Watch_Dogs on PS4: Leaked Direct Feed High Quality Screenshots Show that it Looks Nothing Like GTA5

The first footage emerged from the beta of Watch_Dogs caused mixed reactions, mostly because the quality of most of the footage was low. It hasn’t been rare to see people comparing the game to the visuals of Grand Theft Auto V, or even arguing that it looks worse. Things have started to get out of hand when that kind of misconception started to filter over to a few media outlets.

Luckily a reader that opted to remain anonymous took it upon himself to send DualShockers 15 high quality screenshots snapped from the PS4 beta of the game that can help judging how the game really looks.

[GarrusVakarian]

It's a shame they didn't hit 1080p, the image doesn't quite have the clarity that games such as Infamous SS or AC4 have...but nevertheless, it's good looking game considering it's on 6 separate platforms. The world looks very detailed and the night-time looks amazing in the rain. I'm impressed.

I also found this GIF from the PS4 version- http://i.minus.com/iEHzfpcZ...

Pretty impressive explosions if you ask me, although they do look a little like baby powder, lol.

[Abriael]

Yeah people always forget that it's a cross-gen game.

[GarrusVakarian]

Definitely, people get carried away with their expectations of it, whilst forgetting just how much work Ubisoft have had on their hands with this game.

I got caught up in the silly "DOWNGRADE!" accusations, but footage that ive seen after that and footage that ive seen in the past few days of the PS4 version has removed any doubt i had about the visuals of this game.

And besides, i care more for how it plays and how alive the world feels.

Edit: How the hell could anyone say it looks worse than GTA5? The character models, textures, res, framerate, and effects are ALL better. Some people need to go back to last gen and look at how "bad" some games look in comparison to current gen games before saying things like that.

[GribbleGrunger]

I'm taking issue with the both of you! *fake anger*

When judging how well a game plays or looks, it's not a good sign when you have to first offer a reason for it not looking as good as you'd think. 'for a cross platform game' is neither here nor there when you are buying a current gen game.

Those pictures are not inspiring me at all. They look lifeless, insipid and soulless. If a game depends entirely on action to make it look 'alive' then you have a problem because part of the appeal of an open world game is that you can enjoy the feel of the environments regardless of what's going on.

That doesn't look like a world I'd want to visit which is why I'm not buying it. I don't care how much work Ubisoft have put into it. bad is bad and good is good. This (in my opinion) is bad.

[GarrusVakarian]

@Grib

I get what you're saying man, i shouldn't have to say it looks good..."for a cross platform game". But i guess i didn't really have sky-high expectations for the graphics of this game due to playing AC4 on the PS4, so WD looking better than AC4 (imo) has surprised me somewhat.

Here's hoping the next game is current-gen and PC only.

Note: I'm not saying AC4 looks bad, just that you don't expect amazing, next-gen graphics from cross gen titles.

[GribbleGrunger]

We are never likely to ever find out why this game has been downgraded so much from the first reveal and something tells me Ubisoft wouldn't want us to know either. I've never expected a game to equal the reveal trailer, that would be setting yourself up for huge disappointments, but this doesn't even come close to my 'lowered' expectations. I feel that there's politicking going on here rather than any real hardware limitation.

If a patch comes out after the reviews have gone out and improves the PS4 version, Ubisoft will never get my money again. Although I doubt there'll ever be a patch that adds 'life' to this game <- bit mean that. *End of fake anger*

[ProjectVulcan]

It just doesn't have the crispness and clarity of assets or image quality we saw on earlier builds. Nor that of something like Infamous with more resolution and better AA.

It's a decent looking game but you can see the lower resolution and poor quality anti aliasing hammers image quality. It has to be the low quality AA smearing the game.

One glance at the shot by the water shows a bunch of sub pixel aliasing on the bridge hand rails and the antennas of the skyscrapers in the distance. Lots of pixel crawl and shimmering in the background. http://cdn2.dualshockers.co... look at all the edges suffering this, even the phone text boxes are badly aliased.

Every shot is much the same, low quality post process AA blur smeared about ripping fine detail away. The game would look so much better with higher quality filtering. I really hope that it is better for the finished thing.

I think I'll wait for the reviews, and then if it is good go for the PC version.

[GribbleGrunger]

@vulcanproject: Graphics are definitely part of my disappointment but my main complaint is how dead it looks. When it was first shown, it had the lustre of a sultry Caribbean woman's eyes, but now it has the eyes of a corpse.

It's devoid of tender, loving care and instead we have a game that looks 'by the numbers'. A game that needed to be finished and money made.

[thorstein]

People are getting really stupid with this game.

This is a review? Since when. Oh, they got it from a brick and mortar? Did they?

The game ships Monday in the US(because of the upcoming holiday). It will arrive at retailers on Thursday so it can be inventoried and stocked. It will release on Tuesday.

There is no way these guys got a hold of a retail version of the game. Plain and simple. This is such a pathetic "review."

I can't wait for some legit reviews to come in.

[Sharingan_no_Kakashi]

What the heck is up with that belt on the white coat? Is that lazy or am I just trippin...

http://cdn2.dualshockers.co...

[christrules0041]

As much as Infamous Second Son and AC4 Black Flag are fun they aren't really a good comparison for Watch Dogs. In AC4 Black Flag and Infamous Second Son they just have a few different types of AI were as in Watch Dogs as you go around every single AI will have an occupation, how much money they have in there bank and for some a possibility of a crime. The game will have to keep generating different AI compared to just putting random AI doing different low key actions. Plus they got 100 different hacks and over 75 different vehicles. Infamous Second Son it's just Delsin, with a select few vehicles AI are driving around and in AC4 Black Flag it's just one ship the Jackdaw you can have. The events in Infamous and AC4 were very limited as well and became kind of boring after a while.

I'm kinda tired with the whole downgrade conversation. But even look at how Crytek did Ryse. They downgraded the main character splitting his polygons in half and the game ran at 900p yet it's one of the best visual games out there.

Then even say they downgraded the resolution in Watch Dogs for the PS4 giving it a bit more power they may have a possibility of running MSAA X2 instead of running no MSAA. We don't know how long ago they made it 900p either so they could've made tweaks like that we don't know about. We only hear about developers downgrading resolution but we don't hear about what better things they can do with the extra power because they don't detail the anti aliasing, texture quality, ect. It leads up to panic party when people don't understand it's not only resolution that affects the game.

[Neonridr]

720p vs 1080p is one thing, when you are talking about 900p vs 1080p the differences become even that much smaller Lukas.

If you are sitting 10+ feet away from the TV, you definitely aren't going to be able to tell the difference. If you are like most kids my days were when we were gaming at the age of 5 with our faces practically into the TV, then sure, you'll be able to notice.. :P

[GarrusVakarian]

I most definitely *can* tell the difference 10 feet away from my 42 inch TV. BF4 is 900p on PS4 and i can tell the difference in IQ between that and all of my other 1080p games. Pretty easily too.

Granted, it's not as drastic as 720p vs 1080p, but some people can still differentiate between the two. Those WD screenshots have a 'soft' look to them, typical of an upscaled image, combined with a pretty crappy AA solution and the overall image looks nowhere near as clean as Infamous SS (which is by far has the best IQ ive seen on consoles).

Heck, i can even tell the difference between some 1080p games that use different AA solutions. Infamous SS looks sharper and has better clarity than AC4, for example, due to Infamous using a much better AA solution. Some people, like me, are just really sensitive to things like res and framerate. So for people who aren't sensitive to them, it seems like people like me are BS'ing. Lol.

CURSE MY SENSITIVE EYES!

In terms of WD though, im pleased with the visuals from the direct-feed, beta footage that ive seen. As i said, my expectations weren't sky high for it anyway, especially after the whole downgrade controversy.

[Volkama]

@lukas you really need to be looking at 900p bf4 against 1080p bf4. Otherwise there are just too many other factors influencing image quality across different games (in particular different aa and texture filtering methods).

I have bf4 on the xbox, and also on the PC. Both are hooked up to the same 4k TV, and my PC can push whatever resolution I want. I won't say resolution makes no difference, but I will say anti-aliasing implementation has a much bigger impact on the clarity of the image than native res does.

[GarrusVakarian]

@XBisLIKEdeadANDstuff

You think im BS'ing? What possible reason would i have to come onto the internet and lie about being able to spot differences between resolutions? Think about that. If you don't believe me then whatever, but im telling you i can easily tell the difference in image quality, on my TV, between games with different resolutions. Just because YOU can't, it doesn't mean everyone who says they can is BS'ing.

I'm sorry that my Bald Eagle eyesight makes you doubt me, bro.

[SilentNegotiator]

Any PC gamer, including myself, can tell you that there IS a difference between 900p and 1080p.

[lemoncake]

On my newer 55 inch tv I have a hard time sometimes even seperating 720p from 1080p. I can see that there is a difference on my much older 48inch, but I am also much closer to this one, about 7 feet away as its at the bottom of bed. From my experiance in general there is alot more to it than just the native res of the game.

[Dynasty2021]

Sorry, but anyone that says they don't see any lack of AA (aka "jaggies"), at 1080p, is flat out lying.

Only at 1440p and above do you need less AA, and even then you still need it to produce clean, sharp lines.

Infamous SS had a weak-hardware version of AA implemented, and even then there were still jaggies and very very noteable framerate drops.

1080p 100% needs AA, otherwise objects look terrible when in motion. A screenshot does no justice at all.

If 1080p needs it, 900p CERTAINLY needs it.

[Neonridr]

@Lukas - well the fact that you say you can notice it goes against all proven science, but if it makes you feel better then go nuts. Your eyes can only see so much fidelity and at distances of greater than 10+ feet, the pixels become so small that no added pixels give you any added benefit because your eyes can't differentiate the difference at that distance. It's more of a placebo effect. If you wear a Q-ray bracelet and think to yourself that you feel more balanced, guess what, you feel more balanced.

http://www.digitaltrends.co...

here's a simple article on the matter.

While I will give you the softness as opposed to sharp images, if the game is rendered in 900p and 1080p from that distance you are fooling yourself to believe you can actually notice the extra pixels.

[Arkardo]

Nonetheless, harsh times for a *so so* open world game

[Mankey]

Looks Mad Decent.

[Matt666]

who cares about the graphics as long as you enjoy the game, like myself I can not wait to play this

[Aussiebeachbabe]

I shall get my magnifying glass and i'll tell you the difference mat.lol. No seriously after you have been playing a game at lower res for a while your eyes adjust and it no longer becomes a problem. I should know because after playing pc 2k and above then coming back to console you do notice at first but after a while the res doesn't become a problem. Your eyes adjust, believe me. If you don't believe try it yourself.

[LordMaim]

While I am also somewhat concerned about the graphics we're going to get in a week, my theory is that the game still looks like a lot of fun.

Sleeping Dogs wasn't terribly graphically intensive, and yet it was still a ton of fun. One of my favorite open world games of all time Saints Row 2 was painful on the eyes at times, and yet was still more fun than it's better looking sequel.

I'll wait to see how fun it is before being disappointed, but still think that Ubi may have bitten off more than they can chew. Hopefully they sort out their issues for the sequel.

[uth11]

Well the devs DID say everything in the game is hackable.

So, I'll just hack in 1080p/60fps from Aiden's phone :P

[3-4-5]

Hopefully it's a better game that GT5.

GT5 was hugely disappointing. I tricked myself into thinking it was awesome for like 4-5 day and then I realized I was just making fanboy excuses, and it just hit me "This game isn't that good".

I'm hoping Watch Dogs avoids doing that.

[SneakyDoo]

Yeah, I also thought Gran Turismo 5 was hugely disappointing. I hope the driving in Watch Dogs is better than the driving in Gran Turismo 5.

[gameslayer2411]

All of these screens are from the Beta, It says so in the article, I wouldn't knock the visuals just yet.

[BABY-JEDI]

This is definitely not the game that everyone was expecting on the PS4. I wouldn't say this was next gen. More like nice try but not quite there yet gen. Which is not the reason I bought a PS4.
: (
Better off with GTA5

[CoryHG]

This is my thing. It might be a cross-gen game, but if the game isn't vastly superior to the current gen on the next gen systems, then why did I bother purchasing a next gen system? Especially when i could have had it for the current gen?

[Sloth-Eater]

Explosion and the way the car starts folding was pretty sweet.

[F4sterTh4nFTL]

I can see this game being modded to unbelievable visual fidelity on PC. There is a lot of good stuff to work with in the vanilla version.

I can already see us being bombarded with screenshots and videos of Watch Dogs PC Lighting Enhancing Mods for the next few years.

PS4 version looks great aswell.

[LAWSON72]

I doubt it I don't think any AC game or even Far Cry 3 have seen such mods so why would this?

[elhebbo16]

Maybe SweatFX but that is as far as you can go, most top Ubi games dont attract mods unfortunately.

[10V3N0M01]

I don't see why people disagree but I am eagerly waiting for this for PC. The fact that this would be our GTA V for the meantime means it should give it a boost to get some nice mods. (Not that this game is already looking great)

@LAWSON72
If you look hard enough, there will always be useful mods/enhancements, be it visual or gameplay. Far Cry 3 has some decent ones.

[cyhm3112]

you know what, how come no people suggest that while PS4 version looks fantastic, it is just xbox one version looks like gta5?? Because the footage of the final version which looks like gta5 is the xbox one version. How come people still expect xbox one's version will look the same or even close to ps4's version after so many examples of xbox one's version of multiplatform games being significantly inferior?

[Dudebro90]

Significantly inferior? The game has the same textures, but just runs at 792p and not 900p. If that's significantly inferior you must never be able to play console games compared to their PC counter part.

[MasterCornholio]

You said if yourself. The game has lower resolution textures.

Next time dont contradict yourself because it makes your comments difficult to understand.

[Dudebro90]

I didn't contradict myself at all. The assets of the game are identical...but one runs at 792p and the other 900p.

Maybe you don't have any idea what that means?

[maximus1985]

oooooooh BURNED! brah

[Nekroo91]

PC version with HBAO during day time will look unbelievable but the ps4 is missing some lightning effects.

[TrollingKoala]

Honestly i know that factors like frame-rate and resolution are important(resolution not so much compared to frame-rate) but i am more interested in judging the game for how well it ties all of its elements together like hacking and so on and also to see if the story and multiplayer are any good, that is what i will be judging the game on.

[PersonMan]

The lighting looks so flat. I think GTA V has better lighting.

It's not a bad looking game, but it looks kinda boring. It doesn't have an artistic style to it, yet it doesn't reach photo quality... so it's just kinda generic looking.

[yezz]

Exactly. It's not so bad at night but daytime lighting is actually quite poor.

I will still most likely enjoy this game but there are certain things you would expect from massive games like these. Especially when you're buying it for the new consoles...

[user5669510]

most games lighting looks flat compared to gta. rockstar lighting is always better than most so i dont get how that a negative. this game has more to do than others. ill wait and see. but then again i am getting the pc versions so everything will be way better on that version

[FayZ_]

damage control.. 'leaked'

[thehobbyist]

No, "leaked" was CoD Advanced Warfare's first trailer when it was "leaked". Watchdogs has gone gold and people have posted pictures of the retail game online. It's entirely possible an employee of a retailer snuck a copy from their work and leaked these images.
The only true leaks are after a game's gone gold. Which fits the criteria for this situation.

[hello12]

Like i said before resolution only improves the image quality making it sharper and crisper on your TV screen and monitor. Graphics are set once the developer is finished with releasing the game. At 720p the image has just less clarity than a 1080p image, but you get the same graphics on both versions of released game for console.

Just look at the images in this link i provided, it proves what i am saying is true.

http://www.dualshockers.com...

[thehobbyist]

Yeah, but that's not the point. The point is it's sad that consoles still can't perfectly achieve native 1080p 60FPS. That's what everyone is getting upset about. That they paid $400+ for a console and native 1080p 60FPS is still out of their grasp.

[GarrusVakarian]

Some graphical assets do benefit from a higher resolution. For example, an object in the near-distance might look like an un-defined "mess" of pixels at 720p...but will be much more easy to make out at 1080p, thus the graphics of that object will look better...despite the texture of that object not being any different at the two resolutions.

So while you are right in saying that there is more to an image than just clarity, clarity contributes to overall graphics, which is why 1080p is preferable.

[hello12]

I can agree a higher resolution does change the draw distance of an image, but the graphics don't change that much from a 720p image to 1080p image. Resolution is just making the image more clearer and sharper, in the background. You still get the same graphics.

1080p image is better than 720p i can't disagree with that, but you're not getting an inferior game if its only 720p realistically and lot of game devs have already pointed this out (p) is only a number.

Leo@ Graphics is everything you get on screen from the colours, trees, characters and so on. The link i provided shows images from 720p 900p and 1080p look at them closely!

The graphics are the same. You just see a better image quality, that's it, at 1080p.

[LetoAtreides82]

Yes "p" is just a number, a number that represents almost twice as many pixels. And no that's not the same graphics to me. If one version has sharper image detail how is that "same graphics?" Perhaps what you're trying to say is that they have the same texture quality, although that's not always true.

[Gr1mmyshadows]

some people still wont believe

[LetoAtreides82]

Image clarity is one of the components of graphics. If version X of the game has sharper image quality than version Z, you can say that version X has superior graphics.

Also it is possible for a dev to give a weaker console a less detail texture package. Also the weaker version can be given less assets to load, for example less grass etc.

[GarrusVakarian]

"1080p image is better than 720p i can't disagree with that, but you're not getting an inferior game if its only 720p"

I wouldn't say you get an inferior *game* at 720p, not at all, but you definitely get an inferior *image*. Whether or not that takes anything away from the experience is up to the individual, but i think for most people it just comes to down to *preferring* to have the clarity that 1080p offers in comparison to 720p.

[PersonMan]

For me, I remember the game for the story and how fun it was, not how good it looked.

When I think back to the games I've played years ago, textures, frame rates and resolutions aren't what I remember.

Playing a game at 720p vs 1080p doesn't make a difference to me because it's the same damn game. It's not like the extra pixels are going to make the game fun to play or the story good.

Heck, being amazed at the graphics only lasts a little bit for me. When I first popped in Killzone Shadow Fall, I thought it was going to be amazing. The visuals quite stunned me, but after the graphics wore off, all that was left was a very frustrating single player campaign, and I wasn't having fun at all. I had to stop playing.

[Aussiebeachbabe]

But lukas my magnifying glass says different. Just kidding. It's like I said earlier, after playing at a lower res your eyes will adjust and the lower res will not become a problem.

[XiSasukeUchiha]

So ok it's 900p deal with it!

[ExitToExisT]

Sadly it looks nothing like it was shown on ps4 reveal event. Hopefully pc version will look as Ubisoft showed the game to us for the past 2 years.

[Omnisonne]

It looks nice, but i can't really seem to find anything that interests me in this game, no trolling or anything intended.

Cant really explain, but I have mixed feelings about it lol
I might wait a few weeks before trying it out

[maximus1985]

play it early while its still somewhat relevant. If you wait you might not ever play it.....unless you have ps plus and patience

[LetoAtreides82]

Why not use actual gameplay screenshots of GTA5 instead of these bullshots?

[r21]

Looking good IMO. Hopefully its plays well and is fun.

[jlo]

Wow, the console version looks really poor

[yezz]

Hey umm, do you ever speak about anything else than frame rate and resolution? It seems like 95% of your 175 comments are about frame rate, resolution and bashing consoles relating to those things...

If they bother you so much, maybe you should stop playing and commenting anything related to consoles? Although, I'm quite sure that you actually enjoy talking crap about them..

[maximus1985]

thats why he has 1 bubble

[Ninjamonkey82]

I'm just playing the game for what it is when it comes out and letting all this talk do its normal rattling ;). Off course a game that's open world with cars will always draw comparisons with the game that rules them all GTA.

But there's enough stuff in this game to set it apart and that's why I'm wanting to give it a fair go.

I think GTA5 single player is one off the best I've played ever. I'm not expecting Watch dogs to beat it i never was i just want a solid game and ubisoft seem to have delivered on that.

[65Savy]

VIDEO ON THIS ARTICLE

sh.st/etLU7

[gamernova]

Once again, PC is where it's at. Depending on further reviews, maybe I'll get this one.

[theshredded]

wow @ the people comparing this game to GTAV please just grow up already

[maximus1985]

its a valid comparison, they are both open world games and if anything gta is on the previous gen so yeah its a fair comparison to make. sure ones more about hacking but if its an open world game then you better believe were gonna compare it to the GAME OF THE YEAR

[theshredded]

@maximu1985 open world and?same goes to people who compared saints row,L.A Noire and just cause to GTA.Just because it's a 3rd Person open world game that has guns and cars does not make it GTA folks.
oh and btw The Last of Us raped GTAV...

[Revolver_X_]

GTAV GOTY? According to who? VGA's? LMAO

[Patrick_pk44]

The majority of you in the comment section protected the shit out of this game and attacked anyone who went against it. Now the majority of you are disappointed of the downgraded visuals and lack of life in the game. The community never ceases to amaze me. 4chan 2.0.

[maximus1985]

patrick you just took the words from my mouth. i hate getting bashed for my opinion only to be right and to have all the nay sayers instantly convert and pretend they werent on the other side.

[user5669510]

yep they quickly change they tune once things isnt in their favor

[Revolver_X_]

Ppl have bashed WD since the delay. You three amigos didnt convert anyone. It will still sell well, get over it.

[Stapleface]

I like the color scheme they went with. They didn't make the colors too bright. Everything has a more natural tone to it. Which people are not used to, so your going to get complaints of it looking dull, etc. Bricks should not be almost glowing red, they should look like brick. Which has a deep, dull red color, especially after being outside for a while. It shouldn't look like every building was built yesterday. They achieved a worn concrete look to many of them by not over saturating the colors. Looks good to me. Will look even better when people are actually playing on their tvs. We also have to wait for PC screen shots before anyone can call downgrade on Watch Dogs as a whole. It's not a console exclusive.

[Klad]

Are Dualshockers being sarcastic or something? Looks no better than GTA 5

[gameslayer2411]

Just a question, Isn't all of these screens from beta footage? I mean, There is no final build that any one is playing right?

[Izzy408]

Meh... still not convinced. However, the game looks great during night time though.

[jay2]

Hope people like what the mourned HD port of GTA will look like compared to the current one.

gameslayer2411: yes, everything from the PS4 is BETA code, about 5-6GB compressed compared to the retail copy. The PS3 copy is from the disc.

[SneakyDoo]

Eh, the daytime lighting looks pretty bland. In my opinion, GTA V's daytime lighting is significantly better.

I'm not expecting this game to be as good as GTA V; no way, but I hope Ubisoft delivers- after all, they've been babying this game for quite some time.

Honestly, people need to stop ostentatiously giving the graphics crap. They're good enough. The texture resolution in the environment looks fine. All i can complain about is the lighting and lack of vehicle reflection.

[Pintheshadows]

I think it looks good. Much like Ground Zeroes it looks waaaaay better in the rain though. The weather effects are terrific.

[larrysdirtydrawss]

GribbleGrunger + 8h ago

We are never likely to ever find out why this game has been downgraded so much from the first reveal and something tells me Ubisoft wouldn't want us to know either. I've never expected a game to equal the reveal trailer, that would be setting yourself up for huge disappointments, but this doesn't even come close to my 'lowered' expectations. I feel that there's politicking going on here rather than any real hardware limitation.

If a patch comes out after the reviews have gone out and improves the PS4 version, Ubisoft will never get my money again. Although I doubt there'll ever be a patch that adds 'life' to this game <- bit mean that. *End of fake anger*

because the frst reveal was on a high end pc.and they never claimed it was on a ps4/xone dev kit..but seeing it now,to me its not to far off from the initial reveal,i think it looks great

[ThatEnglishDude]

Personally, I think the game looks fantastic! Visually speaking anyway.

[Longshot28]

Day one patch to bump it to 1080p ala ACIV... bank on it.

[mochachino]

The games graphics look amazing to me.

[KakashiHotake]

Even if the graphics are on par with GTA5 that's really nothing to be ashamed of considering GTA5 is the best game graphically of Last gen completely maxed out. Personally in my opinion from what I've seen of the pics and videos there are elements that's on par with GTA5 and other elements that's far superior. At the end of the day it just looks like an all around great game and people really should not be so damn picky. The devs are doing the best they can to give the best experience possible. If you don't like it then just don't buy it and shut up, and let the gamers that appreciate the game for what it is enjoy it.

[Thomaticus]

This is the last watch dogs article I'll look at. I've seen enough, and I've decided to purchase the game.

[DarthSocio]

This is why Rockstar deserves every penny they earn

[Jack_Reacher]

Still dont think it looks head and shoulders above gta at all. Im sure there are reasons. Which I cannot be bothered to go into just to flame an argument. It does not look like its reveal but shock I bet it does on a good pc.

Tho I will say that if games start to look the same cross platform then is it because one version will be getting gimped so as not to promote sales to one platform.

[hobbitooo]

everyone just over reacting... just wait for the game to be release and judge for yourself

[oIITSBIIo]

PC version better be good . this is crap .