300°

Sony on ex-Naughty Dog Amy Hennig: ‘People Change, Business Changes, Things Change’

Scott Rohde talks to IGN about the departure of one of Naughty Dog's most prolific employees.

MrSwankSinatra3722d ago

You know this really isn't cool. First Sony lays off employees from SSM & cancel a new IP, then Amy Hennig leaves Naughty Dog & then Jack Tretton resigns. What the hell is going on???

mushroomwig3722d ago

'What the hell is going on???'

Like the title says, people change, things change. There is no conspiracy, nothing is "going on".

incredibleMULK3722d ago

yep.

And so it begins.

first, nintendo makes wii u. RIP nintendo.

second, microsoft brings in company squasher phil elop. RIP Xbox

third, sony implodes after a bad electronics run and wasteful spending. RIP Sony

and now rise of the tablets!....aaaaaahh!! no! splat! take cover! splat! oh the humanity!

BX813722d ago

Good point. I don't think they are related but that is a bunch of suck in a small time frame. The gaming industry is pretty resilient so I don't think we will see any hicups because of it.

plaZeHD3722d ago

The dark times have come.

iamnsuperman3722d ago (Edited 3722d ago )

The lay offs at SSM are not a big deal (since they are still hiring). Clearly Sony cancelled a game (for whatever reason. Ips get cancelled quite a lot). Those people would have been specialised for that genre. If they are not making that game/genre of game anymore why have them around? It is sad for them but the gamble didn't work.

Tretton and Amy are more interesting and I would like to know why they left. Army's departure does seem suspicious but Tretton's could be down to wanting more. Yes he was CES of PlayStation but he is still young enough to become CES of somewhere bigger (he isn't going to go any higher is Sony). Leaving on a high is a good thing for him (let's just hope Sony replaces him with someone good)

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3722d ago
-Foxtrot3722d ago (Edited 3722d ago )

The whole thing just seems off with me, NaughtyDog, Sony, hell even Amy herself can out and say things like "Oh no no...nothing happened, everything is fine and dandy" yet she left during development. As I said in another comment if it was near the end of development or when the game went gold I'd understand but NOW....Amy wouldn't just leave a franchise she help create behind and leave during early development, she would of wanted to stay to finish it off or get as much as she could finished.

Hell they are probably still doing mo-cap for this and she's always present during those shoots, so now what...she just drops her script and goes "...DONE" then walks out.

Sorry but it doesn't seem like something she would do....

Then you had NaughtyDog defending Neil and Bruce in another article, why didn't they just come out straight away and defend themselves on their own twitter accounts....why a very well thought out PR speech from the heads of ND if they didn't do anything wrong. Let them tell us. If you were getting slated by some horrible rumors the first thing you would do would be to tell people STRAIGHT AWAY that they are not true, they know if they post something on Twitter gaming sites will report on it and get the world out even more. It's common sense.

I also find funny how Neil is allowed to write the script for the Last of Us film but for Uncharted they couldn't...or maybe didn't want Amy Hennig to write it. Look how many people they have went through with the Uncharted film....why not just ask Amy. I thought it was because they didn't want to hire or couldn't hire people from the studio but since they got the creative director from the Last of Us game why did they not do the same with Uncharted.

I just feel like things aren't what they seem....it's nice to keep an open mind about all this and not just buy in to what you read on the web.

Was she pushed...or was she not? Who knows...

We'll probably never know

PrinceOfAllSaiyans3722d ago

Stop overreacting. Yea losing Amy is a big loss. But like it says people move on. And Amy already finished writing Uncharted 4. She is only a writer not a developer. And Uncharted is in good hands with Niel Druckmann he is behind Uncharted 2, which is the best of all the Uncharted games and he is behind TLOU. Naughty Dog is still the best studio of them all with or without Amy.

-Foxtrot3722d ago (Edited 3722d ago )

How am I over reacting...I mean really I'm just trying to put some thought into it. If you want to blindly go along with anything someone says fair enough but it's the whole point of commenting on here...discussion.

Is it trolling, being immature, personally attacking someone, off topic etc....no it's not. You shouldn't take offence into what someone writes and get all ticked off about it. I would most likely respect your opinion as long as it's fair.

"and Amy already finished writing Uncharted 4. She is only a writer not a developer.

Wow...you really don't know how writing works do you. You don't just write it and it's done, read the interviews or behind the scenes stuff with the mo cap. Amy and the guys say Amy was always re-writing stuff during mo cap shoots and she helped get the characters into a mind set of her vision she wrote down. She helps the games director aswell.

"And Uncharted is in good hands with Niel Druckmann he is behind Uncharted 2 which is the best of all the Uncharted games "

I'm not saying it's not but Neil is quite dark with his writing, he wanted to kill Elena off in Uncharted 2 and you've seen what he can write thanks to the Last of Us. Fantastic writing but I wouldn't want dark themes popping up in Uncharted 4. There was balance with Uncharted 2 because both of them were writing, you have Amy, a light hearted writer then Neil who is more serious with darker tones.

"Naughty Dog is still the best studio of them all with or without Amy"

Uncharted wouldn't be Uncharted without Amy...lets not forget that. Naughty Dog are talented but you can't ignore the amount of hard work she put into it.

EDIT@ Below

How is it ONE SIDED when I'm not believing in either "possible" sides to the story. I've stated I'm not, so why say something like that

It's up in the air in my opinion....don't see why you can't get that, unless your just looking for an argument. Why do people like yourself care more about the users on here then the article.

SoapShoes3722d ago

But all you're doing is being very one-sided with your idea that there's something behind the scenes. Maybe there is but it's just as likely that there is nothing behind the scenes too.

SoapShoes3722d ago (Edited 3722d ago )

"How is it ONE SIDED when I'm not believing in either "possible" sides to the story. I've stated I'm not, so why say something like that "

Well probably the fact you're going into so much depth about how something could have been awry within the company and not at all about any other possible scenario. You can't make a huge post about how you think something went down, starting it off by saying you feel something is off, then wrapping it up with a question stating no one knows and think the last sentence makes you somehow neutral.

Also Naughty Dog is more than just one or two or three people. It's a team, they don't have just one person calling all of the shots. Everyone has input. While Amy did shape Uncharted, your comment about it not being Uncharted without her doesn't sit well. It will have some differences for sure but many series get different directors/writers and still remain true to what they are. Andy Gavin and Jason Rubin left ND shortly after Jak and Daxter but they still continued to make great Jak games and continued on to great series. ND is awesome and Amy is awesome, it's not the end of the world or going to change Uncharted into something it's not.

Salooh3722d ago

I don''t see why people would disagree with this. She's great but if that's he choice it's not really a big effect. They can live without her. Naught dog may even get another great writer. Who knows , sometimes people hate something good for them..

PoSTedUP3722d ago

she may or may not have been pushed. there, done. i wouldnt waste anymore brain power on it. "business changes" and her talent certainly will not go unnoticed.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3722d ago
SoapShoes3722d ago (Edited 3722d ago )

Yeah and you know Amy personally? How do you know what she would do and what circumstances are going on in her life? Stop filling in the gaps you don't know.

-Foxtrot3722d ago (Edited 3722d ago )

It's a DISCUSSION SITE

What are you not getting, stop personally attacking people just because you like it.

I wouldn't attack you for your opinions

Jeez I think people forget the whole point of N4G commenting features is to discuss the article. Instead we get people like you who go OFF TOPIC, calling users instead of the actual article

Honestly man...chill out.

EDIT

Nice sly edit pal...

SoapShoes3722d ago (Edited 3722d ago )

Wasn't a sly edit, it was just fleshing out what I was thinking in more detail. I don't see why you are so upset about me pointing out that there are other things that could have happened and it doesn't necessarily have to be some conspiracy theory where things went down behind the scenes.

-Foxtrot3722d ago

Mate your making your self look silly now....just stop

thehitman3722d ago

I dont know what to make of this situation other than what the article title says. Fox you never know if Amy has an opportunity at another project that she had her sights on and she had to leave for that opportunity now. Maybe she didnt want to do another Uncharted and just wanted to move on? Nobody knows the situation other than her and the people at NaughtyDog.

In the end I dont think it really matters as its obvious NaughtyDog has enough talent to go around. They have 2 franchises now with unrivaled accolades from last generation. You cant say that it was all her doing for Naughty success. They have sooo many people that work to make the games what they are.

Whatever the reason for her leaving lets just hope her the best wishes on her future projects as she has proven she is talented and will probably have more successes in her career. ND will keep being what they are until proven otherwise 1 person wont make or break them.

Chevalier3722d ago

Honestly it's not for us to speculate, it could be any number of things. Things happen in life that are hard to explain, people shouldn't have to defend against baseless accusations. It's not like Neil or anyone can discuss with full disclosure and explain a whole story without other implications or violating someones privacy.

For example you could show up at at my hospital and have blood work done and maybe someone noticed you were jaundiced. Someone who doesn't know you could easily makeup a plausible story and say "Hey I see that guy at my bar all the time always leaves with a different girl, clearly he's sleeping around must of got Hepatitis somewhere." I could be drawing your blood and chat and find out that your in fact gay and just go out with female friends to dance and have a good time and contracted Hep while on vacation from contamination or have an auto immune condition. I can't defend this person or clear up any misunderstanding because I have been told in confidence and it goes against pipeda. Doesn't change the fact that any jerk can makeup some story full of conflict now does it?

-Foxtrot3722d ago

It's not for us to speculate....urmmmmmm yeah it is, thats what people do on sites like this

Why are so many people on here trying to "hush hush" the whole thing....seriously.

Telling me not to waste time or brain power on it, when they are doing the same towards my comment.

jetlian3722d ago (Edited 3722d ago )

she was pushed out they dont like the term pushed! They dont like the pr because its true. Amy was paid to stay silent most likely.

Funny how eveybody talking about it arent the three involved.The three being bruce,amy and neil. Yet sony and ND top 2 yapping about it as closed case

AceBlazer133722d ago (Edited 3722d ago )

Maybe Amy began writing absolute crap so they had to cut her, maybe she had a different direction from the rest of the team, maybe she got bored with uncharted and didn't wanna do a half assed job, maybe she got a better writing job, maybe there is something going on at Sony. There are too many possibilities to bother wondering about it.We have nothing more than the words of the people who were involved so we might as well take it for what it is over such a trivial matter.

Clogmaster3722d ago (Edited 3722d ago )

How come no one is mentioning how the lead gameplay designer left CD Projekt Red before Witcher 3 was finished?

As long as the work is done, then it's fine. Sometimes we need a change of scene.

Chevalier3721d ago

@ Foxtrot

Ultimately do you think you'll actually get the full story? So yeah go ahead and speculate, my point was that more then likely there were many factors and extenuating circumstances. Unless you know everyone involved personally, what exactly do you think you'll gain? At the end of the day your speculation will just end up as is. But be my guest and continue on your path if you think you'll gain enlightenment.

Bottom line is it's just what it is. Like I said if you were in the same position and someone threw out a bunch of baseless accusations to stir something up then let them. If you left for personal reasons then it should remain that way. Your entitled to your opinion and so are everyone else so as I said continue if that's what you wish.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3721d ago
chrissx3722d ago

Yea its sad,but change is constant in life. We can only hope this change if for the best

Show all comments (42)
290°

Why Xbox believes it must cut costs and close studios

Companies, particularly public companies like Microsoft, need to grow.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
gold_drake2d ago

i mean its pretty simple, they spent close to 30 billion in acquiring activision, they thought they'd make it bk no problem, and that didnt happen.

its just shit that because of MS's miscalculation alot of people lost their jobs.

Jingsing2d ago

This is exactly what many people said would happen including the CMA and FTC. Lies lies and more lies and they allowed a $69 billion buy out to happen.

gold_drake2d ago

oh yeh it was 70 billion. that was my bad haha even worse.

JackBNimble1d 3h ago

MS has educated financial advisers, they knew there was little chance to recoup the 70billion just to break even on the Activision deal let alone whatever other nonsense is going on in MS.
This whole thing was to corner the market for leverage.

thesoftware7302d ago (Edited 2d ago )

gold,

You can't be serious, right?

Do you think that MS thought they would make 80bill in a year & Half? They haven't even released titles under MS yet, lol.

But in fact, that A/B revenue is already paying off, look at the last earnings call. That $80 billion is long-term money, my guy, no sane person/company would think they would make that back in any short-term situation, it's a long-term investment.

Let's play silly then. If MS's reason for laying off staff and closing studios was due(which it really was not) to the A/B deal, tell me what Sony's reason was for past studio closures, the recent 900-person layoffs, closing Sony London, shutting down Dreams, and closing Japan Studio? Zipper? Psygnosis? cuts at all their internal studios.

Keep in mind, you are claiming MS's reason is because of the A/B deal; please explain Sony's reason.

Hofstaderman2d ago

You actually still defending them? Sheesh.....

gold_drake2d ago

this is not a sony vs MS debate. dont make it something it isnt.

and of course not, but im pretty sure they thought they'd make more money after the deal. they didnt, and closed off some studios.

its pretty insane to think there is any other reason for the closure of studios in this case.

romulus232d ago (Edited 2d ago )

(It really was) due to the Activision Blizzard deal and the loss of physical sales due to gamepass. You keep bringing up Sony in all your posts about this, stop deflecting and trying to change the topic, this is about MS and what they are doing.

BehindTheRows2d ago

Has nothing to do with Sony. Stay on topic.

notachance2d ago

once in a while you see someone too invested in their make-believe console war that everything happened has to be connected to said war…

a bit of banter between fans is normal, this crusade you’re doing now isn’t.

Chevalier1d 23h ago

Wow idiotic. You bring up very old closures not that there haven't been recent ones from Playstations, but, seriously stop deflecting. This has NOTHING to do with Playstation.

Does Playstation got $3 trillion behind them and daddies wallet? No they don't so stop making a fool of yourself.

Xbox has never been profitable really and they just keep losing money so between their worst hardware sales, terrible 3rd party sales and now terrible 1st party sales.

Gamepass numbers that are no longer being announced shows their numbers after 3 years of missed targets has flatlined. Plus their recent gains up to 34 million were ONLY because they folded Gold members in too. Absolutely take your idiotic rhetoric out of here. Keep on topic without deflecting.

S2Killinit1d 23h ago

Ayayayay with these xbox/MS excuses.

Reaper22_1d 18h ago

How dare you mention Sony! Everyone here knows when Sony closes a studio and lay off workers it was the right thing to do. Even when they bought Gaikai and fired almost everyone it was the right thing to do.

Gamers can be such hypocrites sometimes.

andy851d 17h ago

Is it? That's revenue not profit. Completely different.

fr0sty1d 8h ago

The earnings call only showcased how dire the situation is... Even with ABK and Bethesda, they still couldn't make enough to keep investors happy, gamepass subs are stagnant, and hardware sales are tanking.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 1d 8h ago
thesoftware7301d 22h ago (Edited 1d 22h ago )

Drake,

"this is not a sony vs MS debate. dont make it something it isnt."

You are correct that it's not an MS Vs Sony Topic, but when exaggeration and imagination mix from a one-sided social group, similar examples are needed to ground radical thoughts; in this instance, the example was that shutting down 3,4,5, even 6 studios during a restructure/ buyout/acquisition is not some anomaly(it can suck) that has to be dissected or spell doom and gloom.

"But I'm pretty sure they thought they'd make more money after the deal. They didn't, and they closed off some studios."

But they did make more money, a lot, actually; the last earnings call showed a huge growth in profit, almost all due to A/B revenue.

"its pretty insane to think there is any other reason for the closure of studios in this case."

The fact that they did make money, kinda throws this out the window, and besides, you don't wake up and say, hey let's close a studio, you look at the output, you look at the dev as a whole, the long term and short term, you weigh it against all other studios and goals, you keep key members, ect..then you close if they are the weakest links...which by MS analysis they were.

Again, I will make a small Sony comparison, just so some of you can understand and see past the bias; Insomniac, ND, and Bungie have made some of the best games ever created, yet Sony saw fit to cut jobs in every of these studios, even tho Insomniac & ND are the biggest producers of PS games, leagues ahead better than Tango and Arkane, yet, they saw cuts, mind you, while being the TOP produces of PS first party. They were told to cut costs, and more jobs may be on the line, and Bungie is being threatened by a hostile Sony takeover. Put that in perspective, as I know that layoffs and dev closures are different, but if the best of the best is getting cut off, it is less than surprising, that lesser studios are closing.

@Cheva,
My response fits well with your comments as well. You even went on to prove that the dev closures are not just due to A/B acquisition. Then you point out Sony has less money than MS, inferring that MS should keep devs open that they see as lesser earners, while Sony having less money makes it okay to close them. lol...it doesn't work that way.

gold_drake1d 22h ago

im not reading all of that. u have ur opinion, i have mine.

thats rly it.

but this aint sony vs ms.

ApocalypseShadow1d 21h ago

You're trying to compare a 100 billion company to a company that has 3 TRILLION worth. SIE has to live or die on their own. And in turn, PlayStation has helped the main company again and again. Sony has to balance out what is working and not working in the company.

While Xbox has Daddy Warbucks footing the bill to keep the platform afloat. They have been bleeding money from Nvidia hardware in the OG Xbox, the RROD fiasco, the attempted 2013 DRM nonsense and the lies about being the most powerful console in the world and the losses of paying out millions to prop up a service hoping it catches on with enough subscribers to justify its existence.

They're not comparable if Xbox isn't allowed to live or die by its actions. It's subsidized. Revenue isn't profit. And if they were profiting on their own, they wouldn't be closing developers. If they were profiting, they wouldn't need Daddy Warbucks spending 80 to 100 billion buying up 3rd party publishers to sustain a loss leading platform.

They stopped announcing game sales, stopped announcing hardware sales, stopped announcing game pass subscribers, they are putting games on their competitors platforms but you're telling us that they are doing great even after killing jobs and closing developers at Xbox.

Stop drinking the Kool aid. You're drunk.

Chevalier1d 12h ago

Again at which point did Playstation have a $3 trillion company shift the market with a giant purchase?

"But they did make more money, a lot, actually; the last earnings call showed a huge growth in profit, almost all due to A/B revenue."

Lol. No they didn't. Increased revenue was ONLY due to adding Activision Blizzard revenue in. Growth was only 1 percent. It's idiots like you that have no idea what they're talking about is why Xbox isn't better than it is. You guys just make excuses continually.

If Xbox got so much profit then why did they stop announcing hardware numbers? Why did they stop announcing Gamepass numbers? Oh right because they're NOT profitable. Their sales in every category has dropped off the face of the planet. It's why Spencer will be closing more studios and canceling upcoming projects too.

The Wood1d 4h ago

How can they be profitable when they're not selling enough hardware, software or subs. You need take a seat on this one my friend unless you can prove you angles

jwillj2k41d 3h ago

Sony didnt shut down the studios you mentioned after they made last of us or ratchet and clank or destiny. Cutting jobs is not equal to closing studios. Sony cuts are a candle in the sun of Microsoft’s closures.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1d 3h ago
WelkinCole1d 17h ago

I am pretty sure MS knew this would happen and this was part of their plan. I mean if anyone with half a brain can see this happening I am pretty sure a multi billion company like MS knew this would happen

The whole strategy in buying Beth and Acti/Blizzard is for

1. Buy established games they can have under xbox because they have done a horrible job in building their portfolio internally for the past 15 years

2. Following from 1, try and boost xbox competitivenss against a dominat PS which MS after 3 tries still can't crack

3. Follolwing from 2, try and weaken Playstation dominance by taking out these massive multiplats from the PS

4. Following from 3, try and profit off from the PS domiance with selected games they will still have on the PS to make money like COD

5. Obviously get the IP's by buying them instead of creating them which again as I mentioned in number 1 they have been woeful in doing

None of these had anyting to do with keeping all the devs they accuried. MS has always been very shitty to Devs under them. Look at what happned to Bungie for example.

I believe MS in court truely mean it when they said they had to do something because PS was just too dominant. This was their last roll of the dice.

And from the looks of things. It has not panned out as MS had hoped. PS5 is still as dominant as ever and xbox is still behind. Worse still their MP's they got is not irreplaceable as they thought. Starfield? lol!. There have not been any major shift in momentum in this console war in their favor so now its time to start cutting their loses and it starts with the most expensive cost for any company. People.

Michiel19891d 15h ago

for a comparison, sony laid of a bigger % of it's staff this year than ms, it's what companies sadly do nowadays. If you think with GP and Bethesda + acti aquisition they were looking for quick cash, you couldn't be more wrong. It hasn't even been a year, "they thought they'd make it bk no problem, and that didnt happen." shows you have 0 understanding of how a business operates.

thesoftware7301d 2h ago

@ Michiel1989

Exactly this!

I'm reading these comments, and it's mesmerizing how off-base most of them are.

I posted a few comments above, and their rebuttals have nothing to do with the points that I presented; when they start doing that, I just ignore them because, at that point, they're debating all over the place.

Profchaos1d 8h ago

30 more like 70 to 80 plus 7 for Bethesda

Tzuno1d 3h ago

meanwhile everything turned woke an inevitably went downward, i'd say it serves them well if they promote such kind of approach, mwuahahahahahhh!

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1d 2h ago
anast2d ago

They are going to use AI for a large portion of the game development process. Upper management need bonuses and the shareholders need more money. So, people will lose their jobs.

Skuletor2d ago

Maybe they were already using AI to make business decisions, which would explain why they closed Hi-Fi Rush's studio, then said they need more games like Hi-Fi Rush not long after that announcement.

Crows902d ago (Edited 2d ago )

They shouldn't have bought any studios. Some is okay...but they went on a shopping spree...stupid

Einhander19721d 23h ago

The better question is why did Microsoft buy publishers for a service they were subsidizing they knew couldn't support.

And why are so many websites trying to make people feel sorry for Microsoft instead of truly criticizing the fact they are closing studios and killing jobs that would have been fine if Microsoft themselves hadn't gotten involved.

Quit feeling sorry for Microsoft and start feeling sorry for the industry and the all the gamers who are actually losing out.

THIS IS MICROSOFTS FAULT.

RNTody1d 23h ago

The first thing that happens after any major acquisition or merger is a consolidation of the whole new portfolio, which includes cutting any excess, bloat or portfolios that don't fit the larger MO of the big boy. So far, it's been par for the course with Microsoft and that's why gamers have been so against this acquisition. Tango Gameworks is the beginning. You think Microsoft wants to pay to keep small timers like Ninja Theory in business?

There is absolutely zero evidence to suggest that Microsoft will improve any of these studios, but plenty to suggest that they will get rid of what they don't need and hold onto the IP. The real agenda of the acquisition was always to acquire The Elder Scrolls, Diablo, Fallout, Call of Duty, Candy Crush etc. that will create millions in passive revenue stream for Microsoft regardless of where the games release. Microsoft simply wants their cut.

Because of Games Pass Microsoft has no interest in investing in new IP which is risky and requires creative talent they can neither nurture nor manage. Game Pass has also not grown in the way Microsoft expected it to, even post acquisitions. Therefore the logical thing to do, without serious money makers to release, is to cut as much cost as possible.

Show all comments (47)
70°

A Matter Of Trust: What The Game Industry Should Do To Win Gamers Back

Skewed and Reviewed have written an Opinion Piece covering issues in the gaming industry, how current issues were issues years ago, and what can be done to help restore consumer trust.

anast4d ago

Nothing. It's up to the gamers to stop consuming content from companies that they don't agree with.

Garethvk4d ago

How do you know if you agree with it or not unless you play it? Which without conventions forces gamers to rely on trailers. Perhaps Demos should be made more frequently. But companies need to do better as well.

anast4d ago

Wait until release. Watch Gameplay. Exercise patience.

Garethvk4d ago

But is that not what they have now? Tons of gameplay or are you talking about watching actual gamers play it versus the trailers and streams? The big issue is that some companies pay streamers and influencers and they create content but for me; that is hardly a fair, unbiased, and factual look at a game.

1nsomniac4d ago

Get rid of the suits in the industry and job done!!

Garethvk4d ago

They usually are attached to the money sadly. It would be nice to have gamers in charge but you have so much money invested that business people are needed. Hence the issue; you need people who know business but are also gamers who know have an eye to the community. It sounds simple in theory that if you give gamers quality games that they want to play; money will be made. But that is not always so.

60°

From The Last of Us to Baldur's Gate 3: The success of the Game Music Festival

Marie Dealessandri speaks to Borislav Slavov and Gustavo Santaolalla about “the new golden age of games music”.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz