510°

Kojima Reacts to Critctism on Metal Gear Solid V Platform Comparison: Comparing with MGS4 "Nonsense"

Hideo Kojima is quite obviously looking at the comments filtering through after the posting of the screenshot comparison between the various platforms of Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes and he had some comments of his own.

Read Full Story >>
dualshockers.com
n1kki63733d ago (Edited 3733d ago )

From a visual standpoint I tend to agree, it's hit or miss if people will notice, the general consumer probably doesn't see, or know their is a difference.

That said, from a tech view. All of these xbox one games coming in at 720p/900p in 2014 is not good news for the long term viability of the hardware. 1080p is native resolutions for the majority of TVs on the market. I find it unacceptable that brand new "next-gen" hardware needs to compromise for frame rate or resolution. Their shouldnt be a reason that the PS4 can render 1080p with stable frame rates but the XB1 cannot. Regardless if a person cares or can notice the difference is secondary to the fact that this $500 piece of hardware needs to compromise starting from day 1.

Kojima's posts really didn't address any issue with resolution though.

nohopeinc3732d ago

There isn't a resolutions issue. If you love resolution you will have bought a PS4. If you don't care about res than you will buy whichever one you want to.

The real reason I am reply is to let you know that I think it is extraordinarily bold of you to claim that this is going to be bad for the long term viability. Also check your facts the majority of TV's on the market are 720p because most consumers think HD is HD. They don't understand 720, 1080, 1440, 4k, none of it.

The reason the PS4 can render 1080p, 60fps is because it has better hardware and a more focused purpose. The XB1 cannot because the focus is everything and it has mediocre hardware.

medman3732d ago (Edited 3732d ago )

I think your premise is flawed. You say "if you don't care about res then...". Of course people care about resolution. If they didn't, we would still be buying 480p tube televisions. And your statement that "the majority of tv's on the market are 720p" isn't accurate, as manufacturers are constantly pushing the resolution envelope, with 8k televisions being worked on even though 4k hasn't even really begun it's ascendency yet. As panel prices have declined, many manufacturers don't even offer 720p tv's any more, and those that do offer them as budget models, which becomes less of a factor as the price of flat panels continues to drop. People will always want the highest resolution product they can afford, even if content in that resolution isn't widely available. Anyone who watches blu rays on a 720p television isn't getting the full resolution available. I think most people would understand that, it's not a terribly difficult concept. And with the pending hdmi 2.0 format change, and ultra hd blu rays set to come late this year/early next year, having a 1080p/4k television will become even more the standard. 720p's days are finished. It's beyond me how Microsoft, a company that claimed to want "to own the living room", is so far behind the current standard, which is 1080p.

n1kki63732d ago

It's bold of me to have an opinion?

"All of these xbox one games coming in at 720p/900p in 2014 is not good news for the long term viability of the hardware."

Are you telling me that XB1 games coming in at 720 and 900 is good news for the long term viability?

Look, its early in the game and they could get this worked out. Only time will tell. I am going on what we currently know, and as it currently sits, this is not good news for hardware that needs to be relevant for 5-7 years.

sAVAge_bEaST3732d ago

You can get a decent True HD 1080p, for 499$ -It's a standard now.

Microsoft Really dropped the ball, focusing on 'Marketing' Marketing "marketing", -thinking that the xbone would be a money minting machine for them.. They fully deserve, what they have coming to them. I feel sorry for anyone, who bought/ got gifted, the xbone as their only console.

badz1493732d ago

@nohopeinc

"Also check your facts the majority of TV's on the market are 720p because most consumers think HD is HD. They don't understand 720, 1080, 1440, 4k, none of it."

seriously, what fact? the only fact that I can see is that you're WRONG! majority of TV on the market is 720p? are you still living in 2008? minus the 32" models and some low end plasmas, most 40" and above on the market these days are most of the time AT LEAST 1080p and many TV makers are already pushing 4k. 1440p is not common at all, though.

1080p from any brand is cheap nowadays even if they are Smart TVs with Wifi, 3D and stuff.

nohopeinc3731d ago

@n1kki6

I am not saying that it is bold for you to have an opinion because you did not state an opinion, you stated it in a matter of fact way. I am not attacking you in any way, I just think it is bold for any claim to say that it will be bad for them. I am going to make a not so bold claim and say that I guarantee they turn a good profit and continue the XB brand. Because they actually do have enough purchasers regardless of not the most powerful hardware. It isn't going to harm there long term viability at all. It is easy to make claims that it will be the end of M$ or XB but it simply won't.

@medman

Although you can buy a Sieka 4k TV for $1000 it isn't going to be common in the household for a while. Partly because of the lack of 4k content and the massive bandwidth to send/receive it. Google is only just now speaking publicly about it's 10GB Fiber plans. I won't argue that eventually it will be the most common, definition isn't like 3d or smart, it is important. It just isn't the deciding factor in gaming. I also did a couple website comparisons (Amazon, Newegg, Target, Walmart, Best Buy), and it is about even on 1080p v 720p tvs. The cheaper the store the more 720p just so you know. I don't want to be that guy but every 1080p sold is also 720p. I am just kidding BTW. But seriously, it's true.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3731d ago
UltraNova3732d ago (Edited 3732d ago )

@n1kki6

Couldn't agree more man. Now days 1080p/60fps should be standard not pushing for it and if we get there, well thats fine!

Actually its not fine, not in my book at east!

No in my opinion the next gen (next gen get it? )should have been pushing for even higher rez than 1080p which is current gen if not oudated with the 2 and 4K wave we are riding! Even with the PS4 we cant be sure all games will be a rock solid full hd/60fps all the time, because as long as multiplatform games exist (95% of all the games) it will always get gimped to a degree.

And what about 3D games? I can bet you right here right now that it will be 720p/3D not 1080p! (hopefully I will be proved wrong here).

As much as I am excited for next gen I simply demand more of a leap in terms of power like with the ps2 to ps3. Now we got exactly what Nintendo fans got the Wii 1.5 aka Wii U just like from ps3 to ps4 and the Wii to Wii 1.2 for the 360 to xbone.

Yeah ok they had to cut costs and all that I get it, something they would never do in previous years/gens. Maybe Sony is excused with all their financial problems and all but what about MS and their seemingly unlimited cash flow???

Sorry for the rant but I had to get it out there ;-)

webeblazing3732d ago

yeah i never seem to get that. if people want their console to push the bar shouldnt they be asking for 1080p and 60fps. i never buy a console thinking its going to push the bar, and learning the spec of both consoles before they launched i knew they just was going to catch up to what i been seeing on pc for the pass few years. gamers have the right to demand quality hardware but thats not gonna give you everything you want. ms messed up with kinect and its showing. people need to move on because we knew this when the announce the console.

and no person is going to admit 60fps should be a standard too because most people on here are fanboys. they try to one up each other. if most of the games isnt 60fps their not going to use it as ammo.

i figure like last get games are going to look better at the same time res and frame rate are going to get lower.

Eonjay3733d ago (Edited 3733d ago )

A very through answer form Kojima. I can't wait to see the video comparison tomorrow.

HeavenlySnipes3732d ago

Those screenshots just confirmed I'm buying it for my PS3 because there isn't a big difference across the platforms to warrant the price

firelogic3732d ago

lol at saying there's not a big difference. You must be blind or rationalizing like crazy.

Of course you shouldn't buy a console for just one game but don't delude yourself by saying there's little difference between the last gen and current gen versions.

If you're referring to the $20 vs $30 price tags, lol again.

ABizzel13732d ago (Edited 3732d ago )

PS3 version: probably 680p @ 30fps, low settings
PS4 version: 1080p @ 60fps, high settings

Both are fine, but if I had the option I'd go with the higher spec.ed version. Though I agree with you they should all be the same price considering no extra work or content is going into the next-gen versions that I know of.

Talidan3732d ago

That's cool. If you don't see enough of a difference to justify the upgrade, no biggie. That's your own preference and people shouldn't be so upset by it.

MashedPotatoAsylum3732d ago

'Next-gen versions look better because of the high specs of the consoles, but what I want you to feel that we’re pursuing a photorealistic image with the FOX Engine. FOX Engine made even the current-gen versions look as good as next-gen versions.'
Kojima-san, you can't have it both ways. This might be a poor translation though and he was probably trying to say that last gen versions look fine, but the next-gen versions are a notch above them. Either that, or he's trying to confuse us.

Abriael3732d ago

Yeah I fixed that. Kojima's own translation was really bad. I went back to grab the original Japanese and it makes a lot more sense.

Melankolis3732d ago

1080p is a must for next-gen, but 30/60fps is a choice.

I wouldn't mind sacrificing framerate from 60fps to 30fps for better graphics for some games/genre.

I don't regret Uncharted series had 30fps with beautiful graphic, than 60fps but missing a lot of details.

Yet, i like MG : Rising running 60fps with average quality graphic.

It depends on the game i think.

deadfrag3732d ago (Edited 3732d ago )

Look ps4 and Xboxone are next generation Machines so people that have long waited for them are expecting that this machines atleast display in 1080p since thats the most common hdtvs resolution and also if the Hardware to do it is available why not; resolution is evolution also; i think thats fine and that we should expect that,now regarding framerate i think 60fps if possible it should also be standard,if its not possible i can live with 30fps but it needs to be 30fps LOCK without dips and it depends on the type of game.Racing drivers,Hack n slash,and first person shooters should be 60fps,frankly for me even third person games should be 60fps thats the reason that im willing to accept a lower resolution in some type of games in favor of a higher framerate but lock.If a game has a flutuation framerate that jumps between 40 to 60fps and creates higher controller input lag and motion judder i would prefer that developers just lock it at 30fps or atleast give the gamers the option of having it lock or unlock the framerate just like Guerrilha made with the last patch for Killzone Shadow Fall,its the best way.

Show all comments (32)
140°

The Metal Gear series has sold over 59.8 million copies

300,000 Metal Gear games were sold during the first quarter of 2023, Konami has announced, bringing the total number to 59.8 million.

Read Full Story >>
metalgearinformer.com
FallenAngel1984356d ago

Still waiting on Konami to put the MGS Collection back on digital stores

Nyxus356d ago

I know right? And rerelease the games for current gen systems while they're at it.

just_looken355d ago

Do not worry they will give use those pichincko remakes for top dollar soon.

Metal gear solid 3 in the fox engine looked/ran amazing but was sealed away :(

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Sarcasm356d ago

I know re-makes and stuff have been played to death this generation.

But damn I wouldn't mind an MGS4 remake

gold_drake355d ago

i played it quite recently and it holds up very well

CantThinkOfAUsername355d ago

It does, but a remake will be available on platforms other than PS3.

itsmebryan356d ago

I thought the series would have sold more over all these years and different releases.

Ready4nxtgen356d ago

Yeah I would have thought over 150 Mil. Something.missing here

Nyxus356d ago

Metal Gear isn't that big, and there hasn't been a new release in years. Also MGS2 and 3 are still missing from digital storefronts.

shinoff2183355d ago

5 mgs games in total if I'm not mistaken. 59 60 million seems about right. Mgs is dope to some of us but it would be hard for a lot of regulars to understand

ChasterMies356d ago

I would love to buy MGS4 but it’s still a PS3 exclusive.

JEECE356d ago

Although there are notable exceptions (GTA, certain first-party Nintendo games, Gran Turismo), as a rule games didn't sell as much in earlier generations as they have in the past few generations. So a lot of PS1-PS2 era titles that are viewed as seminal games didn't actually sell all that much by today's standards (yes, despite the large install bases of those systems lol). I remember a similar surprised reaction happening a few months ago when Square announced the total overall sales of Final Fantasy VII.

Deathdeliverer356d ago

Some of the best fun you can have online was the first metal gear online and to a lesser, but still fun to an extent, MGO2. The magazine, CQC, stealth, and tactical play Vs real players is just a blast. Not to mention playing Snake vs everyone? Amazing. The game will never be the same without Hideo, but Konami can definitely update what’s already there and take my money.

ceyoga355d ago

You wouldn't be talking about the OG MGO that was included with MGS3:S would you? It's rare running into another former player. Those were some of the best memories of any online game I had.

Deathdeliverer355d ago

Yes my man!! That seems like the BEST game that nobody played! Tranquilizer pistol, drag the body to a corner and lay a girly mag right by their head so they wake up and instantly get caught by the mag. You could get real toxic if you wanted at that point, but man that game was incredible! The only thing annoying was that damn Konami ID

P_Bomb356d ago

Did my part!

“You’re pretty good” 🫡

Show all comments (20)
220°

Kojima looks back on Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes on its 9th anniversary

Hideo Kojima: "After the launch, many people seemed to expect GZ to be a full game."

Read Full Story >>
metalgearinformer.com
-Foxtrot414d ago

People would have gotten “your intention” if you stated it from the beginning but people didn’t want smaller episode like MGS games.

He should have just focused on MGSV and work Ground Zeroes into that game instead

I_am_Batman414d ago

I don't remember there being confusion over Ground Zeroes being a full game. But then again I was just starting to catch up on the MGS series as a whole at that point so I might've not paid enough attention or simply have forgotten that there was confusion about it. I bet the whole Moby Dick Studios thing didn't help the casual observer understand what the hell was going on though.

I only got both MGSV games when Phantom Pain was already out and I kinda agree that it probably would've sucked if I had to wait one and a half years to pay The Phantom Pain after Ground Zeroes.

jambola414d ago

I'm sorry what now?
Who expected that?
If it was meant to be episodic or an experiment for that, the price should / would have reflected that

MadLad414d ago (Edited 414d ago )

To be fair, there really wasn't enough content to actually justify even the smaller price tag. It was still half the cost of a full game, yet a 20th of the content.

I can't stand these paid glorified demos.

CrimsonWing69413d ago

Honestly, it was basically similar to the FF15 Duscae demo. My theory is he was taking too damn long to make a game and Konami was like, “Sell what you got!” It just has kind of a scummy corporate “let’s sell this demo for half the price of a full game,” feel to it.

That’s just my take on it. I love Kojima and I love the MGS series, but this and 5 were the biggest let downs, ever. Clearly unfinished work forced out because, in Konami’s defense, Kojima was going over budget and taking forever on the project.

MIDGETonSTILTS17414d ago

Lol, I loved Ground Zeroes, but releasing that level at $40 during a dryspell for games at the onset of the new gen was an obvious cash grab.

I handed over my money happily, but plenty of non-diehard fans were understandably letdown by the scale of what $40 bought them.

Chocoburger413d ago

The price was originally $40 for the physical PS4 and XBO versions, but due to controversy it dropped down to $30 before launch. And as much as I love GZ, and even bought it twice, I do agree that $30 was too much. It should have launched at $20.

https://kotaku.com/konami-c...

staticall414d ago

I don't know how about anyone else. But i've bought it for $20 1 week after release (or $15, don't remember the exact exchange rate) and spent 24 hours beating every mission and getting all the steam achievements. I was 100% aware what the game was about beforehand though and i did enjoy every second of it. I knew it was a work in progress and it was probably the best and less restrictive game i've played in a long time (and controls were just perfect).

Even previous MGS games didn't gave me that much freedom as Ground Zeroes did.
Love stealth? Got you covered.
Want to speedrun? Here's the timer.
Wanna kill everyone? No problem, grab that AK then and let's party.
Wanna cause chaos? Just tell Pequod where to land.
Love to drive? Then go ahead.
Miss Raiden? Then play as him.

I wish they would continue MGSV, finish remaining chapters and add more missions as DLCs, there was SO many options... A poor man still can dream...

Show all comments (15)
370°

Metal Gear Solid V Is The Greatest Stealth Game Ever Made

Hideo Kojima was dealing with a hostile publisher who was pulling his team’s game apart at the seams in order to launch in some form of finished state, and it’s still downright masterful. Everything about it is mechanically focused and aesthetically nuanced, and not a single thing feels out of place or without purpose. Big Boss moves about each environment with a pace that provides the perfect cadence to use all manner of gadgets in whatever ways you like.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
Mobis-New-Nest586d ago

You are incorrect and I will be taking this time to correct you. The Legend of Zelda Wind Waker Forsaken Fortress is stealth that no game has yet to match. Having Link, crawl, sneak and hide under a barrel is innovative stealth that Metal Gear Solid, Splinter Cell, Thief and Tenchu wish they had achieved. I rest my case.

ChubbyBlade585d ago

Cardboard box beats barrel

585d ago
got_dam585d ago

Lol I see what you did there.

fr0sty585d ago

So tired of opinion pieces... I come here for hot news, not hot takes.

-Foxtrot585d ago

Shit Metal Gear Solid game though

It's boring, empty, repetitive

Great mechanics and gameplay but it's just so dull....

586d ago
Chard586d ago

I played it long after the hype had settled, and I had a blast with it. Strip away the disappointment over what it could have been, and you're still left with a great game

porkChop586d ago

The gameplay loop was phenomenal, no question. From a gameplay standpoint it's an incredible stealth game.

porkChop586d ago

"Hideo Kojima was dealing with a hostile publisher who was pulling his team’s game apart at the seams in order to launch in some form of finished state, and it’s still downright masterful."

Let's not pretend Kojima was entirely innocent there. The game was 5+ years into development, way over budget, and wasn't even halfway done. That's why Chapter 2 is so unfinished and Chapter 3 was scrapped entirely. He was wasting time micromanaging and second-guessing everything his team was doing, and little to no progress was being made. The same thing happened with MGS: Rising. That's why the game got rebooted as MGR: Revengeance and was handed off to Platinum. That's the only way the game was going to get finished. And yet after wasting millions on a scrapped game, MGR only went on to sell a little over 1 million units. It was a failure no matter how you look at it.

That's why Kojima was "locked away" in his office for the final 6 months of development of MGSV. So the team could actually piece together and finish the game. Was Konami just supposed to let Kojima spend more than a decade with infinite funds to make one game? Kojima isn't Rockstar, his games don't sell 170+ million units. At some point the game has to come out.

I get that Konami are a garbage company but they aren't solely responsible for what happened with Kojima. As much as I love his games and will always be a fan, MGSV was almost entirely Kojima's fault and I'm tired of people pretending that it wasn't.

MIDGETonSTILTS17586d ago

Sounds like mismanagement by Konami.

generic-user-name586d ago

Can you prove any of what you're claiming? Because I've seen Kojima build a studio and release a AAA game in 3 years with Death Stranding. All I'm seeing here are the same conspiracy theories that people like to believe to confirm their biases towards certain people, same with Neil Druckmann. For instance, MGSV may have been in development for a while but you leave out that he was also having the FOX Engine developed alongside it, an engine so good that MGSV ran at 60fps on a PS4.

He's gone on record disputing that he ever goes over budget on very rarely has to delay his titles.

"He was wasting time micromanaging and second-guessing everything his team was doing, and little to no progress was being made."

Where did you get this from?

585d ago
Workshyskiver586d ago

Best gameplay of the series hand down, its not even close. Worst story in the series hand down, its not even close.

Ezio2048586d ago

But that ending though with amazing music. The Man who sold the world.

1Victor586d ago

I can’t say it’s the best or the worse to me I stopped playing metal gear at the end of 4 the official end of the snakes saga and the best in my book was 3 snake eater excellent gameplay and excellent story telling giving us the reason for big boss to go and create his own country before the metal gear saga on the 4-8 bits consoles.

Show all comments (66)