150°

Why it's good to be a PC gamer in '08: Action

PC gaming is alive and well. One of the reasons why I believe so is because of the kick ass list of RTS games that are expected to come out this year. I know the RTS fans will be pleased with this year's lineup, but what about us action buffs? What good shooters are coming out this year? Well why don't we just take a look and check out these PC exclusives!

Read Full Story >>
gamernode.com
MadMax5845d ago

PC gaming was out a long time ago, its all about the consoles right now. Why pay thousands of dollars for a PC to meet the requirements to play games that are equal on the PS3 and 360? It doesnt make sense and you would have to be retarded to do so.

wAtdaFck5845d ago (Edited 5845d ago )

Only a retard would call other people retards for doing something different, or believing in something else.

The graphics on PC are on a league of their own; more advanced than either the PS3 or the 360. You get what you pay for. And for $1,000 (not THOUSANDS), you can get a PC that will blow the PS3 and 360 out of the water in terms of graphics (that is, if you build it).

However, I do agree in terms of 'whats dominating now.' The PS3 and 360 have all the greatest and most anticipated games for the year, and the only thing i'm looking forward to in PC is Mass Effect, and maybe Starcraft 2.

solar5845d ago

its not your money. so why do you give too craps what i do with it?

JsonHenry5845d ago

Or the money it takes to buy a $400-$500 console, a $1,000 HDTV, and a $200 5.1 surround sound to enjoy the consoles they way they were meant to be played?

I will pay $800 for a gaming rig I build myself that blows the consoles out of the water in terms of graphics AND control scheme (KB+M FTW!!).

HuntTheWumpus5845d ago

Being a graphics whore and a tech buff there is no way any of the consoles can scratch my itch for the best looking and playing games available today.

At least show me a game that looks nicer than Crysis on consoles before you tell me that PC gaming is on the out.

I respect your perspective but I think PC gaming is not going anywhere.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5845d ago
monkey6025845d ago

Battlefield: heroes looks great. really looking forward to that one.
I thought Far Cry 2 was coming to consoles aswell no?

Douchebaggery5845d ago

always was and will always be

monkey6025845d ago

Matter of opinion dude. I for one cant use a keyboard and mouse to save my life. I'm sure I'd get the hang of it if I really tried but console gaming appeals to me so much more. I cant stand booting up my PC to play a game, It takes so long. All the technical stuff goes over my head a lot of the time too. In general I much prefer the games released on consoles only. But the biggest factor would be that my friends play consoles and it's them i want to play with. Thanks to college though I've tried a few games on PC I normally wouldn't have played on anything but a console.

heyheyhey5845d ago

are the servers for CS: Source still up?

well then it's still good being a PC gamer

PC gaming is much more rewarding if you put the time and effort in

you get better graphics, a catalogue of games that make the PS2 look like the Virtual Boy

and a lot of diversity

you get emulators to play old games, tons of free indie games, you can get the latest games via steam or the shops or you can torrent ANY game for free

there's just so much

but i prefer being a console gamer primarily anyway

apart from when its time to waste my life playing Counterstrike

monkey6025845d ago

I played CS:S for the first time today with a friend in college. It was just me and him with a bunch of bots filling in the empty spaces but it was fun. Not a bad game

JsonHenry5845d ago

Monkey602 - you will be a PC gamer before the end of your school year - Guaranteed.

I still enjoy console games, don't get me wrong, but you will see what we mean when we say we are PC gamers first and foremost over all others.

In advance - welcome to the club!

monkey6025845d ago

Sorry Jason it wont be this year because I finish in a week, Maybe next year ay? :D

Ballsacteebaghow5845d ago

PC gaming is still the best type of gaming 2day.

Its made my life brighter. I did think i had experienced a ultimate gaming sensation when i bought a 360. Although when i purchased my PC for a good £3000 i noticed everything from graphics to physics are so much more advanced than ANY console or any console game.

08 is going to be a great year for the PC and i do think I'll see more gamers notice that PC is the way too go if you want a superior type of gaming.

Ive turned my head to consoles after playing Crysis :)

Show all comments (24)
60°
7.0

S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Clear Sky Review | TheXboxHub

Review - S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Clear Sky should be seen as an expansion rather than a full prequel, but it is one that fans will enjoy nonetheless.

Read Full Story >>
thexboxhub.com
90°

Which Far Cry Should I Start With? - A Beginner's Guide 2023

If you’re new to this long-running franchise, we’ve got you covered.

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
masterfox415d ago

Farcry 3 and literally thats it! lol

GamingSinceForever414d ago (Edited 414d ago )

I recently tried 3 for the first time but the frame rate was a turnoff.

I liked 5 and 6 though.

banger88413d ago

If you have a Series X or S, the Xbox 360 version runs at 60 fps with fps boost. It's a shame the remaster doesn't.

isarai415d ago

2 and 3, pretty much the only ones i really enjoyed. 1 was amazing for the time but aged quite poorly. 4 has the elephant gun, all i can praise from any entry after 3 lol

cooperdnizzle414d ago

Ummmm 3 than stop.

Okay maybe two as well. But yeah probably 3 and then move on.

JEECE414d ago (Edited 414d ago )

Far Cry 2. People constantly rant about games now being too easy, holding your hand, having too many unnecessary RPG-lite leveling features, etc. People specifically complain about open world games being too focused on tons of collectibles and "checkmarks" that just waste time.

Far Cry 2 is an answer to all of those complaints. It was made by Ubisoft before they fell into all the traps discussed above (and before they started inserting towers into their games to defog the map). It has respawning enemies, weapons that degrade, and the collectible diamonds are very useful in the game (which you find in a similar way to the way you find shrines in BOTW with a radar system). The map you have is an in game item you pull out while playing, not a pause menu that is unnecessarily detailed. Also the enemy AI and physics are much better than later entries in the series.

It has a mixed reputation because people at the time said it was too hard, the weapon degradation was annoying, and then respawning enemies were annoying. FC2 came out in 2008, so this was before games like Dark Souls and BOTW had come out and made it cool to like these types of features.

XbladeTeddy413d ago

Far Cry 2, the one with the AI that find you through walls and trees, can one shot you from a mile away and have 100% accuracy? That was frustrating not fun because cheap AI.

JEECE413d ago (Edited 413d ago )

Uhh, I mean, it isn't one of these games where once the enemies have detected you they will magically forget you exist because you walked behind a wall or went into a bush. And yeah the AI isn't stormtrooper level accuracy. Again, these are positives, not negatives to me.

To be fair, I'm really directing this at the people most critical of "Modern Ubisoft" or "Modern Open World" design elements. Like the type of people who fawned all over Elden Ring because it had a clean UI because they are so burnt out by the "checkbox" type of open world design.

If you like those types of games, then a later FC game like 3 and especially 4-5 would be more your style.

Show all comments (11)
220°

10 Old Games With Outstanding Graphics

GF365: "There are some games with extraordinary visuals that impress us to this day. Here are old games with outstanding graphics."

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
ShwaaMan461d ago

Bioshock still looks fantastic, one of my all time favorites.

Yui_Suzumiya461d ago

Beyond: Two Souls on PS3 can compete with modern day graphics.

SonyStyled461d ago (Edited 461d ago )

Same as Killzone 2 and 3, uncharted 2 and 3, Infamous 2, Heavy Rain, Resistance 3

jasonismoney461d ago

I wish this was entirely true, but you might want to load up Killzone 2 and Resistance 3 again.

SonyStyled461d ago

@jason I watched some gameplay videos of KZ2 and R3 on my full screen. They are on par or succeed graphically to the first person shooters mentioned in the article that also launched on the seventh generation of consoles. Try the same and see what you think

cthulhucultist460d ago

Killzone 3 was super impressive! I could not believe the graphics back then as I was regularly pausing the game to stand in awe looking at the surroundings! Resistance however did not impress me that much. Heavy rain is also another amazing graphically speaking game. It almost felt next gen

Fist4achin461d ago

I always thought the first 3 Gears of War games looked great and still hold up for today.

SonyStyled461d ago

They did for their day. I recently played gears judgement with on the 360 and the draw distance was so blurry. The characters up close look great though

JEECE461d ago

Far Cry 2 was awesome. In addition to having demonstrably better physics and AI than later games in the series, it had a lot of design decisions that, criticized at the time, have since been praised in games like BOTW and Dark Souls.

iNcRiMiNaTi461d ago

It might not be super amazing by today's standard but I thought Mgs3 looked really good

JEECE461d ago

In terms of art style it still holds up.

Show all comments (13)