300°

The Last of Us Remastered Reviews: 60fps Is Massive Improvement, PS4 Port Not Necessary

While The Last of Us Remastered is generally lauded for it's masterful storytelling and near perfection of a genre, there are a few noteworthy points common in each opinion.

Read Full Story >>
twinfinite.net
Insomnia_843574d ago (Edited 3574d ago )

With 50% of PS4 owners coming from Xbox 360 how is the Remastered of one of the best games last gen not necessary? And with $30 worth of DLC that I didn't play on PS3, it is very worth getting on top of the technical improvements it has for $50.

idlet3574d ago

It's definitely a valuable pick up for a lot of people. I think the common consensus was that there isn't a lot of distance between the original and remaster. So while people didn't feel it was a crucial release, it's still worthy and very well put together.

Maddens Raiders3574d ago

TLOU is hype I can believe in. I can hardly wait til tomorrow to play through it all again.

truefan13574d ago (Edited 3574d ago )

Man you guys kill me with that 50% did not own a ps3 crap, sony is just spewing numbers to justify remasters and ports. Only 7 million out of 83 million bought the tlou on ps3, which is only 8%. Now all of a sudden a greater % of people are supposed to buy it for ps4? That doesn't make any sense to me. The main people that buy tlour will be from that 7 million that bought it for ps3, not from the made up 50% that didn't own a ps3.

The reason tlour is coming out now is because they wanted to maximize ps3 sales before offering a double dipping opportunity with ps4.

Allsystemgamer3574d ago

Sony is making up numbers you say?

LordMaim3574d ago

Maybe you're just spewing numbers to drag down one of the best games ever made because it's only available on a system you don't like.

dedicatedtogamers3574d ago

Considering all of the remasters already out as well as the ones on the way, what exactly is wrong with a remaster? The PS4 version is objectively superior to the PS3 version in every technical aspect by a fairly wide margin, the 60 FPS only being one part of the picture.

Nothing wrong with wanting to maximize sales of the game and maximize potential sales of the eventual Last of Us 2, which will be coming out on PS4 some time down the road.

I swear, some people get so angry about what other people decide to buy. When it comes to something as silly as this, why get mad?

805Junior8053574d ago

Your very biased towards anything Sony does. I see in the near future, you being in every Master Chief articles, and boasting that it's the greatest thing ever created. Many PS4 owners came from the 360. I highly doubt that they will be willing to spend 250$ to buy a ps3 to play this game, so it gives those select few the opportunity to play this amazing game.

Pogmathoin3574d ago

For once I agree with you dedicated..... Looking forward to picking up GTA5 again, and Halo collection.....nothing wrong with having great games look even better....

ger23963574d ago

Dude, just quit already. I know it hurts.Those numbers will also be from Xbox owners who are making the jump to ps4. Yes the game is that good.

stuna13574d ago

Then die already! That'll just mean 1 less person person telling me why I shouldn't buy a PS4 version of a game I didn't experience on the PS3.

Your words are falling on deaf ears for those just like me who will buy it on their PS4.

Delive3574d ago

@dedicatedtogamers.
This is not a jab. You asked what is wrong with remasters. IMHO, I believe they are being used to supplement a lack of new, top tier titles for the ps4. Yes, they are great games, mostly, but i believe that since most of the big named games were pushed to late 2014 and beyond, the library needed something to keep gamers happy. In comes remasters and indie titles. Games that can be ported quickly while gamers are waiting for the next big Sony games, announced and unannounced. I buy remasters some of the time, but i chose to pass on TLOU. Great game, but i didn't play online much and the story was just as good on ps3. Nothing against those who get it though.

marioJP873574d ago (Edited 3574d ago )

100% agreed. It's just PS4 Sony fanboys talking out the arse with excuses for this resolution/fps "remaster".

Chevalier3574d ago

Sure Sony are terrible for remastering last years best game.

Tomb Raider
Metro Redux
Halo Collection - guess MS are just as bad?!
GTA V

Other games being released for the millionth time.

Minecraft
Walking Dead season 1

Also on the way.

Wolf Among Us
Walking Dead season 2

Sharky2313574d ago

So did every xbox owner buy halo? No... So you post is pointless!

reko3574d ago

truedesperateidiotfanboyleech

link or stfu

Clarence3574d ago

Yeah just like M$ is doing with the Halo remastered

CuddlyREDRUM3574d ago

You speak the truth, which is why they hate you.

PeaSFor3573d ago

dat truefan salty tears, anyway, Twinfinite is just a bunch of dumbass anyway, 99% of their articles are retarded and wack.

Themba763573d ago

man your delusional im one of the main ones who didn't own a ps3 (I didn't own a ps2 for that matter) all xbox here. I got sick of microsoft and decided to try to change things up and give sony a go so far im extremly impressed so no it's not made up.

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 3573d ago
CuddlyREDRUM3574d ago

You are using Sony's PR numbers.

You think early adopters are half of which never owned a PS3? If Microsoft said half the owners of Xbox One never owned a 360, would you believe it? That is something Yoshida put out right before Last Of Us was announced for PS4.

Come on, it is a cash grab.

Bennibop3574d ago

It's necessary for those who didn't own a ps3 last gen, same goes for those that did not own an xbox and any of the Halo series with regards halo collection

JoGam3574d ago

It was necessary to me and I had it on PS3. It was a game I was playing a lot before the PS4 dropped. But since having the PS4 I no longer played it. I'M BACK BABY. Multiplayer HERE I COME.

Bennibop3574d ago

I finished it on PS3 and have it on order for PS4, going to try Platinum this time around. I was not saying that it was not necessary if you have already bought it!

LordMaim3574d ago

So how can the port be unnecessary if 60FPS is a "massive improvement"?

MysticStrummer3574d ago

It's unnecessary for guys like truefan up there who won't be getting a PS4 anyway.

Edvin19843574d ago

I am not sure why a port wasn't necessary? I mean it could have not been done on PS3. Also, if you don't care for a upgraded port DO NOT BUY IT. I beat Tomb Raider and The Last of Us on last gen systems, but I bought both on next gen as I replay those games and now they look and play better.

If you don't like it don't buy it simple as that. I do not care for sports games, but I do think they should make them as there is a group that enjoys those games.

LamerTamer3574d ago (Edited 3574d ago )

Movies remastered on Blu-ray aren't "necessary" either if they were once on VHS tape as well then, right?

Show all comments (33)
160°

The Last of Us Part 1 – Why The Ending is Still so Impactful

The Last of Us never dreams of insulting its audience’s intelligence. And the best example of this is, of course, is its ending.

Read Full Story >>
goombastomp.com
shinoff2183511d ago

Shit the beginning was to. I'm not sure how I would feel if I didn't have kids but having them it broke my heart to see.

ClayRules2012511d ago

Yes. The beginning and ending…how they break you, make you think , question things etc. so impactful.

And yeah, I have a son (he’ll be going to college here next year) and just feeling Joel’s pain, heartbreak, loss…it hits you differently when you have a kid (s) of your own.

PhillyDillyDee511d ago

I didnt have kids when i played it and the beginning had me sobbing. That story left an impact on me

Orchard511d ago

The story was a rollercoaster from start to finish. Probably my 1st or 2nd most favorite game on PS3 (the other being MGS4).

Aloymetal511d ago

I agree with you. MGS4 was truly special, I wasn't the biggest fan of the long cutscenes but I understand is part of Kojima. Great game nonetheless.

Snookies12511d ago

Best Metal Gear game, coming from a HUGE fan of the series. I bought a PS3 JUST for MGS4. And got the collector's edition too. Worth every bit of money.

Yes, the cutscenes can be very lengthy. But a lot of it was quite necessary to really tie things together. Previous games had some longer cutscenes as well. It's just that they were trying to wrap everything up with MGS4. So, it's understandable that they'd have to throw some info dumps into the game here and there.

Orchard511d ago

The cutscenes are long indeed, every Kojima game sets a new record there :P

But the game was awesome, the second they showed that first E3 demo, it was clear it was going to be something special.

I still remember being mind blown by the Octocamo. It was also the first third person shooter game where I felt like the controls and aiming etc all went smooth / fluid and weren't janky. Hard to explain in words, but it felt 'natural' to aim, move etc in it.

gangsta_red511d ago

I thought the game went on a little too long and it started to wear thin. It should have stopped at Winter. That would have been a great way to end that game with the sequel continuing from there (if necessary).

-Foxtrot511d ago

I loved it however the ambiguous ending was kind of ruined in the sequel

The first game had this conflicting grey area of Joel's actions, a decision to let you think it over and discuss it with people, however the sequel created a narrative that "OMG JOEL 100% DOOMED HUMANITY...HOW SELFISH" and making out Ellie wanted to die in the hospital even though 1) She didn't know she was going to die and 2) She was ready to see Joel once she got out of surgery so he could teach her how to play Guitar.

For me he did the right thing, I mean they pretty much attacked him when he was trying to save Ellie, they lied to him and said they were going to kill her without thinking any other decision out or asking Ellie herself and they pretty much were going to throw him out onto the street without any of his weapons/gear where he could have probably died. There was no guarantee a cure could be made with these guys, it was all "chance".

Crows90511d ago

Exactly. He made the first good decision and this time around the girl he took care of didn't die while escaping...which alluded to the beginning of the game. He was prepared this time.

-Foxtrot511d ago

Like I just don't know why the Fireflies (and now Jerry in Part II) didn't think about any other tests, it was literally "Yeah this bitch has gotta die". You're telling me they couldn't wait for more blood tests, think of new ways to approach it? The worlds been gone for decades, it's not going to collapse even more by waiting, the damage is done.

If they woke Ellie up and asked her but Joel also told her what they did and were going to do to him I don't think she'd really want to sacrifice her life for these guys compared how she suddenly reacts in the sequel.

Even the hospital setting in the original game was run down, dirty and literally the best they could do, that alone didn't inspire confidence they had the tools to distribute a cure let along make one. I know the sequel and remake kind of retcon it where it looked cleaner, brighter and newer but again I'm going off the original, the first time I played it. The Fireflies at the end of the day were not good people, they were still terrorists with their own ambitious goals in mind, I don't think they would have been fair handing out the cure if they did get it made

TricksterArrow511d ago (Edited 511d ago )

It's a work of fiction, and more than once Bruce and Neil stated that the cure was a given, it was a sure thing and they regret not making it more clearly. If the cure wasn't a thing, the ending wouldn't ne nearly as impactful as is.

Crows90511d ago

@trickster
Except tlou2 states that it isnt a given. The ending is still impactful.

Inverno511d ago

Think the reason why she was going to die was because the guy was a vet, not a doctor

-Foxtrot511d ago

Yet suddenly was the only person who could create a cure

"We deffo need to kill her"

"Wait...WHY"

"Trust me....I'm a vet"

TricksterArrow510d ago (Edited 510d ago )

Jerry was a doctor. A lead doctor. His bio makes it clear that he attended Northern Utah Medical University. He just happened to like animals. I wonder if people really pay attention to the games they play anymore (if they played, it’s a toss with TLOU2’s critics)…

Imalwaysright510d ago

TricksterArrow

You should play the PS3 version. Once you do, you'll realize that the ending was retconned because Jerry wasn't the surgeon that was going to kill Ellie.

TricksterArrow510d ago

I played all versions. He was not a vet in any of them.

Imalwaysright510d ago

He was not in the original version of the game but the "Jerry" that Joel killed in the original clearly wasn't someone that acted professionaly or inspired confidence because he was willing to work in a dirty operating room and was wearing boots.

TricksterArrow510d ago (Edited 510d ago )

Jerry was a minor unnamed role that got expanded on the sequel and also got recast, not unlike any TV series and games before this one (such as Resident Evil, in which Claire, Leon, Carlos and Chris all look considerably different from one iteration to the other). Also, still not a vet. And also unsure what argument you are trying to make by “dirty room” and “wearing boots”. He is still a doctor that has the ability to develop a cure, it doesn’t matter what he is wearing or what tools are at his disposal, the story is what it is.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 510d ago
ChubbyBlade511d ago

That’s why I didn’t like part 2. It removed all the nuance

Inverno511d ago

I think when you realize he's a vet, Joel's decision feels a bit more justified for those who played both games. Just playing, since you're in Joel's shoes, you don't really question it. Then playing the second there's a justification that doesn't take away from Joel's decision but for the player should reinforce your understanding of it.

You said it in the second comment. "The Fireflies at the end of the day were not good people, they were still terrorists with their own ambitious goals in mind." That's why they just went along with killing her cause they didn't want to figure out some other way.

shinoff2183510d ago

Foxtrot

I think they just tried to show you how Joel's decision affected more then just Joel and ellie . Just showing different angles and a bigger picture. I think Joel did the right thing.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 510d ago
dmonee511d ago

The story had me emotionally engaged. Gaming for 40 years it was the first time a game story messed with my emotions in the way movies do. As far as the game and gameplay? Not so much lol. It wasn’t bad in my opinion but the game itself was ok. It was the storyline that kept me going in TLOU 1 and TLOU 2.

ClayRules2012511d ago

“As far as the game and gameplay? Not so much lol. It wasn’t bad in my opinion but the game itself was ok.“

What exactly did the game do that qualifies it for just being ok? And same question for the gameplay?

dmonee511d ago

That’s a tough question because I could ramble on and on as to why. I’m speaking for myself because I usually pass on survival horror type games. So instead of getting into a debate as to why I found the gameplay to be ok. I originally commented on how the narrative had me emotionally sucked in. Especially the opening segment. So much that I purchased a game I would never have purchased if not for the story. It’s more kudos to the developer for getting people like me out of my comfort zone to play a game I wouldn’t usually play.

ClayRules2012511d ago

I know some people were upset with Joel lying to Ellie (friends of mine) that they felt it should’ve given the player an option to have Joel either

A. Lie to Ellie or B. Tell Ellie the truth. Type of situation, which just makes no sense. The game nor its story doesn’t given the player any control to have/make any choices that change the direction or outcome of ANY of these characters in this unforgiving and dark world.

I don’t blame Joel for doing what he did.

1. Ellie became the “Something” that he needed to keep fighting for, beyond just living day to day, simply being survivors.

2. Marlene gave orders to that no -name guard to kill Joel if he tried anything…you just done pissed him off all the more with those words. I wonder, if Joel had been killed and Marlene ever came across Tommy again (Joel’s brother) would she have the guts to tell him “Listen Tommy, we need to talk! About Joel…I couldn’t waste this gift. Tommy “What the hell you talking about, Marlene??” Marlene “I had Joel killed, if he” Tommy “YOU SON OF A BITCH!” Got carried away there lol. You get the idea tho. To my point, it wasn’t guaranteed that Ellie was the cure, and after all Joel did, went through, not even allowing Joel to see Ellie, just talk with her, that’s messed up.

3. Of course looking at the actions Joel took in the hospital and how that has major consequences in Part 2 for him, Ellie etc. it’s not like there wouldn’t have been a big threat later on at some point. This world is wicked, dark, unforgiving and everyone’s growing up, has their own WANTS. NEEDS. DESIRES. Solely for themselves, loved ones, or group. All while trying to survive.

Joel I think knew when he said “I Swear” that he’d done something much worse than when he actually saved Ellie from that operating room and possibly causing death to humanity (as if it would be appreciated anyways.

Yes, he lied to the one person who gave him purpose to live, purpose to have hope, purpose to be that father again (which he of course wasn’t looking for, but it just naturally happened upon him) like he was to his daughter Sarah all those years ago. And to him, maybe in that moment, lying would be worth the little bit of time, the years they’d have together creating memories, seeing Ellie grow up before his eyes etc. rather than lie to her and see a reaction in words and deeds in which she might’ve ran off losing all hope and trust in him etc. I mean, she did lose trust in him all those years later etc. but as we saw, she was willing to work with him, try to repair what Joel broke, and he knew it wouldn’t be easy, as did she. But with time she understood I think why he did what he did.

It’s just sad in the end, his lie, the time they lost with his betrayal, and than horrific death, caused Ellie to go seek revenge in a way in which Ellie changed, she kept chipping off more of herself along the journey, scary and sad thing to see, and exhausting. But powerful storytelling throughout it all.

Show all comments (36)
40°

Top 10 PlayStation Plus Premium Horror Games

We love to scare ourselves silly within the horror genre of video games. Thankfully, there are many to find on PlayStation Plus Premium, such as the intense Resident Evil VII: Biohazard and cult favorite Little Nightmares.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
40°

PlayStation Store July Sale Is Live With More Than 500 Games Discounted

PlayStation Store is offering a new sale this week with more than 500 games discounted including some DLCs. See the complete list here.

Read Full Story >>
novicegamerguides.com