90°

Why the Numbers Aren't All Doom and Gloom for Nintendo

The news you won't read in most of the stories reshuffling a Reuters report that ominously claims Wii U sales have “flopped,” is that Wii U sales in December 2013, according to NPD, were the best they've ever been.

Or take the company’s weirdly dismissed 3DS: you know, Nintendo’s handheld-slash-console that, just last night, NPD reported “topped overall hardware sales for December 2013 and for 2013 as a whole.” Important sidebars — or in the 3DS’s case, headliner — lost in the admittedly disturbing din of Nintendo’s “third consecutive annual loss” bandwagon.

Read Full Story >>
techland.time.com
mhunterjr3776d ago

What this article neglects is the need to MAKE money while selling products. Sure there are things Nintendo can do to move more units, but cutting price to move units won't bring them to profitability. Especially not without 3rd party support to help bring in revenue from software sales.

The dismal outlook on profitability won't make investors eager to invest in Nintendo, and THAT'S why analysts think they are in trouble.

3775d ago Replies(1)
clouds53775d ago (Edited 3775d ago )

Sony did it with the ps3 for a loong time and the last time i checked their still in business...

mhunterjr3775d ago (Edited 3775d ago )

There's nothing wrong with selling consoles at a loss... up until the Nintendo Wii, it was common practice from all manufacturers.

The thing is, when companies plan it out that way, they are counting on software sales to bring in the profit.

Sony always had good 3rd party support. not to mention the ps3 was a bet on blu-Ray, which paid off for Sony in the end.

In this case of the wii u, both the console and the software is selling poorly, compounded by the fact that 3rd parties are ignoring the system all together.

If there's no hope that software will make up for the loss, then you have a very risky proposition...one that investors won't like.

yesmynameissumo3775d ago (Edited 3775d ago )

You don't cut your sales forecast by 6.2 million consoles when things are going "swell". Time to take your head out of the sand.

RPG_Lover3775d ago

This is the kind of article that is factual. Makes the game journalism doom and gloom look childish.

Brazz3775d ago (Edited 3775d ago )

Nintendo number are good! they have 3DS that is almost printing money! they don't need WII U, they have 3DS! Portable game will save nintendo, as in the time of Nintendo 64 and Game Cube, the 2 floped, but nintendo did fine whit gameboy family.

MasterCornholio3775d ago

Wasn't the GameCube profitable?

deafdani3775d ago

In terms of hardware sales, no; Nintendo sold it at a loss.

But overall, yes, it was slightly profitable for them due to software sales.

InTheLab3775d ago

No it was not. There's something called a break even point and Nintendo never hit it with the GameCube. There was a set number of console they had to sell with the GC and they failed to hit that number, so it does not matter if you make a small profit on each unit (which in this case was only manufacturing costs)sold as it won't ever cover your losses.

What the people that continue to spread misinformation on how much Nintendo made during that era is that the DS kept N afloat after the major flops of both the N64 and the GC. They say things like N made more money during that era than Sony did then throw out how the GC was profitable but it's a half truth wrapped in a lie.

The truth is, the 3ds is making them money NOW but it was a different story 2 years ago when it launched. Remember when the thing was earning them over a $130 in profit with each sold back when the thing was $250? Well it was selling extremely poor but the numbers were offset by how much they made on the few sold. But they still needed to hit a break even point to turn out a real profit which means they needed a price cut and needed to move units. The point is, while they made a profit day one with the 3ds, that means nothing unless you move a set number of units each year.

So a year after the 3ds struggled, the WiiU comes along lights up the charts before falling off a cliff. So N is bleeding money with the WiiU and making a ton off a handheld much like they did ten years ago with the GC and the DS.

BlackWolf3775d ago

Correction. The 64 and the Gamecube were not the success Nintendo was expecting, but they made profit from them, so flop is not the word you're looking for.

kB03775d ago

To fix this, let in reliable and good third party games. Not what Wii had...shovelware.

Articles like this are getting boring and predictable. Both the hate side of Wii.U and the Save part of Wii.u

It's simple. Mario kart and Super smash are coming out. If those do not turn sales around, nothing else will. (Not even Zelda, since I think it's more of a niche audience game at this point.)

To be honest I'm surprised Super Mario 3D World didn't push sales...that game made me almost go out and buy a Wii.U. I had to force myself hard not to because I bought a ps4 in Nov and I need to save for school!

Show all comments (16)
80°

Game Developers Have Begun Confirming Nintendo Switch 2 Support

Game developers have already started to confirm that they will support the Nintendo Switch 2 with their future titles.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
80°

How Many More Victims, Like Garry's Mod, Will Nintendo's Hurtful Crusade Create?

Hanzala from eXputer: "As Nintendo takes out 20 years' worth of stuff from Garry's Mod, I watch in shock, thinking why it continues to hurt and discourage its fans."

RiseNShine16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

The irony that some of the most disgusting business practices come from companies like Disney or Nintendo, i can't even begin to understand what terrible damage was Garrys Mod making to Nintendo bottom line, imho they're getting pretty nervous about where they're heading in the future, handhelds are no longer something exclusive to Nintendo, from Steam Deck to many others, now you can play the latest games and pay a fraction of the price on Steam sales, so it's up to their exclusives, which just on their own would make hard to justify purchasing a closed overpriced hardware with outrageous price policies (Super Mario Odyssey is still 60 euro 6 years later!), and as a home console they're always underperforming compared to Sony or Xbox.

gold_drake16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

i cam guarantee you, that their exclusives alone is what drives switch sales. they sell in the 10s of millions of copies.

nintendo created their franchises to be sort of nostalgia driven, exclusive only on nintendo.

people will always buy the pkmn games as they always bring in new younger fans amd is family friendly

mario kart, the same thing, mario games in general.

zelda games are system sellers. animal crossing for the casual gamers.

nintendo doesnt need third vame devs essentially. they made sure with the switch and the limitations that they looked more to pc ps and xbox.

its sad, but nintendo is more than fine with what they're doing. they positioned themselves to appeal to the more casual gamers.

but to your point, im not sure why they're doing this rly.

Inverno16d ago

Look at how they handled Nintendo games being streamed or uploaded on YouTube in the past. They killed Yuzu and Citra even when they had nothing to do with ToTK being leaked, not to mention it was basically unplayable on emulation the week it was leaked. Smash Bros tournament, that was fairly recent. They shut down their online services without any care for purchases made. I bought a switch after skipping their last 2 consoles and handhelds but I don't plan on buying anything Nintendo in the future. They take things to the extremes, they legitimately hate their fans. They're honestly right up there with the likes of Acti, EA, and Ubi, only difference is that they disguise themselves as being family friendly all the while being shady.

80°

Nintendo's Massacre Of The 3DS And Wii U Is Finally Complete, Regrettably

Hanzala from eXputer: "The cruel hammer of Nintendo has fallen. Farewell, 3DS and Wii U, you surely brightened my life and many others; you won't be forgotten."