely on virtually every type of processor from the 360's Xenon to ps3's Cell and even graphics processors. My point is that no developer would have any problems getting physics to run on the SPUs, in fact they are extremely well suited for it and it is one of their strong points.

The fact is that you are an outright fanboy. Actually more like a fanbaby. Scratch that you are most like a fanweed. That's it fanweed.

FANWEED

As part of your fanweed ability set you have this strange ability to hallucinate better graphics on your favorite console. Man I wish I could do that.

[Time_Is_On_My_Side]

Both games are the same just get over it, now it just comes to online. Free or a paid service because it seems now developers are better with the PlayStation 3 hardware. I'm with the free service so I can save that $49.99 on game add-ons.

[InMyOpinion]

I have to agree with you. I have played the demo on both consoles as well. At the same time actually. The PS3 version has much more jaggies and less vibrant colors than the 360 version. It also had less particle effects(visible in the explosions in the video).

[power of Green]

Agreed in the video 1:20 in look at the ground when the video pans through each version despite the PS3 version looking like it has a layer of jelly the textures are rubbish the 360 versions ground looks 3D and is far more detailed.

[Bubble Buddy]

Siligon's like Mart's clone or something. Like at the end of Mgs4 at the cemetery... oh my bad, 360 doesn't have MGS4. And you have a "PS3" too right? Well I got an Xbox720, not hard to lie over the internet is it.

[LJWooly]

PoG, to notice something like that, you must have been looking for it, and that is beyond sad, my little friend.

[Willio]

I also noticed the superior console's softlocks and hardlocks consistent rate.

[edhe]

The 360 version has better colours & possibly specular lighting highlights on the artillery.

[akaFullMetal]

they both look good, look at this

http://www.gametrailers.com...

[Montrealien]

Another game of spot the difference for the mentally challenged, that game is great on BOTH consoles, the rest is just semantics.

[clintos59]

I hate it when u are on ground and u grab out a rocket launcher and shoot the tank 2 r 3 times and it still doesnt blow it up. I mean what good is all this destructable invironments and then u cant even blow the damn tank up with a missle launcher. Also they need to do the same for the grenade launcher. Only way I found it easy to kill the tanks when on foot was when u were a sniper, using the above view rockets being dropped on the tank, usually takes them out if u get a direct hit.

Edit: Other then that the game feels like call of duty 4, but I think this one is a bit better because of the tanks and vehicles and big area and the weapons are pretty cool, but thats just my opinion.

[OC_MurphysLaw]

As for RPG's vs Tanks. I know they purposely made the tanks tough against RPG's so it will take a good 2 or 3 hits to kill one but that was to keep the demolition class from being too powerful. Also, all the tanks...especially the light tanks have vulnerable spots where the armor is lighter (see backside of light tank) and should allow for 2 hit kills.

[yess]

There are two guy's in the tank, one jumping out to repair the other shooting.

Get out of there, he will probably kill you....
PS:I am the one shooting;-)

[matchgrade]

What do destructable ENVIRONMENTS (at least get the first letter right, please.) have to do with tanks? Tanks take 2-3 hits to destroy so the game is more balanced. How would you benefit tactically from driving a tank and only being able to shoot off a couple rounds before being taken out by a single rocket (which are much easier to get than tanks)?

[clintos59]

In a real war a missile launcher is more then enough to take out a tank. Atleast make it 2 shots and the tank is dead. Because it just seems unfair when u hit a direct hit on the tank and then while u are reloading the tank turns around and kills u. That doesnt seem fun at all, especially if u are trying to catch a base and they have tanks gaurding the areas. I think everything else in this game is awesome but they need to change the missile launcher to 2 shots and the tank is dead. I just got off playing it again online and shot the tank 3 times direct hit and didnt kill it. I am the one who got killed for blowing my cover. They need to fix that.

[M4GN3T]

I think on the PS3-version the RGB Full Color mode is turned off.

[chetan]

why do you have to set up the PS3, does it not have the best setting out of the box?

you shouldn't really have to play around with settings...

lets say if you are a total dim-wit and want to play best settings, then you have a problem.........

any way, the game looks great on both... beside's from color 'adjustments' on the ps3 no real big difference; such as framerates.

[Bigrhyno]

Because Some TVs (the majority of owners) don't support the best features, and having them on will make it look worse.

[Vip3r]

"lets say if you are a total dim-wit and want to play best settings, then you have a problem........."

Well now that you know about full RGB I can't see it being a problem for you.

[chetan]

thanks for the tad bit of info....

[SeanScythe]

Not sure how they have their ps3 setup but mine doesn't look like that.

[InMyOpinion]

repressed anger much?

[PMantix]

no bubbles for you

[MANCREEP]

You get bubbles for a MASSIVE DISPLAY OF ANGER!

HULK SMASH!!!!

But seriously, I have a great therapist who you should talk to.

[GiantEnemyCrab]

"This section is heavily moderated by the N4G staff, so leave your fanboyism at the door please. Using words such as Xbots and Sony droids, or other words from the console war vocabulary, is strictly prohibited in this Zone."

I'll see your baseball bat and raise you a 9mm.

[SeanScythe]

No the bat isn't for me, I wanted to make it as fair as possible. Without making it a sissy fight with guns and shlt. Any moron can fire a gun, real men fight hand to hand. BTW I wasn't posting a reply to anyone but the hidden Ninja's from the Disagree clan. I call them Ninja because they are some how in my house watching me play games without me noticing them.

[JokesOnYou]

I don't know if its just a case of the TV settings needing adjustment for ps3 version but in this vid 360 version definitely looks a bit better.

Cool this game looks pretty good, gameplay with destructible environments is interesting, some humor too, I might just check it out.

JOY

[PirateThom]

Why do people care?

I've played this game on both consoles and it sucks really, really badly. Terrible game.

[Stryfeno1]

Obviously, you haven't played it.

[vilmer]

I don't know why in all of these 'comparison' videos the PS3 versions color palette always looks so dull. On top of that, I'm not impressed with the game as a whole on either system. Very disappointing for me :(

[Sangria]

Yeah, we already saw it with Assassin's Creed and GTA IV comparison videos, there was always a bit less color on PS3, and once you buy it, there is strictly no difference between both versions.

[akaFullMetal]

this vid has a good representation of both

http://www.gametrailers.com...

[Lizzi10]

Mhmmm looks brighter and more Colorful on 360 but the Ps3 the Graphics look more Sharp and Clear

[Rusted]

EXACTLY.

Basically, the graphics are the same, just the classic washed effect in the PS3. if you can deal with it, what is the problema?

[rhood022]

As some have said, I don't know what they did to their tv, but my PS3 version looks nothing like that. In fact, it has the deep colors and contrast that the 360 version has. At least going by the demo on LIVE.

But I take these "comparison" videos with an eye of skepticism

[AngryHippo]

......what is for sure though is that this game is a blast online, its sooooo much fun. Love it.

[OC_MurphysLaw]

If you are a 360 fanboy then the game will clearly look better and more rich on the 360

If you are a PS3 fanboy then this game will be a sharper and better looking on the PS3.

If you are a gamer the game looks great on either and it really just comes down to which console you will prefer to play it on.

Edit: I love that I got 2 disagree's when my comments are spot on. both versions do look good. Sure there are differences but honestly they are not enough on either system that someone who buys the game on theirs is going to be upset because of them. The game is good on either and only the true fanboys are going to come on here and start barkin about how their version looks vastly superior and thus makes their system of choice justified and makes the other system a bad choice. This stuff just cracks me up. Just enjoy a good game people.

[JokesOnYou]

Thats the usual on n4g, but seriously I don't see anything "sharper" about ps3 version and I think its obvious the 360 version looks better in *this video, even sony folks would agree, at any rate like I and others have said maybe its the TV but whatever the reason its noticeable in *this vid. Either way its not a big deal so I agree with your last statement.

edit: ^^^^ I disagreed somewhat but I didn't hit "Disagree"...is that the same thing? lmfao

@ AclayPS3 thats your opinion about exclusives, personally Gears and maybe even Bioshock still eclipses those games graphically, got to admit Uncharted looked fckn awesome though, ha ha but thats just my opinion,.... as for multiplat comparisons, they do matter a little or alot to some gamers because the majority of games released for consoles are multiplatform and most people don't want a "inferior" version (not saying thats the case here) but far worst problems can occur like framerates/glitches etc. which can be definite killers for 1 version of a multiplat game.

JOY

[Aclay]

I'm tired of these gaming sites comparing PS3 and 360 Multiplatform games graphically, why don't they compare PS3 exclusives to 360 exclusives? Oh yea, I know why, it's because PS3 exclusive games like MGS4, GT5 Prologue and Uncharted look better than anything that's been released on the 360.

Developers releasing Multiplatform PS3 and 360 games are more focused on making both version identitical than making each version the best it can be and bringing out the best in both consoles, so doing graphical game comparisions between 360 and PS3 games is almost irrelevant. If developers were trying to bring out the best in BOTH consoles, then a graphical comparison would be nice. Either way I know that Killzone 2 and Resistance 2 will look better than Battlefield Bad Company and it's PS3 exclusives that I care about.

[azmanmanz]

just download and played the demo on my ps3, the game is suck, resistant is much better.

[chetan]

whoa! slow down man....

exclusives will look better because they are exclusives...

any way i thought (AS MANY PS3 owners DID) that haze was way better game than 360 has... look how that turned out...

i still believe that gears is the best graphically game ive played... not including racing game...(not a big fan of those)

put that aside... cant compare resistance to gears cum'on....

killzone however i thing will be the best looking game on the market untill gears 2

(i own a ps3 and 360.. plus getting a wii for starwars force unleashed ;P)

p.s Not A Fan Boy

[twoface]

While I did not click disagree on you, I have to say that I disagree. Some random guy once said that in his opinion MGS4 looks no better or in some cases worse than Gears, COD4 and Bioshock.
So no matter if you compare exclusives or multi-plat, fanboys of each system will still be dissing the other systems' games.

[Vip3r]

"killzone however i thing will be the best looking game on the market untill gears 2"

If by that you mean Killzone 2 it won't make any sense seeing that GeOW2 should be out before KZ2.

[tordavis]

"why don't they compare PS3 exclusives to 360 exclusives?"

Because exclusives aren't meant to look like anything else. That's why they are exclusives. A multiplatform title SHOULD look the same across the board. Sometimes it doesn't and that's why they do the comparisons.

[Angelitos]

These devs weren't skilled enough to make the superior hardware look better.

[Deadman64]

Exactly. Most of the reasons a game looks good/play well is because of the DEVS. When will people understand it has very little to do with the console its on??

According to this VIDEO [I did not see a comparison in person], the Xbox 360 version looks more crisp/detailed to me.

[AngryTypingGuy]

Who says it's superior hardware? Yeah, BluRay has more storage, but it doesn't make the game look or run better. The 360 versions of games consistently look better.

Some games look identical, but this looks WAY better on the 360. Look at the ground and the detail in it. Also, the 360 is a lot more clear. Did you notice during the vehicle scene that there were bushes in places on the 360 version where there were none at all in the PS3 version?

With the superior RAM and graphics card in the 360, it's no wonder most games look better on the system.

[GiantEnemyCrab]

"Chalk up another one for the 360"

QFT!

I find it funny that everytime the PS3 version is worse it's all of a sudden a configuration problem on the PS3 with full RGB or some contrast setting. Do you have to adjust your TV and console video settings everytime you play a different game on the PS3?

[Deadman64]

Very valid points angry.

[theKiller]

then this game will flop big time on ps3 sales!!!

we have other worthy games that uses the full potential of ps3 and blue ray!!! not DVD cheap games!!

[Pain]

it was Made on and with Inferior old gen tech so yea PS3's will look like sh)t like always...what eles is new?

but i will say this.. Those guys F*^$^#$@ Funny!!! i luv the hick he the best.

[Kleptic]

360 definitely wins this one...(EDIT...nevermind)

but seriously...real question...why don't 360 exclusives EVER show an edge on the PS3 exclusives?...Gears is still the best looking 360 exclusive there is...and it doesn't even look as good as the rushed UT3 on the PS3...

Angry...you talk about 'superior ram and gpu' for the 360...why is that only applicable to multiplat games?...cod 4 is the best looking 360 game period...and it looks identical to the PS3 version (don't even bring up that crap texture BS...they look the same...they run the same...and both are well below HD)...

I am not arguing...just curious...the PS3 gets 1st party exclusives that wreck UE3...and got a 3rd party exclusive that makes every game this generation seem like a joke so far...whats that about?...

call me crazy...but this sounds very PS2 vs. Dreamcast'ish...the DC won a lot of multiplatform comparisons...yet was graphically maxed out in its first year on the market...seriously...some of the DC's best looking games were first generation titles...you could argue that that is exactly what is happening with the 360...

EDIT:...this was posted lower in this thread...Why does this paint an entirely different picture between the two versions?...this HD vid clearly gives the PS3 an edge...further justifying how multiplat comparisons are pointless...

http://www.gametrailers.com...

[AngryTypingGuy]

Kleptic, 3rd party, multiplatform games are the solid majority of games, probably 90% or more. Out of all of those multiplatform games, the 360 has outperformed the PS3 in most.

The most impressive exclusive out so far is definitely MGS4, in almost every way. It's downright breathtaking. GOW 2 will be the new measuring stick in terms of graphics though. GT already said it looks better than Killzone 2.

[mushypeas]

im a big PS3 fan, but there is a tiny bit more detail on the 360 version along with the saturated colors. The one thing i dont get is why (and i have two PS3's on two different Samsungs 1080p) do these comparison videos make the PS3 look more washed out then the 360? Maybe its just my Samsungs but I feel once i correct my TV's I have to tone down the contrast and color settings because my PS3 and Digital Cable sometimes appear too over saturated.

With that logic and with these comparison videos it would appear that im almost running my games in black and white!!!

[mushypeas]

as im in the market for a Elite and since I have two identical TV's running both consoles on HDMI, it will give me a good chance if I buy a game, to then rent its counterpart if im bored enough to see a difference. Or bring a friends version of the opposite console.

[dale1]

must of down loaded my demo on xbox live even though i have a ps3 as it looks like the 360 version

[Cheboury]

Played both retail versions! Both look almost identical except for a few issues!

On the Xbox 360 I noticed some screen tearing here and there, but nothing too distracting.

The PS3 has screen tearing too but not as much, however, I did run into quite a few occations where I experienced frame dropping! This was not that pronounced on the Xbox 360.

As far as textures and Anti-Aliasing both look close enough to the point of negligiblillty. But if I had to choose... Xbox 360 does look cleaner!

Contrast-wise Xbox 360 looks better but that's saying the PS3 doesn't have contrast/brightness/color slider.

Audio is cleaner on the PS3. No surprise here!

Loading times are faster on the Xbox 360!

The game is good and we will have to leave it at that!

[poos3]

hahahahaha I HAVE ALWYS SAID IT AND ill say itagain the 360 is a more powerfull system than the ps3 technically ,the 360 was th enext lvl to the xbox 1 which was a beast graphically and tore apart every ps2 game so what would you excpect the 360 would be quite powerfull ,while the ps3 is the next step to the ps2 which tbh graphic wise is a joke 1s again after 2years of the ps3 being out its still cant match the visual quality of the 360 hahah ps3 droids waittill e3 hahayou will cry more

[digger18]

Talking crap again poos3. How fu*king old are you, 10?

I'm running the 360 version at the minute and I must say its pretty good. My only gripe is the bad screen tearing. I will play the PS3 version when my sons gets it, as its been said it hasn't got screen tear.

[ThatCanadianGuy]

Look at the final fantasy games,Metal gear solid 2,Metal gear solid 3,
Gran turismo's,god of war,etc

why do you think nobody even talks about the xbox? or why it isnt even for sale anymore? it sucked.

[Tottenhamtom]

Hi,
I'm a Ps3 owner but by no means a fanboy. Personally i think there is very little difference between the 2. The colours on the 360 do tend to be a bit more vibrant and this is the case again with this game. However you can always adjust your TV. What i don't understand is that at the end of the day unless your mad you'll only be looking at the game running on one system when you purchase it and as such all that matters is that it looks good in your home on your console what ever that may be.
Personally i think the game is a little lacking graphically. Probably a consequences of the large environments.
The promised destruction is also disappointing, clearly it is largely pre-determined, with some nice effects covering its limitations.
A good game but nothing remarkable.

[OC_MurphysLaw]

Yes there are certain walls and sections of things that can't be blown up. That was done on purpose in order to keep the gameplay balanced. If you could level everything and make absolutely zero cover available to troops then there would be no point to being on foot. this game would become a huge vehicle battle and nothing more.

That said, using the destructible enviornment radically changes how you attack things...and defend them. You cant just sit on a corner of a building anymore and know that you are safe from fire around the corner, etc... When you play this and play COD4 you will immediately know the differences and the difference in tactics too. In COD4 you can pretty much run and gun yourself, in BF:BC you can try, but 9/10 times you wont last terribly long trying to run and gun with out support of your squad and tactics.

[fablib]

Play both demos. Very similar.
Better texture and effect on Xbox360.
The usual vaselline effect on PS3 and some frame rate drop.

[Fishy Fingers]

Demo's are not a 100% true representation of the retail build. Hence why they clearly state that at the beginning.

[LeonSKennedy4Life]

I understand what you're saying, but it's the video with screen-tear, not the PS3 version. I think they did it on purpose...the PS3 version doesn't have screen-tear...not even the demo.

I am a little upset they didn't use the PS3 for the main console, but then again, they are used to developing for a PC and the 360's architecture is closer to a PC's.

[jkhan]

the game is same on both consoles. So kindly please put the fanboy stuff at home.

[SKullDugger]

No they are not the same, but it does not make one better then the other. They both have positives and negatives, Colors are richer and deeper on the 360 and the particile effects on the 360 are better. Yes it is the same game on both consoles but they do not look the same. Take a look at T.V.'s on display at any store and the pictures are not the same even if all the settings are all set the same.

[mesh1]

lol blur station 3 strikes again cod4,gta 4,battle field, bacially 99% of games look better on the 360 .

[digger18]

Another one who needs to grow up. I said this time and time again, you can never judged a game by videos on the net.

And as for you saying COD4 is better on the 360, think again buddy because you couldn't be more wrong. I have both the 360 and PS3 version and the PS3 wins hands down for lighting, colour and playing lag free online.

[karlostomy]

Blurstation3...LOL

Here's a few more:

- Vaselinestation3
- washedoutstation3
- Hypestation3
- Liestation3
- Delaystation3
- noprofitstation3
- got any more..... lol

[karlostomy]

- Fra.m..erat..eproblemstation3
- Flash-in-the-pan-station3

[LeonSKennedy4Life]

I've done a comparison side-by-side and they are, quite literally, the SAME GAME!!!

It's the smoothest port I've ever seen, people. Seriously! Although you can see that most of the explosions are scripted...which takes away from the game. I mean, even Resistance had the Chimera acting in real-time differently every single time you played.

The settings need to be changed on this TV. That's just blatantly not fair there.

The game is great on both. Basically, just go with whatever version most of your friends are getting.

[pandabear]

I only have a pS3, but have to be honest and say the xbox version looks a bit sharper and more polished, it could be the settings, Full RGB not on ect - but on the evidence in the vid the 360 version defo looks more polished.

[ASSASSYN 36o]

Wow I am shocked thank you for showing some humility. Bubble!

[pandabear]

yeah, I always say how I see it,

I am a Sony fan but they are far from perfect - and neither are developers - and especially game reviewers, so in in absence of knowing who is responsible - the fact is without seeing both versions myself side by side - then the 360 is more polished.

And if my wife wouldn't go nuts - I'd have both systems!!!

[End Of war 2]

If your a gamer and have onl a ps3 your prolly the dumest person alive the exclsuive are crap and few ,the game look like crap uncharted .mgs4 dont even look as good as cod4,gears of war 1,mass effect not to mention ps3 games are just not right they feel so baron and strange when playing its liek the gameplay programming is veyr last gen .

[SEVERN]

Your logic sucks, Uncharted kicks all 360 games asses graphically just look at the water affects, and MGS4 looks even better than Uncharted. Even Gears 2 looks worse than Uncharted.

[ChrisGTR1]

a multiplat EA game??? well in that case i dont even have to see the video to know the 360 version is better.

[digger18]

I think something is a bit fishy here.

Look here at gametrailers HD 360 vs PS3 video, the PS3 clearly wins.

http://www.gametrailers.com...

[Crazyglues]

the reason it looks different in there review is because of what most people have not understood about the PS3 since it has come out..

There is an adjust color option on the PS3 to adjust the RGB to full instead of limited-(the default setting).

When adjusted to full the PS3 and X360 look exactly alike just like in that video you just posted of the gametrailers review.

Here is a video for further proof - http://www.youtube.com/watc...

The truth is the game looks and plays the same on both systems - finally it looks like where getting to a point where this will no-longer be an issue and you can just buy the game for whatever system you like.

[PSMonster21]

Oh wow, yea guys go watch the gametrailers video. The PS3 version looks slightly better. 360 version was kinda blurry.

[yoghurt]

looks arn't everything, reviews have already confirmed screen tearing and a few frame drops on the xbox 360 version, shame, because the graphics are almost on par

[pegger24]

to the reviews that said the frame rate drops only on the 360

[Eimmij]

Ok look i have the ps3 version but played them both in demo form the ps3 version looks like that its not the settings. I have a 40 inch Sony XBR 1080p tv and yes I have the full RGB and super whites on but I still went with the ps3 version because it ran better online. Oh and there is a difference there 2 the xbox mics don't go out like the ps3 but it lags really bad so i had to pick hmmm... ok do I go with my mic going out half the time I play or do i go with lag half the time well you see what way i went despite the game having shaper colors on the 360 i still pick sony because i like it better p.s me as a in my personal opinion I'M NOT SAYING IT IS BETTER OVERALL!!

[sprinterboy]

Is`nt it time we all moved on with comparison images and trailers, does my nut in, why cant we just enjoy games, makes me laugh this console stuff, PS3 is the 1st console I have ever brought and I never had to put up with this bullshit on PC. Just play and enjoy the games wether its SP or MP. Move on people.

[OC_MurphysLaw]

How true that is...you never hear PC gamers flaming over which graphics processor is the best or which PC rig is the best to run PC games or debates over if it looks best on Nvidia or ATI, etc... They just game. About the only groans you hear from PC gamers is when a new game comes around that pretty much is so advanced it cant run on half or more of the machines out there. Even then its not ususally a complaint but more of an "Shock and Awe" comment.

[felidae]

360 version has better colors and contrast. besides that .. they both look identical

[thehitman]

and this is just based of those vids I would have to reconfirm after playing the demo again, but the 360 version texture details on the ground looked better.. I got no money for this game anyway and the online is not designed well enough for me to pick it up or save for it so ill be skipping it anyway.

[highdro]

to be honest i am really sick of seeing comparing videos every time a new multiplat game is relased....for 4 sake both games are going to nice and let who has a 360 by the version and who has a ps3 by the version and for thoes that hve a ps3 and 360 by any one u want to(dont let some fan boi talk piss of crap to u about how one is this and one is that blablabla!!!), this fan boi war sh1t is pretty dumb, im i the only one here in n4g that cannot see y this is dumb !!!

[LiquifiedArt]

Adjust the TV for the PS3. That "Washed Out" look has nothing to do with the ps3. I've adjusted mine and it looks just as vivid as anything. Noobs!

[achira]

ps3 version looks better. sharper and detailed. btw its a very good game!

[juuken]

Am I the only one who thinks this comparison video is downright ridiculous?

[juuken]

Cute, but no.

[OC_MurphysLaw]

You are not alone.

Militant07 ---> open zone is that way.

[DarkSniper]

The PLAYSTATION®3 version looks noticably better due to the superior hardware that Sony provided. Xbox 360 version has some jaggies and probable frame rate hiccups. When looking at the grass, it looks more realistic on PLAYSTATION®3 when the soliders are running to cover.

$niper

[InMyOpinion]

Are you wearing 4-D goggles or are you just in grave denial?

[GiantEnemyCrab]

I believe it's grave denial.

[Deadman64]

Sniper, according to this video the 360 looks better. Are you honestly that blinded by PS3?

Whether the difference is actually this different in person, is debatable. But this video CLEARLY shows 360 superior.

[Hockey11]

Umm this HD comparison tells a completely different story

http://www.gametrailers.com...

[old-snake]

ps3 version looks better.. more realistic.. 360 sucks..

[LuHawk]

seems like you need some glassess

[Wakka_]

The PS3 version does look better ya?

[Deadman64]

Thanks for proving your fanboyism old-snake.

[SEVERN]

He's talking about the HD Version on GT, and it does look like the PS3 wins graphically, even though it is very close.

[zer0man1]

This comparison is bogus. Gametrailers.com already did the Battlefield Bad Company PS3/360 comparison video and there video did not have the PS3 version looking all grey and washed out.

If all these comparison videos are supposed to be fair and unbiased, why do they all look different from one-another.

http://www.gametrailers.com...

[digger18]

yup, I posted this link in the Open zone, but I got a disagree because I said the PS3 version looks clearly better in it, which most people on gametrailers said it did.

[4cough]

The murky ps3 GFX is hurting my eyes.

[specialguest]

-sharper
-better explosion
-color looks better

don't hate, I don't even own a 360. Just an honest opinion.

[thornh]

The Intellivision version looks better than the 2600 version. The pixels were a little smaller and less square looking on the Intellivision version but I really didn't notice much difference in color seeing as I was playing both on a 13" black and white set. I did try smearing vasoline on the tv to see if that helped or hurt anything but I'm not sure what it accomplished.....

As an old timer I've seen EVERY "generation" of videogames since day 1 and this one is the most pathetic so far. We really need to give this whole comparison thing a rest. Whether one version has 500 particles of dust on the screen after you blow up a tank and the other has 450 should not be a determining factor in what system is better!! Each system has its strengths and weaknesses. If you are lucky enough to own all of the systems you should never have to comment in a thread like this. I do not have that luxury and if I get a multiplatform game it is, obviously, for the system I own. The real difference in systems are the 1st party exclusives and which ones appeal to whom. I like certain types of games and that's the single most important determining factor in why I chose the console I did.

Stop looking for minor differences and just go play the damn game!

[dkgshiz]

The destruction in this game is just too generic to make it seem fun. This game is overall a pretty terrible shooter. EA sucks at making games. If they didn't have Madden they would be under in a heart beat. The gameplay is just terrible. Not fun at all. I mite give it a rent. But until than, COD4 for me and MGO.

[three304]

another bad video in favor 360.
i played the demo(ps3) and the color don't match up
oh using the same code isn't doing any good for the ps3
but business is business

[DaCandyman]

The Colors look better on the 360 but I noticed that in the driving sequence the PS3 seems smoother than the 360.

[Closing]

obviously someone was messing with the brightness on the tv, and not putting on full rgb to make one look washed out. Something is most definitely up with these comparisons. Just another way the media outlet is distorting the view because of their biased agendas.

[OMEGAXS1]

This is garbage. The demo for this on the ps3 doenst even look close to this crap.

[tk]

The more "vibrant" colors story again...
Both can output the same colors - it is just a selection of color palette - not a proof of the quality output.

Seems like both is good and playable. Just enjoy the game.

I am sure some people buy a game and start running to his foe / friend with a competing console to start comparing...

[MANCREEP]

I think it looks better on 360, but not by much. I talked about ports on here a while back, and some douche-nozzle replied with how i was wrong and he couldnt back up his areguement with ANYTHING valid.

Anywho, i dont think it really matters. Anyone who plays a game, especially online, and thinks to himself, "Man, i wish there was more debree/trash flying around." ---is an idiot. It'll be a great game, and its a blast online. It gives me all the things I thought COD4 should've had and them some(destruction of enviro.)

[ASSASSYN 36o]

So if the 360 version looks better sony guys think both look good. Got it. Funny that was the case with splinter cell also and it's differences where huge.

[digger18]

I have to agree with you on this video, but the one in gametrailers shows it the other way around, the 360 version blurry and bad screen tear.

http://www.gametrailers.com...

I'm starting to wonder why the 2 videos look so different.

[aiphanes]

I saw a bit in the video...and there was a bit in the PS3 version also...but its worst in the xbox 360 version..

Still both look good...but the sound seems better in the Ps3 version.

[TheMART]

Same as always:

PS3 version is less sharp & blurry, it has washed out colours, seems to run on lower fps, overall looks the gimped little brother of the good 360 version.

With the 360 its sharp, you can count the leafes on the tree, the PS3 just has some blurry green thing standing there. Oh wait its a tree.

[digger18]

Go and watch the HD one in gametrailers then, you will see how much more blurry the 360 version is when seen in HD

http://www.gametrailers.com...

[Covenant]

*Yawn*

Excuse me, I'm going to leave this pissing contest and go play a GAME. Jeez.

[Morgue]

Is this what next gen has come too, video comparison? Listen. If I have a 360, then I think the game is going to look good on that and the same goes for the PS3. Videos like this are made for people that don't own both systems and need something too nick pick about. And how many people or should say kids or adults by the way own an HDTV too begin with and a nice one at that? Probably not a lot and watching videos on a computer monitor is REAL ( sarcasm ) credible.

[agentace]

the both the same the only difference is the brightness and coulor,but if you press a button on your tv you can change it.

why do they hav to do these stupid compassions all they do is start flamebaits, i buy a game to lay it not to compair it

[chidj2]

in gametrailers looks better the ps3 version

[KittenzCanFly]

honestly i think the 2 look extremely similar. Only thing i noticed was some of the anti-alising on the the shadows looked better in spots on the 360 (at time 1:30 - 1:32 the ps3's shadow looks pretty alised). People saying that one is slightly better is acceptable but anyone saying one is massively better than the other is just a raving fanboy. As for the occasional sligtly washed out ps3 image, this game doesnt seem to be that bad in that aspects. some points the image looked better becuase of it. but in the peoples defense, on any tv (CRT, plasma, lcd, rear projection) the ps3 image really does look perfectly fine.... not washed out

One thing i'd like to point out is that gametrailers does have rgb full range on, i know this because if you watch the opening cutscene in the comparison the black bars above and below the actual image on ps3 are actually black where as the 360's are a dark grey (no this doesnt say ps3 is better because of darker blacks during cutscene, it is merely an observation)

[chidj2]

did someone saw that dead VSINC?

[JasonPC360PS3Wii]

To the Droids above.........WAAH WAAAH WAAAHHHH "MS payed them, somthing is fishy, the settings arn't right" blah blah blah excuses. The only way to get a game to look good on the PS3 is to spend $40-60 million and take 5yrs making it.

[LiquifiedArt]

Use the FULL RGB settings in the Display Settings Menu. Your supposed to calibrate your devices + TV initally anyway.

:) cheers

I'm just saying its an unfair comparison, seeing as how i have played the game on my PS3 w/46inch Bravia. I know how it looks, and its damn good. :D

[JasonPC360PS3Wii]

It's what droids are best at, well that and whining and signing petitions.

[jollygoodchap8]

It looks a lot different from this.

I don't know what to think anymore :S

[PoSTedUP]

might have something to do with the RBG* rull range.

[steck67]

IMO the 360 version has a better contrast than the ps3 version, but cant really tell unless you have it side-by-side.

[JasonPC360PS3Wii]

And I thought they might look even when the side by sides came out, guess I was wrong

[Silent]

this game is looks like crap compare to Gears and MGS4. O yea its hard to playing anything after playing MGS4. Graphics are wayyyy over the top.

[donscrillinger]

again 360 iz has the better version ..whats new !!!!!lol

[yanikins111]

....And I bet all those idiots signing the Orange Box Petition go and buy this.

And in 1 weeks time there will be another petition because the ps3 version runs at 719P instead of 720P or some stupid, retarded, moronic, redundant crap.

Im going to work.

[Egzekutor]

Im a fanboy veteran, but i feel the need to say that both look almost the same, 360 is more colourful than PS3.

[Irishrocket69]

a game on the PS3 looks like with rose petal glasses on!

[xg-ei8ht]

There is more aa on the ps3. You can clearly see this on the weapon.

The game is the same.

The models are the same.
The textures are the same.
The decals are the same.
Everything in this game is the same except for online.

One is free and the other isn't.

I played this demo many times, and it looks nothing like the low quality mess in that vid. on either versions.

Sad but true.

What you really need to do is turn on full white on ps3, and then play it again, it's night and day.

The game is very well textured on both consoles.

[LONEWOLF231]

Ps3 for me!

[CrizzleC24]

The smog really brings out the vibrant grey-ness in Battlefield Bad Company. If only the 360' had the power of the Super Cell Processor to push the limits of 4d gaming....

But alas! I am stuck without the grey smog effects on my 360'. Forever doomed to have sharper gaming...why me?

HHAHAHAHA

PS3 Losers will say anything!

Go on gimme those little bubbles!!!

I dont care!

[Cynical-Gamerzus]

Compare it to Metal Gear or Uncharted!!! Or GT5

You want to see if PC ports look good on Cell/RSX???

Compare it to native engines!!!!
LOL
Dare you to!!!

[Stiffler203]

For all the people who say it looks the same are full of sh!t. Tell me you cant see the texture differences look at the ground on the xbox 360 version compared to the PS3 version. The textures and color look much better on the xbox 360. Other then that your right they are the same.

[xg-ei8ht]

Your missing the point, in the vid, the ps3 version looks bad.

But have a go of a friends ps3(if you have any friends with a ps3 and bad company, you'll see, that video looks nothing like the ps3 version.

[Mr Marbles]

but the PS3 version most likely does look like that in person. The good news is that is not a bad looking game, the 360 version just looks better.

Most people will not noticce the difference unless you put both versions side by side, because the game still looks great on PS3. But in this case as with cases time and time before, the PS3 version is less clear, less vibrant, washed out.

[Marlon Jackson]

But who the hell is gonna be spending their time looking at the ground? Hopefully this isnt something people do and scoff about while they are in a multiplayer game! ;)

[zer0man1]

The PS3 version does not look like that. I have it, the video is total BS. But please feel free to continue acting like idiots. I'm having a blast reading it.

[NikV3]

because alot of my friends have it for 360, only problem is i dont get my 360 back from repair untill monday, ill probaly rent it on the ps3 until then. i could careless wich looks better, its all about what console my friends get it for. most ea games are 360 except burnout, all the others are usaly ps3

[Xi]

how we do love comparing our penis sizes to one another on the internet.

I wholeheartedly belive that people here actually think their penis will grow if their game looks just the slightest bit better, or 1 frame faster, or one 1 pixel higher in resolution.

[Rusted]

the ps3 version is a port of the 360 version, as usual. That's annoying and is the typical washed image in the PS3 version. What's the suprise?

[wangdiddy82]

I have a 52' samsung 1080p tv and it makes a huge difference in the color.. If you flip it to Full it will look exactly like the 360 version.. Darker colors..

[aiphanes]

Since more and more people are getting 1080p tvs...

Go superwhite on, and limited if you tv can not support or full RGB.

Its all in the settings...

[heavyarms]

getting the ps3 version for free online play. I will rent it for 360 just for the achievement points and i do like fps like this one. Hehehehe but both version look identical to me. Nothing to make me buy one over the other. If you own both console buy the one with free online play.

[xg-ei8ht]

http://members.aol.com/xgme...

I Just uploaded this.

Its only small. 10.mb and was shot with a panasonic fx10. 30fps.

[alakazzam]

It looks better on the 360 in this video, but the PS3 looks better on the gametrailers video. Perhaps it is the settings on the PS3 who cares. GAMING IS ABOUT, having FUN

[aiphanes]

Both look about the same in graphics...but the sound effects are way better in the PS3 version. Look and hear how the gun fire sounds, and the explosions sound and look better on the PS3 version. They must have mastered this in 7.1 surround..which is something the xbox 360 can not do. Also some peeps on here were comparing the demo...the demo was from an old build months ago. What we are seeing here is the final build.

It does seem like the xbox 360 version is a bit pixelated...but both are good...but you still go to admit..the sound is better on the PS3 in this game.

[power of Green]

Turning on RGB does not make missing trees, bushes, rocks, smoke and partical effect magically appear nor does it clear up this strange layer of haze(vaseline) the PS3 often displays.

>alakazzam< the PS3 version has never looked better I'v seen what we seen in this video in every comparison video about this game that has been posted go ahead and check the threads out everying you see(differences)in this video I'v mentioned in past videos posted on this site.

[DFresh]

That game was alright.
You can find better 1st person shooter games if you look harder.
As far as the game goes it's advertised more for the PS3 than the 360.
Hell the times they advertise them it's only shown for Sony not 360.
Graphics look good obviously better on the PS3 but I would pass on buying this game and just rent it instead.

[jeanius]

The multi-player is kind of slim.

One mode, albeit fun, a great multi-player does not make. Of course as most know there is a patch coming out, but I am sure at an additional cost (hopefully not).

COD4 is a more well rounded game, but the game looks and plays great on the demo... so I'll more than likely get it... On PS3 because PSN is free, I'm not a fanboy by any means... fanboys are people to poor to buy both systems... I just like playing online ps3 because 12 year olds are less likely to call you racist names.

[TheKungFool]

Seriously, do any of you 360iots think that any PS3 owner is going to run out and buy a 360 that'll brick within 4 months just so he can play a blurrier version of a multiplat?

Notice all these "360 is superior" comparisons are only mulitplats made by Ubisoft and Electronic Arts?

And what cables and settings are being used?

Feel free to enjoy a glossier version of BattleField while I enjoy MGS4, lol.

[paracardium]

the way mines set up on my ps3 it doesn't even look like that.. maybe old Tv's or something? Maybe turn game mode on.. my version looks way better anyway back at it.

[wallace1000]

It just really depends on how the tv is calibrated. I can drastically change my picture by running through DVE when compared to using my TVs game mode or dynamic mode for example.

[Spydiggity]

360 looks way better.

let the disagrees fly you fangirl noobs. if you can't be objective, don't goto comparison sites.

Quake wars looked better on PS3 and had more features. i didn't see the 360 guys goin off the handle when ps3 fangirls ran their mouths about that.

so when we say this battlefield game looks better on the 360, it's just obvious. it's right there in front of you. 360 looked richer, more solid colors and the ps3 version looked washed out and blurry.

but you fangirls are probably right, i'm sure whomever did this comparison probably set their TV to blurry when they did the ps3 side.

[wallace1000]

This game looks pretty damn sweet. Basically the same on both consoles, just needs a few settings tweaked and i am sure they will look identical.

[Highwayman]

They both look damn good. Though I wonder what the hell is up with the PS3. Mine never has contrast that dull looking. It could have been the TV itself!?

I picked up BF:BC for my X360. All my friends are on LIVE and plus I actually enjoy unlocking achievements.

[livespawn]

both look pretty similar, tho i thought trees looked a little better on 360 version

[harpua]

gamers: "Hey this game looks decent, I might get it for my console of choice."

fanboys: "It looks a million times better on my console, the other console sucks."

[power of Green]

Based on this fanboy's past comments and behavior he is just now *some level headed non-fanboy* due to the game being inferior on PS3 lol.

[ScottEFresh]

gamers: "Hey this game looks like trash compared to Call of Duty4, MGO and UnrealTournament3, why the hell would I buy this?"

[Old Snake]

They both look fine, the color is just darker and more saturated on the 360, like all other 360 games. Both look great

[Mclovin96]

Just like every other game, PS3 version looks dull and washed out next to the crisper 360 version with much better colors. I own both systems and I will definately be playing this one on XBL.

[sleepbox]

Arguing about a game that will require you to BUY WEAPONS WITH YOUR OWN REAL $...anyone buying this is a part of the problem.

[snoopgg]

to take me away from Call of Duty 4. It having only team death match is not enough to warrant a buy. It looks great on the ps3, but lack of depth and gameplay variety online will make me pass. I like teamwork, but enjoy capture the flag, deathmatch, and other game types. Call of Duty 4 sure did get it right, and thats what I will play until anything worthy comes out. I own a 360 and a ps3 and have played both versions. They look the same, and those videos were mocked up to make the ps3 version look that bad. I have played them on both and know first hand how they look and will never believe any of tha shatty videos these fanboy websites post. Yes, its sad but there are also fanboys running these sites and this is what the people get. They get biased reviews and bad videos. Overall this game isn't even worth the worry. Move on, and play Grid its the best racing game out right now!!!!!

[nycredude]

This game sucks balls and the multiplayer is fun but nothing to write home about! Plus you have to buy more weapons and packs? Give me a break. This fanboy sh*t is wack man, and besides both version gets crushed by MGS4!

[Blaze929]

up above nailed it

[CertifiedGamer]

I recommend buying it on any console at hand
It doesn't matter which looks better or worse what does matter is that this is a bad ass game.

[EL MAESTRO]

These comparisons are so gay...only someone with absolutely no time would pixel count like this. There is obviously no real difference, just color which can be fixed by tv setting. I saw this video cuz i thought i was going to see an actual difference but no just a waste of time. And same goes with all the multiplatform games. THEY ALL LOOK THE SAME FOR BOTH COUNSEL. minor things you can barely notice while playing should not be brought up. STOP SAYING this looks better than this and that looks better than this..we all know the best games are not the ones that look the best but the ones that are fun.

[pow3r of t3h c3ll]

They turned the resolution of the video down for the PS3 version, its so obvious they did this if you watch the gametrailers comparison where they are both the same.

[devilhunterx]

I remember the xb1 always being declared having "better" graphics then the ps2. Guess who won the last generation?

[Pete_Approved]

Both look good, but the X360 sharper, like the environment and gear, cars.. But still the game rocks, so game on!! (on both systems :P)

[ind1]

liking the 360 version better.

the colour is nicer, but graphics wise its pretty much the same

[titntin]

Does it even matter to most? You won't see nothing from these lame comparison video's - as we've all discussed on here a million times before.

I've not played this title on both machines yet, but its not difficult to imagine that it was lead on 360 and ported to PS3, and I should imagine that the PS3 has suffered in that port.

Thats simply what you can expect from E.A. who have clearly demonstrated a complete lack of effort and inability to make a decent port.

I'd be shocked if the PS3 version was as polished as the 360 one for that reason alone, and most comments from more trustworthy sources seem to indicate thats the fact.

Anyone who reads my comments over the last few years on here, knows I'm no fan boy, and I actually prefer my PS3 as a machine to my 360. But there are many developers who lead on 360 and still haven't got their heads around PS3 conversions - thats a simple demonstrable fact and doesn't say anything at all about the PS3's innate abilities, which I actually believe are superior if they are correctly coded.

Those of gamers who actually play games and don't pay homage to one machine, already know the score: For most multiplats, grab the 360 version unless you know the dev team are competent enough to have coded the PS3 version properly. Only E.A. dev house I've seen that can code the PS3 properly is Criterion so far. Maybe they'll get their heads round it one day, but till then, E.A. multi plat games are likely to remain better polished on the platform they are primarily developed for - P.C and 360.

[tordavis]

I still think it's BS that you guys complain that they don't turn RGB full on. They always capture the videos without adjusting any settings. Most average Joes don't even know what FULL RGB does. Anyways, both games look good. Choose wisely.

[rootEXT]

is the superior one, looks sharp and colorful and more fluid, i'm getting the x360