This is How Developers Should Be Making DLC

With all of the focus on DLC and expanding content Standalone DLC seems to be the path to a real benefit for all parties involved.

[ScottyHoss]

Yes, best DLC I've had the pleasure of buying in a long time, probably since Festival of Blood. It's everything Second Son should have been, with more end game content in 15 dollars than 70 and improved upon the original gameplay instead of being sub par like most DLC packs.

[avengers1978]

I gotta say first light is well worth the purchase, and it's a stand alone DLC. I mean it's better to have played all the infamous games, but if you haven't you can still enjoy First Light

[greenlantern2814]

Loved it easily worth the 15$, I hope they go on to do the other conduits as well.

[mixolydian_id]

I still feel like DLC is completely nickel 'n' diming the industry.

If it's ready at launch... ship it from launch.

It falsely adds value.

The fact that most games need a "day one patch" insights that they could easily disperse the content upon release.

[3-4-5]

A good idea will always get watered down by the lowest of low people and used specifically and only to make money and nothing else.

Some people have integrity......some don't

[Rebel_Scum]

Have to say I enjoyed Far Cry Blood Dragon more than Far Cry 3. The narrower scope was much more enjoyable.

[Roccetarius]

Actual expansions / DLC used to be expanding the game, not at the beginning or the middle, but at the end of the game. Shivering Isles is one example.