130°

The Price of Exclusivity

Sony has been a powerhouse in the video game industry for years. Initially entering the market with the PlayStation and then following it up with the immensely popular Playstation 2. (I love you PS2). What Sony had to offer on these consoles was a variety of exclusive experiences that you could not find anywhere else. Many series that started on the original PlayStation were continued on the PlayStation 2. 3rd Party developers took advantage of the PS architecture and now we have the highest selling console of all time. How did Sony convince these companies to support its platforms? A large user base, amazing technology, and the freedom to bring your masterpiece to the masses.

Of course you all know that competition causes companies to make the necessary moves to be competitive.

Read Full Story >>
playstationlifestyle.net
HighDefinition5828d ago (Edited 5828d ago )

They have So many 1st party studio it`s insane.....
And lot`s of those titles are approaching late 2008 early 2009.

Like...

-GOW3
-White Knight
-Team Ico`s new game
-Killzone2
-LBP
-Suckerpunch (infamous)
-Zipper (socom)
-just to name a few

3rd Party exclusives
-FF13
-FF13V
-MGS4
-R2

which are ALL basically 1st partys, Sony like keep "close ties" with TALENTED devs.

w/ "real" 1st party studios, They have so many it`s crazy and RIGHT NOW their ALL hard @ work on NEW games for the PS3.

As people start seeing more stuff like/better than Killzone2 looks, they`ll "JUMP IN" to the PS3. The PS3 is beginning to show it has more room to be technically more impressive, thru Bluray/Cell/HDD.

The 360 had the numbers at first, so they got the 3rd partys. But 2008 has been alot different and 2009 looks to be better than 2008 for PS.

The media is changing their minds about the PS3, so will devs.

Violater5828d ago

The low scores for PS3 exclusives says otherwise I am afraid.
Sony needs to not only pay for exclusives but reviews as well because the sad truth is both seem to be common practice in the industry.

HighDefinition5828d ago

Sony had a rough start. I think their plans were shifted into "high gear" since 360 launch so early. But the truth is now...they don`t have to rush and some seriously quality seems to be on the horizon.

W/ that said....I love

-Uncharted
-Warhawk
-Heavenly Sword
-RFOM
-RC:FTOD

and most of the games in their first year, to me as a gamer that has bought almost EVERY CONSOLE at launch. It wasn`t bad, personally I felt it was better than 360s first year. All I play was GRAW and Dead Rising.

juuken5828d ago

You're absolutely right. While Sony still has some more work to do, they're heading in the right direction.

theKiller5828d ago

like IGN etc so that they give them their fair scores of exclusive games! just 1 to 3 big sites, it wont cost them a lot, and what they will gain is much more! unfortunately Reviews have changed. ID-tagged journalists carry ID-tagged websites, use ID-tagged review scores. Illogical opinions inside their minds enhance and regulate their actions.

so sony needs to do what MS did and make their own ID-tagged websites!

Sev5828d ago

That is hilarious.. bubble + for you. ID tagged...lol

theKiller5828d ago

thanks, bubble to u too, keep up the news and inside info of sony and ps3!

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5828d ago
Ezcobar4115828d ago

They aren't getting the respect from reviewers that they deserve. Uncharted was simply amazing. I'm playing it right now actually. I love Ratchet and Clank. I still haven't perfected Warhawk. But things are definitely looking up for Sony. MGS will be the exclusive that gets everything going imo.

fork_the_wii60fanboy5828d ago (Edited 5828d ago )

HAHAH they need to buy exlusive just like they stole FFVI for the ps1 by paying Square Enix

wer as microsft seem to be much less in pressure. They are better company and never pay for exclusivity unlike sony. this is what i here from my friends

pwnsause5828d ago (Edited 5828d ago )

??? square enix left nintendo cause of the size of the N64 cartrige look how big FFVII was,

"microsft seem to be much less in pressure. They are better company and never pay for exclusivity unlike sony who do"

HAHAHHAAHAHHHHAAHA thats very funny go------------>that way

did you just create an account yesterday to troll, ahahahahhahahhahahha
seriously we have enough of those people here, go jump to some other site

Sev5828d ago

He has to be being sarcastic...

Doesnt 50 million for GTA DLC ring a bell?

lodossrage5828d ago

Square wanted their games on discs rather than cartridges so they CHOSE to move the series to the ps1 at the time.

LastDance5827d ago

dude if i had the power to take all your bubbles away i definatly would.....

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5827d ago
lodossrage5828d ago

The business didn't get dirty until MS entered it. There was never an issue of "buying" exclusives or content until they came around and started doing that.

In my opinion, that very practice will ruin the game industry.

Here is a good example. Let us use Final fantasy and metal gear. Let's say for example sony is giving them both money for their games to be exclusive on their system. In this example, Sony is giving konami an extra 50 million while they are giving Squareenix and extra 25 million.

Now here is the problem. Who is to stop iwata (squareenix president) from saying "No, you gave konami more than us even though we have the better product. So either you give us more, or we go to another console.

So now, Sony has to up the bid and give Square more money. But wait, now Konami sees that Square is getting paid more. So now, Konami turns around and says "Wait, we have just as many system sellers as they do. We have metal gear, zoe, and suikoden. Give us more money or we walk".

Anyone see the violent cycle that's happening in that example?

THIS is why I say what MS is doing with this "buying rights and exclusives" is a very bad thing

LastDance5827d ago

I completely agree with your statements at the start....microsoft smirk in the face of virtue whilst picking its pocket.

Kyur4ThePain5827d ago

If I could, i would give you 5 bubbles for that statement because it's so true, it's scary.

N2NOther5827d ago

The only problem with your theory is that if they say something like "You gave them more, give us more or we walk" puts them in a terrible position because then the competition doesn't have to give them nearly as much or anything because they burned a bridge. So they either work with the competitor for less, nothing, or the amount they balked at. Or they can go back with their tale between their legs and say "we're sorry" and then either take the offer they didn't want, or have to suck it up for less.

See, companies want to make money. Weird, I know, but telling someone that you want more money or you'll go to their rival is just about one of the poorest business moves you can do.

lodossrage5827d ago (Edited 5827d ago )

That is true.

When the other company says "give us more or we walk", it MIGHT put them in a bad position.

But in that particular matter, it comes down to how much weight a title carries. Final fantasy carries weight because it's considered a system seller. Same for Metal Gear.

So when they say that, it can also be seen as "if they go to the other company, we will lose out on so much more.

So overall, it becomes a "double edged sword".

But no matter which way it goes, it will bring about the downfall of the gaming industry one day.

To be honest, they are at each other's mercy. Hardware becomes just a piece of junk without software to play in it. And software is useless without hardware to play it on. But that's all the more reason why MS's ways of "buying exclusives and rights" is bad.

I honestly fear for the gaming industry because even though what you said is true, don't think for a second that greed, and even more so, ego's won't get in the way

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5827d ago
Kaz Hirai5828d ago

The PerfectionStation 3 and the 2 GODS of the industry- King Kaz and Emperor Kutaragi! Nazisoft's WORST NIGHTMARE!

12 days until Judgment Day, Nazisoft!

MWAH-HA-HA-HA!!!

Sir_Ken_Kutaragi5827d ago

We had fun King Kaz and i!!!;)
I couldn't have said it better!;)
PS3+KAZ+ME!!!;)
Poor Micro$oft have got er erm...GOD KNOWS!!! ;-D

In that photo i have just said to King Kaz;) - "Micro$oft are f**ked!!!" ;-D ;-D ;-D

Sir_Ken_Kutaragi5827d ago (Edited 5827d ago )

Very Handsome those two men in that photo!;-D
(Above sorry i wasn't replying to you, i must of done something wrong, i'm sure i didn't hit Reply just then) ;)

Sir_Ken_Kutaragi5827d ago

Your photo is cool;)
Yeah shame SONY hasn't got unlimited money.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5827d ago
Show all comments (38)
290°

Why Xbox believes it must cut costs and close studios

Companies, particularly public companies like Microsoft, need to grow.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
gold_drake1d 23h ago

i mean its pretty simple, they spent close to 30 billion in acquiring activision, they thought they'd make it bk no problem, and that didnt happen.

its just shit that because of MS's miscalculation alot of people lost their jobs.

Jingsing1d 19h ago

This is exactly what many people said would happen including the CMA and FTC. Lies lies and more lies and they allowed a $69 billion buy out to happen.

gold_drake1d 19h ago

oh yeh it was 70 billion. that was my bad haha even worse.

JackBNimble22h ago

MS has educated financial advisers, they knew there was little chance to recoup the 70billion just to break even on the Activision deal let alone whatever other nonsense is going on in MS.
This whole thing was to corner the market for leverage.

thesoftware7301d 19h ago (Edited 1d 19h ago )

gold,

You can't be serious, right?

Do you think that MS thought they would make 80bill in a year & Half? They haven't even released titles under MS yet, lol.

But in fact, that A/B revenue is already paying off, look at the last earnings call. That $80 billion is long-term money, my guy, no sane person/company would think they would make that back in any short-term situation, it's a long-term investment.

Let's play silly then. If MS's reason for laying off staff and closing studios was due(which it really was not) to the A/B deal, tell me what Sony's reason was for past studio closures, the recent 900-person layoffs, closing Sony London, shutting down Dreams, and closing Japan Studio? Zipper? Psygnosis? cuts at all their internal studios.

Keep in mind, you are claiming MS's reason is because of the A/B deal; please explain Sony's reason.

Hofstaderman1d 19h ago

You actually still defending them? Sheesh.....

gold_drake1d 19h ago

this is not a sony vs MS debate. dont make it something it isnt.

and of course not, but im pretty sure they thought they'd make more money after the deal. they didnt, and closed off some studios.

its pretty insane to think there is any other reason for the closure of studios in this case.

romulus231d 19h ago (Edited 1d 19h ago )

(It really was) due to the Activision Blizzard deal and the loss of physical sales due to gamepass. You keep bringing up Sony in all your posts about this, stop deflecting and trying to change the topic, this is about MS and what they are doing.

BehindTheRows1d 18h ago

Has nothing to do with Sony. Stay on topic.

notachance1d 18h ago

once in a while you see someone too invested in their make-believe console war that everything happened has to be connected to said war…

a bit of banter between fans is normal, this crusade you’re doing now isn’t.

Chevalier1d 18h ago

Wow idiotic. You bring up very old closures not that there haven't been recent ones from Playstations, but, seriously stop deflecting. This has NOTHING to do with Playstation.

Does Playstation got $3 trillion behind them and daddies wallet? No they don't so stop making a fool of yourself.

Xbox has never been profitable really and they just keep losing money so between their worst hardware sales, terrible 3rd party sales and now terrible 1st party sales.

Gamepass numbers that are no longer being announced shows their numbers after 3 years of missed targets has flatlined. Plus their recent gains up to 34 million were ONLY because they folded Gold members in too. Absolutely take your idiotic rhetoric out of here. Keep on topic without deflecting.

S2Killinit1d 18h ago

Ayayayay with these xbox/MS excuses.

Reaper22_1d 13h ago

How dare you mention Sony! Everyone here knows when Sony closes a studio and lay off workers it was the right thing to do. Even when they bought Gaikai and fired almost everyone it was the right thing to do.

Gamers can be such hypocrites sometimes.

andy851d 12h ago

Is it? That's revenue not profit. Completely different.

fr0sty1d 2h ago

The earnings call only showcased how dire the situation is... Even with ABK and Bethesda, they still couldn't make enough to keep investors happy, gamepass subs are stagnant, and hardware sales are tanking.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 1d 2h ago
thesoftware7301d 16h ago (Edited 1d 16h ago )

Drake,

"this is not a sony vs MS debate. dont make it something it isnt."

You are correct that it's not an MS Vs Sony Topic, but when exaggeration and imagination mix from a one-sided social group, similar examples are needed to ground radical thoughts; in this instance, the example was that shutting down 3,4,5, even 6 studios during a restructure/ buyout/acquisition is not some anomaly(it can suck) that has to be dissected or spell doom and gloom.

"But I'm pretty sure they thought they'd make more money after the deal. They didn't, and they closed off some studios."

But they did make more money, a lot, actually; the last earnings call showed a huge growth in profit, almost all due to A/B revenue.

"its pretty insane to think there is any other reason for the closure of studios in this case."

The fact that they did make money, kinda throws this out the window, and besides, you don't wake up and say, hey let's close a studio, you look at the output, you look at the dev as a whole, the long term and short term, you weigh it against all other studios and goals, you keep key members, ect..then you close if they are the weakest links...which by MS analysis they were.

Again, I will make a small Sony comparison, just so some of you can understand and see past the bias; Insomniac, ND, and Bungie have made some of the best games ever created, yet Sony saw fit to cut jobs in every of these studios, even tho Insomniac & ND are the biggest producers of PS games, leagues ahead better than Tango and Arkane, yet, they saw cuts, mind you, while being the TOP produces of PS first party. They were told to cut costs, and more jobs may be on the line, and Bungie is being threatened by a hostile Sony takeover. Put that in perspective, as I know that layoffs and dev closures are different, but if the best of the best is getting cut off, it is less than surprising, that lesser studios are closing.

@Cheva,
My response fits well with your comments as well. You even went on to prove that the dev closures are not just due to A/B acquisition. Then you point out Sony has less money than MS, inferring that MS should keep devs open that they see as lesser earners, while Sony having less money makes it okay to close them. lol...it doesn't work that way.

gold_drake1d 16h ago

im not reading all of that. u have ur opinion, i have mine.

thats rly it.

but this aint sony vs ms.

ApocalypseShadow1d 16h ago

You're trying to compare a 100 billion company to a company that has 3 TRILLION worth. SIE has to live or die on their own. And in turn, PlayStation has helped the main company again and again. Sony has to balance out what is working and not working in the company.

While Xbox has Daddy Warbucks footing the bill to keep the platform afloat. They have been bleeding money from Nvidia hardware in the OG Xbox, the RROD fiasco, the attempted 2013 DRM nonsense and the lies about being the most powerful console in the world and the losses of paying out millions to prop up a service hoping it catches on with enough subscribers to justify its existence.

They're not comparable if Xbox isn't allowed to live or die by its actions. It's subsidized. Revenue isn't profit. And if they were profiting on their own, they wouldn't be closing developers. If they were profiting, they wouldn't need Daddy Warbucks spending 80 to 100 billion buying up 3rd party publishers to sustain a loss leading platform.

They stopped announcing game sales, stopped announcing hardware sales, stopped announcing game pass subscribers, they are putting games on their competitors platforms but you're telling us that they are doing great even after killing jobs and closing developers at Xbox.

Stop drinking the Kool aid. You're drunk.

Chevalier1d 6h ago

Again at which point did Playstation have a $3 trillion company shift the market with a giant purchase?

"But they did make more money, a lot, actually; the last earnings call showed a huge growth in profit, almost all due to A/B revenue."

Lol. No they didn't. Increased revenue was ONLY due to adding Activision Blizzard revenue in. Growth was only 1 percent. It's idiots like you that have no idea what they're talking about is why Xbox isn't better than it is. You guys just make excuses continually.

If Xbox got so much profit then why did they stop announcing hardware numbers? Why did they stop announcing Gamepass numbers? Oh right because they're NOT profitable. Their sales in every category has dropped off the face of the planet. It's why Spencer will be closing more studios and canceling upcoming projects too.

The Wood23h ago

How can they be profitable when they're not selling enough hardware, software or subs. You need take a seat on this one my friend unless you can prove you angles

jwillj2k422h ago

Sony didnt shut down the studios you mentioned after they made last of us or ratchet and clank or destiny. Cutting jobs is not equal to closing studios. Sony cuts are a candle in the sun of Microsoft’s closures.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 22h ago
WelkinCole1d 11h ago

I am pretty sure MS knew this would happen and this was part of their plan. I mean if anyone with half a brain can see this happening I am pretty sure a multi billion company like MS knew this would happen

The whole strategy in buying Beth and Acti/Blizzard is for

1. Buy established games they can have under xbox because they have done a horrible job in building their portfolio internally for the past 15 years

2. Following from 1, try and boost xbox competitivenss against a dominat PS which MS after 3 tries still can't crack

3. Follolwing from 2, try and weaken Playstation dominance by taking out these massive multiplats from the PS

4. Following from 3, try and profit off from the PS domiance with selected games they will still have on the PS to make money like COD

5. Obviously get the IP's by buying them instead of creating them which again as I mentioned in number 1 they have been woeful in doing

None of these had anyting to do with keeping all the devs they accuried. MS has always been very shitty to Devs under them. Look at what happned to Bungie for example.

I believe MS in court truely mean it when they said they had to do something because PS was just too dominant. This was their last roll of the dice.

And from the looks of things. It has not panned out as MS had hoped. PS5 is still as dominant as ever and xbox is still behind. Worse still their MP's they got is not irreplaceable as they thought. Starfield? lol!. There have not been any major shift in momentum in this console war in their favor so now its time to start cutting their loses and it starts with the most expensive cost for any company. People.

Michiel19891d 9h ago

for a comparison, sony laid of a bigger % of it's staff this year than ms, it's what companies sadly do nowadays. If you think with GP and Bethesda + acti aquisition they were looking for quick cash, you couldn't be more wrong. It hasn't even been a year, "they thought they'd make it bk no problem, and that didnt happen." shows you have 0 understanding of how a business operates.

thesoftware73020h ago

@ Michiel1989

Exactly this!

I'm reading these comments, and it's mesmerizing how off-base most of them are.

I posted a few comments above, and their rebuttals have nothing to do with the points that I presented; when they start doing that, I just ignore them because, at that point, they're debating all over the place.

Profchaos1d 2h ago

30 more like 70 to 80 plus 7 for Bethesda

Tzuno21h ago

meanwhile everything turned woke an inevitably went downward, i'd say it serves them well if they promote such kind of approach, mwuahahahahahhh!

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 20h ago
anast1d 19h ago

They are going to use AI for a large portion of the game development process. Upper management need bonuses and the shareholders need more money. So, people will lose their jobs.

Skuletor1d 19h ago

Maybe they were already using AI to make business decisions, which would explain why they closed Hi-Fi Rush's studio, then said they need more games like Hi-Fi Rush not long after that announcement.

Crows901d 18h ago (Edited 1d 18h ago )

They shouldn't have bought any studios. Some is okay...but they went on a shopping spree...stupid

Einhander19721d 18h ago

The better question is why did Microsoft buy publishers for a service they were subsidizing they knew couldn't support.

And why are so many websites trying to make people feel sorry for Microsoft instead of truly criticizing the fact they are closing studios and killing jobs that would have been fine if Microsoft themselves hadn't gotten involved.

Quit feeling sorry for Microsoft and start feeling sorry for the industry and the all the gamers who are actually losing out.

THIS IS MICROSOFTS FAULT.

RNTody1d 18h ago

The first thing that happens after any major acquisition or merger is a consolidation of the whole new portfolio, which includes cutting any excess, bloat or portfolios that don't fit the larger MO of the big boy. So far, it's been par for the course with Microsoft and that's why gamers have been so against this acquisition. Tango Gameworks is the beginning. You think Microsoft wants to pay to keep small timers like Ninja Theory in business?

There is absolutely zero evidence to suggest that Microsoft will improve any of these studios, but plenty to suggest that they will get rid of what they don't need and hold onto the IP. The real agenda of the acquisition was always to acquire The Elder Scrolls, Diablo, Fallout, Call of Duty, Candy Crush etc. that will create millions in passive revenue stream for Microsoft regardless of where the games release. Microsoft simply wants their cut.

Because of Games Pass Microsoft has no interest in investing in new IP which is risky and requires creative talent they can neither nurture nor manage. Game Pass has also not grown in the way Microsoft expected it to, even post acquisitions. Therefore the logical thing to do, without serious money makers to release, is to cut as much cost as possible.

Show all comments (47)
110°

7 Deserving Games That Never Got Backward Compatibility

Backward compatibility works for many games on newer consoles, but titles such as The Simpsons: Hit and Run have been left out.

90°

20 Best Survival Games of All Time

From base building to swinging willies, here are the best survival games around, which include a couple of less than obvious picks.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Vader822d ago

No 7 days to die is criminal