290°
7.0

Lightning Returns: Final Fantasy XIII- IGN Review

IGN writes, "Lightning Returns: Final Fantasy XIII takes the kitchen-sink approach in its attempt to cap off Square’s trilogy on a strong note. It wisely throws away the battle system and locations of the previous games in favor of fresh and more interesting mechanics and settings. It also presents a slew of new ideas to the series that call back to everything from classic JRPGs to Skyrim and Majora’s Mask, and even Assassin’s Creed. But in its attempt to kick things up for the final act, Lightning Returns stumbles in its storytelling. Instead of going out with a bang, it sadly ends the trilogy with an muddled and tonally inconsistent whimper."

-Gespenst-3731d ago

"it sadly ends the trilogy with an muddled and tonally inconsistent whimper"

And yet a 7/10. The above verdict certainly suggests the game should have received a lower score. IGN once more contributing to a culture of atrocious and inconsistent review standards. 7/10 as a quantification of the game's quality should objectively indicate that the game's quality resides somewhere in a far better realm than "sad, muddled, tonally inconsistent whimpers." That verdict suggests at most a 4 or 5 out of 10. 7/10 is or should be an objectively good score.

LAWSON723731d ago (Edited 3731d ago )

Well strong gameplay alone can make someone still enjoy a game. Remember a review is not a deduction of points but rather the reviewer asking himself how much he/she enjoyed it. It is sad though about the characters not getting a good ending I should of skipped all of the cutscenes in FF13-2 so I had the good first ending

maximus19853731d ago

the only GOOD is that this trilogy is OVER (knock on wood) its very exhausting explaining to people why this game doesnt do justice to the final fantasy name

Omegasyde3731d ago

^^ Agreed.

I didn't care for any of the Characters. Lightning was cool as well as Snow in the First one.

These resources for the trilogy should of went towards FF15 AKA FF13 versus.

admiralvic3731d ago

"Well strong gameplay alone can make someone still enjoy a game."

This is true.

"Remember a review is not a deduction of points but rather the reviewer asking himself how much he/she enjoyed it."

No. It's a written explanation that generally justifies / explains the score the game receives. A good review gives you an understanding of what is good and bad, along with the tools to decide if this is up your ally. It should not be a personal assessment that goes over a persons own personal beliefs in what the game should or should not be and how well the item in question satisfied those needs.

-Foxtrot3731d ago (Edited 3731d ago )

I agree

I've read the review and going off other reviews by Marty which have a variety of different scores, the way he's reviewed this and spoke about it does suggest the score should be lower...I'd say at least a 5.5 or a solid 6. The pro's at the end he's listed are not enough to hold a game up, the Final Fantasy games are about stories and characters, if the game doesn't do that properly then sorry but you've lost people there.

I think they are still being too generous, I mean look at FF13, it was a terrible FF game with only the beautiful graphics to keep it going and that got an 8.9 from them. FF13-2 got an 8 and this got a 7.

It's brand name at the end of the day, it's a score which is reasonable or tries to be reasonable to us but at the same time won't p*** off Square Enix because I'll tell you something if it got a bad score you wouldn't see Sauare Enix rush to give IGN or any other big sites exclusive interviews, previews, teasers, screenshots or goodies (Press Kits) of FF15 in the future or any other games they have coming up like the next Hitman or Tomb Raider game....something which is vital for these websites to stay relevant and gain hits.

If it wasn't Final Fantasy it would of gotten a much lower score.

However I can't believe he praised the battle system, it looks boring, not as bad as FF13s terrible battle system but still nothing interesting.

ANYWAY...it's over, FF13 is finally finished and as long as we know how bad it was we don't need reviewers to tell us what we already know.

We can all look to the future now not just as Final Fantasy fans but as gamers to see if the FF franchise will manage to turn things around. Heres hoping

Lets just put these games behind us.

LAWSON723731d ago (Edited 3731d ago )

FF13 is much more than graphics and only someone who played it <20 hrs or just hates change would say that. The game had plenty of content. The post game, story, storytelling, characters, and battle system were all great. It was very well made FF game and is nothing but quality. Just because it was not traditional does not mean it is a bad game. It was a pretty limear story driven game and it was a hell of a good one that even featured plenty of depth with equipment and paradigms. The game was clearly designed the way they wanted it to be because it would not work as a non linear game. It had a well deserved score.

-Gespenst-3731d ago (Edited 3731d ago )

Well I don't know about the actual quality of the game, I've yet to play it. I think the previous two are unjustly maligned and I enjoyed them, so I'm personally interested in LR. Nevertheless, you're likely right about IGN saving face with SE - if they stay on their good side they get lots of preview materials and stuff for big profitable "scoops," its all very cynical and corporate and at the end of the day has nothing to do with games, but all to do with money (which incidentally makes me feel very stupid for playing videogames - makes videogames seem like a bunch of fobbed off corporate shit to keep us mindless and entertained while a bunch of capitalists amass wealth and enslave us all). Most people just glance at reviews rather than reading them so a 7 on the surface SHOULD be perceived as meaning the game is pretty good, which should serve to keep IGN/SE relations profitable. However, most people, whether they like it or not, because of the culture of games journalism, perceive a 7 to be a failure, so it's not like such a score really keeps IGNs business relations with SE healthy. Talking about it objectively here makes it seem like it should, but the fact remains that many people see a 7 as indicative of sheer mediocrity (which it isn't), and this ultimately undermines the corporate circle-jerking that's going on. The review says the game is crap, but the surface score suggests otherwise. However the score itself, BECAUSE of games journalism culture in the first place, is perceived by readers (glancers) as highly negative. Sort of a big mess if you ask me. If only they just told the truth and weren't all so greedy and money-obsessed.

Objectively, I have a feeling the game is about a 7 anyway, but the language of this review suggests much lower. @LAWSON: The final verdict as expressed in that final sentence is supposed to be a summation of the reviewer's experience with the game, and it's extremely dismal. Whatever the reviewer had to say about the game that was positive seems to not matter in the end if we understand that final sentence as a kind of summary, which is what it is.

-Foxtrot3731d ago (Edited 3731d ago )

@LAWSON72

I think a lot of people gave it a fair chance, most people bought it based on hype and because it was a next gen FF game.

I got half way through it and called it a day, it was so bad, especially for a FF game. The only good thing going for it was the graphics.

The Battle system was boring and repetitive
The characters were horrible
Lightning, the main character was bland, boring and a depressing b****
Unlike past heros she had no backstory to why she was like that
No character developments
The Summons...robots in disguise
Linear as hell
Repetitive structure
No towns
Hardly no side quests
No weapon making
Hardly no NPCs to talk to, the place was dead most of the time
No overworld map
Story was complicated as hell and just awful
Voice acting got worse
No exploration
Nothing meorable about it really
They got Leona Lewis for the theme...an X factor, manufactured crap winner

I think the hate is pretty much justified for a Final Fantasy game, if it was called something else it would of gotten the benefit of the doubt.

The battle system was the worst, the majority of the time it was mashing the X button and you relied on luck to win most of your battles.

No skill involved what's so ever

LAWSON723731d ago (Edited 3731d ago )

@Foxtrot
You did not experience every moment the game has to offer so your opinion is not only ignorant but irrelevant. That is like me calling it a day after playing through the atrocious beginning of KH 1 and 2.

The battle system does not get good until the game actually presents a challenge which sadly takes a while.

Characters also take some time to become interesting, IMO they are all quite good except I never grew to like Hope.

Lightning changes alot throughout the game and she becomes a very rememberable character.

Character devlopement? As in story you only played probbaly a small portion of the game so how do you know or as in leveling which by the end of the game you are badass compared to the beginning so I dont know what your point is here.

The summons IMO were as useless as they were in FFX and I guess the looks come down to taste. Th only use I got out of them was using vanilles to help beat a certain tough enemy. They are actually pretty interesting and serve a point to their journey. I agree though the vehicle thing is kind odd.

The game is linear, but it was designed to be that way so I dont see the problem. They are Pulse fal'cie and they are wanted and feared by everyone so they are either trying to do something or stay out of sight. I think the developers through in the post game so there was extra and some fun non linear extras.

Not sure about linear structure I did not notice any bad reuse of enviroments.

NO towns as I said everyone fears you and the government wants you dead, and the civilians of Pulse are pretty much all gone what did you want them to do ignore the main story.

Side quests there are plenty of post game cieth stones and challenges so if you played the game you would know this. There are also a few side quests throughout Pulse as you progress through the story.

No weapon making I have not played many JRPGs with that feature and actually weapons are upgradeable and then transform into new more powerful weapons and even have a new appearance with 3 tiers so it kind of does have weapon making as well as item making.

NPCs refer to above.

Overworld map is not even in FFX (and I dont even think 12 though I am not sure I have yet to playthrough alot of it). The overworld map is not really a big deal IMO it comes down to level design.

The last bit is meaningless because you did not play the whole game and how would you know about the ending song if you did not beat the game. I actually think it played very well in the background with the good ending.

rainslacker3730d ago

"If it wasn't Final Fantasy it would of gotten a much lower score."

I actually believe the opposite is true.

This whole series has been held up to the standards that FF has set in the past.

There is nothing inherently wrong with that, but most of the hate I see for this game comes from the fact that it is a weak FF game, not that the games themselves suck bad.

I feel that these games, taken as their own thing, are about as standard as a standard JRPG get. Nothing amazing, very little innovation in the genre, but still worth a play if you take the time to learn the nuances of the battle systems.

There is nothing broken in the games of the series. The production quality is high. There are no major bugs. The story, while convoluted and poorly delivered, isn't bad, and while not all the characters are amazing, there are likable ones to be had.

What's broken, however, is that they aren't really as amazing as other FF games, particularly the main entry titles. Because of this, they get rated lower, and because it has the FF name, scores become a way to either garner hits, or criticize a reviewer because they rate it higher/lower than one would themselves based on their own biases towards these particular entries themselves.

Square Enix isn't going to blow off IGN due to a low score. Their readership is too high to do so, and IGN is in a fairly comfortable position to be able to give whatever rating they want to a game.

To Genspent, the original poster on this thread, I don't believe a poor ending warrants a 2-3 point deduction if the overall game is fun. If a game is decent fun, and not broken, 7 is a good score.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3730d ago
CrossingEden3731d ago

Try reading the rest of the review and not just the tagline. -_-

Tdmd3731d ago (Edited 3731d ago )

He also praises the combat, the world design and the customization, all the while admiting it is a good game. So, if the game parts are not bad, a 7 seems a fair and objective score to me. It is, not surprisingly, what one could expect from XIII saga: decent, somewhat mediocre gameplay, with a bad storytelling. I might give it a chance when it drops to $20.

NeoTribe3731d ago

Its final fantasy... the last two werre horrible, why people so surprised this one isnt great?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3730d ago
kevnb3731d ago (Edited 3731d ago )

I think Ill love it, story is secondary for me. Give me an awesome world to explore and great combat and im sold. I loved final fantasy 12, despite a weak story.

maximus19853731d ago (Edited 3731d ago )

STORY is secondary? on a FINAL FANTASY RPG GAME!?.....im at a loss for words

update: i found them, so thats like shooting being secondary on Call of DUTY right?

admiralvic3731d ago

"STORY is secondary?"

For him...

Come on Maximus1985, at least read the WHOLE sentence before you comment. I mean, it is only 2 more words and hardly much to ask. With that being said, your comment is totally uncalled for. People play games for different reasons and just because you're playing an RPG, doesn't mean you love stories. Some people simply enjoy long games, leveling up a team and many other things. This is a strong foundation for why things like MMO's work.

maximus19853731d ago (Edited 3731d ago )

"leveling up a team"

lightning is a team of her and theres NO leveling but more importantly Im clear on what he said and that doesnt make his comment any less confusing. ill try some more examples with you.......nah forget it commenting in the comments section is secondary TO ME!

NarooN3731d ago

"STORY is secondary? on a FINAL FANTASY RPG GAME!?.....im at a loss for words "

I remember asking people how good the story was for FFVIII before on a different forum (I'd never played it besides a demo way back in the late 90's) and they told me it was basically garbage. I told them I'm the type who can't really trudge through a JRPG if the story is crap, and a majority of the people there said they played for the gameplay mainly.

Sure enough I went and read a very in-depth plot summary and the story must've been written by someone who was stuck in an eternal acid trip. It made no sense whatsoever, to the point that there are long-running fan theories (which admittedly are just as convoluted and nonsensical as the story itself, if not moreso) to try to explain many of the perceived plotholes and such.

From what I've observed over my many years on the internet, it seems there are indeed a lot of people who don't care about the stories, especially if they're garbage, and I don't blame them.

rextraordinaire3731d ago

I'm with you on this.

I enjoyed many RPGs only because of their battle systems, like most Tales games, Star Ocean, Radiata Stories etc.

It amuses me when people say they go into FF for story. FF story are always super generic fantasy / sci fi stuff.

True great RPG stories can be found, like in Persona, or The World Ends With You, or Digital Devil Saga, even Shadow Hearts. But Final Fantasy, great stories? That's a really funny one...

Godmars2903731d ago

just have to ask if you've played FF4 or Ff6? Chrono Trigger.

rextraordinaire3731d ago

@Godmars : Yeah sure did.

Chrono Trigger's story was okay. But FF4 ? Seriously? That's paperback fantasy novel fare that's been written hundreds of time.

FF6 was okay, but nothing exceptional.

Last_Boss3731d ago

I didn't know your character fought his soul to gain enlightment, only to find out he's a descendant of moon people. I've never heard of no crazy mess like that.

rextraordinaire3731d ago

@PaperClichePixel Then you need to browse the fantasy section of your local bookstore.

http://www.goodshowsir.co.u...

Stories about coming from the moon and fighting your dark side?

Do you, like, seriously think it's original in any way?

Tons and tons of books have a story close to that...

Godmars2903731d ago

Starting to realize - just now - that it wasn't the story overall that made FF what it was to me, but rather the characters and the exploration of their histories and origins. That Square gave up on any real semblance of reason regarding character backgrounds and development, which is how we ended up with Lightning: a heroine with no real personality outside of a press release, dev interview or side note in a chapter summery.

Last_Boss3730d ago

@rlacorne

Video games not books, and regardless FFIV was done fantastically. The main character didn't have amnesia level 10. He actually learned something about himself along the way. The cast that supported him, were rememberable. As a pretty teenager, this RPG stood it's ground, and set a great tone, for things to come.

rainslacker3730d ago

There are very few original stories that come about nowadays. Even TLOU, for all it's praise, is nothing new.

What's important with story is how it's delivered. Take Harry Potter for example. Not a single lick of original content or story to be had. Everything is ripped off from other, often better written stories. But the characters have depth and motivations behind their actions that the reader can relate to. Their interactions with each other, and their personal growth throughout the series makes the story enjoyable.

Most FF games are the same way. This is where FF13 fell short. The gameplay was fine once you got into the intricacies of it, and it was improved for the second game. But the story itself was so blandly delivered, and there was so little character growth, or even explanations of their motivations, that it was hard to care about them.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3730d ago
FlameHawk3731d ago

Still going to buy the game but when its $20-$30 bucks.

maximus19853731d ago

god my only regret is not waiting...amazon has my money and the damn thing shipped this morning...aaaahhh my wallet hurts. i wish i could defend this game and be optimistic like some on here

LAWSON723731d ago

Amazon is quite generous they would probably have no problem refunding you especially if you dont open the game. If you enjoyed the first 2 and dont want to deal with returning it, the game probably has plenty of content and with a good battle system I doubt it would be easy to get bored. If their are any SP games that are worth the cash it is JRPGs because they usually have 40+ hrs of content. Apparently though dont expect much from the story side of things.

Then again I have not played it and if you are upset about the game Amazon probably has free return and all you got to do is buy one of those orange envelopes with bubble wrap for a dollar

LAWSON723731d ago

I was disappointed with the quality of 13-2 and this appears to be even worse when it comes to quality. I enjoy the combat system and they are still decent games and I look forward to playing it, but I cant support Squares bad attempts at FF that are subpar. I will probably get Thief or South Park instead for the time being. Or maybe even that Castlevania which looks pretty awesome and needs some sales especially on PC because I want Konami to know PC gamers will by the games they publish

-Foxtrot3731d ago

Smart decision...you get to play the game you like and you don't give Square all of your money for the kind of crap they've pulled

Don't see why all people who like this don't have the same attitude.

Aloren3731d ago

Maybe because they think they'll really like the game and don't want to wait to play it?

See, when there's a game I like, want, and when I think I'll enjoy it, I get it asap. Because I get it for my personal enjoyment, and I couldn't care less about teaching the developper a lesson by forcing myself to wait 3 months just to give them 20 bucks less.

-Foxtrot3731d ago

First of all you should care because it benefits all of us, if FF games got worse for example then it would be your fault for buying average ones to begin with...making Square think they haven't done anything wrong.

In the end it dosent just effect all of us, it will end up effect you and when that happens you'll be complaining.

Plus it's Lightning Returns, this game will be going cheap in a month, tops.

Ilovetheps53731d ago (Edited 3731d ago )

Did you read what he said? He thinks he will enjoy it. If he thinks he will enjoy it, why shouldn't he buy it? I enjoyed FF13. Was it different from the other FF games? Yes. But I thought it was pretty fun. Am I going to let some random person on the internet tell me what to buy and what not to buy? No. It's all about what I enjoy. I place money where I see fit. That's what most gamers do. If he feels like he'll enjoy a game, you have no right to dissuade him from buying it. It's his money.

Godmars2903731d ago

@Ilovetheps4:
Have to ask why you're sounding so put about this when Flamehawk clearly stated when he'd buy the game. Foxtrot is only agreeing with his choice.

Likewise Aloren has made his choice clear and that about the end of it. The concern really is whether or not Square take complains to heart and try to improve the franchise, or apparently do as they've been doing since FF10-2 and coast on reputation. Because that seems to be a dwindling resource.

Aloren3731d ago

@-Foxtrot But you're assuming there's something indisputably wrong about the game. And what if I like the game the way it is, and don't think there's anything wrong with it? should I still delay my purchase cause some people/reviewers don't like it or some of the decisions the developer took? so that it benefits "all of us" and teaches the developper a lesson?

I'm not just talking about lightning returns but about any game.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3731d ago
maximus19853731d ago (Edited 3731d ago )

So there we have it, a 7/10. but besides losing 60 painful dollars because of the cloud costume bait im just happy that its over.

some one PLEASE convince me that this game is good. LIE TO ME!

A LIVING LEGEND3731d ago

I'm seeing 7 but feeling 5....

couldn't agree more with Foxtrot's list and the sentiment "Lets just put these games behind us".
Indeed.

knifefight3731d ago

"I'm seeing 7 but feeling 5.... "

IGN has a pretty high tilt on reviews. They don't usually use the whole scale. They gave a Spiderman gave a 6.5 and said "flush this spider down the toilet" at the end. So this game is .5 better than that, I guess? >_>
I don't get IGN sometimes.

Show all comments (46)
280°

The Final Fantasy XIII Trilogy Deserves a Remaster

Final Fantasy 13 was first introduced to us back in 2009, almost four years after Final Fantasy 12 was released, and fans had been eagerly anticipating the next installment. But when it finally arrived, there were mixed reactions, including complaints about its linearity, the lack of towns and NPCs, and the limited control over the characters. At the time, Square Enix kept its game production behind closed doors and didn't take in a lot of feedback — especially from Western fans.

The game has been revisited by many different Final Fantasy fans since then, and some, like myself, have come to love it again. Almost all staple entries in the series have found their way to modern consoles, so it's about time that the FF13 trilogy gets a remaster

Read Full Story >>
dualshockers.com
shinoff2183333d ago

I've been thinking about this. I agree. While I really disliked it at first I never played it again. After hating ff15 so damn much I just think it can't be worse then 15 and if I'm not mistaken atleast it's turn based. I need more of that in my life.

nitus10333d ago

I actually finished FFXIII and on the second playthrough found I actually liked the game.

Actually I have liked most of the FF games (I have not played FFIX unfortunately) and I do agree with you with regards to FFXV. Graphically IMHO FFXV is excelent but for some reason I just could not get enthusiastic in playing it.

As for "turn-based", I prefer active and real time although to be fair "turn-based" is a real plus especially when confronting a difficult protagonist. I found this to be especially the case when playing FFXXII where you could switch rapidly between "turn" and "active" although having a resonable knowledge of simple Boolean Algebra is IMHO essential when playing this game.

333d ago
Levii_92333d ago

Ridiculous comment, first of all i think you should replay 15, second of all that game is 10 times better than the XIII games especially the royal edition. And third .. turn based combat is a dying (almost dead) style of gameplay and i personally wont miss it at all so don’t act like that is some sort of big plus because XIII has it.. it is not.

jambola333d ago

Somebody needs to learn about subjective taste

shinoff2183333d ago

Ff15

Sucked imo. I don't need to give it another try. Last time was the 3rd time and I had 34 hours into it. It just wasn't good imo

Chriswynnetbh333d ago

How is turn based dying or almost dead? Pokémon is one of the biggest RPGs in the world and is and has always been turn based. To some it is a plus especially when it comes to FF since the first 10 of them all are and are arguably better games than any FF to come after

CDbiggen333d ago

XV was rubbish, but understandable given the development hell. That overworld for me is the biggest example, so strangely designed and empty. And parts of the story awkwardly cut for DLC, most egregious being that prompto part where he's like "I'm a clone", or whatever he was (it was that forgettable), and the other guys basically shrugging it off.

Tapani333d ago (Edited 333d ago )

Turn-based is alive and well: Pokemon, Dragon Quest, XCom, Civilization, Homeworld, Age of Wonders, Total War, Original Sin, Baldur's Gate, Warhammer, Yu-Gi-Oh, Company of Heroes, Wasteland, Pathfinder, Disco Elysium, Octopath Traveler, Chained Echoes and many, many more great games, both new and old, franchises and new IPs are selling well, reviewing well and sequels are coming.

If you don't play the game, maybe the turn-based has just died in/for you, but certainly the genre has never been so alive as in 2023! Plus, when you look at Final Fantasy franchise, it started going down in quality when it left turn-based combat behind. FFXVI may redeem some of the glory (and FFXIV was great), but the turn-based games were higher rated and deeper in terms of gameplay and had more interesting things to do in the world.

DarXyde333d ago

I'd say Persona 5 is one of the best of the best games in a couple of decades.

I don't think you manage that with a dying gameplay format.

shinoff2183333d ago (Edited 333d ago )

Levii92

Turn based is way funner imo then just some hack n slash rpg. I like both but prefer turn based.

Far as dying I doubt it. It's also kinda funny cause the best final fantasy have been turn based. Ff still to this day can't top ff6 through ff9. Interesting.

Far as someone who brought up persona 5. I dislike the art style so I've yet to play it but I'd throw dq11 in there. Best jrpg I've played in fkin years. Over a decade.

Last I was a bit iffy on chained echoes because of the sp and no traditional leveling system. I recently bought it. Looks gorgeous, story is fantastic so far, but I cannot for the life of me get over how much I truly hate the leveling system. It's just flat out whack to me. I'm still going to finish it cause unlike ff15 atleast chained echoes doesn't feel like a chore

goldwyncq332d ago

The XIII series (especially Lightning Returns) has far better combat than XV, and you don't need to watch an anime and a movie to make sense of the story.

FinalFantasyFanatic332d ago (Edited 332d ago )

15 was only fun for derping about in the wilderness, at least FF13 had a better story and was more coherent overall (plot, characters, gameplay, world, ect...).

15 was just beautify garbage, so much wasted potential, the Duke Nukem Forever of the FF franchise.

I really loved Persona 5, can't wait for P6 to be announced, I'd love ports of the first few games (we already have P3P/P4G/P5R available on almost everything now).

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 332d ago
sadraiden332d ago

People act like XV killed one of their family members. It wasn't the best FF ever, but it certainly wasn't a bad game. You "hated it so damn much"? Chill.

FinalFantasyFanatic332d ago

I agree, FF13 is better than FF15, but I don't think I can play through that trilogy again, I'd rather play one of the older games.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 332d ago
-Foxtrot333d ago

Not really

Let them move on and focus on good FF games

Hofstaderman333d ago (Edited 333d ago )

Thank you. A ton of FFXIII articles recently. Most of the people who like this game are not old enough to have played 4 to 9. Even 10 and 12 are vastly superior to this game. That being said a remaster would then make all the FF titles available on the PS platform.

jambola333d ago

Citation needed
Do you have some kind of official survey of ff 13 fans ages?
Would love a link
Also, all games are available on multiple systems, re released many times
"Not old enough" doesn't even make much sense

shinoff2183333d ago (Edited 333d ago )

That was part of what I was trying to say. I've gave 15 3 try ff13 deserves atleast a second. And like I said I could use some turn based in my life

I've also played through or played all of the ff games starting with ff1 way way way back.

goldwyncq332d ago

"Good" is subjective. I love FFIX but I know many fans who don't like it for the art style and the slow combat.

I_am_Batman333d ago (Edited 333d ago )

Recently replayed them and I agree a remaster would be great. The complaints about linearity are fair, but they only really apply to the first half of the first game and while I agree that it would've been nice to have proper towns, minigames and subquests, it didn't detract from the intriguing story, interesting characters, tactical gameplay and amazing soundtrack in my opinion.

XIII-2 fixes a lot of the issues of XIII and expands on the story in interesting ways. The combat and progression builds on top of the systems of XIII and the nonlinearity and discoverability of secrets is a big inprovement over the original game. It's easily the best game of the trilogy.

Lightning Returns was probably a bit too experimental for it's own good. It tried to reinvent the wheel for no reason. The solo party for most of the game and the outfit based combat felt like a downgrade over XIII-2 combat system. It does have a unique vibe, but the plot kinda goes off the rails and many of the story beats didn't land as much for me as they did in the first two games. The race against time aspect was an interesting idea, but it never felt like it mattered, because it wasn't much of a challenge to manage the remaining time even while doing all the subquests.

Eonjay333d ago

XIII-2 is one of the greatest games ever.

Snookies12333d ago (Edited 333d ago )

XIII-2 is by far the best of the trilogy. Went out of my way to get the Platinum trophy on it. Which is actually a fun one to go for. Didn't take too long, only about 70-80 hours to accomplish. Loved every second of it though.

Youngindy21333d ago

I don't think linearity is a fair critique, when every FF up until that point was fairly linear esp. in the first half of the game. People herald FF VII(including the remake), but it is just as linear as FFXIII was. The linearity complaints came at a time when open-world games were just starting to become a thing and people thought every game should be open-world, but now that every game is, people now want more linear experiences. Go Figure.

shinoff2183333d ago

Ff10 was pretty linear to. Haven't played through all of 13 but 10 was linear as fk until the end

I_am_Batman333d ago

Totally agree. I never fully understood why 10 was so universally praised when it had many of the same design philosophies xiii is criticized for.

CDbiggen333d ago (Edited 333d ago )

I felt the same for the most part except the LR combat system. I thought it was an upgrade on the party of three system the previous two games had as now you had more control over your moves with different sets being an L1/R1 click away, and could move the single character around in battle and attack limbs or tails of certain enemies, or reduce the distance between you and an enemy you're after saving ATB.

I_am_Batman333d ago

LR combat certainly has it's merits. I would've preferred it if it wasn't tied to the costumes which can make Lightning look quite ridiculous and out of place sometimes though.

But mainly I would've preferred to see an evolution of XIII-2 systems. Since they are so different it's obviously just a preference. Can't really compare them objectively.

CDbiggen333d ago

Yeah I get ya, and I can totally see why the costume part got to people. I'm someone that doesn't care what the character looks like as long as I'm happy with the stats (looking at Xenoblade). LR to me is just one of those odd games that I can't help respect for mixing things up, even if the outcome wasn't the best lol. But yeah too different to compare.

sadraiden332d ago

Why would a remaster be great? They exist in HD, on a console that is still compatible with modern televisions, and you just replayed it.

I_am_Batman332d ago

I replayed them on my PS3. I just think it would make sense for those games to be more accessible to Playstation gamers, which is where the majority of the modern FF fanbase is (due to the exclusivity deals of VII Re and XVI).

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 332d ago
gold_drake333d ago

yes.
remaster collection.

not sure why the hell we never got one.

sadraiden332d ago

Just dying to give SE money for nothing eh?

gold_drake332d ago

i enjoyed the games.
so it wouldn't be for "nothing".

Show all comments (75)
170°

Why The Final Fantasy XIII Trilogy Has Some of The Best Music In The Series

As we celebrate Final Fantasy’s 35th anniversary, let’s look back at the underrated soundtracks of the Final Fantasy XIII trilogy.

Read Full Story >>
game-grooves.com
goldwyncq490d ago

It really does. Caius’ theme is still one of the best villain themes ever.

SeTTriP490d ago

Barthandelus is a great boss theme to.

Snookies12490d ago

Come on... Even haters of Final Fantasy XIII have to admit the soundtrack really was great. There are some parts of the OST that stand out among even Nobuo's work.

CrimsonWing69490d ago

The battle themes are pretty amazing, man.

gold_drake490d ago

sat what you want about the games, but the soundtrack has always been good.

MehmetAlperTR490d ago

Agreed... Legendary Nobuo Uematsu was not involved with FF13.. So that has got terrible musics.

jambola490d ago

so any game without no Uematsu has terrible music?

MehmetAlperTR489d ago (Edited 489d ago )

@Jambola nope... But in PS1 era we played FF7-8-9 and in a PS2 era FF10... They were all involved with Uematsu San. We grove up with him and his musics.. SO FF means, him and his music to us.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 489d ago
-Foxtrot491d ago

It's alright but I mean with so many other FF games it's not even in the top 10 for me

You just can't beat IX, VII, X and my personal favourite VIII when it comes to music

Even the theme song sucks, instead of just having an English version of the Japanese theme they got X Factors Leona Lewis to do the song which didn't sound like FF theme song.

FinalFantasyFanatic490d ago

Yeah, that ending song was terrible, I'll never be able to fathom why that was chosen, it feels so out of place with that game.

RedDevils490d ago

Lol is was my wtf moment.

SoulWarrior491d ago

I agree, regardless of the general consensus of the game itself, FF rarely lets down when it comes to the music at least.

porkChop491d ago

Nah. VIII has the best music in the series. IX is a close second.

Hofstaderman490d ago

Yes; eyes one me, man with the machine gun, waltz to the moon, the oath, maybe I’m a lion…FF8 has the best music in the series by far. I have the original OST, the orchestra arrangement, the piano arrangement, the Black Mages tracks and a few other albums. My four disc original OST is my pride and joy.

ManMarmalade490d ago

I agree on VIII. I've started growing really fond of X's lately.

GoodGuy09491d ago

Music was pretty good yes. Pretty much all FFs do even the crappy ones lol.

Show all comments (40)
180°

Lightning Returns: Final Fantasy XIII Steam Version Patched for Some Reason

After about five years since the last patch was released for Lightning Returns: Final Fantasy XIII Steam version on PC, Square Enix released a new patch today.

Read Full Story >>
infinitestart.com
Sephiroushin1021d ago

Probably because it didnt work on some amd gpus, same goes for FF13!

antikbaka1021d ago

what about Nier Automata...

vergilxx31020d ago

Read the article maybe?
It clearly says they updated Nier too

gold_drake1020d ago

i find it sich a waste that they didnt release them on the ps4.
i know alot of ppl dont like 13, but 13-2 is amazing ha.

DeathTouch1020d ago

I love 13-2. Addictive battle system, Serah and Noel are pretty cool, the story is a bit all over, but it can be endearing, the villain is interesting and the ending is somber. Good game!

gold_drake1020d ago

ahh the music, dont forget the music! haha

autobotdan1020d ago

They are 4k enhanced on Xbox One X and Xbox Series X

solideagle1020d ago

13-2 battle system was great. Collecting monster and upgrading them was fun. I liked FF X-2 gameplay as well because of monsters.

rpvenom1020d ago

Interesting.. I am one of the few I guess who actually enjoyed 13.. never tried 13-2 though.. maybe I should give it a shot.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1020d ago