130°

Drakengard 3 Rated by the ESRB, With all the Violence and Debauchery You Can Expect

Square Enix's JRPG Drakengard 3 will be released on May 20th in North America and on May 21st in Europe, and the ESRB finally stamped its "M" for Mature on the game, with a description that might discourage the faint of heart.

Read Full Story >>
dualshockers.com
sonypsnow3702d ago

Great game for Playstation 3.

Kenshin_BATT0USAI3702d ago

Literally my most anticipated game, it'll probably get terrible reviews and such. But god damn more Drakengard is too good to pass up. Preordered collector's.

dark-kyon3702d ago

maybe after the lighting return reviews,westerns critics can appreciate when they get a good game
although this have some flaws and heve being midtier production values.

Kenshin_BATT0USAI3702d ago

No, western critics will eat this up for it being a weird ass game alone, or 'the voice acting is bad' because they don't want to listen to the original VO. Either way, I'm gonna love it regardless.

izumo_lee3702d ago

Unfortunately i have to agree with you there. This game from what i hear has some pretty disturbing imagery & morbid story that only the Japanese will understand.

The gameplay is pretty simple hack & slash which shouldn't be any issue unless the game media make it to be.

Also preordered the collectors with all the DLC, though i am hesitant to play it cause seeing pretty girls kill each other is a little dark.

dark-kyon3702d ago

something what bother me,is what look like the reviewer suck playing hack slash games,for that casual games how DMC get good scores and hardcore one how killer is dead,yaiba,rising revengance get lower scores for being too hard,i remember the times of devil may cry where if you are not a good player the game simply can be impossible for some.

Inception3701d ago

I thought SE already announced that they already sold out every CE they had?

gamer78043702d ago

i wish this was on or ported to ps4!

Show all comments (18)
200°

Remembering the Best JRPGs on the PS3

Get ready to embark on a journey filled with monsters, magic, and overpowered haircuts, because this list features the best JRPGs on the PS3.

Read Full Story >>
altarofgaming.com
shinoff2183284d ago (Edited 284d ago )

There wasn't that many. Thanks to the west's criticism. It was definitely lacking compared to every other ps system. Dont get me wrong there were a few good ones i know that.

jznrpg284d ago

Nier, Valkyrie Chronciles, Tales games , Ni No Kuni, Resonance of Fate, FF13’s, Ys8 just a few off the top of my head and there were a lot more.

CrimsonWing69284d ago (Edited 284d ago )

Not nearly to the degree of PS1 and PS2.

@shinoff2183 makes a good point that around the PS3/Xbox 360 gen is when the genre wasn’t as prevalent and began to shy away from turn-based. There’s some standouts for sure, but look at the PS1 and PS2 JRPG library and then compare that to the PS3 and PS4’s.

Theres definitely a decline in a selection of titles. Even worse was the quality seemed to take a massive hit as well. I think Lost Odyssey was a huge standout for that gen when you look at production values, then you look at something like Fairy Fencer on the PS3 and it’s kind of depressing.

But by that generation there was a shift from western developed games overtaking Japanese developed games. Back from the NES to PS2 Japanese games were the cream of the crop… I don’t know what happened but like midway into the PS3/360 life-time they became less so.

shinoff2183283d ago (Edited 283d ago )

Compared to the ps1 ps2 and he'll even ps4 ps3 doesn't hold a candle to either imo. It's also when turn based damn near disappeared. Again thanks to the west's criticism

Crimson I'd put money on the west being at fault, guys like Phil phish, and numerous others at that time were attacking jrpg and Japanese games in general pretty hard.

Ni no kuni was probably my fav jrpg back then , and the blue dragon

GameBoyColor283d ago

Tales got kinda lucky here. When they took a chance and finally brought tales of graces f over west it sold like 250k lmao a lot of jrpgs did 500k or below. Disgaea was worse i think. Bamco decided to keep bringing more games over though.

Tapani283d ago (Edited 283d ago )

Demon's Souls, Dark Souls and Dark Souls II were the best RPGs on PS3 made by Japanese developers. Everything else just fell short always. Ni No Kuni was a full package, an okayish game as well. Nier and Drakengard III had superb writing, setting and voice acting, however, the performance was a real drag on the gameplay. Traditional RPG-wise I'd actually say 360 had better JRPGs, and think that Lost Odyssey and Blue Dragon were the best traditional JRPGs of the era. PS3 Valkyria Chronicles was okay, but it is closer to an SRPG.

Ryu Ga Gotoku games were also solid, they were still finding their footing and breaking new ground with new cities and formats.

PS3 was the era that almost made me quit gaming and I started playing on PC because I could not find good performance nor games on the system. PS4 got me back into it, and now PS5 is a mix in and between, I just play my PS4 library on the PS5 and rest on PC, just like during the PS3 era. The only new exclusive Sony JRPG is pretty much FFXVI and it is so streamlined and simplified from the normal RPG experience that I can't fit it into the genre anymore. Dragon Quest XII hopefully remedies all of this, but it is just one game.

These new games will all be on PC (while it does take 2-3 years to wait, and 6-12 months from launch to have them patched + fixed by modders) and they perform better on it. The only point in owning a PS5 is to play games a couple of years earlier, but for a hard-working family man like me, the quality of the experience is more important than playing it as soon as possible. And I can't do modern games at 30fps 720p after playing 120fps at 4K. For older games, that's okay.

PSX and PS2 though, those were the days...Still have a massive collections of classic RPGs in CD and DVD format and a phat PS3 to play them!

FinalFantasyFanatic283d ago

It's kinda like that, the PS3 generation was a bad time for JRPGs, especially with the Japanese feeling the need to westernize their games, shooters dominating that gen, the racism from western game journalists (it was bad, between G4, Phill Fish, and a slew of others), and the higher development costs...

It really made me miss the PS1/PS2 days of JRPGs, even the quality of half of those games during the 7th gen weren't as good. The 360 tried, but Microsoft's consoles weren't popular in Japan and no body in the West bought a Xbox for JRPGs (despite Xbox having Vesperia, Blue Dragon and Lost Odyssey).

on_line_forever283d ago

" It's kinda like that, the PS3 generation was a bad time for JRPGs, especially with the Japanese feeling the need to westernize their games "

This is when everything fall down and games looks not fun to play anymore except for few games like demon and dark souls for example

-Foxtrot283d ago (Edited 283d ago )

Nah. It's a bad trilogy of games

The only reason XIII-2 stands out is because XIII was so bad

When the bar is so low, anything after feels better.

goldwyncq283d ago

The monster catching mechanic was nice.

Eonjay283d ago

Don't understand the hate for it at all. Seems forced.

shinoff2183283d ago

Watching the credits roll on ff16 now it is good but , I'd really like to re try ff13 least it's turn based and would fill that gap for me.

FinalFantasyFanatic283d ago

They got better after the first one in the trilogy, not outstanding game though.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 283d ago
CS7283d ago

Honestly, I played FFXIII a few years after release and maybe because it was after the hype cycle and I knew the flaws of the game, it actually became my favorite FF after VII.

I took off the mini map and never used auto battle and the stuff that mattered to me in an FF was just so well done.

The art and graphics were insane at the time
The music is still special
The story still lingers in memory more than a decade later
The RPG systems were decent

I never really got the hate for it, still have a soft spot for that game inside me.

goldwyncq283d ago

Still better than XV and XVI.

Yui_Suzumiya284d ago

Drakengard 3 goes for a small fortune nowadays

Knightofelemia283d ago (Edited 283d ago )

Only gripe I have with Ar Tonelico 3 is that Saki is annoying as hell whether English or in Japanese. Then Saki's English voice actor became Ionasal on Ar Nosurge she was a little annoying but not as bad. Johnny Young Bosch voicing Tatsumi I thought he did a great job. And Akiko Shikata with her vocals and the music from the games just went hand and hand.

DarkZane283d ago

I wish Ar No Surge and Ar Tonelico 3 would be remastered on PS4/PS5.

Show all comments (31)
250°

Square Enix Classics We’d Love to See Remastered

Square Enix suggested they might remaster more games from their storied archives—here are the classics we’d like to see get a new coat of paint.

Read Full Story >>
cgmagonline.com
raWfodog304d ago

I would definitely enjoy a Xenogears remaster. Recently finished Legend of Dragoon again (this time with platinum trophy) and would love to dive back into Xenogears with Fei and the rest of the crew.

closed_account303d ago

Came here to say Xenogears as well. Great taste, raWfodog!

notachance303d ago

It needs more than a remaster though, I hope they can turn disc 2 into a full game..

Kneetos303d ago (Edited 303d ago )

I wonder how they would even handle a xenogears remaster

Would they give it to monolith soft (the original developers) to handle, and more then likely make it a Nintendo exclusive, cue the endless bitching from Sony fans...

Or will they do it themselves, thus not finishing the original story as intended

raWfodog303d ago

"... and more then likely make it a Nintendo exclusive"

I would think it'd eventually hit all the platforms much like the Front Mission 1st Remake. That way no one would be 'bitching' regardless of your platform preference lol.

Miraak82 303d ago

They don't need the original people , they already have the foundation of characters ,world and lore to work off of.
Honestly it's not that big of a game if you really examine it by modern standards , it's how they present everything that makes it seem so grand especially with how epic the story/music is . SE have good writers that could incorporate post release lore of perfect works and such if they ever remade it from the ground up.

gold_drake304d ago

"THE BOUNCER"

scares me everytime i play it haha

Godmars290303d ago (Edited 303d ago )

Maybe this time around it could be good/playable?

Becuzisaid303d ago

Lol! What a game. Had a lot of fun with it. Beat it multiple times!

Marcello304d ago

Square Enix classics? dont they mean Squaresoft. Square Enix dont make classic games, just games with pretty graphics, no heart & soul, boring & over stuffed with woke Gen Z cockiness.

But while were on the subject i would love too see a remaster of Front Mission 3.

ZeekQuattro304d ago

They already announced a Front Mission 3 remake. Doubt they'll also do a remaster.

Marcello304d ago

I will get the remake but i still want a remaster cos with all remakes they lose a lot of the original magic the original game had.

Godmars290303d ago

Pretty sure its going to be a remaster of the game, similar to what's been done with the first two games, not a remake.

FF7r is certainly more a remake of FF7 than a remaster for instance.

Now, if they did Gun Hazard remaster...

raWfodog303d ago (Edited 303d ago )

Yeah they call it a remake like "Front Mission 1st Remake" but I'd consider it more of a remaster as it doesn't change any of the core gameplay but basically just sharpens up the graphics. I think they added a couple of new features also but I still think it's more of a remaster.

Like @Godmars290 suggested, FF7Remake fits the mold of a remake since they 'remade' the game from the ground up, changing the battle system completely, and retelling the story with a lot of different elements added.

But I guess they can call it what they want since they're making it lol.

DeadManMMX303d ago

Exactly. SquareSoft merged with Enix shortly after Final Fantasy X and it has never been the same.

Gardenia303d ago

I miss the old Squaresoft games. So much quality back then.

Terry_B304d ago

Almost all of the listed games are not Square Enix Classics lol

AdventurerDonLocke304d ago

Quintet Gaia Trilogy: Soulblazer, Illusion of Gaia & Terranigma.

Show all comments (45)
100°

Now That We've Got Nier Replicant, It's Time To Remaster Drakengard 3

Drakengard 3 is a hidden gem from Yoko Taro that deserves a remaster.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
NovusTerminus1113d ago

No, remake the first Drakengard.

lucian2291113d ago

That would be better. I couldn't beat part 3. By the time it came out the combat and gameplay was so outdated it was painful. Also graphically awful.

It would need a full remake, and for that they may as well build the original from the ground up.

Jambola121113d ago

Would love them to, one of my favorite games of all time

HarryMasonHerpderp1113d ago

The framerate completely destroyed this game. The graphics were pretty terrible as well. Other than that though I quite enjoyed it, the story, characters and overall gameplay was really good. It would definitely benefit from a remaster.

lucian2291113d ago

No, a remake. There is too much else that needs fixing lol.

HarryMasonHerpderp1112d ago

Haha maybe. Either way I still liked the story and characters. Never thought Nier replicant would get a remaster so fingers crossed this game gets a second chance too.

Vits1113d ago

They should remake the entire franchise to be honest. Every single Drakengard game is definitely unique, but overall clunky as hell.

CrimsonWing691113d ago

Oof, I do not want to try to finish that final stage again, so no thanks.

Show all comments (9)