270°

HD Upgrades. Are We Being Mugs?

In a period when 1080p/60fps is bounded about like a badge of honour, it’s easy to blind and daze us to true artistry in favour of some numbers and marketing blurb that most of really don’t care about, we’re being told to care about - Writes UglyGeezer

Read Full Story >>
frugalgaming.co.uk
PridedLlama3567d ago

I can proudly say I have yet to buy a HD update/remake/directors edition yet.

Apart from the Gamecube remaster of Resident Evil 1.......

Like the geezer says a few have been done really well, and there are some true classics that would be great to see revitalised. I'd much rather see proper oldies reworked rather than anything that came out on the last gen.

It clearly is a cash grab when it comes to certain games and anyone thinking anything else is naive to the extreme

PridedLlama3567d ago

and its just been announced that Resident Evil 1 is being remade for EVERYTHING!!!!!! yay I now love HD upgrades!

This bloke doesn't have a clue

Mikelarry3567d ago

lol that was a quick switch.

i am not a big fan of hd remakes but understand why they exist. the only remake i ever purchased was tomb raider and that was because i never purchased it on ps3. so as long as people keep buying them they will keep pumping these out same as everything.

LordMaim3567d ago

I think I just got whiplash.

Like I said in the other thread about the remake, Resident Evil would benefit from a full fledged reboot. Go back to base principles and start again with modern design philosophy and old school tension. The original control scheme is dated, and the new games are... lacking.

saber000053567d ago

For other games, yes, but for this game... The Last of Us came out extremely late. It only makes sense that they would update it to PS4. However, most remake games, I feel are kind of a cash and grab. I thought Tomb Raider was one of those games since all it really just needed to be done, was imported over to the new game systems. Visually, I almost see no difference. Just seems silly re-releasing a game twice on PC.. O_o

ChuckTheIceMan3567d ago

I won't buy any remake/remaster unless they are completely rebooted new games. These studios are taking resources away from new games to retouch an old game and making a crap-load of money off you people who buy them.

mixolydian_id3567d ago (Edited 3567d ago )

Yep... were mugs.

Less of this next-gen-port business....

Give us, re-recorded/developed audio. New game engines... new textures... new features and the lot, re-developed cut scense.

Some of these companies are taking everyone for a ride.

They claim they want to 'protect' the original game, during a next-gen transition.

I call it belony... they just can't be bothered to put any work in!

Rebuild from the ground up please

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3567d ago
Clown_Syndr0me3567d ago (Edited 3567d ago )

Yeah we are mugs. But its optional we don't have to buy them.
Im getting a little fed up with all the HD remake announcements, my thirst for new games isn't being quenched enough. I don't mind if its PS1 games, as its skipped two generations and many people wouldn't have played them.
Most of my favourite franchises seem to have just died out, and there really isn't that much variety in the new ones. That being said Im not complaining, I still have plenty to play and still enjoy gaming.

Spotie3567d ago

I've gotten two so far. ICO/SotC and ZoE. I might get TLOU, since I never finished it on PS3.

Frankly, I don't have a problem with the HD ports of games produced at the tail end of the generation. Granted, the prices need to be right, but especially when it comes to this new generation, where there could be people new to a brand, the exclusive port/remake makes sense.

Hellsvacancy3567d ago

Okami and the Hitman Trilogy is all i've bought, I never played Okami when it was released on the PS2 so that was a no-brainer

Hitman is my favourite series ever (except that abomination that is Absolution) and I would buy this Resident Evil remaster only if it comes with Res2

It's too early for me to play The Last Of Us again, i'll give it a year or two then get the PS4 version

jimjam34423567d ago

if my ps4 breaks before i play a single good game on it ima be pissed.

UglyGeezer3567d ago

People can't really be blamed for buying into them.

In the case of TLoU, I just wish and really feel it should be cheaper.

Irony is that we get this posted up for a RE1 HD update of an update gets announced. I'm hearing it's another shoddy one as well, ugly backgrounds and looks rushed.

GenericNameHere3567d ago (Edited 3567d ago )

If you have a Gamestop near you, you could have traded in your physical copy of the PS3 version, and gotten $25 off last week. Too late now though. If you wish it to be cheaper, wait a few months. Not everyone has to buy the game at launch and at full price.

@the writer
Mind actually showing us the problems, instead of whining like the wannabe "journalist" you are? There are problems with TLOUR. Texture work on some objects are still bad, there are still pop-ups, and things appear, disappear, and re-appear depending on how far or close you are. MAYBE, just maybe, you should do some research, look up user problems of the games, verify whether they are actually common and horrible bugs/texture work that affects the game. THEN present them to us, and compare them to previous set of HD Remasters (keyword here: REMASTERS).

ALL I read in your horrible article is you whining and moaning about something that you have no evidence of. You're just jumping on the bandwagon. Why don't you be an actual journalist for once, present some real facts (i just mentioned a few problems to help you get started), and come back with professional integrity instead of joining the "Uhh, yeah I heard about this. Let me hate on it too!" Bandwagon.

#truthfacts
If this sounds too harsh, too bad. You've put your opinion on the Internet, you've provided ZERO evidence to support your opinion, and you're getting called out for it.

Just noticed you are the writer. Still, my point stands. There ARE problems with TLOUR, and that's a fact. But you have to present the evidence to us and make a claim on why it's such a bad thing.

UglyGeezer3567d ago

I was trying to get a discussion going. My piece is an opinion piece, not a scientific paper.

You say there are problems, I'm saying there are problems/ There's my evidence.

I'm saying demand better treatment classic games, they deserve better treatment.

I won't add CAPS to emphasise my point, that would just look silly.

funkybudda3567d ago

When Tomb Raider Definitive edition was released at $60 earlier this year, TLOU at $50 is VERY reasonable, especially when it's pretty much the best console game of last year, and possibly last gen. People are just complaining for the sake of complaining. Not to mention when you can trade in the PS3 version for the PS4 version for $25, at Gamestop in the USA, it's GREAT deal.

jimjam34423567d ago

for me tlou r is a no brainer, had a 360 all last gen so getting a game i never played with all dlc included is a great deal, but when i see comparison videos it looks like they barely touched the game, plus i have a 720 p tv, so im wondering if ill even see any improvements what-so-ever.

LordMaim3567d ago

When Deus Ex Human Revolution was released for the Wii U two years after it was released for PS3/Xbox 360, no one batted an eye that it cost $50. It also included DLC, but offered *no* improvements in graphics or performance. Gameplay was identical, but it offered some second screen functionality that was unique.

Two years between releases instead of one, less difference between versions, same price, but no internet furor. The key difference seems to be that Deus Ex was multiplatform and The Last of Us isn't.

Show all comments (49)
160°

The Last of Us Part 1 – Why The Ending is Still so Impactful

The Last of Us never dreams of insulting its audience’s intelligence. And the best example of this is, of course, is its ending.

Read Full Story >>
goombastomp.com
shinoff2183511d ago

Shit the beginning was to. I'm not sure how I would feel if I didn't have kids but having them it broke my heart to see.

ClayRules2012511d ago

Yes. The beginning and ending…how they break you, make you think , question things etc. so impactful.

And yeah, I have a son (he’ll be going to college here next year) and just feeling Joel’s pain, heartbreak, loss…it hits you differently when you have a kid (s) of your own.

PhillyDillyDee511d ago

I didnt have kids when i played it and the beginning had me sobbing. That story left an impact on me

Orchard511d ago

The story was a rollercoaster from start to finish. Probably my 1st or 2nd most favorite game on PS3 (the other being MGS4).

Aloymetal511d ago

I agree with you. MGS4 was truly special, I wasn't the biggest fan of the long cutscenes but I understand is part of Kojima. Great game nonetheless.

Snookies12511d ago

Best Metal Gear game, coming from a HUGE fan of the series. I bought a PS3 JUST for MGS4. And got the collector's edition too. Worth every bit of money.

Yes, the cutscenes can be very lengthy. But a lot of it was quite necessary to really tie things together. Previous games had some longer cutscenes as well. It's just that they were trying to wrap everything up with MGS4. So, it's understandable that they'd have to throw some info dumps into the game here and there.

Orchard511d ago

The cutscenes are long indeed, every Kojima game sets a new record there :P

But the game was awesome, the second they showed that first E3 demo, it was clear it was going to be something special.

I still remember being mind blown by the Octocamo. It was also the first third person shooter game where I felt like the controls and aiming etc all went smooth / fluid and weren't janky. Hard to explain in words, but it felt 'natural' to aim, move etc in it.

gangsta_red511d ago

I thought the game went on a little too long and it started to wear thin. It should have stopped at Winter. That would have been a great way to end that game with the sequel continuing from there (if necessary).

-Foxtrot511d ago

I loved it however the ambiguous ending was kind of ruined in the sequel

The first game had this conflicting grey area of Joel's actions, a decision to let you think it over and discuss it with people, however the sequel created a narrative that "OMG JOEL 100% DOOMED HUMANITY...HOW SELFISH" and making out Ellie wanted to die in the hospital even though 1) She didn't know she was going to die and 2) She was ready to see Joel once she got out of surgery so he could teach her how to play Guitar.

For me he did the right thing, I mean they pretty much attacked him when he was trying to save Ellie, they lied to him and said they were going to kill her without thinking any other decision out or asking Ellie herself and they pretty much were going to throw him out onto the street without any of his weapons/gear where he could have probably died. There was no guarantee a cure could be made with these guys, it was all "chance".

Crows90511d ago

Exactly. He made the first good decision and this time around the girl he took care of didn't die while escaping...which alluded to the beginning of the game. He was prepared this time.

-Foxtrot511d ago

Like I just don't know why the Fireflies (and now Jerry in Part II) didn't think about any other tests, it was literally "Yeah this bitch has gotta die". You're telling me they couldn't wait for more blood tests, think of new ways to approach it? The worlds been gone for decades, it's not going to collapse even more by waiting, the damage is done.

If they woke Ellie up and asked her but Joel also told her what they did and were going to do to him I don't think she'd really want to sacrifice her life for these guys compared how she suddenly reacts in the sequel.

Even the hospital setting in the original game was run down, dirty and literally the best they could do, that alone didn't inspire confidence they had the tools to distribute a cure let along make one. I know the sequel and remake kind of retcon it where it looked cleaner, brighter and newer but again I'm going off the original, the first time I played it. The Fireflies at the end of the day were not good people, they were still terrorists with their own ambitious goals in mind, I don't think they would have been fair handing out the cure if they did get it made

TricksterArrow511d ago (Edited 511d ago )

It's a work of fiction, and more than once Bruce and Neil stated that the cure was a given, it was a sure thing and they regret not making it more clearly. If the cure wasn't a thing, the ending wouldn't ne nearly as impactful as is.

Crows90511d ago

@trickster
Except tlou2 states that it isnt a given. The ending is still impactful.

Inverno511d ago

Think the reason why she was going to die was because the guy was a vet, not a doctor

-Foxtrot511d ago

Yet suddenly was the only person who could create a cure

"We deffo need to kill her"

"Wait...WHY"

"Trust me....I'm a vet"

TricksterArrow511d ago (Edited 511d ago )

Jerry was a doctor. A lead doctor. His bio makes it clear that he attended Northern Utah Medical University. He just happened to like animals. I wonder if people really pay attention to the games they play anymore (if they played, it’s a toss with TLOU2’s critics)…

Imalwaysright511d ago

TricksterArrow

You should play the PS3 version. Once you do, you'll realize that the ending was retconned because Jerry wasn't the surgeon that was going to kill Ellie.

TricksterArrow511d ago

I played all versions. He was not a vet in any of them.

Imalwaysright510d ago

He was not in the original version of the game but the "Jerry" that Joel killed in the original clearly wasn't someone that acted professionaly or inspired confidence because he was willing to work in a dirty operating room and was wearing boots.

TricksterArrow510d ago (Edited 510d ago )

Jerry was a minor unnamed role that got expanded on the sequel and also got recast, not unlike any TV series and games before this one (such as Resident Evil, in which Claire, Leon, Carlos and Chris all look considerably different from one iteration to the other). Also, still not a vet. And also unsure what argument you are trying to make by “dirty room” and “wearing boots”. He is still a doctor that has the ability to develop a cure, it doesn’t matter what he is wearing or what tools are at his disposal, the story is what it is.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 510d ago
ChubbyBlade511d ago

That’s why I didn’t like part 2. It removed all the nuance

Inverno511d ago

I think when you realize he's a vet, Joel's decision feels a bit more justified for those who played both games. Just playing, since you're in Joel's shoes, you don't really question it. Then playing the second there's a justification that doesn't take away from Joel's decision but for the player should reinforce your understanding of it.

You said it in the second comment. "The Fireflies at the end of the day were not good people, they were still terrorists with their own ambitious goals in mind." That's why they just went along with killing her cause they didn't want to figure out some other way.

shinoff2183510d ago

Foxtrot

I think they just tried to show you how Joel's decision affected more then just Joel and ellie . Just showing different angles and a bigger picture. I think Joel did the right thing.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 510d ago
dmonee511d ago

The story had me emotionally engaged. Gaming for 40 years it was the first time a game story messed with my emotions in the way movies do. As far as the game and gameplay? Not so much lol. It wasn’t bad in my opinion but the game itself was ok. It was the storyline that kept me going in TLOU 1 and TLOU 2.

ClayRules2012511d ago

“As far as the game and gameplay? Not so much lol. It wasn’t bad in my opinion but the game itself was ok.“

What exactly did the game do that qualifies it for just being ok? And same question for the gameplay?

dmonee511d ago

That’s a tough question because I could ramble on and on as to why. I’m speaking for myself because I usually pass on survival horror type games. So instead of getting into a debate as to why I found the gameplay to be ok. I originally commented on how the narrative had me emotionally sucked in. Especially the opening segment. So much that I purchased a game I would never have purchased if not for the story. It’s more kudos to the developer for getting people like me out of my comfort zone to play a game I wouldn’t usually play.

ClayRules2012511d ago

I know some people were upset with Joel lying to Ellie (friends of mine) that they felt it should’ve given the player an option to have Joel either

A. Lie to Ellie or B. Tell Ellie the truth. Type of situation, which just makes no sense. The game nor its story doesn’t given the player any control to have/make any choices that change the direction or outcome of ANY of these characters in this unforgiving and dark world.

I don’t blame Joel for doing what he did.

1. Ellie became the “Something” that he needed to keep fighting for, beyond just living day to day, simply being survivors.

2. Marlene gave orders to that no -name guard to kill Joel if he tried anything…you just done pissed him off all the more with those words. I wonder, if Joel had been killed and Marlene ever came across Tommy again (Joel’s brother) would she have the guts to tell him “Listen Tommy, we need to talk! About Joel…I couldn’t waste this gift. Tommy “What the hell you talking about, Marlene??” Marlene “I had Joel killed, if he” Tommy “YOU SON OF A BITCH!” Got carried away there lol. You get the idea tho. To my point, it wasn’t guaranteed that Ellie was the cure, and after all Joel did, went through, not even allowing Joel to see Ellie, just talk with her, that’s messed up.

3. Of course looking at the actions Joel took in the hospital and how that has major consequences in Part 2 for him, Ellie etc. it’s not like there wouldn’t have been a big threat later on at some point. This world is wicked, dark, unforgiving and everyone’s growing up, has their own WANTS. NEEDS. DESIRES. Solely for themselves, loved ones, or group. All while trying to survive.

Joel I think knew when he said “I Swear” that he’d done something much worse than when he actually saved Ellie from that operating room and possibly causing death to humanity (as if it would be appreciated anyways.

Yes, he lied to the one person who gave him purpose to live, purpose to have hope, purpose to be that father again (which he of course wasn’t looking for, but it just naturally happened upon him) like he was to his daughter Sarah all those years ago. And to him, maybe in that moment, lying would be worth the little bit of time, the years they’d have together creating memories, seeing Ellie grow up before his eyes etc. rather than lie to her and see a reaction in words and deeds in which she might’ve ran off losing all hope and trust in him etc. I mean, she did lose trust in him all those years later etc. but as we saw, she was willing to work with him, try to repair what Joel broke, and he knew it wouldn’t be easy, as did she. But with time she understood I think why he did what he did.

It’s just sad in the end, his lie, the time they lost with his betrayal, and than horrific death, caused Ellie to go seek revenge in a way in which Ellie changed, she kept chipping off more of herself along the journey, scary and sad thing to see, and exhausting. But powerful storytelling throughout it all.

Show all comments (36)
40°

Top 10 PlayStation Plus Premium Horror Games

We love to scare ourselves silly within the horror genre of video games. Thankfully, there are many to find on PlayStation Plus Premium, such as the intense Resident Evil VII: Biohazard and cult favorite Little Nightmares.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
40°

PlayStation Store July Sale Is Live With More Than 500 Games Discounted

PlayStation Store is offering a new sale this week with more than 500 games discounted including some DLCs. See the complete list here.

Read Full Story >>
novicegamerguides.com