1120°

The Last of Us Remastered 720p vs. 1080p, 30 FPS vs. 60 FPS:Shows More Than A Simple Resolution Bump

GearNuke: "The Last of Us Remastered was announced earlier this week for the PS4. Along with this announcement, Naughty Dog were also quick enough to release a short teaser trailer. Unfortunately, this trailer was on YouTube, and hence locked at 30 fps. Naughty Dog have released a brand new 1080p HQ trailer, which also has 60 fps footage of the game."

Read Full Story >>
gearnuke.com
randomass1713666d ago

Well now... that actually is really smooth looking.

Gazondaily3666d ago

Yeah I think it looks nicer. Not a massive jump and not something I would get but still, for die-hard fans and for those who haven't been lucky enough to sample it yet, the PS4 just gives people more options to enjoy this seminal game.

darthv723666d ago

could sony have made this game attainable via an upgrade program like CoD was?

Gazondaily3666d ago

Yeah they could to be fair. I don't think the jump is significant enough to warrant full price though. Its too soon for a HD re-master and the jump in quality in drastic isn't that high.

A COD like upgrade program would be much more suitable yeah.

But people will vote with their wallets as always. If they want it, they want it. What can we do? There's a danger that this might set a precedent though. I dunno...I have mixed feelings about it.

hkgamer3666d ago

Seems like Sony is being super greedy with this one. Maybe TR sold very well on PS4 which kinda pushed for Sony to release this game at full price (even more than TR was). I guess TLOU may sell well because of the gamers who don't own PS3 but own PS4.

scott1823666d ago

Man, I can't wait to see some longer videos of the re mastered version. Love TLoU.

hay3666d ago

In motion the difference will be more significant.

Prime1573666d ago

Eh, it's a Sony first party... honestly, after news of ps4 I'm surprised at the three games that came out on ps3: tlou, beyond, and gt6.

Also, in business it's supply and demand. Demand is there for tlou.

One more point: at least it's nd doing the porting and not a third party like most remakes.

JustPlay43666d ago

At least you get all dlc so that's something, plus upgrade in graphics, to me it seems worth 60, but I don't own the game on ps3 so that's just might just be me

LoveSpuds3666d ago

This is exactly how I feel squire, why people feel the need to complain about this HD remake is beyond me.

If you don't want to play it then don't purchase it, it really is that simple. What harm is there in giving people the chance to replay one of the finest pieces of software ever made?

I completed the game 3 times on PS3 and cannot wait to replay the game in HD, one of my all time faves.

Jack_Of_All_Blades3666d ago

It already looked great on Ps3, but I'm sure this will be the definitive version

kingfetish173666d ago

PS4 version looks more like a painting. Was hoping for a graphical overhaul aiming for photo-realism. Uncharted PS4 will likely aim for that. Was waiting for a PS3 TLOU GOTY Edition, but I'm definitely getting the PS4 Remastered Edition now.

miyamoto3665d ago

It's a PORT
not a remake.

It's a remastered port not a remake.

Why?

The Last of Us being a former "PS3 exclusive" has a different case compared to Tomb Raider.
I would consider TLOU PS4 version as a port not a remake because it was made with the PS4 imminent launch in mind. So Naughty Dog made the game's assets PS4 worthy.

"We always create our assets at a higher resolution than what you see in-game," Christophe Balestra told Eurogamer. "A lot of our pipelines are already ready to move to something superior to the PS3.”
http://www.examiner.com/art...

With regards to a sequel, Druckmann stated that, “It’s just like the DLC, we had the choice to do it or not to do it. Well, let’s figure out if it’s worth doing. Let’s see if we can get passionate about it, so that’s how we would approach The Last of Us 2. We will brainstorm and if there is something we can latch on to then yeah, we can do it,” he said to IGN in a lengthy video podcast.
Read more at http://gamingbolt.com/naugh...

“We had a lot of people on the forums saying ‘can I play this on PlayStation 4?’ We had actually been anticipating that, and started working on it pretty much as soon as we finished the PlayStation 3 [version]," he explained. "We weren’t sure if it was going to go anywhere, but when we saw the fans clamouring for it we doubled-down, and put more effort behind it.
http://ca.ign.com/articles/...
#1.4

AstroCyborg3665d ago

you guys do relize the game at retailers is still $60 new so remastered is a deal alone since you get all dlc which is a $80 value

strifeblade3665d ago

cant tell the difference, what a rip off, even more than tomb raider definitive was. Why is sony asking me to pay 60$ for an old game barely upgraded. What a greedy cash in.

combatcash3665d ago

Not sure why you're getting disagrees about mentioning the $10 upgrade. I played the first version and loved it. However I feel sony is being greedy with this version, I'm sure they have been working on it for quite some time they could have easily made it a $10 upgrade.

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 3665d ago
showtimefolks3666d ago ShowReplies(2)
turgore3666d ago

Maybe too smooth for this type of game.

AstroCyborg3665d ago

the game on ps3 new is $6o without the dlc so how is it to much

Alexious3665d ago

Indeed. Can't wait to play it once again with the DualShock 4 and in glorious FullHD!

3665d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3665d ago
izumo_lee3666d ago

This is Naughty Dog we are talking about. They aren't gonna half ass any project they work on whether it be new IP or a remaster.

randomass1713666d ago

I dare someone to find a BAD Naughty Dog game, original or otherwise. It ain't gonna happen.

I_am_Batman3666d ago

I agree if we're talking post Crash Bandicoot.

Have you played Rings of Power? If there is one bad Naughty Dog game it's probably that but to be fair that was 23 years ago.

IRetrouk3666d ago

I can only comment from crash b onwards as I never played any of their games before that.......... Nope cant think of one.

Yui_Suzumiya3666d ago

Until Uncharted 2 I didn't know Naughty Dog had done anything but Rings of Power and Way of the Warrior. Honestly.

juggulator3666d ago (Edited 3666d ago )

I'm gonna chalk it up as your young but there is one, it's called Way Of The Warrior. This was a fighting game released on the 3DO that tried to compete with Mortal Kombat. It used the same kind if character rendering and had fatalities as well but was widely regarded as just an MK clone. I'm fairly sure it was a bad game since Naughty Dog has not made another fighting game since, thus completely washing their hands of the tile. I never played it because the 3DO was too expensive and too hard to find but remember seeing it in EGM back in the day.

I will add that most of it was likely due to the platform. The 3DO seemed a little ahead of it's time.

Myze3665d ago (Edited 3665d ago )

@juggulator

To be fair to the younger players, I vaguely (at best) remember hearing about Way of the Warrior 20 years ago. Only because, at the time, I was slightly interested in the 3DO. Even if the game was great, a lot of people wouldn't have heard of it, since the 3DO was not a successful console.

Reading about it, it seems one of the main problems with the game was the controls, which is understandable considering how terrible the 3DO controller was (felt like a cheap WalMart knockoff Genesis controller).

Really though, I think the best thing to say is that Naughty Dog has been making truly great games for a long time. 95% of the people working at ND weren't even there then. The two main guys were part of the game (Jason Rubin and Andy Gavin), but I would guess there probably aren't more than 7-8 people still around from that game at ND now.

Way of the Warrior did lead to the contract with Activision (Universal Interactive Studios at the time) for three Crash Bandicoot games, so something really good came out of it.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3665d ago
corvusmd3666d ago

Other than the one screen with the arrows in his bag, it's really not that noticeable. Yeah you can notice, but it's not a HUGE difference.

DarkLordMalik3666d ago

Ummm... it matters a lot especially for 720p vs. 1080p.

The other screen is a "bullshot" and not a ps3 shot, in which the game is rendered at higher than 720p res and then downsampled to 720p/1080p; so it looks super smooth and clean without any jaggies. These are usually called "bullshots" because they are mostly press-material and the end game never looks like it.

As can be seen in the comparison, The Last of Us Remaster actually compares favorably to the "bullshot" and is running in real-time on the PS4.

hollabox3666d ago (Edited 3666d ago )

I was some what disappointed visually with The Last of Us when compared to press AKA Bullshots. It still looked good but had a lot of blurry textures on medium distant objects, seem to lack anistropic filtering in some levels, while using high quality character models to distract from blurry environment textures. Especially in the 2nd level city, followed by the rain level looked pretty bad. But all the forest levels looked phenomenal. Hopefully the PS4 version will be allot more consistent through out the game.

ltachiUchiha3666d ago (Edited 3666d ago )

@hollabox

These are from the ps3 build.
https://scontent-b-sjc.xx.f...
https://scontent-a-sjc.xx.f...
https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.a...
https://scontent-a-sjc.xx.f...
https://fbcdn-photos-g-a.ak...
The ps3 version was gorgeous already. I can only imagine it in 1080p 60fps. Imangine what Uncharted 4 is going to look like on ps4. Going to be crazy.

Gamer6663666d ago

Yes, there is a difference for resolution and when you compare both side-by-side you can really see it. But, during gameplay most people won't pay attention to that.

They will however notice a large difference from frame rate... That was my only beef with TLOU... Now, that changed I am going to play it again!

randomass1713666d ago

The anti-aliasing is a little better an the framerate is indeed smoother. I guess this version is more definitive?

Cueil3665d ago

the higher resolution actually helps this more then the AA

ltachiUchiha3665d ago

It definitely is worth the $60. Your not just getting an average game here, its "The Whole Package & Game Of The Year."

@Ustrifeblade

"Thecant tell the difference, what a rip off, even more than tomb raider definitive was. Why is sony asking me to pay 60$ for an old game barely upgraded. What a greedy cash in."

Yeah because a game that won more Game Of The Year Awards then any other game in HISTORY isn't worth it. /s

FlunkinMonkey3666d ago

Well you can't seem to see anything past the big green X.. You guys are sweating that this re-release is going to be miles better than anything on your console of choice.

Keep those precious tears coming boys.

1080p+60FPS+DLC+IMPROVED TEXTURES = Yup!

Audiggity3666d ago

Are you seriously using this to get a dig on Xbox owners/fans?

[Slaps forehead]

Corvus was simply saying that he didn't think the difference was that massive. He was initiating a flame war.

I own and Xbox One and will likely be getting a PS4 for THIS game. The momentum from your comment has officially been lost.

MasterCornholio3666d ago

"You guys are sweating that this re-release is going to be miles better than anything on your console of choice."

The game won over 240 GOTY awards which means that it will be extremely difficult for any game coming out this year to beat. Its a remaster of a PS3 game but that doesn't stop the game from being an incredible purchase for the PS4.

Can't wait to get my hands on it.

FlunkinMonkey3666d ago

Haha, ignorance is bliss, huh?

You either haven't been around here particularly long, or you are extremely naive and ignorant.

For your information I am putting him into the same bunch as Truefan, Alex etc. who i have seen sweating hard over this and wouldn't even consider about commenting positively on this, regardless of the games state.

I think you should slap yourself again.. harder... with your fist..

Judging by your ratio of disagrees to agrees, i believe it is your comment that has lost momentum.

Whoops.

Ron_Danger3666d ago

Well since the XB1 can of worms has been opened in this comment section, I must say this really puts a lot of pressure on MS to produce 1080p 60fps for the alleged Halo 2 HD project.

StrawberryDiesel4203666d ago

Lol sad but true. And if the Xbone comes out with an amazing game in the future I will pick one up, not everything is about graphics when it comes to gaming and Gears of War on the Xbone might get me to splurge, those games are guaranteed fun in my opinion.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3666d ago
LackTrue4K3666d ago

Well it's obvious you can't tell.....your stuck in the 720p camp.

Salooh3666d ago (Edited 3666d ago )

This is huge compared to other ports. That's CGI quality . What do you people expect from a remastered ps3 game ?. The game already look soo good in ps3.

Wait for Uncharted in ps4 to see new stuff.

psforward3666d ago

@corvusmd

Maybe try reading the article and watching the video...you know instead of just glancing at the photo in the heading?

DigitalRaptor3665d ago (Edited 3665d ago )

You're such a joke.

Stealth trolling, making contradictions in your own comment. Something that's "not that noticeable", is not even close to "not a huge difference". So if it's not a "HUGE" difference, it's a "BIG" difference then. And if you think a "BIG" difference is close to "not that noticeable" then you either need your eyes testing, or you're delusional.

http://i2.wp.com/gearnuke.c...

Go on say it again. "Not really that noticable".

Double the pixel density, higher resolution textures, better anti-aliasing, better lighting, better shadows, smoother frame rate.

Again... you're a massive joke.

Cueil3665d ago

I think they pulled a Legos with this... meaning they are using the cut scene models in game... I wonder if they are going to clean up some of the other texures...

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3665d ago
Braid3666d ago

A dramatic difference or not, if that's going to make an already excellent game better, that's a welcome change for me.

king_george3666d ago

The difference in graphics will be alot more noticable when the game is in motion

hkgamer3666d ago

definitely, the PS3 version had aliasing problems. Not too much to put you off, but would be great to see that problem isn't there anymore.

What I would like to see is the game having real-time cutscenes, would love to see how it can compare to the pre-rendered cutscenes the PS3 has.

StrawberryDiesel4203666d ago

Yes it will be phenomenal and the gameplay compliments it perfectly, can't wait for this. A lot of games coming out over the next few months, looks like no summer drought this year.

Show all comments (121)
160°

The Last of Us Part 1 – Why The Ending is Still so Impactful

The Last of Us never dreams of insulting its audience’s intelligence. And the best example of this is, of course, is its ending.

Read Full Story >>
goombastomp.com
shinoff2183497d ago

Shit the beginning was to. I'm not sure how I would feel if I didn't have kids but having them it broke my heart to see.

ClayRules2012497d ago

Yes. The beginning and ending…how they break you, make you think , question things etc. so impactful.

And yeah, I have a son (he’ll be going to college here next year) and just feeling Joel’s pain, heartbreak, loss…it hits you differently when you have a kid (s) of your own.

PhillyDillyDee497d ago

I didnt have kids when i played it and the beginning had me sobbing. That story left an impact on me

Orchard497d ago

The story was a rollercoaster from start to finish. Probably my 1st or 2nd most favorite game on PS3 (the other being MGS4).

Aloymetal497d ago

I agree with you. MGS4 was truly special, I wasn't the biggest fan of the long cutscenes but I understand is part of Kojima. Great game nonetheless.

Snookies12497d ago

Best Metal Gear game, coming from a HUGE fan of the series. I bought a PS3 JUST for MGS4. And got the collector's edition too. Worth every bit of money.

Yes, the cutscenes can be very lengthy. But a lot of it was quite necessary to really tie things together. Previous games had some longer cutscenes as well. It's just that they were trying to wrap everything up with MGS4. So, it's understandable that they'd have to throw some info dumps into the game here and there.

Orchard497d ago

The cutscenes are long indeed, every Kojima game sets a new record there :P

But the game was awesome, the second they showed that first E3 demo, it was clear it was going to be something special.

I still remember being mind blown by the Octocamo. It was also the first third person shooter game where I felt like the controls and aiming etc all went smooth / fluid and weren't janky. Hard to explain in words, but it felt 'natural' to aim, move etc in it.

gangsta_red497d ago

I thought the game went on a little too long and it started to wear thin. It should have stopped at Winter. That would have been a great way to end that game with the sequel continuing from there (if necessary).

-Foxtrot497d ago

I loved it however the ambiguous ending was kind of ruined in the sequel

The first game had this conflicting grey area of Joel's actions, a decision to let you think it over and discuss it with people, however the sequel created a narrative that "OMG JOEL 100% DOOMED HUMANITY...HOW SELFISH" and making out Ellie wanted to die in the hospital even though 1) She didn't know she was going to die and 2) She was ready to see Joel once she got out of surgery so he could teach her how to play Guitar.

For me he did the right thing, I mean they pretty much attacked him when he was trying to save Ellie, they lied to him and said they were going to kill her without thinking any other decision out or asking Ellie herself and they pretty much were going to throw him out onto the street without any of his weapons/gear where he could have probably died. There was no guarantee a cure could be made with these guys, it was all "chance".

Crows90497d ago

Exactly. He made the first good decision and this time around the girl he took care of didn't die while escaping...which alluded to the beginning of the game. He was prepared this time.

-Foxtrot497d ago

Like I just don't know why the Fireflies (and now Jerry in Part II) didn't think about any other tests, it was literally "Yeah this bitch has gotta die". You're telling me they couldn't wait for more blood tests, think of new ways to approach it? The worlds been gone for decades, it's not going to collapse even more by waiting, the damage is done.

If they woke Ellie up and asked her but Joel also told her what they did and were going to do to him I don't think she'd really want to sacrifice her life for these guys compared how she suddenly reacts in the sequel.

Even the hospital setting in the original game was run down, dirty and literally the best they could do, that alone didn't inspire confidence they had the tools to distribute a cure let along make one. I know the sequel and remake kind of retcon it where it looked cleaner, brighter and newer but again I'm going off the original, the first time I played it. The Fireflies at the end of the day were not good people, they were still terrorists with their own ambitious goals in mind, I don't think they would have been fair handing out the cure if they did get it made

TricksterArrow497d ago (Edited 497d ago )

It's a work of fiction, and more than once Bruce and Neil stated that the cure was a given, it was a sure thing and they regret not making it more clearly. If the cure wasn't a thing, the ending wouldn't ne nearly as impactful as is.

Crows90497d ago

@trickster
Except tlou2 states that it isnt a given. The ending is still impactful.

Inverno497d ago

Think the reason why she was going to die was because the guy was a vet, not a doctor

-Foxtrot497d ago

Yet suddenly was the only person who could create a cure

"We deffo need to kill her"

"Wait...WHY"

"Trust me....I'm a vet"

TricksterArrow497d ago (Edited 497d ago )

Jerry was a doctor. A lead doctor. His bio makes it clear that he attended Northern Utah Medical University. He just happened to like animals. I wonder if people really pay attention to the games they play anymore (if they played, it’s a toss with TLOU2’s critics)…

Imalwaysright497d ago

TricksterArrow

You should play the PS3 version. Once you do, you'll realize that the ending was retconned because Jerry wasn't the surgeon that was going to kill Ellie.

TricksterArrow497d ago

I played all versions. He was not a vet in any of them.

Imalwaysright497d ago

He was not in the original version of the game but the "Jerry" that Joel killed in the original clearly wasn't someone that acted professionaly or inspired confidence because he was willing to work in a dirty operating room and was wearing boots.

TricksterArrow497d ago (Edited 497d ago )

Jerry was a minor unnamed role that got expanded on the sequel and also got recast, not unlike any TV series and games before this one (such as Resident Evil, in which Claire, Leon, Carlos and Chris all look considerably different from one iteration to the other). Also, still not a vet. And also unsure what argument you are trying to make by “dirty room” and “wearing boots”. He is still a doctor that has the ability to develop a cure, it doesn’t matter what he is wearing or what tools are at his disposal, the story is what it is.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 497d ago
ChubbyBlade497d ago

That’s why I didn’t like part 2. It removed all the nuance

Inverno497d ago

I think when you realize he's a vet, Joel's decision feels a bit more justified for those who played both games. Just playing, since you're in Joel's shoes, you don't really question it. Then playing the second there's a justification that doesn't take away from Joel's decision but for the player should reinforce your understanding of it.

You said it in the second comment. "The Fireflies at the end of the day were not good people, they were still terrorists with their own ambitious goals in mind." That's why they just went along with killing her cause they didn't want to figure out some other way.

shinoff2183496d ago

Foxtrot

I think they just tried to show you how Joel's decision affected more then just Joel and ellie . Just showing different angles and a bigger picture. I think Joel did the right thing.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 496d ago
dmonee497d ago

The story had me emotionally engaged. Gaming for 40 years it was the first time a game story messed with my emotions in the way movies do. As far as the game and gameplay? Not so much lol. It wasn’t bad in my opinion but the game itself was ok. It was the storyline that kept me going in TLOU 1 and TLOU 2.

ClayRules2012497d ago

“As far as the game and gameplay? Not so much lol. It wasn’t bad in my opinion but the game itself was ok.“

What exactly did the game do that qualifies it for just being ok? And same question for the gameplay?

dmonee497d ago

That’s a tough question because I could ramble on and on as to why. I’m speaking for myself because I usually pass on survival horror type games. So instead of getting into a debate as to why I found the gameplay to be ok. I originally commented on how the narrative had me emotionally sucked in. Especially the opening segment. So much that I purchased a game I would never have purchased if not for the story. It’s more kudos to the developer for getting people like me out of my comfort zone to play a game I wouldn’t usually play.

ClayRules2012497d ago

I know some people were upset with Joel lying to Ellie (friends of mine) that they felt it should’ve given the player an option to have Joel either

A. Lie to Ellie or B. Tell Ellie the truth. Type of situation, which just makes no sense. The game nor its story doesn’t given the player any control to have/make any choices that change the direction or outcome of ANY of these characters in this unforgiving and dark world.

I don’t blame Joel for doing what he did.

1. Ellie became the “Something” that he needed to keep fighting for, beyond just living day to day, simply being survivors.

2. Marlene gave orders to that no -name guard to kill Joel if he tried anything…you just done pissed him off all the more with those words. I wonder, if Joel had been killed and Marlene ever came across Tommy again (Joel’s brother) would she have the guts to tell him “Listen Tommy, we need to talk! About Joel…I couldn’t waste this gift. Tommy “What the hell you talking about, Marlene??” Marlene “I had Joel killed, if he” Tommy “YOU SON OF A BITCH!” Got carried away there lol. You get the idea tho. To my point, it wasn’t guaranteed that Ellie was the cure, and after all Joel did, went through, not even allowing Joel to see Ellie, just talk with her, that’s messed up.

3. Of course looking at the actions Joel took in the hospital and how that has major consequences in Part 2 for him, Ellie etc. it’s not like there wouldn’t have been a big threat later on at some point. This world is wicked, dark, unforgiving and everyone’s growing up, has their own WANTS. NEEDS. DESIRES. Solely for themselves, loved ones, or group. All while trying to survive.

Joel I think knew when he said “I Swear” that he’d done something much worse than when he actually saved Ellie from that operating room and possibly causing death to humanity (as if it would be appreciated anyways.

Yes, he lied to the one person who gave him purpose to live, purpose to have hope, purpose to be that father again (which he of course wasn’t looking for, but it just naturally happened upon him) like he was to his daughter Sarah all those years ago. And to him, maybe in that moment, lying would be worth the little bit of time, the years they’d have together creating memories, seeing Ellie grow up before his eyes etc. rather than lie to her and see a reaction in words and deeds in which she might’ve ran off losing all hope and trust in him etc. I mean, she did lose trust in him all those years later etc. but as we saw, she was willing to work with him, try to repair what Joel broke, and he knew it wouldn’t be easy, as did she. But with time she understood I think why he did what he did.

It’s just sad in the end, his lie, the time they lost with his betrayal, and than horrific death, caused Ellie to go seek revenge in a way in which Ellie changed, she kept chipping off more of herself along the journey, scary and sad thing to see, and exhausting. But powerful storytelling throughout it all.

Show all comments (36)
40°

Top 10 PlayStation Plus Premium Horror Games

We love to scare ourselves silly within the horror genre of video games. Thankfully, there are many to find on PlayStation Plus Premium, such as the intense Resident Evil VII: Biohazard and cult favorite Little Nightmares.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
40°

PlayStation Store July Sale Is Live With More Than 500 Games Discounted

PlayStation Store is offering a new sale this week with more than 500 games discounted including some DLCs. See the complete list here.

Read Full Story >>
novicegamerguides.com