240°

New Project CARS Video Shows Why This Is The Best Looking Racer To Date

YouTube’s member ‘Rauf Zero’ has released a new video, showing off the amazing visuals of Slightly Mad Studios upcoming racer, Project CARS. Projet CARS looks beautiful and this video proves that the screenshots that have been released thus far are not bullshots

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
SniperControl3683d ago

Loving this at the moment, what a cracking game.

Tempted to get the Rift for it, would imagine this to be amazing in VR.

ATi_Elite3683d ago

a triple screen, Hydraulic Racing seat, wheel and pedals would be better.

Sure VR is nice but for this MONSTER you want to simulate a real world experience.

VR on a smaller screen will limit your view and PC is great with a wider view along with Peripheral view that 3 screen allows.

Rift will allow for a 360 view but on a smaller screen.

SniperControl3683d ago

I disagree with that, surely the rift screen will always be bigger than any triple screen set up, the rift screens are right next to your eyes, you could probably equate that to a 120" screen.
Plus it will be a fully immersive experience, looking pass the bezels on a triple screen setup will break up the reality.

RedSoakedSponge3683d ago

@ATi_Elite.

"Rift will allow for a 360 view but on a smaller screen"

LMAO ummmm no. the screen will cover your field of view for total immersion. smaller screen? load of bollocks. do your research lol.

3683d ago
randomass1713683d ago

I'm not sure I can agree with that. With VR you have full control of where you're looking in the driver seat. You get a full 360 view, unlike the three screen idea. Both are awesome, but I think the VR will offer a more immersive experience.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3683d ago
fr0sty3683d ago

Still a lot of work to do on the shadows and reflections, very low resolution. There's also a lot of aliasing.

abstractel3683d ago

@SniperControl People like you need to experience VR for themselves before making ignorant statements like that.

This is the biggest hurdle for VR adoption IMO, people who have no idea what the immersion is like and can't experience it by just looking at an internet video.

You have to experience it _yourself_ before you can have a valid opinion.

cfc783683d ago

If it plays as good as it looks should be some serious competition for forza and gt which is a good thing is it not.

Magicite3683d ago

this game might be in its own class.

RumbleFish3683d ago

I am in pCARS since 10/2011 and I can assure that indeed it is in its own class. The physics and the ffb are phenomenal!

randomass1713683d ago

Hear, hear. This game looks astounding.

Tsar4ever013678d ago

This game looks astounding cuz, what their showing us is off the PC BUILD! There's no way the PS4 & XB1's gonna look this CRISP on our HDTV's.

FlameWater3683d ago

So they're going to tease the game from now until November, that's just mean

deafdani3683d ago

They have been teasing this game for ages now. We're practically bombarded on a daily basis on N4G with articles and screenshots and videos, all of them boasting how awesome the graphics in Project Cars look.

I mean, building hype is nice, but I'm feeling a bit burned already. Same goes with Watch_Dogs.

Just release these damn games already and let us play them, dammit! ;_;

MadSientist893683d ago

the rain effects and the car is really the only nice part, rest is meh

hollabox3683d ago

Looked kinda rough to me as well. I've seen much better looking screens shots over the past year. Unless this is the Wii U build I smell bullshots.

cyguration3683d ago

lol... there's no such thing as "bullshots" for Project CARS since the community have provided all the screenshots and videos. Even the video above is from a member of the community.

Different members have different PC setups, so of course some of the screenshots and trailers will look better than others.

Since the game is crowd-funded the gamers who pledged their money are the ones doing the PR and marketing for the game. It's quite brilliant because there's no corporate falsehoods involved.

We're only seeing what REAL, ACTUAL gamers are currently playing from the alpha builds.

steve30x3683d ago

I wish I had your super powers of being able to smell over the internet. Anyway what you see in that video is what you get when playing PCars with everything set to maximum. I know because I am a senior member of WMD with two years and play PCars daily.

Gamingcapacity3683d ago

@ Steve,
Theres a few questions I have for you. Some driving footage I've seen looks slightly better than GT5 graphics with superior AI and other footage (like the one shown) looks far better than any racing game out there. Are some modes we are seeing similar to photo mode on GT and/or replay mode (with improved graphics).

I ask this because GT and Forza both used photo modes shot and replay mode footage to showcase their games.

Still interested in this game though. looking good.

Thank you in advance.

turgore3683d ago

Ya forza 5 looks better. So does driveclub.

Lior3683d ago

''Ya forza 5 looks better. So does driveclub.''

The game is in pre alpha on the PC and won't look nearly as good on consoles, with mods as well this game will be the best looking racing game ever

Sp1tfireXM3683d ago

An almost 11 minute video without one clip of the game in motion. Hardly impressive

aliengmr3683d ago

Actually that isn't true there was motion it just wasn't a lot.

If you want to see the game in motion all you have to do is search Google. There are plenty of videos.

cfc783683d ago (Edited 3683d ago )

This video shows plenty of the game in motion

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

randomass1713683d ago

Zing! Still looks fabulous.

Rivitur3683d ago

Every project cars article you get a comment like this... Its either yeah those screens look good but how does it look in motion or those are just PR vids no way it looks like that but sure enough yes it looks that good.

Show all comments (47)
170°

Why did EA Kill Project CARS?

This video explains why we think Electronic Arts didn't see a future in the sim racing title Project CARS and promptly cancelled the fourth instalment.

Jin_Sakai557d ago

After the last installment I’d say most hardcore fans left. It’s just not that good anymore so I can’t really blame EA this time.

masterfox557d ago

because it was always a project and it never got finished :D

ChubbyBlade555d ago

Every game is a project. Your joke doesn’t make sense

InUrFoxHole554d ago

It makes perfect sense. It's obviously a play on the title. Jesus christ you must be a blast at parties.

ApocalypseShadow556d ago (Edited 556d ago )

Ask Bullfrog or Black Box or Tiburon or Studio 33 or Criterion or any of the previously acquired developers who made racing games as competition, or as developers of EA games, then eventually dissolved into oblivion or reassigned. Just ask them. They'll tell you why.

ApocalypseShadow555d ago

Oh. I forgot. Even Code Masters were absorbed into Criterion. Another racing developer EA took over.

Every racing developer either absorbed by EA or eventually destroyed by them. They either kill competition or have them in the end make Need 4 Speed for them.

MadLad555d ago

EA only cancels projects for one reason.
They didn't see enough money in it.

Kombatologist555d ago (Edited 555d ago )

Not when it's because it didn't meet some crazy margin. It's like if something doesn't make EA a billion dollars on day one (I'm exaggerating that figure of course), they swiftly put it out to pasture.

SurgicalMenace555d ago (Edited 555d ago )

Much like if you're spending money on what's a bad investment for your desired goals, you'd do away with it, if you're wise. We should try to get away from thinking we know more about business than individuals that have been doing it for decades. Perhaps you could benefit from going into business instead of wasting all of your talents in comment sections. It's clear that you're the missing piece that EA's been looking for.

MadLad554d ago

I've made a good amount of money betting on underdog investments over the years.

EA sets unrealistic expectations of their more niche developers, yet continue to fund absolute blunders like DICE and the Battlefield series year after year.

dumahim555d ago

EA butted in and messed with the formula and act shocked when it doesn't work out.

Show all comments (16)
90°

Original Project CARS creator trying to re-hire EA team

Ian Bell, the founder of Slightly Mad Studios, is aiming to hire former Project CARS employees to work on his upcoming GTR Revival project.

Sgt_Slaughter558d ago

If it's just going to be another sim-cade that doesn't do either one correctly then no thanks.

Project CARS 2 was a step in the right direction but the physics still aren't where they should have been, so what did they do for PC3? Go completely arcade. That killed the franchise.

220°

EA dropping Project CARS

From GI.biz: "EA is dropping Project CARS, GamesIndustry.biz can reveal.

The Slightly Mad Studios-developed series was launched in 2015, with EA confirming today that it has made the decision to "stop further development and investment" in the franchise.

The announcement was made internally and it's unclear at this stage to which extent staff could be affected. EA said that employees working on Project CARS will be moved into "suitable" roles "wherever [they] can.""

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
Terry_B560d ago

Typical for EA. They buy studios that created nice games..and are sooner or later destroying them and move the people to work on the old same 5+ EA series.

italiangamer560d ago

They will put the developers on the 1000th Need for Speed for the rest of their entire careers, just like Criterion.

SurgicalMenace560d ago

To be fair, it's not EAs fault it falls directly on the consumer. Everytime these companies choose to drop a series they're met with backlash though the gamers didn't support said series enough to justify its continuation. Attempting to paint every company as evil all because they're in it to succeed is ridiculous. They have to make money just like each of us typing in this section. If a job wasn't supporting you well you'd quit and find a new one, this is the same mentality concerning series.

TheColbertinator560d ago

@SurgicalMenace

No it is their fault. They don't listen to fans and burn the franchise to the ground by introducing elements that nobody wanted instead of increasing support for said respected franchises.

I order a steak, they make a steak. 1st sale
I order a steak again, they vomit on my steak and charge me more for it. No sale.

EA in a nutshell.

Tapani559d ago

@TheColbinator Well how do you think they make the billions then?

Their fans ARE buying their games. You are just not their focus group, and I can guarantee their customer insights team is more thorough and detailed in their reaearch than any N4G commentors’ opinion on the matter. Otherwise EA would not exist as a company, and they’d be bankrupt.

deleted560d ago

The one that still hurts the most though was Criterion w the Burnout series. Acquired Criterion's tech for their own existing IP, then shut em down. It's basically parasitic. I sure do miss Burnout's crash mode!

Hofstaderman560d ago

Sounds eerily similar to another large unnamed corporation hey. I believe some EA bigwigs shifted to that company back in the day, would explain the similarities.

rlow1559d ago

Must be talking about Sony

peppeaccardo560d ago

and instead they come out with that piece of shit of Need for Speed which looks like an Anna & Barbera cartoon. C'mon .... PC2 was my go to game for VR racing and the first one i played for tens of hours. i was so lookiing forward to PC4 after that failure of PC3 ... what a shame EA, they are bombing all the good games and stick to the garbage ones. EA when you think you have reached maximum of disappointment they top it off with style .... screw them!

SurgicalMenace560d ago

Need for Speed continues to sell so why would they get rid of what's producing what they need to maintain stability?

EazyC560d ago

What they did to this series was idiotic. The premise was great -- a sim/simcade game that GENUINELY got developed in line with its community. There is a huge gap in the market for this...I mean, PD hasn't listened to fans at all over the last year with regard to simple Gran Turismo 7 tweaks. Sim racing fans are screaming for a title where they actually give a shit about their users.

Project Cars 2 was genuinely on to something, it just needed some refinement. But instead they followed up by selling off to EA with a braindead GRID clone with Project Cars 3. Again...idiotic.

SurgicalMenace560d ago

Well since you're the authority on properly managing a million dollar company, why don't you just call them to let them know of your divine wisdom?

Hardcore sim racers are the ones who are competing acrossed the globe, no company in their right mind would focus on a forever moving casual market. They have to focus on those dedicated to supporting their efforts. Notice how you're speaking from a perspective of self opposed to the collective. Perhaps they sold out because they, like us, needed the money knowing that they could reinvest it into something new. PC was a decent racer but very few people mainlined it over GT or Forza.

EazyC560d ago

I'm not a divine authority but I notice a pattern where these huge corporations turn completely tone deaf of what the "average fan" wants.

vallencer560d ago

Hate to break it to you but project cars 3 was published by Bandai in 2020. EA didn't buy codemasters, which owned slightly mad studios, until 2021. Either way the sales were super poor for the game and it's not surprising EA would just drop the game. BUT it still sucks because it's one less sim racing game on the market. Especially because the first 2 were really good.

Tzuno560d ago

and focuses more on cartoon network games

Show all comments (19)