250°

Demon's Souls still feels fresher than its "Dark" successors | Eurogamer

Demon's Souls doesn't just hold up, it feels fresher and more innovative today than either of its "Dark" brethren.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
nX3517d ago

Couldn't agree more with this article. (that's why I had to post it :D)

radler3517d ago

I think Dark Souls was a really good game, but Dark Souls 2 is just wholly unremarkable in every regard. It seems glaringly obvious now that Namco relegated development of that game to some b-team while they shifted the talented folk over to Bloodborne. I just hope that they don't leave the Dark Souls franchise to be run into the ground by the idiots that made the second game.

shammgod3517d ago

Well said bubs.
It was a good game, but compared to demons and DS1, lacking. My biggest complaint was the level design after the first few areas. So lazy and unimaginative. Disappointing.

Mega243517d ago

Namco has nothing to do with Bloodborne, Bloodborne is being published under Sony.

PurpHerbison3517d ago (Edited 3517d ago )

@Mega24

I know damn well you knew he meant From Software and not Namco. Honest mistake.

thorstein3517d ago

I agree as well, but haven't been able to play since I get invaded all the time.

I wonder if there will be a patch when they take down the servers that allows us to continue to play without being connected.

nitus103516d ago

You have always been able to play the Souls series without being on-line.

The on-line component of the Souls series mainly allows you to get help or be invaded although in the case of Demon Souls the "tendencies" to work properly.

When on-line in Dark Souls one way to stop or reduce getting invaded while still being able to get help is to try and keep your level below 15. Pyromancy is really useful as is weapon and armour upgrading. One or two hits with a level 15 hand flame spell usually will kill off a level 100 player fairly quickly, although a fight between a level 15 player and level 100 player should not happen.

It is annoying when you can see that some players are cheats such as those who set themselves up as level 0 (minimum level is 1) and ridicules or infinite life (max life is less then 3,000).

It must be noted that some players are really good and have been able to complete the game at level one without cheating. Upgrading and enhancement of weapons and armour is not cheating. Increasing your life while maintaining the same level is.

miyamoto3516d ago

Great Post, buddy.

Demon's Souls is the ray of hope for Japanese RPG developers and gamers.

LightDiego3517d ago

True, Demon's Souls is special, i hope we get a sequel for the game. Even better that Bloodborne and Demon's Souls 2 will be exclusive for PS4.

nucky643517d ago (Edited 3517d ago )

demon souls 2 - it takes my breath away just thinking about it

Agent20093517d ago

With all due respect, sequel are overrated - I'd much rather have more of those "successors" instead. Bloodborne is kind of a successor.

MEsoJD3517d ago

Just because it's exclusive... Honestly, Dark Souls is the best of the Souls series. Awesome world, lore, content, flexibility, no grass hoarding, no world tendency, etc... I like Demons Souls, but I didn't go back after the Dark Souls series.

torchic3517d ago (Edited 3517d ago )

whichever one you played first will be the best one, that's generally how i've seen discussions play out on the internet.

I agree with you on Dark Souls I being the best of the three. the fact that Demon's Souls is exclusive also wins it brownie points amongst fans.

MEsoJD3516d ago (Edited 3516d ago )

@torchic

Demons Souls was my first. Bought it, when it first came out.

Xof3517d ago (Edited 3517d ago )

I love the hell out of Dark Souls and have tried to get into Demons Souls several times. I just can't. Maybe it's the claustrophobic level design, maybe it's the Mario 64 level hub (something I've never liked).

Last time I tried to get into it, after DS2, the thing that immediately threw me off was the godawful draw distance. Most of the difficulty seemed to come from the fact that the game wouldn't render anything further than a few meters from my character.

So, yeah: I respectfully disagree with the assertion that Demon's Souls offers anything to top its successor.

A012345673517d ago (Edited 3517d ago )

"Maybe it's the claustrophobic level design, maybe it's the Mario 64 level hub (something I've never liked). "

That description alone suggests you've never played through Demon's Souls.

"godawful draw distance".

Then this comment flat out confirmed it.

I smell PC troll...

Xof3517d ago

I don't mind if you disagree with me, but at least behave with a modicum of courtesy. Only one of us is trolling here, and it sure as hell isn't me.

Sly-Lupin3517d ago

...That you think Demons Souls doesn't have a level hub indicates that YOU have never played Demons Souls. Because it does. Very obviously. Maybe you're confusing it with Dark Souls?

And the draw-distance in Demons Souls isn't uniform. Some levels have really decent draw distances, some have really crappy draw distances. It depends more on the lighting of the level and the amount of clutter. That one bit in one of the early levels where you're "inside" a bridge is really, really bad for example.

A012345673517d ago (Edited 3517d ago )

@Sly-Lupin

I'm referring to his comment on claustrophobic level design, hence why I said it suggests he hasn't played THROUGH Demon's Souls.

The nexus is a matter of opinion and was just a part of the sentence I copied. To clarify I should have omitted that part.

Further more, I cannot recall a single draw distance issue I ever had, not even at the bridge in the beginning when looking from the hanging posts.

Especially, despite the night/fog in terms of atmosphere, the entire level of the Fool's Idol Archstone you can see any of the interconnecting bridges and towers (assuming that there is lighting at the areas).

internationterrorist3517d ago (Edited 3517d ago )

You have not played Demon's Soul's. I own both Demon's Souls and Dark Souls. First if you played Dark Souls and Demon's Soul's. You would know that Demon's Soul's preformance was superior quality vs Dark Souls. Dark Souls had horrible frame rates drops and back stabbing was over powerful. Demon's Soul's had better frames rates and back stabbing was better balanced than Dark Souls 1 .

torchic3517d ago

Dark Souls had framerate problems in ONE area (that you could skip) otherwise the game was freaking solid everywhere else.

MysticStrummer3517d ago

If you don't like a hub and you don't like the level design I can respect that if not agree with it. The level design was that way on purpose. The game was supposed to make players uncomfortable and it did.

Your complaint about draw distance… I have no idea what you're talking about.

Loved Dark Souls, never played DS2, but Demon's Souls was the best of the three imo.

internationterrorist3517d ago (Edited 3517d ago )

Xof@

As in xbonefanboys you are a trolling. Alot of xbonefanboy want to down play Demon's Soul's and Bloodborne because they are both Playstation exclusives.

torchic@

Dark Souls had framerate problems in ONE area (that you could skip) otherwise the game was freaking solid everywhere else.

Really? Well that's not what Hidetaka Miyazaki said.

Dark Souls dev sorry for frame-rate issues, uncertain on sequel

"We don't know if the users will forgive

Dark Souls developer From Software has admitted to "technical difficulties" which cause troubling frame-rate issues in its hard-as-nails role-player.

From Software felt out of its depth with the game's huge scope, Dark Souls' creative director Hidetaka Miyazaki revealed to Edge.

"Yes, there were technical difficulties," Miyazaki said. "I don't believe that it's okay to have them, but realistically speaking, it was quite a large-scale game - even in terms of budget and expectations.

"So we're very sorry for the trouble we've caused by our processing errors and bugs from Japan. It was a title that we haven't really experienced in all aspects, so there were areas where we felt our technical side couldn't keep up with the game's scope, like an increasingly growing ache."

Miyazaki considered working on the game "a learning curve", but is unsure whether From Software will ever revisit the Dark Souls universe.

"We don't even know if we'll have another chance. We have the confidence that we can improve from our mistakes this time and create an even better Dark world, but we don't know if the users will forgive us for the mistakes."

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3517d ago
Remy_Chaos3517d ago

Demon's Souls is a masterpiece, I finally beat it about 2 months ago. I would love a remaster of that game for PS4 using BloodBorne's engine.

nucky643517d ago

demon souls remaster?!....hells, yea!

Inception3517d ago

Mate, that's awesome and you should ask the idea to Shuhei Yoshida. Maybe he will talk to From Soft / Jpn Studio about that possibility!

HighResHero3517d ago

Yes and possibly with some more content.
Release it a few months before DS2.

Kevlar0093517d ago

It's a shame I don't have a PS3. Would really like to try this game.

Inception3517d ago

Too bad mate. A couple months ago sony made it free for PS+ users. But the game itself already cheap (it's $20 on PSN). If you really want to try it, maybe you should buy a second-hand PS3 (it's cheap) or...waiting if sony / From Soft will remaster the game for PS4.

HighResHero3517d ago (Edited 3517d ago )

Wait until you can find a great deal on a PS3 and pick up the Bluray for around $10 US. (I would buy it new if it's still available to support the devs and Atlus)

Remy_Chaos3517d ago

Wait for the Black Friday sales, PS3 despite its horrible beginnings is now definitely well worth it. Also Demon's Souls goes cheap on Amazon last I checked.

Show all comments (63)
240°

The best PS5 exclusives 2024

With so many PS5 exclusives to choose from, it can be a little overwhelming to pick which one to play. This is especially true for a new PlayStation gamer who has yet to experience the wonder of PlayStation-exclusive storytelling. So, here's KnowTechie's take on the best PS5 exclusives in 2024 and beyond

Read Full Story >>
knowtechie.com
Hereandthere36d ago

PlayStation is killing it with the exclusives this year. Exclusive wise, what has xbox released this year?

VersusDMC36d ago

They won't complain about Microsoft not releasing games here but put all their effort into saying that only first party counts. Games like Rebirth and Grandblue Relink don't count. Games published by Sony like Helldivers 2, Stellar Blade and Rise of the Ronin don't count because Sony don't own the studios.

It's some narrative building so for when Hellblade 2 come out they can say, seemingly without shame, that Microsoft is actually releasing first party games this year. And claim victory.🙃

Chevalier36d ago

Weird 1st party games didn't matter when Xbox had so little, but, now they're important again? Guess Ark 3, Stalker 2 don't count any more?

KyRo36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

ARK 3 doesn't exist and it's just a timed exclusive. It's also a game that a majority of the ARK player base doesn't want as it's a massive deviation from what people like about the original game

Abnor_Mal36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

Honestly to me it doesn’t matter what they say, they are just finally getting a chance to say all the things PS fan(boy)s were saying to them for the past few years. Let them get that, they deserve a “win” for a change.

The new narrative is that suddenly first party games matter again when awhile ago they didn’t, but that was because they were struggling with the same three games with the occasional fourth or fifth. That games should be everywhere on all platforms since that’s whats happening to theirs. The consoles don’t matter just the ability to play anywhere. Whatever Xbox is doing Sony will soon follow.

They’re not moving the goalpost anymore, but rather just moving the whole damn stadium.

jwillj2k436d ago

Only a incel would care about who published what and who owns who.

If it’s not on the other consoles it’s an exclusive.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 36d ago
Cacabunga36d ago

Killing what? Where are the 1st party games??
Stellar Blade and FF7 is what I’m seeing this year.. so shallow!!!!

andy8536d ago

Doesn't really matter as long as they're great games. Baffles me why people put an emphasis on 1st party. They're still games you can't play anywhere else this year

Cacabunga36d ago

Andy

PS brand is my favorite because of their stellar first party software.. currently I see absolutely nothing to go crazy for..

CS735d ago

Nonsense.

PS1 and PS2 was built on great third party exclusives like FF, MGS, GTA & Tekken.

36d ago Replies(2)
raWfodog36d ago

Of course I love the games I’ve played from PS but I don’t believe we need to limit it to ‘exclusive’ to acknowledge that Xbox will be releasing some good games this year also. In that same vein, I believe that Xbox diehards shouldn’t limit their acknowledgment of good PS games to 1st party. There are plenty of good games to go around for everybody.

Tacoboto36d ago

This is a Playstation article about Playstation games and your comment is about Xbox. Can't you just celebrate what PS has without dragging this into console war BS?

ChasterMies36d ago

I don’t think Microsoft is releasing games exclusively on Xbox anymore. They have some timed exclusives that release on Xbox first.

36d ago
36d ago
+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 35d ago
Abear2136d ago (Edited 36d ago )

Returnal, Astro Bot, and Ratchet made having it since day one worth it.

GT7 free updates and Spiderman 2 and others at 60fps have made this last year more than okay.

But yeah, it’s been dry lately. BG3 and third party have made great filler, but we ready for that SOCOM or Killzone announcement and some more 1st party goodness. Crossing fingers for Ghost of Tsushima 2 announcement this summer.

Didn’t know Helldivers was exclusive! Wtf is going on at Xbox that they can’t get these games, series s strikes again.

SonyStyled36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

Sony owns the Helldivers IP. The first was a PS3/Vita/PC game. It was never an Xbox game that they could ‘get’ a decade ago. I’m not sure what the upset is with Xbox here

CS735d ago

Lol, how do you ignore Rebirth one of the best games ever made?

anast36d ago

Looks like they are on par with the previous gens. Solid games all around. Interestingly enough, we can't say they released a bad game yet this gen. Unlike the Quiet Man dustup.

36d ago Replies(2)
36d ago
DefenderOfDoom236d ago

I actually do not mind if Marathon releases on multiple platforms . I just wish that Marathon has a dedicated single player campaign.

DaniMacYo36d ago

Helldivers 2 is exactly what gaming needed. I’m loving it.

Show all comments (35)
140°

The 7 Best Souls-Like Games - Mastering the Challenge

The Souls-like genre remains popular, along with FromSoftware's classics there are many contenders. But which are the best Souls-like games?

toxic-inferno49d ago

Hmm... In my opinion, the 7 best are the 6 made by FromSoftware (DeS, DS1, DS2, DS3, BB and ER), then Lies of P. But each to their own.

kevco3349d ago

Still DS1? You don't feel it's been surpassed yet?

Demon's Souls has the remake of course, but DS1 has surely been outdated?

Smellsforfree49d ago

I think that the DS1 remake is better looking than DS2. The interior lighting matched with the low resolution textures in DS2 is very garish, IMO.

Besides graphics, what do you mean by DS1 being "outdated"? I'm someone who played through Elden Ring and just recently played through the DS series, and as far as gameplay went, there were all very similar.

Cacabunga49d ago

I haven’t played many but Bloodborne and NIOH1 are on top of my list.. had a blast with these 2

toxic-inferno49d ago

For world design and interconnectedness (that's a word, right?) DS1 is yet to be beaten.

anast17d ago

All great games beside DS2.

toxic-inferno17d ago

I would agree, but there are some things in DS2 that are great and incredibly memorable. It tries to do things differently, and there are some amazingly cinematic moments.

Of course, there's also poor level design (particularly the interconnectivity of the world), questionable combat choices and some of the worst boss runs since the early days of video games...

anast17d ago

True. I can't disagree the game has some moments.

290°

9 Years Later, Does Bloodborne Deserve All The Praise It Gets?

Saad from eXputer: "Almost a decade later, it's time to take the nostalgia goggles off and accept that Bloodborne has long been surpassed by its successors."

jznrpg51d ago (Edited 51d ago )

Yes, yes it does. It’s still a great game. Elden Ring isn’t better just different and a bit easier . I like that you have to be aggressive but smart in Bloodborne

thorstein51d ago

I literally replayed it recently and it's better than I remember. I think it's like going back to a beloved book and noticing things I hadn't before.

raWfodog51d ago (Edited 51d ago )

Yo! I was getting ready to reply with the exact same four words you started with lol. Yes, I think Bloodborne has withstood the test of time and remains a great game. That’s why all the fans are hoping for a sequel someday. Hoping that we can catch that magic again with a new storyline.

Leeroyw51d ago

Yes. Just replayed it a few days ago. My first Platinum. And yes. I rage quitted so many times and called it BS too when I started. It's tight. The combat is amazing and the lore is rich.

GamingSinceForever50d ago

Elden Ring was easier? I don’t know about that at all. I remember leveling up in Bloodborne and breezing through it. In Elden Ring no matter how powerful I got I was still catching a beat down from every boss.

thorstein50d ago

That's due to scaling enemies. I remember not doing Haligtree untill near the end and having enemies withstand almost a full blast from Azur's Glintstone Staff Comet Azure. My level was quite high.

Melee characters are not fun in that game, especially for the Elden Beast.

MeteorPanda51d ago

Considering l did a run 2 months ago? Yes.

Show all comments (54)