50°

Is MGSV: Ground Zeroes Worth Playing?

Dan searches through the latest releases to decipher if some games are really Worth Playing? This time it is the turn of Ground Zeroes, the first MGS game on the new generation of consoles.

Read Full Story >>
danjohnhobbs.com
ritsuka6663700d ago (Edited 3700d ago )

MGSV: Ground Zeroes Worth Playing?'

Nope.jpg. Too short and too expensive. this demo doesn't deserve you money. The game uses old animations, dated physics and is too damn short.

Ratty3700d ago

It all comes down to a few things in the end.

1. If you're a fan of MGS
2. What you look for in a game

If you answer no at No. 1 then it's not for you.

If all you do in a game is rush through the story and call it the end then it's not for you either.

It's also not a demo. It has less content than a full-priced game but more than a demo. The right price would probably have been a universal 20$ for all formats and consoles but it was sadly a bit more expensive for next gen.

I spent over 20 hours on it. Some people over 30. Hardly what I'd call short.

raWfodog3700d ago

I'll more than likely wait until they come out with a combo edition that includes both titles and any extra dlc that may have been released up until then. Somehow I see them doing that down road.

Aleithian3700d ago

This is the best response. You sum it up perfectly.

Swiggins3700d ago (Edited 3700d ago )

You can play ANY game multiple times to get more out of it, that's not a good counter-point.

The fact of the matter is that MGS:GZ is not worth the price of admission, especially when it launched. The fact that I, a relatively scrubby metal gear player managed to beat the whole damn thing in under an hour is inexcusable. Certain veterans of the series have beat it in half an hour and speed runners have completed it in 4 freaking minutes!!!

What I did play I liked a lot, and it's definitely sold me on The Phantom Pain, but the lack of content found in Ground Zeroes is borderline criminal.

I'm glad you had fun with it, but you cannot deny that for 30 freaking dollars it Ground Zeroes does not justify itself.

If it had be $10 at launch, MAYBE $15 I'd give it a free pass, but like Angry Joe said in his review this is setting a DANGEROUS precedent.

I don't believe this is Kojima's fault either, he seems to have his ear to the ground in regards to what gamer's want. Konami on the other hand is notorious for this kind of ****, so I'm less inclined to give them any slack.

lsujester3700d ago

While I understand that it's a tough purchase at $30 for one very short main mission, it's definitely worth playing if you can rent it from GameFly, Redbox, etc. And if you're the type of person who wants to go see and collect every single thing, there are numerous hours to be had from it.

crimsonfox3700d ago (Edited 3700d ago )

@ritsuka666
Excuse me for being so blunt and it is not very mature to say, But you have a very stupid opinion. I know everyone is entitled to one.But to say the Graphics are dated is dumb. And to you saying the game is short is dumb. I have put in almost 30 hours into the game and still have a couple trials to finish to 100% the game. Honestly until you play it yourself, Just seriously shut up. If you had played it you would know it's worth playing. I know everyone is split by the costs so I won't comment on that but, When it comes to the game itself. It's totally worth playing.

Minipandaninja3700d ago

I was surprise but this game offers much more than some games at 59,99$ released buggy and incomplete. No, it's not a full game but it was worth my 19,99$. Yes you have one mission yes it's short but you have 4 more side missions and a lot to explore.

ThatEnglishDude3700d ago

Is it worth playing? Absolutely. It's a masterfully designed game with excellent gameplay and stunning visuals to boot. It's the next chapter in the Metal Gear saga and chances are, 95% of people who are interested in this game would have played it already.

Is it worth paying $30 for? Well that's up to you. Something, anything, is only as valuable as you perceive it to be. Personally, I've had a great experience with Ground Zeroes and feel what I paid was worth it.

Illusive_Man3700d ago

OP is correct. This title is very shallow.

Physics suck, textures suck, and the story is so utterly stupid. Mission can be completed in under 15 minutes. Boss runs 40 mph.

Aleithian3700d ago

Most of what you said isn't worth commenting on. That said, I agree with part of it: *some* of the textures suck. The foliage is a joke, in particular. The whole game has the same "plastic" appearance as MGS2. I'm not really sure how to describe it - hopefully people understand what I'm talking about. Compare MGS2 and MGS3 - GZ has a similar look to MGS2.

Show all comments (19)
140°

The Metal Gear series has sold over 59.8 million copies

300,000 Metal Gear games were sold during the first quarter of 2023, Konami has announced, bringing the total number to 59.8 million.

Read Full Story >>
metalgearinformer.com
FallenAngel1984367d ago

Still waiting on Konami to put the MGS Collection back on digital stores

Nyxus367d ago

I know right? And rerelease the games for current gen systems while they're at it.

just_looken366d ago

Do not worry they will give use those pichincko remakes for top dollar soon.

Metal gear solid 3 in the fox engine looked/ran amazing but was sealed away :(

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Sarcasm367d ago

I know re-makes and stuff have been played to death this generation.

But damn I wouldn't mind an MGS4 remake

gold_drake366d ago

i played it quite recently and it holds up very well

CantThinkOfAUsername366d ago

It does, but a remake will be available on platforms other than PS3.

itsmebryan367d ago

I thought the series would have sold more over all these years and different releases.

Ready4nxtgen367d ago

Yeah I would have thought over 150 Mil. Something.missing here

Nyxus367d ago

Metal Gear isn't that big, and there hasn't been a new release in years. Also MGS2 and 3 are still missing from digital storefronts.

shinoff2183367d ago

5 mgs games in total if I'm not mistaken. 59 60 million seems about right. Mgs is dope to some of us but it would be hard for a lot of regulars to understand

ChasterMies367d ago

I would love to buy MGS4 but it’s still a PS3 exclusive.

JEECE367d ago

Although there are notable exceptions (GTA, certain first-party Nintendo games, Gran Turismo), as a rule games didn't sell as much in earlier generations as they have in the past few generations. So a lot of PS1-PS2 era titles that are viewed as seminal games didn't actually sell all that much by today's standards (yes, despite the large install bases of those systems lol). I remember a similar surprised reaction happening a few months ago when Square announced the total overall sales of Final Fantasy VII.

Deathdeliverer367d ago

Some of the best fun you can have online was the first metal gear online and to a lesser, but still fun to an extent, MGO2. The magazine, CQC, stealth, and tactical play Vs real players is just a blast. Not to mention playing Snake vs everyone? Amazing. The game will never be the same without Hideo, but Konami can definitely update what’s already there and take my money.

ceyoga366d ago

You wouldn't be talking about the OG MGO that was included with MGS3:S would you? It's rare running into another former player. Those were some of the best memories of any online game I had.

Deathdeliverer366d ago

Yes my man!! That seems like the BEST game that nobody played! Tranquilizer pistol, drag the body to a corner and lay a girly mag right by their head so they wake up and instantly get caught by the mag. You could get real toxic if you wanted at that point, but man that game was incredible! The only thing annoying was that damn Konami ID

P_Bomb367d ago

Did my part!

“You’re pretty good” 🫡

Show all comments (20)
220°

Kojima looks back on Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes on its 9th anniversary

Hideo Kojima: "After the launch, many people seemed to expect GZ to be a full game."

Read Full Story >>
metalgearinformer.com
-Foxtrot425d ago

People would have gotten “your intention” if you stated it from the beginning but people didn’t want smaller episode like MGS games.

He should have just focused on MGSV and work Ground Zeroes into that game instead

I_am_Batman425d ago

I don't remember there being confusion over Ground Zeroes being a full game. But then again I was just starting to catch up on the MGS series as a whole at that point so I might've not paid enough attention or simply have forgotten that there was confusion about it. I bet the whole Moby Dick Studios thing didn't help the casual observer understand what the hell was going on though.

I only got both MGSV games when Phantom Pain was already out and I kinda agree that it probably would've sucked if I had to wait one and a half years to pay The Phantom Pain after Ground Zeroes.

jambola425d ago

I'm sorry what now?
Who expected that?
If it was meant to be episodic or an experiment for that, the price should / would have reflected that

MadLad425d ago (Edited 425d ago )

To be fair, there really wasn't enough content to actually justify even the smaller price tag. It was still half the cost of a full game, yet a 20th of the content.

I can't stand these paid glorified demos.

CrimsonWing69425d ago

Honestly, it was basically similar to the FF15 Duscae demo. My theory is he was taking too damn long to make a game and Konami was like, “Sell what you got!” It just has kind of a scummy corporate “let’s sell this demo for half the price of a full game,” feel to it.

That’s just my take on it. I love Kojima and I love the MGS series, but this and 5 were the biggest let downs, ever. Clearly unfinished work forced out because, in Konami’s defense, Kojima was going over budget and taking forever on the project.

MIDGETonSTILTS17425d ago

Lol, I loved Ground Zeroes, but releasing that level at $40 during a dryspell for games at the onset of the new gen was an obvious cash grab.

I handed over my money happily, but plenty of non-diehard fans were understandably letdown by the scale of what $40 bought them.

Chocoburger425d ago

The price was originally $40 for the physical PS4 and XBO versions, but due to controversy it dropped down to $30 before launch. And as much as I love GZ, and even bought it twice, I do agree that $30 was too much. It should have launched at $20.

https://kotaku.com/konami-c...

staticall425d ago

I don't know how about anyone else. But i've bought it for $20 1 week after release (or $15, don't remember the exact exchange rate) and spent 24 hours beating every mission and getting all the steam achievements. I was 100% aware what the game was about beforehand though and i did enjoy every second of it. I knew it was a work in progress and it was probably the best and less restrictive game i've played in a long time (and controls were just perfect).

Even previous MGS games didn't gave me that much freedom as Ground Zeroes did.
Love stealth? Got you covered.
Want to speedrun? Here's the timer.
Wanna kill everyone? No problem, grab that AK then and let's party.
Wanna cause chaos? Just tell Pequod where to land.
Love to drive? Then go ahead.
Miss Raiden? Then play as him.

I wish they would continue MGSV, finish remaining chapters and add more missions as DLCs, there was SO many options... A poor man still can dream...

Show all comments (15)
370°

Metal Gear Solid V Is The Greatest Stealth Game Ever Made

Hideo Kojima was dealing with a hostile publisher who was pulling his team’s game apart at the seams in order to launch in some form of finished state, and it’s still downright masterful. Everything about it is mechanically focused and aesthetically nuanced, and not a single thing feels out of place or without purpose. Big Boss moves about each environment with a pace that provides the perfect cadence to use all manner of gadgets in whatever ways you like.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
Mobis-New-Nest597d ago

You are incorrect and I will be taking this time to correct you. The Legend of Zelda Wind Waker Forsaken Fortress is stealth that no game has yet to match. Having Link, crawl, sneak and hide under a barrel is innovative stealth that Metal Gear Solid, Splinter Cell, Thief and Tenchu wish they had achieved. I rest my case.

ChubbyBlade597d ago

Cardboard box beats barrel

597d ago
got_dam597d ago

Lol I see what you did there.

fr0sty597d ago

So tired of opinion pieces... I come here for hot news, not hot takes.

-Foxtrot597d ago

Shit Metal Gear Solid game though

It's boring, empty, repetitive

Great mechanics and gameplay but it's just so dull....

597d ago
Chard597d ago

I played it long after the hype had settled, and I had a blast with it. Strip away the disappointment over what it could have been, and you're still left with a great game

porkChop597d ago

The gameplay loop was phenomenal, no question. From a gameplay standpoint it's an incredible stealth game.

porkChop597d ago

"Hideo Kojima was dealing with a hostile publisher who was pulling his team’s game apart at the seams in order to launch in some form of finished state, and it’s still downright masterful."

Let's not pretend Kojima was entirely innocent there. The game was 5+ years into development, way over budget, and wasn't even halfway done. That's why Chapter 2 is so unfinished and Chapter 3 was scrapped entirely. He was wasting time micromanaging and second-guessing everything his team was doing, and little to no progress was being made. The same thing happened with MGS: Rising. That's why the game got rebooted as MGR: Revengeance and was handed off to Platinum. That's the only way the game was going to get finished. And yet after wasting millions on a scrapped game, MGR only went on to sell a little over 1 million units. It was a failure no matter how you look at it.

That's why Kojima was "locked away" in his office for the final 6 months of development of MGSV. So the team could actually piece together and finish the game. Was Konami just supposed to let Kojima spend more than a decade with infinite funds to make one game? Kojima isn't Rockstar, his games don't sell 170+ million units. At some point the game has to come out.

I get that Konami are a garbage company but they aren't solely responsible for what happened with Kojima. As much as I love his games and will always be a fan, MGSV was almost entirely Kojima's fault and I'm tired of people pretending that it wasn't.

MIDGETonSTILTS17597d ago

Sounds like mismanagement by Konami.

generic-user-name597d ago

Can you prove any of what you're claiming? Because I've seen Kojima build a studio and release a AAA game in 3 years with Death Stranding. All I'm seeing here are the same conspiracy theories that people like to believe to confirm their biases towards certain people, same with Neil Druckmann. For instance, MGSV may have been in development for a while but you leave out that he was also having the FOX Engine developed alongside it, an engine so good that MGSV ran at 60fps on a PS4.

He's gone on record disputing that he ever goes over budget on very rarely has to delay his titles.

"He was wasting time micromanaging and second-guessing everything his team was doing, and little to no progress was being made."

Where did you get this from?

596d ago
Workshyskiver597d ago

Best gameplay of the series hand down, its not even close. Worst story in the series hand down, its not even close.

Ezio2048597d ago

But that ending though with amazing music. The Man who sold the world.

1Victor597d ago

I can’t say it’s the best or the worse to me I stopped playing metal gear at the end of 4 the official end of the snakes saga and the best in my book was 3 snake eater excellent gameplay and excellent story telling giving us the reason for big boss to go and create his own country before the metal gear saga on the 4-8 bits consoles.

Show all comments (66)