420°

Wii U Sales Still Soaring, Pokémon X and Y at Number Two, Dynasty Warriors: Gundam in Top Ten

The Media Create and Famitsu sales chart for December 16th to December 22nd have been released and it looks as if the Wii U is still selling strong.

Read Full Story >>
dualshockers.com
PeaSFor3785d ago

thats really nice, but after all, there's not really a competitor against the WiiU(forget old gen), as soon the ps4 will launch in Japan, the WiiU sales numbers will matter a LOT more than right now.

ajames3473785d ago

That is very true. Can't wait to see the sales when that happens then :)

PeaSFor3785d ago

btw, my body is ready for a new Metroid

abzdine3785d ago

who said Wii U was dead?
Nintendo power!!! Sony vs Nintendo will be a very healthy competition in Japan starting feb 22nd.

Movieworld3784d ago

Why would anybody disagree with somebody looking forward to seeing the sales? #morons

wonderfulmonkeyman3785d ago

As long as the sales don't dip back into the 30k a month range again, the wii u will bee fine, no matter how much it is outsold by the other two, IMO.

MsmackyM3785d ago

I really doubt sales will dip that low again. What gotten the Wii U moving is software releases which don't seem to be slowing down any time soon.

LAWSON723785d ago

@msmacky
Apparently people are in denial the system has plenty of titles coming in first quarter, at least no less than the competition. If that is not enough Spring and Summer will definitely help move units.

chente00253785d ago

Wii U is DOOOOOOOMED.....Sike!

PeaSFor3785d ago

"ps3 is dooomed" "3ds is Dooooooomd" ...etc

chente00253784d ago

i was making fun of all the "Doom & Gloom" articles and all the nintendo haters that were always saying the wii u was dead! do ya'll even know what the word "Sike" means? smh

RPG_Lover3784d ago

You are so insecure, Wii u is doing better than the PS3 did even when it was NEW

PeaSFor3784d ago (Edited 3784d ago )

wut? i want to see good wii u sales, you dimwit.

RPG_Lover3784d ago

@pea

Your the only dimwit I see

BullyMangler3784d ago

and when people get the ps4 in japan they will enjoy what ?

Resogun?

JodyCones3781d ago

You're a PlayStation and nintendo gamer like me huh? :)

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3781d ago
KakashiHotake3785d ago

Good job for Nintendo. Even if it is there destiny to be absorbed by Sony.

MsmackyM3785d ago

Nintendo actually makes money.

SilentNegotiator3785d ago (Edited 3785d ago )

Someone misunderstood "Details Emerge on Sony’s Acquisition of Factory Producing Wii U’s DRAM: 30 Billion Yen Investment"...

They're purchasing a factory that MAKES stuff for Nintendo. Not Nintendo.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3785d ago
Sarcasm3785d ago

607 Xbox 360's.

Do people understand now why MS shouldn't bother with Japan?

Hicken3785d ago

That's actually up a hundred or so from it's weekly average.

AnteCash3785d ago

They are collectors item in jp.

MightyNoX3785d ago

Nintendoooo---------MINATION.

thehobbyist3784d ago

Lol no. The Vita has sold more than the Wii U.

The_Villager3784d ago

The vita has been out longer LOL fail

CAB18023785d ago

I'm sure the Wii U sold atleast sold 200K globally this week. Hell, the Wii U is factually closer to reaching 5 million units

Beastforlifenoob3785d ago

The ps3 is about 7 years old (note it released in 2007 for much of the world)

The WII U sold 5 mil in 1 year.

5x7=35million

The ps3 has sold 81 million in about 7 yrs

81/7=11.57

That means on average the Ps3 sold at twice the rate of the WII U, even though it had an extremely bumpy start (very high price, 1 year late, 2 years late in europe and aus, little amount of games, difficult architecture,etc,etc)

CAB18023785d ago

The PS3 had third party support and the Wii U doesn't thats why the PS3 has a slight advantage

2muchw1nn1ng3785d ago

Uh, no. Wii U sold roughly 3 million this year and 1 million at launch back in November and December of 2012.

Realplaya3784d ago

Ummmm you should stop posting blind facts that are nothing but fake.

PS3: 5,552,074 sales
X360: 5,656,039 sales

Wii U has posted 100 plus thousand units this week alone in japan we don't know what the numbers are globally as of yet.

The Wii U had a bumpier start than the psw so that throws that argument out the window.

Difficult vs weaker hardware so throw that out the window.

The difference is in Japan it always has been and will a Nintendo country Nintendo.

If Nintendo can drop X in Japan and follow it up with Shinmegami or however you spell it. They will outsell PS4 all day mark my words.

Movieworld3784d ago

This is ridiculous. For this to have any relevance you. Need to do ps3's first year sales times 7. That would be comparing like for like.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3784d ago
Show all comments (55)
200°

Remembering the Best JRPGs on the PS3

Get ready to embark on a journey filled with monsters, magic, and overpowered haircuts, because this list features the best JRPGs on the PS3.

Read Full Story >>
altarofgaming.com
shinoff2183274d ago (Edited 274d ago )

There wasn't that many. Thanks to the west's criticism. It was definitely lacking compared to every other ps system. Dont get me wrong there were a few good ones i know that.

jznrpg273d ago

Nier, Valkyrie Chronciles, Tales games , Ni No Kuni, Resonance of Fate, FF13’s, Ys8 just a few off the top of my head and there were a lot more.

CrimsonWing69273d ago (Edited 273d ago )

Not nearly to the degree of PS1 and PS2.

@shinoff2183 makes a good point that around the PS3/Xbox 360 gen is when the genre wasn’t as prevalent and began to shy away from turn-based. There’s some standouts for sure, but look at the PS1 and PS2 JRPG library and then compare that to the PS3 and PS4’s.

Theres definitely a decline in a selection of titles. Even worse was the quality seemed to take a massive hit as well. I think Lost Odyssey was a huge standout for that gen when you look at production values, then you look at something like Fairy Fencer on the PS3 and it’s kind of depressing.

But by that generation there was a shift from western developed games overtaking Japanese developed games. Back from the NES to PS2 Japanese games were the cream of the crop… I don’t know what happened but like midway into the PS3/360 life-time they became less so.

shinoff2183273d ago (Edited 273d ago )

Compared to the ps1 ps2 and he'll even ps4 ps3 doesn't hold a candle to either imo. It's also when turn based damn near disappeared. Again thanks to the west's criticism

Crimson I'd put money on the west being at fault, guys like Phil phish, and numerous others at that time were attacking jrpg and Japanese games in general pretty hard.

Ni no kuni was probably my fav jrpg back then , and the blue dragon

GameBoyColor273d ago

Tales got kinda lucky here. When they took a chance and finally brought tales of graces f over west it sold like 250k lmao a lot of jrpgs did 500k or below. Disgaea was worse i think. Bamco decided to keep bringing more games over though.

Tapani273d ago (Edited 273d ago )

Demon's Souls, Dark Souls and Dark Souls II were the best RPGs on PS3 made by Japanese developers. Everything else just fell short always. Ni No Kuni was a full package, an okayish game as well. Nier and Drakengard III had superb writing, setting and voice acting, however, the performance was a real drag on the gameplay. Traditional RPG-wise I'd actually say 360 had better JRPGs, and think that Lost Odyssey and Blue Dragon were the best traditional JRPGs of the era. PS3 Valkyria Chronicles was okay, but it is closer to an SRPG.

Ryu Ga Gotoku games were also solid, they were still finding their footing and breaking new ground with new cities and formats.

PS3 was the era that almost made me quit gaming and I started playing on PC because I could not find good performance nor games on the system. PS4 got me back into it, and now PS5 is a mix in and between, I just play my PS4 library on the PS5 and rest on PC, just like during the PS3 era. The only new exclusive Sony JRPG is pretty much FFXVI and it is so streamlined and simplified from the normal RPG experience that I can't fit it into the genre anymore. Dragon Quest XII hopefully remedies all of this, but it is just one game.

These new games will all be on PC (while it does take 2-3 years to wait, and 6-12 months from launch to have them patched + fixed by modders) and they perform better on it. The only point in owning a PS5 is to play games a couple of years earlier, but for a hard-working family man like me, the quality of the experience is more important than playing it as soon as possible. And I can't do modern games at 30fps 720p after playing 120fps at 4K. For older games, that's okay.

PSX and PS2 though, those were the days...Still have a massive collections of classic RPGs in CD and DVD format and a phat PS3 to play them!

FinalFantasyFanatic273d ago

It's kinda like that, the PS3 generation was a bad time for JRPGs, especially with the Japanese feeling the need to westernize their games, shooters dominating that gen, the racism from western game journalists (it was bad, between G4, Phill Fish, and a slew of others), and the higher development costs...

It really made me miss the PS1/PS2 days of JRPGs, even the quality of half of those games during the 7th gen weren't as good. The 360 tried, but Microsoft's consoles weren't popular in Japan and no body in the West bought a Xbox for JRPGs (despite Xbox having Vesperia, Blue Dragon and Lost Odyssey).

on_line_forever273d ago

" It's kinda like that, the PS3 generation was a bad time for JRPGs, especially with the Japanese feeling the need to westernize their games "

This is when everything fall down and games looks not fun to play anymore except for few games like demon and dark souls for example

-Foxtrot273d ago (Edited 273d ago )

Nah. It's a bad trilogy of games

The only reason XIII-2 stands out is because XIII was so bad

When the bar is so low, anything after feels better.

goldwyncq273d ago

The monster catching mechanic was nice.

Eonjay273d ago

Don't understand the hate for it at all. Seems forced.

shinoff2183273d ago

Watching the credits roll on ff16 now it is good but , I'd really like to re try ff13 least it's turn based and would fill that gap for me.

FinalFantasyFanatic273d ago

They got better after the first one in the trilogy, not outstanding game though.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 273d ago
CS7273d ago

Honestly, I played FFXIII a few years after release and maybe because it was after the hype cycle and I knew the flaws of the game, it actually became my favorite FF after VII.

I took off the mini map and never used auto battle and the stuff that mattered to me in an FF was just so well done.

The art and graphics were insane at the time
The music is still special
The story still lingers in memory more than a decade later
The RPG systems were decent

I never really got the hate for it, still have a soft spot for that game inside me.

goldwyncq273d ago

Still better than XV and XVI.

Yui_Suzumiya273d ago

Drakengard 3 goes for a small fortune nowadays

Knightofelemia273d ago (Edited 273d ago )

Only gripe I have with Ar Tonelico 3 is that Saki is annoying as hell whether English or in Japanese. Then Saki's English voice actor became Ionasal on Ar Nosurge she was a little annoying but not as bad. Johnny Young Bosch voicing Tatsumi I thought he did a great job. And Akiko Shikata with her vocals and the music from the games just went hand and hand.

DarkZane273d ago

I wish Ar No Surge and Ar Tonelico 3 would be remastered on PS4/PS5.

Show all comments (31)
250°

Square Enix Classics We’d Love to See Remastered

Square Enix suggested they might remaster more games from their storied archives—here are the classics we’d like to see get a new coat of paint.

Read Full Story >>
cgmagonline.com
raWfodog294d ago

I would definitely enjoy a Xenogears remaster. Recently finished Legend of Dragoon again (this time with platinum trophy) and would love to dive back into Xenogears with Fei and the rest of the crew.

closed_account293d ago

Came here to say Xenogears as well. Great taste, raWfodog!

notachance293d ago

It needs more than a remaster though, I hope they can turn disc 2 into a full game..

Kneetos293d ago (Edited 293d ago )

I wonder how they would even handle a xenogears remaster

Would they give it to monolith soft (the original developers) to handle, and more then likely make it a Nintendo exclusive, cue the endless bitching from Sony fans...

Or will they do it themselves, thus not finishing the original story as intended

raWfodog293d ago

"... and more then likely make it a Nintendo exclusive"

I would think it'd eventually hit all the platforms much like the Front Mission 1st Remake. That way no one would be 'bitching' regardless of your platform preference lol.

Miraak82 292d ago

They don't need the original people , they already have the foundation of characters ,world and lore to work off of.
Honestly it's not that big of a game if you really examine it by modern standards , it's how they present everything that makes it seem so grand especially with how epic the story/music is . SE have good writers that could incorporate post release lore of perfect works and such if they ever remade it from the ground up.

gold_drake294d ago

"THE BOUNCER"

scares me everytime i play it haha

Godmars290293d ago (Edited 293d ago )

Maybe this time around it could be good/playable?

Becuzisaid293d ago

Lol! What a game. Had a lot of fun with it. Beat it multiple times!

Marcello294d ago

Square Enix classics? dont they mean Squaresoft. Square Enix dont make classic games, just games with pretty graphics, no heart & soul, boring & over stuffed with woke Gen Z cockiness.

But while were on the subject i would love too see a remaster of Front Mission 3.

ZeekQuattro293d ago

They already announced a Front Mission 3 remake. Doubt they'll also do a remaster.

Marcello293d ago

I will get the remake but i still want a remaster cos with all remakes they lose a lot of the original magic the original game had.

Godmars290293d ago

Pretty sure its going to be a remaster of the game, similar to what's been done with the first two games, not a remake.

FF7r is certainly more a remake of FF7 than a remaster for instance.

Now, if they did Gun Hazard remaster...

raWfodog293d ago (Edited 293d ago )

Yeah they call it a remake like "Front Mission 1st Remake" but I'd consider it more of a remaster as it doesn't change any of the core gameplay but basically just sharpens up the graphics. I think they added a couple of new features also but I still think it's more of a remaster.

Like @Godmars290 suggested, FF7Remake fits the mold of a remake since they 'remade' the game from the ground up, changing the battle system completely, and retelling the story with a lot of different elements added.

But I guess they can call it what they want since they're making it lol.

DeadManMMX293d ago

Exactly. SquareSoft merged with Enix shortly after Final Fantasy X and it has never been the same.

Gardenia293d ago

I miss the old Squaresoft games. So much quality back then.

Terry_B294d ago

Almost all of the listed games are not Square Enix Classics lol

AdventurerDonLocke294d ago

Quintet Gaia Trilogy: Soulblazer, Illusion of Gaia & Terranigma.

Show all comments (45)
60°

Making Pokémon 3D Was A Mistake

Pokémon’s shift to 3D was a big mistake, as the series’ roots in 2D design make it difficult to transfer important game mechanics into a 3D overworld.

Read Full Story >>
screenrant.com
CrimsonWing69507d ago

why do other games pull off 3D monster collecting JRPG games just fine? Look at Jade Cocoon and Shin Megami Tensei for examples.

FallenAngel1984507d ago

Answer should be obvious.

No other videogame franchise is as merchandise driven as Pokémon