Wolfenstein: The New Order Will Run at 1080p 60FPS on Xbox One

OnlySP: A Bethesda representative has confirmed to OnlySP that the game will run at 1080p/60fps on the Xbox One.

[Wingsfan24]

Glad they confirmed this quickly before all these debates about the resolution started up instead of talking about the actual game.

[Magicite]

well...its not like this would look like next-gen game anyway.

[ramiuk1]

exactly,it looks ugly so no wonder its 1080p.
but i hope its the start of MS games being 1080p or as close as possible

[abstractel]

I completely agree, the only real next-gen looking gaming on the XboxOne is Ryse, and that was quite the looker. 900p didn't seem so bad in the Gamersyde videos.

Wolfenstein is a high-res PS3/Xbox360 game. BF4, Ryse, Killzone Shadowfall all look a big step up. XboxOne's next biggest looker to me looks to be Quantum Break.

I would not gloat and be satisfied about Wolfenstein being at 1080p 60fps because it doesn't look any better than last gen's PC ports of FPS shooters.

Edit: But really, factually the PS4 is stronger and it will and already is showing in both exclusive and third party games. If that's ok with you, that's fine. I will end up getting the XboxOne for a strong exclusive first party title like if Quantum Break turns out as good as it looks to be. But deal with the fact that XboxOne is technologically (minus the kinect) inferior.

[dcj0524]

In your opinion. Looks fantastic to me.

[UnHoly_One]

We can't have any good news about Xbox, can we???

Ryse looks great, but that's not good enough because it's not 1080p.

Then when something is 1080p, it's because the game doesn't look good in the first place.

Can't we just give this a rest? Does everything have to be a damn argument on this site?

[thezeldadoth]

man these comments are so predictable. you don't even have to click the article yet to know that sony fanboys are gonna be on here claiming its only because the graphics are shit. you guys are so passionate about your non-innovative mid range pseudo PC.

[DoubleM70]

I laugh at you now it doesn't look next gen. Make up your mind fanboy. shut the hell up and play games.

[BallsEye]

Funny how people say XO is so weak it can't run COD better than 720p but Ryse which is superior visually to any other next-gen game runs in 900p high AA and example in article in 1080p/60. Both games look better and run better than COD. Prooves it's up to dev and their engine.

[mr233]

Wow, what a waste of a bubble.

[CrowbaitBob]

Yep, totally confirmed my assumption about PS4 fanboys. I knew the inevitable response to a 1080p/60fps game on Xbox One would be something along the lines of "still looks like crap" or "that's because it looks like crap."

[dantesparda]

Here we go with the parity bs.

[cozomel]

@zeldadoth

And you are so passionate about your trolling. Seriously guy give it rest, you're obsessed with Sony fanboys. Get off their you know what

@ballseye

COD runs at 60fps, Ryse doesnt and has alot of fast action going on screen, while Ryse dips into the teens frequently and is much slower paced game. Also its made by Crytek, who are known for pushing graphics. So i'd say the are about even on a performance level. And what it really proves is that the PS4 is a more powerful system. Otherwise why would the devs choose to make it 720p on the X1 but 1080p on the PS4? Makes no sense. But then again, fanboys arent known for their sense.

To the rest of the fanboys, stop being so defensive. A game that looks like this better run at 1080p/60fps on X1, otherwise you'd have more things to worry about

[starchild]

Well if you don't consider this game to have good graphics, the PS4 doesn't have any graphically demanding games that run at 1080p AND 60fps either. COD Ghosts and Wolfenstein are about the only games that do.

[Mr-Dude]

Well i'm a Sony fan, and I am happy the X1 is getting 1080P @6FPS. Now the next gen can start, and we can really see the difference between the games. BTW no Sony fan ever said the X1 couldn't archieve this...

[CrowbaitBob]

Agreed Mr-Dude.

Fan =/= Fanboy

[Flames76]

Take off them fanboy glasses wolfenstein look sbetter than any game on the PS4 right now

[Akuma07]

Agreed.

The graphics in this game look horrible. I have thought this ever since the first trailer was revealed.

Anyone who says it looks great are either talking out their ass, or blind.

[christocolus]

@dimitri

Dude if you have nothing sensible to add then pls move on. Are you so much of a fanboy that you have to troll xbx articles like this?

[Ashunderfire86]

Call of Duty Ghost looks uglier than this, yet that couldn't run 1080p on Xbox One. This is a longer FPS shooter with better graphics all in 1080p 60FPS, so be happy man.

[DaGR8JIBRALTAR]

looks like shiiieeet on both systems!

[badz149]

@Flames76

"Take off them fanboy glasses wolfenstein looks better than any game on the PS4 right now"

ok. but as for you, just keep that sunglasses on, because you're clearly blind!

[YodaCracker]

How come when PS3 games ran worse than the 360 versions, it was because developers were "lazy", but when XB1 games run worse it's the console's fault?

[MadLad]

ElderGeek; a very reputable, if small, site said they felt it was one of the most next-gen looking games so far. Maybe it is needed to be seen first hand.

[UnholyLight]

Wait a minute, let me get this straight. Some good news about Xbox One being able to run 1080p @ 60FPS and there are STILL people downplaying this.

Where could this god forsaken place be that I am seeing this negativity?!

Oh right, the internet,

carry on

[deSSy2724]

On PS4 its also 1080p. I mean, your logic is "it looks ugly, so no wonder its 1080p". So, by that logic, PS4 should render this game in 1440p or 4K or whatever?

Cmon!!!!

The game is 1080p on both PS4 and X1 BUT, on PS4 it will look better because "resolution" is not the same thing as "graphics settings/details".

You want more exapmles? Just compare 1080p + very high graphics settings to 1080p + very low graphics settings (its just an example on PC).

Learn the difference already!

[Gamer1982]

The problem wasn't running 1080p it was the fact it ps4 was doing it and it wasn't. If both do it then its not really a problem. Everybody wins.. To run at 1080p 60fps though somethings gotta have taken a hit somewhere graphically especially this being an FPS. Not even PS4 can run a top looking FPS 1080p 60FPS.. This is not a shot at the Xbox One but more of a shot at how bad this game is going to look..

[abzdine]

is it 4K on PS4 and PC then? :D

joke aside, looking forward to seeing the final product and judge from there and tbh this game is far from impressive looking.

[insomnium2]

@unholy

Yes you can have good news on XBone. I think people are quick to say this game is not pretty to begin with is because we all know how quickly this site can turn into s*it like it was back in 2006-2009. Some clown is bound to say "see these consoles are equal in power I told ya" or something.

To tell nothing but the honest truth with no shots fired if this game runs equal on both platforms and looks the same it will not be very taxing to the PS4's hardware to run it.

It might be a decicion of the dev to make the versions equal. MS might have helped the dev to make that call. The dev might've fealt a little lazy not to take advantage of PS4 hw. There's no way to know.

[SilentNegotiator]

LOL, one multiplat manages 1080p60fps on Xbone and PS4 and suddenly Xbone is just as powerful as Ps4, eh? Oh the sad delusion.

Developers are going to keep pushing the envelope. The disparity of the two systems isn't going away because one game is uncomplicated enough to manage 1080p60fps on both systems.

[Maml07]

thief compare
https://www.youtube.com/wat...
i think x1 in 900p beat ps4 1080p lol

[nicksetzer1]

Guess that sdk really helped .... if this is a continuing trend ps fanboys might have to find a new thing to rant about.

[Gazondaily]

To be honest, its based on an old engine and doesnt really flex those next gen muscles as far as I can see.

If there is parity in something like The Division then yeah, that would be a strong argument in favour of the X1 and resolution debates etc.

[AnEwGuY]

@ Septic..

First of all, iD Tech5 isn't an "old engine"; it was brand new, mid-way through last gen, and has hardly been developed. All signs point toward future Bethesda games using the engine, and their games are always huge, open world experiences. Plus, iD's engines always have a long life, and are very adaptable.

Second, your "point" is moot, since there have been some games made on "old engines" that were sub 1080p on the X1, like Ghosts and Thief.

[sobotz]

@Septic

Titanfall is running on a 2004 year-old engine but still not confirmed 1080p or 900p on Xbox One.

So it's a good thing that Wolfenstein can runs on 1080p 60fps

[Ausbo]

@septic I agree. But its not always the engine. But also the tools they have to work with. As far as division is concerned, I'd be surprised if either console versions run at 1080p with those amazing visuals.

[nicksetzer1]

@septic Doesn't change that less intensive games have run at both lower res and framerates before the sdk, also i said IF, but i guess even the thought of anything positive about xb1 is unfathomable to you...

[scott182]

The game runs at the same res and fps on the ps3/360 as next gen consoles do... We have seen parity in multiplats before, but not very often.

I feel that resolution and fps do matter and I'm glad that both next gen systems can run this at the same resolution/fps. But I think we are seeing now that the "play the games, not the resolution" bit was bull crap all along. I hope for continued parity in the future now that we know how everyone really feels.

[cozomel]

@nicksetzer

You're making assumptions, you dont know if this is running of the new SDK. And even if the X1/Ps4 version both run at 1080/60 it doesnt mean they are equal, one could still have lower res textures, effects, shadows, be missing things, one could hold its framerate better. Dont count your chickens yet.

[nicksetzer1]

Actually i do, the new sdk is being used by devs already ... so what makes you think this is the only dev without access to it?

[ThanatosDMC]

What Septic said.

[Anonagrog]

@Septic,

The engine can be changed as necessary; they do have access to the code-base. It isn't some rigid thing set in cement that needs re-writing from scratch every few years.

[Utalkin2me]

@AnEwGuY

1080p and 60 fps is not a major feat on the xbox1. The feat is doing that and still making it look just as good as the PS4 version.

[Gamer1982]

nothing to do with sdk see when making a game you only have so much power look at it like a game. You have so much GP (game points) PS4 has more than Xbone, 1080p costs GP, 60FPS costs GP, MSAA 4X costs GP and so on.. To get 1080p 60FPS this game will have had to take a hit somewhere.. As the Xbox has less power than the PS4 past games have proved that you cannot ignore the facts here in fact this could be just like last generation where games were purposely nuked to look the same on both systems..

[Blaze929]

for whatever reason, this still wont matter because it "doesnt look next gen"

lol, silly.

[Xsilver]

this would be something to brag about if it was the Witcher 3 a game that actually pushes the next gen consoles :/ because right now both Witcher 3 and Watch Dog are rumored to not be 1080p on the Xone so Wolfenstien doesn't change anything and for some reason i think you know that.

[fr0sty]

You can run mario 64 at 1080p... it won't matter because you're still using blocky n64 models and textures. If a game doesn't push the next gen envelope and can run at 1080p60, it isn't that impressive. Wipeout HD ran at 1080p60 on PS3 (with a few shortcuts, but the point is still valid) with only 256mb of VRAM and a GPU that was outdated before it came out by a good bit.

So, not exactly silly. This game was a current gen game ported to next gen, not much different than tomb raider. This isn't like a game of the visual quality of The Order: 1886 or DriveClub running at full visual parity on both systems.

The fanboys are out on this one... bunch of disagrees to posts like this, without anybody actually providing a solid argument as to why. I'd like to see a counter point from someone who actually knows what they're talking about. Are you out there?

[fr0sty]

Ok, I did some digging, and apparently I'm wrong. There is a game out there that is better on Xbox than PS4. The Order: 1886 has an unannounced Xbox One port in the works, with one super-cool exclusive graphical feature PS4 doesn't have...

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

[Clunkyd]

does this mean that ps4 version will run at 120fps? :P

[torchic]

didn't the PS4 version of CoD:G run at +60fps and so brought framerate problems? :D

but your point is valid. if this game can run 1080p60fps on X1 then surely it must easily do higher framerates & resolutions on PS4

PS4 is more powerful that X1 and will always output better performance & visuals on the same game #dealwithit Xbox fans, no need to be so sour :(

[Utalkin2me]

No it means the PS4 version will better textures and such.

[insomnium2]

Either it will look better or run better. Always*. No point arguing this.

*unles MS moneyhats the dev.

[prankster]

Output or native? The PR rep didn't specify.

[Pogmathoin]

Now where is that Fallout announcement?

[miDnIghtEr20C_SfF]

B-b-b-b-b-b-b-but the Xbox One can't do 1080p and 60fps!!!!1!1!ONE!!

Or at least that is what SAD has told me. (Sony Attack Dogs)

[insomnium2]

Oh dear. Didn't you know of that Kinect game that is already 1080p? What a disgusting little troll you are.

How about a game like Plants vs zombies? That should hit 1080p 60fps easily. Hell it should hit 4kp and 240fps on XBone. Is that something to brag about? Seriously?

[RealtorMDandDC]

Is it upscale? or Native? The article just stated 1080p/60fps.

If it's Native, that's good news for Xbox One owners. And shows there is hope.

People complain that FPS and Resolution does not matter. It does this is a new generation of gaming. It's 2014 for the love of all things good.

If a mobile device can output/input in 1080p and higher. I want my $400 plus game console to be able to do the same when it comes to games. That's not asking for too much.

Many are making excusing stating it does not matter, but it does. What's the point of next generation gaming when you're not getting next generation fluidity and visuals (resolution)

Yes, I agree game-play matters, but a great frame-rate and high resolution helps to enhance the level of immersion. The holy grail of gaming is all about "immersion"

Games are all about immersion. The more you can do to enhance that level of immersion helps to enhance the overall gaming experience.

There's a reason why imax exist. The audio and visual at a imax theater enhances the level of the movie-goers experience. For example Gravity & Superman where great movies to see at imax.

Why can't this be said for games. I want a developer to do the best they can, utilizing all tools available to give me a maximum immersion experience.

Also if resolution did not matter when we go to the movie theater today it would still be in black and white and silent.

We see if HD if you have 20/20 vision, we buy Blu-rays and retina displays for HD. Why is it so different for console gaming?

Even the PC guys has harped and beat the drum that PC can do 5900x8080 resolution and they can play their games at 500fps. (sarcasm)

But when it comes to a next gen console gaming in 2014 that cost over $400 for price of admission frame rates and resolution does not matter all of a sudden.

Resolution and frame-rate should matter in this new generation of console gaming, because if it did not we should all feel bamboozled. And we should of just stuck with our PS3's and 360's for a sub-HD gaming experience.

What would be the point of going next gen gaming when the past gen of gaming consoles can provide a sub-HD gaming at 30-60fps gaming experience.

[Redlogic]

Out of curiosity, did they state if it's native 1080p or up scaled?

[IcarusOne]

Is this all that the next gen is going to be? Debates and articles about pixels and frames per second?

Yawn.

[Utalkin2me]

No, textures and aa too

[IcarusOne]

It's a shame we don't care about fun anymore...

[TheSaint]

I wonder if this'll do the classic MS flip flop?

[DeadlyFire]

Even so. Running this game at 1080p on both platforms means one of two things.

A. They chose the weaker platform as the base platform for the game so graphics and framerate parity wouldn't be an issue on the platform
or
B. They chose to downscale XB1 version's graphics to keep it at 1080p with 60 fps.

Looks pretty decent to me. Could have looked better maybe, but I can live with its looks. Considering Wolfenstien 3D graphics could have been the option for this game and I would still consider it.

[ITPython]

Ok, here is a sincere question for XB1 owners.

Due to all this resolution-gate stuff, there is a good chance that developers might start making more games 1080p @60fps on the XB1 just to steer clear of the resolution and fps debates/fiasco's. Good news, right?

The thing is, no matter what party we are affiliated with, we all can agree that the XB1 just is not as powerful as the PS4. We are constantly seeing multiplat games running at less fps and/or resolution on the XB1 just to keep them looking roughly the same visually (with upscaling) as the PS4 versions. This is simply a hardware bottleneck that will always be present, and while there will undoubtedly be things that can be done to narrow that gap, there will always be a gap.

So here is my question: What would you guys prefer, 1080p @60fps with downgraded texture resolution and/or other effects (lighting, AA or otherwise)? Or would you take something like 900p @30fps and have a game that still looks really nice, like Ryse?

I assume most will take the latter, a nicer looking game graphically, but with less resolution and/or fps.

Honestly I would be very worried as an XB1 owner, because if devs focus most on getting 1080p and 60fps due to recent controversies, the XB1 versions will no doubt be noticeably less appealing (graphics wise) compared to the PS4 versions, due to the fact that they have to downgrade quite a lot to reach 1080p @60fps (unless the game just isn't very demanding). Whereas if they simply dropped the fps and/or resolution, it could be pretty close graphically via upscaling.

I ask this question in complete sincerity, and hope I don't get bubbled down to hell because of it.

[insomnium2]

Don't worry. You won't get an answer from them. Disagrees on the other hand you WILL get.

[Major_Glitch]

@ITPython Smartest post on this fail of a thread. It's funny how all the die hard M$ fans are out here, once again saying graphics matter because they saw a headline saying an x1 game is gonna do 1080p @ 60 fps. Some of them are even trying to use this to justify the laughable assertion that the x1 is somehow technically equal to the PS4. Poor things. Let me spell it out for you guys, Wolfenstein will STILL look better on the PS4. The x1 is STILL less powerful then the PS4.

[jasonc1213]

Xbox owner here. To answer your question I'd prefer something like Ryse in 900p than a 1080p stutterfest. It would be kind of cool to choose which resolution you wanted in the game's settings (like on a PC).

[WillM17]

XBONE wins the year

[Major_Glitch]

You sir, have a bright future as a PR Man for MS.

[TheSaint]

On what planet?

[kenshiro100]

Curious to see how well this game does.

[Convas]

I'm on that "WAIT and SEE" track for now.

But if so, well done to Machine Games.

[Why o why]

Best thing

[SaffronCurse]

good job

[TheTowelBoy]

Good. The less we care about graphics the more we can hold the devs accountable for more than just making shinies. I want GAMEPLAY INNOVATION.

[maniacmayhem]

I don't even care about innovation, (even tho that would be nice), just give me a game as fun as L4D, TF2, Gears 3, Bayonetta and Bioshock.

I want that rushing home from work to play a game feeling again.

[gamertk421]

My last few games like that were Diablo 3, Borderlands 2 and Skyrim. It tends to be long games that have a grinding style that give me that feeling. Titanfall will, as well.

[Kribwalker]

Plants vs zombies garden warfare is pretty good at that

[Ashby_JC]

Evolve looks to be that game with a high FUN factor and encouraging team play 4 v 1 action!!

So many go on and on about res and fps that FUN factor doesnt get talked about.

As I get older I ask myself when im playing ANY game.

'Are you having fun???" If the honest answer is no. I usually will send the game back (gamefly) if the answer is YES. Ill keep and buy it.

I remember the first time I played the L4D1 Demo....I had soooooo much fun!!! It was a must buy!!

PS I have PvZ:GW coming in the mail this week. If the game is FUN...ill buy it!!

[insomnium2]

Rushing home from work for gaming? That sounds just sad and no-lifeish.

[TheTowelBoy]

The game I'm playing now that's doing that for me is Mount and Blade: Warband. Not the prettiest thing, but man am I in love with that combat system. Very underrated game.

[maniacmayhem]

@TowelBoy
Mount and Blade: Warband? I never heard of it, i'll have to check that one out.

@Ashby
'Are you having fun???" If the honest answer is no. I usually will send the game back (gamefly).."

100%, I'm a gamefly user also and I ask mysef the same question(s). I just returned FF13-3 because I found I was forcing myself to play it. But I was not having any fun, I said to hell with this game and threw it right back its case and returned it.

Gamefly is god's gift to gamers. I would have been pissed paying $60 for FF13-3 and then returning it to Gamestop for 13 bux (lol).

@Gamertk
I'm still playing Borderlands 2, grinding my Commando to level 60.

@Krib
PvZ eh? Ok, i'll check that one out too.

[jasondracd]

Then everyone should expect framerate dips on both machines. I have yet to see a solid running 1080P/60frame FPS with no dips on either machine yet. Still saw some on COD for PS4's single player.

[Convas]

Forza 5 says hello.

Look up the Digital Foundry analysis.

[AnEwGuY]

@ Convas...

He said "1080P/60frame F-P-S", as in First Person Shooter. Need to hone those reading comp skills kiddo.

[TekoIie]

@AnEwGuY

Don't be a dick.

I had to read that sentence a couple of times for me to understand he meant "first person shooter" rather than "frames per second".

[dark-kyon]

where are you living,cod ghost do not have frame drops,the lags what the game have is for what the game render above 60 fps.

[Ghost_Nappa]

English much? Ghosts has frequent frame rate drops on every next gen and pc

[JustPlay4]

The game run like shit on everything

[PotatoAsylum]

It may still look better on the PS4 (lighting, anti-aliasing, effects, etc), but at least in this case the differences will probably be negligible and difficult to really see, like they were last-gen. It's nice to see a good lengthy fps as well, and the guns look like they have a nice umph to them. Did any of you guys see Adam Sessler complaining about the inclusion of Nazi scientists? As long as they're portrayed as the bad guys, I don't see the problem.

[Sketchy_Galore]

Re: Nazi Scientists. The problem is that it's not accurate. You're an American and you run around killing Nazi scientists when what you really should have been doing is handing them letters from the US government offering them high paying jobs in America.

[PotatoAsylum]

Were people disagreeing with me about the port or the Adam Sessler thing? It looks like people thought I was being a fanboy or something.

[Eldyraen]

To be fair we weren't the only one doing this although we likely did it more than most. Part of that may have been WW2 for most Americans was simply a different kind of war than those in Europe or even east Asia.

The Nazis by far for the worst wrap (although many other allied/axis countries committed genocide/atrocities as well during this time) and deservedly so but we saw far less of it as a nation "up close and personal". It was likely that much easier to separate the enemy from a potential ally (or at least scientific advantage) because the impact on our own was less than others.

It didn't make it right but was probably one of the most shrewd and "smartest" decisions we made (as a nation relating to growth) as our involvement was primarily support for much of the war. We may want to make it look like we were the heroes in movies (and in some cases we were) but our biggest accomplishment likely had to do with post-war cleanup and politics.

If we hadn't joined in the Soviet Union very well could had expanded significantly on both western/eastern fronts (not going to argue good/bad there either) which would had changed the world in a completely different way. Manpower aside a lot of what happened for us happened on the other side of the world. Most of which gets forgotten when compared to dropping two bombs near the declining days of the war. It was literally overkill but did factor in to a quicker finish of the war.

I'm not diminishing what our soldiers did but like all victors we do like to put a particular light on our own involvement. Movies and games though are what really overstate everything though as you can't more biased than a story told from a single perspective but doubt there isn't any 100% unbiased history of the time anywhere as it just isn't in our nature.

More importantly playing a game where you run around securing Nazi scientists wouldn't sell near as well. Novel and truthful but not very marketable. I suspect there were at least some cases where we (or another country) took missions solely for personal gain and not necessary for the war effort (although denying enemy resources be it personnel or material is undeniably effective).

[Sketchy_Galore]

@PotatoAsylum. My guess is people thought you were stealth trolling about the port. Silly I know but this is pretty much the frontline of the console wars, lots of itchy trigger fingers ready to hit that disagree button at the first sign of the enemy. A little friendly fire is to be expected.

@Eldyraen. I actually agree with you. I can just never pass up the chance to be a smartass.

[Eldyraen]

@Sketchy_Galore:

Me too (both agreeing with your original post and being a smart ass on occasion).

[Shnooze]

Not to mention guys, this IS a wolfenstein game. I don't see how it could've whipped right over Adam's head.

[XboxFun]

Looks like the rumors were true. More of the later releases for x1 will be in 1080p and 60fps.

Crap, what will be the next fiasco to complain and worry about?

[hello12]

It be later this year games will start hitting 1080p and 60 frames. I think Microsoft will surprise Sony fans soon enough and they'll find out the x box 1 isn't weak at all.

The x box 1 is actually more complicated than Sony fans realise. Mistermedia might be wrong about the x box 1 having another GPU, but there is a few things on the x box 1 motherboard, that has puzzled tech guys. They don't know what a certain chip is for things like that!

[GamingNerd013]

Na it's weak yo sure it might get more 1080P games later date but at what cost? Just look at forza 5 the only next gen looking on it is the cars everything else is blend tracks trees people ground and many more. And there aren't anyrhing it has that has puzzled tech guys that people know of hell more devs r amazed with PS4 specs and none r with X1 so stop with ur BS lies really so sick of morons that try to make it look like devs r amazed with the X1 power or that it has a secrete chip that can make it on par with Ps4 specs and also the whole cloud BS as well. Anyway I'm glad X1 is starting to have 1080P games as it should be standard 4 next gen. But fanboy or not X1 will never have high end graphics that will match the PS4 and same as having better FPS as well on PS4 simply cause it's specs r 2 weak to PS4 specs.

[jessupj]

That's funny. Resolution matters all of a sudden. How predictable.

Judging from the agrees and disagrees in this thread, it's full of insecure ms apologists.

It's interesting how the xbone finally gets 1 multiplat game running at 1080p/60fps and all of a sudden you think the xbone is just as powerful as the PS4 and resolutiongate is going to stop now.

Resolution and frame rate are just 2 aspects of graphical fidelity and we all know the PS4 is vastly more powerful than the xbone. I will be fully expecting the PS4 version to have a combination of better AA, textures, lighting, rendering filters etc.

If not I won't be supporting this game. One of the reasons I bought a PS4 is because I wanted superior multiplats. I bought the console with the better specs so I expect better multiplats. I have no issue with the xbone recieving 1080/60 games, but I want the PS4 version to perform better in some way. You can't get much more logical than that, but I fully expect a certain group to not comprehend that simple concept.

I'll be fully expecting a horde of disagrees from my perfectly rational argument based in logic, but maybe one of you could counter my stance with an actual well rounded argument of your own and back it up with evidence of sound examples.

[H0RSE]

"It's interesting how the xbone finally gets 1 multiplat game running at 1080p/60fps and all of a sudden you think the xbone is just as powerful as the PS4 and resolutiongate is going to stop now."

- That's really not whats going on here... It's more along the lines of despite the jokes and heckling the console has received, there are people who knew all along that the X1 was capable of 1080p/60fps, (even though it already accomplished this with Forza and NBA2k14) finally catching the break they needed, and in light of this, Sony fanboys and apologists like yourself, are trying to downplay this news or shift the argument away from resolution and framerate, even though it has been the biggest argument in the console war thus far and is brought up in virtually every single game article - but suddenly, resolution is whatever, let's focus on rendering techniques...

"Resolution and frame rate are just 2 aspects of graphical fidelity and we all know the PS4 is vastly more powerful than the xbone."

- It isn't "vastly" more powerful - it's just more powerful. A high-end PC is vastly more powerful - than both consoles. The arguably more important factor is that the PS4 is easier to develop for, seeing as how the boasted power of the PS3 didn't really manifest into anything until the end of the gen, due to the difficult development process.

"I have no issue with the xbone recieving 1080/60 games, but I want the PS4 version to perform better in some way. You can't get much more logical than that, but I fully expect a certain group to not comprehend that simple concept."

- this is a flawed argument. Just because one device is more powerful, does not mean that it will/should deliver better results every time. Perhaps if the console somehow developed/rendered it's own games based around its hardware capabilities, always knowing how to go about the most optimal way to reach results, your argument would hold more water, but you are not accounting for the human element. What if the game in question is superbly optimized or not a resource hog, or both? Instances where a title could essentially be maxed out on X1 - how do you expect the PS4 to offer you more in this case?

Just because the power is there, doesn't mean devs have to use it. Devs aren't typically required to push every ounce of power out of each system for every game, which could leave you in a scenario where the more powerful console could be turning out equal or even lesser results. This is no fault of the console itself, and you don't have to agree with the "lazy dev" idea, but it does exist.

[Rustynail]

Then buy a PC if graphics and framerates are so important. Graphcis aren't everything. Buying a console just for graphics is stupidity. I buy a console for its games, and the Xbox One has got far better games. I'm not interested in nerd series like Infamous or God of War.

[H0RSE]

The next argument will be how resolution isn't that big of deal, texture detail is, or lighting, or post processing effects, or maybe it will just resort to a numbers game of comparing how many 1080p games each console has.

[jessupj]

@ horse

I'm not trying to downplay this news, I'm merely pointing out the hypocrisy of the MS fanboys. I don't know why you consider that apologising.

" this is a flawed argument. Just because one device is more powerful, does not mean that it will/should deliver better results every time. What if the game in question is superbly optimized or not a resource hog, or both? "

I don't know whether to take you seriously or not. I disagreed with most of your points, but at least I respect your opinion. After I read that, for me, you lost all credibility.

Exempting game like Rayman that don't push hardware limits at all, the vastly more powerful system (and I consider and increase of 50% and 125% pixels is a vast improvement) SHOULD always receive a better performing multiplat title.

Whether that actually happens in the reality is yet to be seen, but logically speaking the PS4 should always receive a better performing multiplat game. I don't know how else to explain that simple concept to you.

[webeblazing]

no ps fanboys win that award. theyre just pointing xbone can run games at 1080p 60fps. ps fanboys are acting like the ones they hated so much last gen. i feel bad because i was a ps fan last gen, still is right now. i thought when this gen started ps fanboys would be more humble but that was wishful thinking.

what i mean is, trying to one up xbox fanboys in every article make them a hypocrite. they do it to every platform.

wiiU= last gen, no games
xbone= weak ps4 better,no 1080p, no 1080p@60fps, no games
pc= gfx dont matter, nobody play games above 1080p and 60fps, need $2000 pc to equal ps4 performance, have to upgrade every year, always have to update to play games, no games, only mmos and moba games, we dont care for stretegy and mmos, VR is giimick, f2p games suck(you do remember that last gen)

ps4= the greatest since sliced bread, greatest games, 1080p always, can do 1080p @60fps, no we like mmos and f2p games, ps VR will be the greatest, games coming to ps4 that was exclusive will now be good, now we are looking forward to a bungie game even tho we downplayed the devs a whole gen.

you will see this in every article. i been seeing this for the last year.

ps fanboys use to give different platforms more respect than what theyre giving now. i think most of them use to be xbox fanboys. well not xbox fanboys just trolls that jump sides just to start $h!t. you

[redcar121]

But the x1 cant do 1080p lol

[payikick]

Finally.

1080p/60fps and Xbone in the same sentence is very uncommon.

[Th4Freak]

So, no next-gen graphics?

[hankmoody]

And here I was convinced by so many on N4G that the XB1 couldn't do 1080p/60fps. Imagine that!

[dcj0524]

Well dis geme en't all dat enyway. No nex gen gwafics cuz XBOX sux.

PS4THEWIN XBOX 720 LOLOLOLOLOLOL

Xbox one? mor liek Xbox 0ne.....cu...cu...cuz it SUXand has no sales

[Hicken]

Nobody said that. I mean, really, NOBODY SAID IT.

What people have been saying- and what is the truth- is that you can reasonably expect that a game running 1080/60 on PS4 will likely not be able to do so on XB1; and if it IS possible, it will be at the sacrifice of graphical effects, unless the developer aims for parity. Dev tools will aid the XB1 in reaching the same performance numbers as the PS4, but thinking that will allow the system to catch up in performance is working under the asinine assumption that the same will not also apply to the PS4.

This has been the argument- outside fanboys that shouldn't be taken seriously, anyway- that has been made. If you're able to poke holes in that argument, I'd love to hear how.

Just saying, "Oh, but everybody said," over and over again doesn't make it true.

[JeffGUNZ]

Hicken,

Not EVERYONE has said that but a lot of sony fanboys here have, over and over. And over.

Not including you in that, actually you have rarely said the X1 is not capable, but hopefully this SDK kit will make this more of a norm for X1 games

[cruzngta]

The new sdks should help to achieve this more and more. I am sure this is a relief for XB1 fans in general and I am glad to see the system getting some good news. The sdks will definitely be a big factor going forward to help utilize the system architecture for getting the required resolution. The March driver updates will help even more.

[hankmoody]

Not really a relief for me because deep down, I know that once this resolution thing gets cleared up for good, some other "problem" blown out of proportion will take its place. Really wish I could come on here without all the constant fighting and name calling.

[imt558]

Well, wait for some comparisons on DF or H2H.

[ChipsDP]

I honestly couldn't care about resolution to be honest.I honestly would like to purchase an Xbox One just so I can sit back and play a few games with a controller for a bit. Let's just hope that this resolution debate doesn't carry on, or I will have to use the PC argument ;)

[Albie360]

Well, use your pc then cause almost everything on xbox is on pc. What is pc argument??? Pc will always be faster and xbox will always be slower to ps4.

[ChipsDP]

My point is, I'd like to sit back and play a game every once in a while. When I had my 360 I played that just as much as my PC because I didn't have to sit right up to the keyboard and mouse, I could just sit back, relax and play some games. That's why resolution doesn't matter to me, the games do.

[KR1ST0F3R]

Rage engine (huge texture pop-ins). Not exactly flexing "next gen" muscle. Ps3 and 360 will manage 720p/60fps with this one

[76erz24]

"But Xbox One can't even run COD or PvsZ Garden Warfare!!!!"

Lol it has nothing to do with the power of the system. Any sensible non-fanboy new that Xbox One would be doing this eventually all along.

[yewles1]

Holy crap at these comments! Here's the truth guys...

"Is 60 frames per second the target for current gen as well?

It’s hardwired for 60fps so we can’t really do anything else (laughs)"

http://gamerhorizon.com/wol...

[jjind]

Current gen is sub HD/60 fps.. so what your point?.. Remember the xb1 can't do 1080p 60fps...

[yewles1]

Current gen is 60fps 'period', there's no reason for X1 to NOT get 1080p/60, just like cross-gen sports games.

[Eldyraen]

@yewles:

1080p/60fps would be the definition of this gen only if you want marginally better looking games than last gen. This generation is about more than that though although some games will scrape through while still looking truly "next gen" compared to last anyways but not as great as if they went for more instead of res/FPS.

Next gen should be fine for 1080p/60fps and maybe some higher res even but I would probably take 1080p/60fps/better AA unless new displays have hit the sweet spot (catering to small market for higher res isn't as big of deal as great AA can make 1080p outstanding already). This gen is about pushing everything else forward as a lot of subtle improvements make big differences once you put it all together.

[aragon]

Is this true? Link doesn't work

[Wingsfan24]

Traffic causing the site to buckle. It's true, trying to get site back online.

[RAWSTA]

HATERS GONNA HATE!

[PrinceOfAllSaiyans]

Lol the game is 1080p/60FOS on PS3/360 so I don't know why all you Xbox fanboys are getting all haply for.

[SonyROXitoohya]

Lol why u getting so defensive and angry? Haha

[MainstreamGamer]

If anything his comment is more in tune with laughter. Why are YOU so defensive?

[MasterCornholio]

The only thing that means is that the developers want 1080P 60FPS across all platforms. But that doesnt mean that it will look the same on all of them. Should be interesting to see what DF finds with this title.

[maniacmayhem]

And if the game wasn't 1080p/60fps for Xbox One, all you sony fanboys would be just as happy to point it out to everyone.

[xx4xx]

As an 'XBot', I'll reiterate what I've said all along.....content is king. It's the games that matter. So if this game sucks, it's gonna suck in 1080p.

(Though I am interested in the Doom beta- I'll be keeping ears out for info on that).

[jjind]

Damn so much for c jok.. I mean cboat

[Debaitable]

Because it's going to run as a xbox360 build /s

[killzone619]

thanks to the cloud!

[MasterCornholio]

Nope.

:I

Thanks to their programming.

[killzone619]

it was a joke :P

[GameingmyLife]

what wait... I thought Xbox One could never run at 1080p 60 fps...

Hmmmmmm look like somebody lied...... congrats MS

[lonewolfjedi]

hate to ask this but is that 1080p native or up-scaled?

[MuhammadJA]

Great news. Still, the PC version will be the best!

[D3athc3ll]

PC will always be the best on multiplats. But who cares?? Its pc!

[OC_MurphysLaw]

So my take away on this. The newest updates and sdk that hit in February will indeed help out BUT its really only going to be useful to games that at have the time on the production side to utilize it. I suspect most games in March that are multiplat may not have the bandwidth to really address with the exception of Titanfall which you can bet MS has given Respawn a small army to help out and make whatever changes they can. Beyond March I think this update will indeed help games down the road.

[xx4xx]

Agreed.

I'll also take your 'small army' comment further:

They will probably offer help to debs on multi plats with the aim for enhancing graphics but
I wouldn't be surprised if they are sending support out to bump up release dates for exclusives as well (Halo 5 in 2014, Gears 4 sooner than 2016, etc)

Bodily getting their butts kicked will provide sufficient motivation. :)

[DoesUs]

I'd hope so looking at how dated it looks.

[JeffGUNZ]

Not knocking you, but this site is hilarious. Sony fanboys boasted about Ghost being 1080p yet this one doesn't count? Come on, COD is running on my grandfathers engine, but it will boasted during it's release. This site will downplay anything positive for MS.

[DoesUs]

Ghosts should also have been 1080p on XB1.

[JeffGUNZ]

@ DoesUs

If X1 had the SDK kit back then it would have been.

[Godz Kastro]

Oh surprise surprise, x1 can do 1080/60 afterall... I am shocked...sarcasm

[RandomDude655]

They have One finally! YAY!

[Radentangr]

I have a ps4 and so far I think Ryse looks better than anything on it. The comical thing is Super Mario 3d World is the best game out and its on neither the xone or ps4. Graphics mean nothing if the game play is meh.

[Godz Kastro]

@Rad... Bubble for you for being a gamer above all else! You are the type of PS owner I'd like to converse with as to why I should get a PS4. Kudos to you bruh!

[Metallox]

B.. but... but Super Mario 3D World is 720p (sarcasm)

[90Supra]

lol

you know damn well you don't have a PS4

[Godz Kastro]

Why, because he's not making a blind fanboy comment. Doesnt take away from PS4 being having tougher specs... chill out :/

[Radentangr]

I really do have a PS4. I even got a PSVita for remote play. Guess what, besides Resogun and Tearaway, neither have been touched. I have AC4, BF4, KZ, Fifa, Madden and two years of PS+. I know its going to be an awesome console eventually but I am happy to say right now I would take PvZ Garden Warfare over anything on the PS4 simply because I feel as though everything I have on the platform I have already played on my PS3 ten times over. I was excited for The Order until I realised it was a third person shooter.

[LexHazard79]

This is great news are you kidding me! Hopefully more games get to 1080p 60fps on XB1. That way we can get back to talking games and not stupid resolution/framerates argument.

[bleedsoe9mm]

what are the trolls going to do with their time when ms gets their SDK straight and every game is running the same on both systems

[Sh0ckWav3]

since its not nextgen graphic then that means it looks like shit on ps4 too..good to know..

[Tedakin]

Games on Xbox regularly getting up to 1080 on Xbox is a PS4 fanboy's worst fear.

[Godz Kastro]

Anyone who thought X1 cant do 1080/60 is delusional. MS has that right now! Forza looks phenomenal. Does Sony have better hardware? Yes! They will have many great looking games, especially exclusives.

Multiplats will eventually level out and be at 1080/60 on both. There might be graphical differences but I don't see anything that will make or break.

This gen will come down to exclusives just like the last. Its like roles were swapped. Sony struggled at first due to design differences but caught up. This time MS threw devs for a loop with different architecture but it will even out.

Just enjoy the games people...

[Tedakin]

My problem is this. People tried to spread a narrative that the Xbox literally CAN'T DO 1080p. Like it was built in the system to not be done. I've told people that Forza is 1080p 60fps and most times they throw back "upscaled" which again is not true. Resolutiongate has gotten out of control. Yeah the Xbox has had major issues, but adding a bunch of misinformation on top of it is just crappy and wrong.

[90Supra]

LMAO

Most who are happy to hear 1080p/60fps probably haven't seen what the game looks like...

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Last-gen graphics.......only reason for the 1080p/60fps on the bone...

[Radentangr]

I would take 8bit graphics over AAA if its more fun to play. I am not saying TitanFall is fun but I am saying if it is, why do the graphics matter? You will be too busy enjoying the game surely?

[InTheZoneAC]

the The One gets a 1080p 60FPS game simply because of dumbed down textures/graphics?

[Shakengandulf]

Where WHERE have you herd that?
Buy it for the platform you own and stop giving a shit what the other person has, you may even spend more time playing games rather than worrying about whats different.

Back in the day, you bought a gaming magazine with/without a demo disk and when a game souned exciting, you bought it, played it, enjoyed it and remembered it..
If you're only worried about what the rivals console looks like.. Than you have issues.
..no hard feelings.

[LKHGFDSA]

I think most people haven't decided which console to get yet.
Only diehard fans would buy the console on launch day to experience the initial issues and software drought.

[jalen247]

All this really means is the baseline for development was 1080p/60 FPS, Xbox one was the lowest-common denominator, and parity was a design goal. So assets, effects, etc were tuned to achieve this.

There is 1 of 2 things or both
1. The game is not pushing performance of PS4
2. PS4 version may sport more advanced assets, effects, etc

Electronics 101 tells us PS4 is the more capable machine given the same game graphics engine and similar CPU and GPU architecture between PS4 and Xbox One

Xbox was more powerful than PS2
Xbox 360 was less powerful than PS3 (complexity of PS3 made it hard to demonstrate in multiplat form games)
Xbox One is a lot less powerful than PS4 (complexity of Xbox one memory and poor design decisions makes the difference in power more noticeable I.e. 720p Xbox One games)

Based on the GPUs in both Xbox one and PS4 respectively, All Xbox One games should be at least 900p with the occasional 1080p games depending on the graphics engine and amount of effects, etc whereas All PS4 games should be 1080p.

There is no amount of efficiency in tools that would completely negate differences in GPU power. If a game's graphics are exactly the same for both machines, then the game design decision was parity and to use lowest-common denominator (Xbox one).

[Tedakin]

Xbox fans can't even have this one. Finally a game is 1080p 60, they're happy, and you can't just let them be happy. You have to explain to them why again this isn't what it seems. So sad.

[UltraAtomic]

yes!!! now hopefully this aguement about this resolution crap stops.

[RE_L_MAYER]

im not afraid to say playstation off in front of my screen

[Mr_InterNational]

Is this the first game running at 1080 60fps on xbox one?

[Shakengandulf]

No and it wont be the last.
Which is a plus btw.

[GusBricker]

I'm just glad it'll be 60fps, that's more important, IMO.

[InTheLab]

I swear this site is depressing at times. One side cheers for finally getting another one and the other side trashes the game or cooks up some conspiracy about parity.

The only good news here is that Greenberg can stop pointing at Forza 5 for every damn article and maybe....we'll stop seeing the same article for a new game every time some dev fails to match the res and framerate on both consoles.

[jalen247]

The game looks pretty good graphically so those saying otherwise are trying to undermine Xbox One achievement of running this game 1080p/60 FPS

Machine Games definitely have some strong engineers/developers working for them

[kiz2694]

This obviously isn't a huge graphically demanding game, it looks good but not that next gen "wow" good. Its running at 60FPS on last gen FGS. The only people holding on to this is the desperate xbone owners, hoping for a game at 1080p and 60FPS. I would of been terribly concerned if this wasn't running at Full HD and 60FPS.

[ThatOneGuyThere]

ugly game verified

[KontryBoy706]

JUST LAST WEEK
"Resolutions don't matter, gameplay matters". "You can't even see the difference between 720p and 1080p". "You can't see the difference between 60fps and 30fps".

THIS WEEK
"See we knew the XB1 could do 1080p". "Ahhhh see Sony ponies, the Xbox 1 is just as strong because it can do 1080"

this is funny to MEEEEeeeee

[air1]

What's next week?

[Hercules189]

I think the better argument is that 1080p games can still look like crap on a 1080p tv. If the division can look the way it does now but only in 900p and 30fps I'll still take it. We're at the point where devs need to add lots more detail to games and if they can make it 1080/60fps then thats just a bonus.

It also depends on the type of game. A game like Halo needs to push special effects and lighting and shadow effects so they can afford to dial it down to 900p.

[GundalfDeGrej]

You know what's funny to me kuntryboy? This is what I saw last week and eeevery week before it.

"Lol xbone doesn't have 1080p games. Only 30 fps? What a horrible system etc. etc."

Now it's either:

"Oh that's nice for a change"

or

"The game looks like crap anyway/they are not taking advantage of the power from the almighty ps4."

Now I actually kinda agree with the argument that the game doesn't look that impressive anyway but it's silly how every time the xbone gets good news people here still act as if they are bad. Same thing with the xbone price cut. Did you see the comments here? There were actually people saying that microsoft is a horrible company because they screw over the early adopters. Are you kidding me??

[air1]

Johnny • 3 hours ago
It's called knowledge people. Xone will deliver very soon and maybe able to do more then what you have been told to at this point. Watch, read and learn to think for yourself instead of being lead by a string. I am by no means belittling the PS4 because I think it rocks.

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

http://www.giantbomb.com/xb...
2 • Reply•Share ›

Those links.... All I know is I'm going to have a blast with both consoles as time goes on...

[larrysdirtydrawss]

snes graphics incoming

[pop-voxuli]

ill believe it when i see it, till then tits or gtfo.

[FanboyKilla]

It isnt and never was an issue. My f***ing wii u does 1080p 60fps. You made up the issue. Now as time goes on it slowly fades away, and it will. What are you left with? A big pile of s*** that you now stand in. Lol and a next gen console that doesnt play the most anticipated game in years. Green is such a ugly color on you. Smh.

[_FantasmA_]

I'm sure there will have to be sacrifices made to get it 1080p just like Forza. Wolfenstein isn't really looking impressive anyways. Decent graphics and way too much action.

[windblowsagain]

Is the PC version confirmed at 1080p/60fps.

I kid I kid.

It's an ok looking game.

Looks like PS3/360 game with updated rez etc.

But it could be a great game, or it could be crap. Regardless of framerate.

Lets judge the gameplay/graphics. After we've played it.

I'm just glad there's another sp game.

Now i just need a sweet fps with dinosaurs.

[Platinum_k]

I wonder how long it took them to "tweek"/compromise enough to make this run on the xboxone...

Good to hear they are as equal to one another

[aragon]

So if it was 720p it would suck, and even tho it's 1080p it sucks? No adult unbiased logic here

[The_devils_chum]

Why even bother reporting it graphics don't matter according to xbox fans, all they accomplished here is create less interest in the wolfenstein game.

[daedra]

What? Thats the dumbest thing ive heard, everyone in this website is now dummer for having to listen to that.

Xbox fans never said graphics don't matter, only presented strictly valid points as to why a game is more than visuals. Oh btw I bet you didn't read that article talking about how the Xbox ones games weren't forced into full hd for stability issues, Sony forced them, and now that's why Sonys games are less stable, plus the xbox ones games have higher res textures and effects . But all that doesnt matter now, xbox one games will all be 1080p/60fps now that the devs probably have had the March sdk in advance

[purp13m0nk3y]

Lol.

THIS is the dumbest thing I have ever heard.

"But all that doesnt matter now, xbox one games will all be 1080p/60fps now that the devs probably have had the March sdk in advance"

Hmmm 8% extra GPU performance and some better development tools will some how make up for the 2.25x resolution difference between the Xbox1 and PS4 versions of some games!?

Nice logic there bud. You're not a mate of that Mister X fellow are you?

[daedra]

Well duh ps4 and xbox one are the same, the minor differences wont really show till the last few months, but it wont matter cause the next next gen consoles will be out

Oh and to add, if the cloud is true and and the one is 4 times more powerful than ps4, then that's a whole new story lol

[HystericalGamez]

We're about 5 years away from any real Cloud Computing, and Sony has also gone on record to say that the PS4 can also render using the cloud if need be.

[Platinum_k]

nice troll

[HystericalGamez]

This game doesn't look too intensive anyway.

Glad MS finally got 1080 on a Non-Racing game, but just 1 isn't going to cut it.

Idc if I get 100 disagree's.

[Platinum_k]

This whole time I thought they were talking about "The Order 1886"...

=/

They should really come up with a different name

[SonyAddict]

Three cheers for X1..hip hip...

[Qwagy UK]

Plants vs zombies looks better than this 360 port over Meh!

[Darkfist]

but is there multiplayer?

[clouds5]

Am i the only one around here who thinks posting the rumoured resolution of an upcoming game is not news?

[KingKevo]

That Quake engine..

Well, there are soooooo many different engines floating around that are still based on that very engine; and they all habe some things in common: High framerate, great for MP games and if there is a lot going on, good for using filters and stuff on them, but always looking dated.

Take every CoD or now Wolfenstein. It always plays good, but it does look really dated, which is alright I guess, but there are much prettier engines around that do run and look good at the same time.

What I'm trying to say is that it's not a real surprise that the Quake engine (is it still the id tech 5 version for this game?) can pull that off. CoD Ghosts (which is 720p on X1) could have done it too if only IW and the other 20 teams had more time and not so many problems with the Xbox One version. Not surprising.

[bandit905]

you people need to remember something just cause a game runs at 1080p doesn't mean its always gonna look good, resolution isnt everything....what about textures??

i own a x1 and i dont complain about it, as along as the game is fun and looks good either 1080p or 900p i dont care....if i wanted premo graphics id buy a supercomputer

[mmj]

Average graphics confirmed... PS4 version will probably have anti-aliasing or something unless half the GPU power is laying wasted.

[purp13m0nk3y]

More advanced AA technique most likely. Maybe FXAA on the Xbox1 and a form of MSAA on the PS4.

I'd say most of the assets will be identical, and the only real difference will be the final image quality/effects. We've seen this before in games like NFS where the PS4 version had extra graphical effects and higher quality absent occlusion.

If both versions look and perform identically then that would just be poor form from the dev not to push the PS4 hardware to it's full potential.

[akraven]

I'm really hoping this game is good. This was my first multiplayer game on the pc "return to castle wolfenstein".

[Lulz_Boat]

ohh... dat game.

[Gr1mmyshadows]

Wow the constant fighting on this site, you guys are worse thsn school girls.

[towelie1288]

sony fanboys are always soo butthurt
and the seem to just troll N4G all day
since there are no games to play on yet ps4

[purp13m0nk3y]

@towelie

Says the troll who is baiting the PS4 fans with comments like

"since there are no games to play on yet ps4"

As an owner of both consoles I can honestly say that I have enjoyed the PS4 exclusives much more than the Xbox1 so far. Plus multi plats are better on the PS4. So guess which console I've spent more time playing.

To say there are no games to play on the PS4 a such sad attempt at a troll. If you're gonna troll at least come up with something original ffs.

[SynestheticRoar]

Kool. It's good to hear something positive.

[urwifeminder]

No multi wow $2 steam sale for me this one.

[Tzuno]

Hello Hatters!!! Xbone has a bonner.

[lyvon]

One game manages 1080p/60fps and suddenly both consoles are equally powerful?

LOL, Ok.