190°

'Alone in the Dark' Wii Loses Fancy Tech And Open World, Adds Motion Controls - Is That Enough?

MTV Multiplayer writes: "Publishers have largely moved away from adapted versions of their high-tech games for Wii, but they still happen, such as this month's "Alone in the Dark."

"Alone in the Dark" doesn't feel much like a game designed for Wii. That's probably because it isn't.

But for Wii-exclusive owners in search of survival horror before Tecmo delivers "Fatal Frame," "Alone in the Dark" is their best bet. In that respect, how does it hold up?

It's hit or miss. Much of the visual fidelity and large set pieces that made "Alone in the Dark" impressive enough to keep my eyes shut during a spoiler aren't found in the Wii version. These environmental edits mean there are actual story differences between the Wii version and the one arriving on Xbox 360, PC and PS3. New levels were constructed to follow the basic story of 'Alone in the Dark.'"

Read Full Story >>
multiplayerblog.mtv.com
MK_Red5811d ago

They should have cancelled the toned down PS2 and Wii versions and instead focused on 360 and PS3 version's driving mechanics and other flaws.
Seriously, the last thing Wii needs is a watered down version of 360 game. They should either make games from ground up for Wii or forget about it.

ChickeyCantor5811d ago (Edited 5811d ago )

The tech is far better with the other two so i really dont see how they didnt focus on the 360 title.

Even if they made it from ground up, due dead line it might have even looked worse( both gameplay and gfx wise)
building everything from ground up requires more TIME.
And in bizz TIME= MONEY= deadline changes= MORE MONEY.

they would focuss less on the 360 title etc etc.

Also story is almost the same...so....i really dont think it would have made difference. Although they could have made a different Alone in the dark just for the Wii...they could have hired a different team or something.

BrotherNick5811d ago

They shouldn't have wasted the time to make a wii version if it's going to be crappy, it's already hard for people to justify buying hardcore wii games based on sales. I would've put money in a diff IP.

Panthers5811d ago

It doesnt matter if it is crappy though. That doesnt affect sales for Wii games. They figured they'd make a quick buck on the Wii version I guess.

BeNice5811d ago (Edited 5811d ago )

@MK there really isn't a wii verison there are just two ps2 versions one with motion controls and the other without. The screens for the wii. one look and you know it isn't even doing the wii justice.

I would much rather the wii not have this game.

Also tecmo isn't technically delivering fatal frame , its nintendo, I believe the director is the only thing from nintendo. also if the rumors are true nintendo bought the fatal frame ip altogether.

EDIT: i saw the diasgree and just to clarify i meant the wii version is a direct port of the ps2 version.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5811d ago
user8586215811d ago

well wat did wii gamers expect HD graphics lmao!!!

Xakep5811d ago

No open world? No sale, that was one of the catches that made me want the game anyway. Of course I'm getting it for PS3 but still, that sucks for people who were looking forward to it on the Wii.

Aclay5811d ago

I really think that Nintendo should have tried to at least make the Wii an HD console with more advanced hardware because if they did, these type of things wouldn't be happening. The majority of the Wii's games really don't require advanced hardware and processing, but for the hardcore games coming out for the Wii like Alone in the Dark, there's nothing much that a game developer can do to improve the visual experience.

jtucker785810d ago

I wish that was the case too mate.

Just imagine how great a Wii would have been if it had decent hardware?
Not only would we have had Mario Galaxy and Zelda, but we'd have had Call of Duty 4 and Grand Theft Auto 4 too.

Still, there's nothing we can do about it now.
On a positive note we've had Mario and Zelda this generation already and with no decent Nintendo Franchises on the horizon now is a good time to sell it and upgrade.

gk075811d ago

waseem335 your gay hd grfx when i got my wii lol i wasnt getting it for hd dumbass got a ps3 and pc i just built for that and the bomb ass wiimote son and these systems keep talking hd when there barely running in hd any way

Snukadaman5811d ago

I think your smoking too much of what is on your avatar kid....lay off and maybe some of those brain cells will grow back. your incoherent as a mother F*cker.

user8586215811d ago

lay off the poor guy he finks hes gangster cuz he got a pc wiv crappy games and a dildo wii stick dat aint got crap this year. So u fink u still fly lil man lmao!!!

Show all comments (18)
140°

Alone in the Dark Developer Has Been Hit With Layoffs

Alone in the Dark developer Pieces Interactive has been hit with layoffs a month after its release, as per the latest information.

Read Full Story >>
nintendopal.com
coolbeans8d ago

That genuinely, genuinely sucks. The reboot has clear flaws, but it really felt like a solid first step for this team to receive *greater* investment.

XiNatsuDragnel8d ago

Alone in the dark is a fun game so that's unfortunate

CrimsonWing697d ago

Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t that the norm after a project is done?

Terry_B7d ago

That's standard. Teams are together for a Project, after its done some..and sometimes most devs are fired until the next Project is in the works and people are needed again. Only the core members stay in the time between the hot phase of the game development.

CrimsonWing697d ago

What’s annoying is people don’t understand how contractors work, either. All of this is uninformed knee-jerk reactions without any understanding of how employment works in this industry. There are key developers and staff that stay with a studio/publisher, but often times it’s a hire per project and then seeking new employment for a project. That’s how it’s always been…

coolbeans7d ago

That's a fair point too. I would say that in light of its tepid critical/commercial response and ongoing mass layoffs across the industry I think it's understandable for fans to worry about the longer-term implications. We'll see how it plays out in the future.

60°
6.5

Alone in the Dark (XS) Review | VGChartz

VGChartz's Lee Mehr: "In one sense, it feels strange to even think Pieces Interactive had big shoes to fill with this series' legacy. Given what's come before, did it really? And yet, even when considering the last two flops over a two-decade span, there's still something about Alone in the Dark emblazoned on a title screen that carries a sense of revered history. In that respect, perhaps this reboot's best accomplishment is in honoring that spirit through its inventive world. It's also fair to emphasize knocks against its survival-horror design, some puzzle-solving, and so on; it certainly won't be considered a trendsetter like the 1992 classic. Still, the amount of goodwill wedded to its brighter qualities makes for something that dawdles the line between unfortunately-flawed and impressively-enticing."

Read Full Story >>
vgchartz.com
50°

Alone in the Dark review [SideQuesting]

The new Alone in the Dark remake doesn't do anything especially noteworthy, but that doesn't mean it's bad. It's just... cromulent.

Read Full Story >>
sidequesting.com